Copy number variation in Williams-Beuren syndrome: suitable diagnostic strategy for developing countries

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS; OMIM 194050) is caused by a hemizygous contiguous gene microdeletion at 7q11.23. Supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS), mental retardation, and overfriendliness comprise typical symptoms of WBS. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is considered the gold standard technique, the microsatellite DNA markers and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) could be used for to confirm the diagnosis of WBS.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We have evaluated a total cohort of 88 patients with a suspicion clinical diagnosis of WBS using a collection of five markers (D7S1870, D7S489, D7S613, D7S2476, and D7S489_A) and a commercial MLPA kit (P029). The microdeletion was present in 64 (72.7%) patients and absent in 24 (27.3%) patients. The parental origin of deletion was maternal in 36 of 64 patients (56.3%) paternal in 28 of 64 patients (43.7%). The deletion size was 1.55 Mb in 57 of 64 patients (89.1%) and 1.84 Mb in 7 of 64 patients (10.9%). The results were concordant using both techniques, except for four patients whose microsatellite markers were uninformative. There were no clinical differences in relation to either the size or parental origin of the deletion.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>MLPA was considered a faster and more economical method in a single assay, whereas the microsatellite markers could determine both the size and parental origin of the deletion in WBS. The microsatellite marker and MLPA techniques are effective in deletion detection in WBS, and both methods provide a useful diagnostic strategy mainly for developing countries.</p

Heterozygous Mutations of FREM1 Are Associated with an Increased Risk of Isolated Metopic Craniosynostosis in Humans and Mice

The premature fusion of the paired frontal bones results in metopic craniosynostosis (MC) and gives rise to the clinical phenotype of trigonocephaly. Deletions of chromosome 9p22.3 are well described as a cause of MC with variably penetrant midface hypoplasia. In order to identify the gene responsible for the trigonocephaly component of the 9p22.3 syndrome, a cohort of 109 patients were assessed by high-resolution arrays and MLPA for copy number variations (CNVs) involving 9p22. Five CNVs involving FREM1, all of which were de novo variants, were identified by array-based analyses. The remaining 104 patients with MC were then subjected to targeted FREM1 gene re-sequencing, which identified 3 further mutant alleles, one of which was de novo. Consistent with a pathogenic role, mouse Frem1 mRNA and protein expression was demonstrated in the metopic suture as well as in the pericranium and dura mater. Micro-computed tomography based analyses of the mouse posterior frontal (PF) suture, the human metopic suture equivalent, revealed advanced fusion in all mice homozygous for either of two different Frem1 mutant alleles, while heterozygotes exhibited variably penetrant PF suture anomalies. Gene dosage-related penetrance of midfacial hypoplasia was also evident in the Frem1 mutants. These data suggest that CNVs and mutations involving FREM1 can be identified in a significant percentage of people with MC with or without midface hypoplasia. Furthermore, we present Frem1 mutant mice as the first bona fide mouse model of human metopic craniosynostosis and a new model for midfacial hypoplasia

Clinical impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing:Follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study

In the TRIDENT-2 study, all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (GW-NIPT) with a choice of receiving either full screening or screening solely for common trisomies. Previous data showed that GW-NIPT can reliably detect common trisomies in the general obstetric population and that this test can also detect other chromosomal abnormalities (additional findings). However, evidence regarding the clinical impact of screening for additional findings is lacking. Therefore, we present follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study to determine this clinical impact based on the laboratory and perinatal outcomes of cases with additional findings. Between April 2017 and April 2019, additional findings were detected in 402/110,739 pregnancies (0.36%). For 358 cases, the origin was proven to be either fetal (n = 79; 22.1%), (assumed) confined placental mosaicism (CPM) (n = 189; 52.8%), or maternal (n = 90; 25.1%). For the remaining 44 (10.9%), the origin of the aberration could not be determined. Most fetal chromosomal aberrations were pathogenic and associated with severe clinical phenotypes (61/79; 77.2%). For CPM cases, occurrence of pre-eclampsia (8.5% [16/189] vs 0.5% [754/159,924]; RR 18.5), and birth weigh

Molecular aspects of craniosynostoses: implications in diagnosis and genetic counseling

Graniossinostose caracteriza-se pelo fechamento prematuro de uma ou mais suturas cranianas. As craniossinostoses formam um grupo bastante heterogêneo, com uma incidência de 1 para 2000-3000 nascimentos. Tanto fatores ambientais como genéticos podem estar relacionados com o surgimento das craniossinostoses. Na última década, verificou-se que mutações em 4 genes (FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, TWIST) podem causar formas sindrômicas de craniossinostose bem definidas clinicamente, a saber: Sindromes de Apert, Pfeiffer, Crouzon, Jackson-Weiss, Beare-Stevenson e Saethre-Chotzen. Ainda, duas novas síndromes foram clinicamente e molecularmente caracterizadas: a síndrome de Muenke e a de Boston. O quadro clínico associado com estas duas formas de craniossinostose é bastante variado. incluindo desde paciente com crânio em trevo até aqueles com apenas craniossinostose da sutura coronal (bilateral ou unilateral), os quais são classificados como portadores de craniossinostose não sindrômica. Uma precisa correlação fenótipo-genótipo têm sido difícil na grande maioria dos casos devido à sobreposição do quadro clínico e pela heterogeneidade genética do grupo, e portanto o teste molecular pode ser importante para o diagnóstico de um grande número de pacientes. O padrão de herança das craniossinostoses acima referidas é o autossômico dominante, o que significa que um indivíduo afetado possui 50% de chance de vir a ter um filho afetado com a mesma condição. Outros padrões de herança também têm sido relatados, sendo sempre importante uma avaliação genética e clínica de todos os membros da família do afetado. Exemplificamos com dois casos atendidos em nosso laboratório, a importância do uso de testes moleculares para a confirmação do diagnóstico e realização precisa do aconselhamento genético.Craniosynostosis is characterized by the premature closure of one or more cranial sutures. It is a highly heterogeneous group, with an incidence of 1 per 2000-3000 births. Both environmental and genetic factors play a role in its etiology. In the last decade, it has been shown that mutations i0 4 genes (FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, TWIST) may cause very well known craniosynostotic syndromes: Apert, Pfeiffer, Crouzon, Jackson-Weiss, Beare-Stevenson and Saethre-Chotzen. Two new conditions associated with the molecular defect have also been elucidated: Muenke's syndrome and Boston type of craniosynostosis. The variability of the phenotype of these two conditions is particularly wide, including patients with only craniosynostosis, classified as non syndromic cases, or those with cloverleaf skull. A precise phenotype and genotype correlationhas not always been possible because of the great clinical overlap and genetic heterogeneity in this group of disorders. A11 the above syndromes present an autossomal dominant pattern of inheritance, and therefore a patient has a 50% chance of having an affected child. Other patterns of inheritance for craniosynostosis have also been described and therefore it is important to perform a careful examination of each case and family. We present two cases seen at our laborato% one with Crouzon and other with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, to illustrate the importance of the molecular testing for an accurate diagnosis and genetic counseling

Mandibulofacial Dysostosis, Severe Lower Eyelid Coloboma, Cleft Palate, and Alopecia: A New Distinct Form of Mandibulofacial Dysostosis or a Severe Form of Johnson-McMillin Syndrome?

We describe a patient with a phenotype characterized by mandibulofacial dysostosis with severe lower eyelid coloboma, cleft palate, abnormal ears, alopecia, delayed eruption and crowded teeth, and sensorioneural hearing loss. The karyotype and the screening for mutations in the coding region of TCOF1 gene were normal. The clinical signs of our case overlap the new mandibulofacial dysostosis described by Stevenson et al. [2007] and the case with Johnson-McMillin syndrome described by Cushman et al. [2005]. The similar clinical signs, mainly, the severe facial involvement observed in these cases suggest that they can represent a new distinct form of mandibulofacial dysostosis or the end of the spectrum of Johnson McMillin syndrome. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Frontonasal dysplasia, callosal agenesis, basal encephalocele, and eye anomalies syndrome with a partial 21q22.3 deletion

We describe a girl with a phenotype characterized by frontonasal dysplasia, callosal agenesis, basal encephalocele, and eye anomalies who presents a 46,XX,r(21) karyotype. Array-comparative genomic hybridization using the Afflymetrix 100K DNA oligoarray set showed an interstitial deletion 21q22.3 of approximately 219?kb. Conventional karyotype of both parents was normal, and it was not possible to perform the molecular studies. In this report we raise the hypothesis that the deleted genes located at 21q22.3 could account to the phenotype. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.CNPqCNPq [301789/2009-6, 302712/2010-0

Microphthalmia, Linear Skin Defects, Callosal Agenesis, and Cleft Palate in a Patient with Deletion at Xp22.3p22.2

The authors describe the clinical findings observed in a Brazilian girl that are suggestive of microphthalmia and linear skin defects (MLS) also known as MIDAS syndrome (OMIM #309801). She also presented with short stature, agenesis of corpus callosum, cleft palate, enamel defects, and genitourinary anomalies, which are rarely reported within the clinical spectrum of MLS. The 11,5 Mb deletion in Xp22.3p22.2 observed in the patient includes the entire HCCS gene (responsible for the MLS phenotype) and also encompasses several other genes involved with behavioral phenotypes, craniofacial and central nervous system development such as MID1, NLGN4X, AMELX , ARHGAP6, and TBL1X. The whole clinical features of our proband possibly represents an unusual MLS syndromic phenotype caused by an Xp22.3p22.2 continuous gene deletion

Using a combination of MLPA kits to detect chromosomal imbalances in patients with multiple congenital anomalies and mental retardation is a valuable choice for developing countries

Conventional karyotyping detects anomalies in 3-15% of patients with multiple congenital anomalies and mental retardation (MCA/MR). Whole-genome array screening (WGAS) has been consistently suggested as the first choice diagnostic test for this group of patients, but it is very costly for large-scale use in developing countries. We evaluated the use of a combination of Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) kits to increase the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities in MCA/MR patients. We screened 261 MCA/MR patients with two subtelomeric and one microdeletion kits. This would theoretically detect up to 70% of all submicroscopic abnormalities. Additionally we scored the de Vries score for 209 patients in an effort to find a suitable cut-off for MLPA screening. Our results reveal that chromosomal abnormalities were present in 87 (33.3%) patients, but only 57 (21.8%) were considered causative. Karyotyping detected 15 abnormalities (6.9%), while MLPA identified 54 (20.7%). Our combined MLPA screening raised the total detection number of pathogenic imbalances more than three times when compared to conventional karyotyping. We also show that using the de Vries score as a cutoff for this screening would only be suitable under financial restrictions. A decision analytic model was constructed with three possible strategies: karyotype, karyotype + MLPA and karyotype + WGAS. Karyotype + MLPA strategy detected anomalies in 19.8% of cases which account for 76.45% of the expected yield for karyotype + WGAS. Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of MLPA is three times lower than that of WGAS, which means that, for the same costs, we have three additional diagnoses with MLPA but only one with WGAS. We list all causative alterations found, including rare findings, such as reciprocal duplications of regions deleted in Sotos and Williams-Beuren syndromes. We also describe imbalances that were considered polymorphisms or rare variants, such as the new SNP that confounded the analysis of the 22q13.3 deletion syndrome. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo)CEPID (Centro de Pesquisa, Inovacao e Difusao)CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico