Abordaje laparoscópico en el cáncer de recto. Factores predictivos de la calidad del mesorrecto.

La escisión total del mesorrecto se considera la técnica quirúrgica gold standard para la cirugía de cáncer de recto, desde que en 1982 Heald et al publicaran un artículo seminal que demostró que este procedimiento era el responsable de un notable descenso en la tasa de recidiva local y consecuentemente un trascendente aumento de la supervivencia. La escisión total del mesorrecto preserva la integridad de la fascia mesorrectal, debido al hecho de que la disección se lleva a cabo siguiendo los planos embriológicos anatómicos, proporcionando así, la obtención de un mesorrecto óptimo y por consiguiente, la reducción de la tasa de la recurrencia en un 5-­‐10% . En los últimos años, numerosos estudios han tratado de demostrar las ventajas del abordaje laparoscópico en la escisión total del mesorrecto. En relación a resultados a corto plazo, varias series y estudios prospectivos aleatorizados, llevados a cabo por cirujanos especialistas en cáncer de recto, han demostrado las ventajas clínicas postoperatorias inmediatas del abordaje mínimamente invasivo. De la misma manera, estos trabajos también han documentado que las características de los espécimenes patológicos obtenidos por la vía laparoscópica son similares a los obtenidos en cirugía abierta. No obstante, estas conclusiones tan optimistas, son difíciles de lograr en práctica diaria. De todos modos, aún carecemos de los resultados a largo plazo derivados de los ensayos aleatorizados, por lo que aún no se puede determinar si la incidencia de recidiva local difiere según sea el abordaje elegido. A pesar de las ventajas que ofrece la cirugía laparoscópica, este enfoque puede ser especialmente complejo en ciertas situaciones, tal y cómo refleja la tasa de conversión de hasta 25% publicada en destacadas series. En un estudio anterior, nuestro grupo investigó qué factores afectaban en el resultado clínico inmediato del cáncer de recto abordado por laparoscopia, concluyendo que tanto el IMC, el tamaño del tumor y el género tienen una influencia significativa en la duración operatoria, la tasa de conversión y la morbilidad. Teniendo en cuenta estos hallazgos previos, nace la hipótesis del trabajo actual, qué consiste en determinar si existen factores preoperatorios, tanto clínicos, quirúrgicos, como pelvimétricos, que puedan tener un impacto en la calidad de las muestras patológicas del cáncer de recto tras el abordaje laparoscópico. El trabajo actual es un estudio prospectivo formado por una serie consecutiva de pacientes diagnosticados de un adenocarcinoma de recto situado a menos de 12 cm de margen anal, sometidos a escisión total del mesorrecto laparoscópica con preservación esfinteriana e intención curativa , en el Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau entre enero de 2010 y julio de 2012. Se excluyeron tumores estadiados como T1 o T4, amputaciones abdomino-­‐perineales, tumores perforados u obstructivos y aquellos pacientes que presentaban contraindicación mayor para la cirugía laparoscópica. Se consideraron más de veinte variables (ver Tabla 8) relacionadas con las características clínicas y anatómicas del paciente, con el acto quirúrgico y con el tumor. Cómo variables dependientes se tomaron dos variables anatomopatológicas ampliamente reconocidas: el margen de resección circunferencial y la integridad macroscópica del mesorrecto. Se llevó a cabo un estudio descriptivo, así como un análisis univariante y multivariante. ¿Cuáles son los principales puntos de interés en este estudio? En primer lugar, nuestras conclusiones ayudan a identificar los casos en los que el mesorrecto está en riesgo y para los qué se requiere un cirujano altamente especializado. Además, nuestros resultados relacionados con las mediciones pelvimétricas pueden ser útiles en la programación del acto quirúrgico, ya que ayudan a predecir el tiempo operatorio. En el caso de dificultades intraoperatorias, el conocimiento de los factores obstaculizadores permite considerar al cirujano la conversión a cirugía abierta, seleccionar a priori la técnica de abordaje, o aumentar el cuidado disección quirúrgica para evitar el riesgo de lesiones en el mesorrecto. Por último, nuestros datos finales ayudan a seleccionar a los pacientes que podrían beneficiarse de la cirugía laparoscópica y por lo tanto contribuir a la formación y la curva de aprendizaje de los cirujanos jóvenes.Background: Pelvic anatomy and tumour features play a role in the difficulty of the laparoscopic approach to total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze whether these characteristics also influence the quality of the surgical specimen. Material and Methods: We performed a prospective study in consecutive patients with rectal cancer located less than 12 cm from the anal verge who underwent laparoscopic surgery between January 2010 and July 2013. Exclusion criteria were T1 and T4 tumours, abdominoperineal resections, obstructive and perforated tumours, or any major contraindication for laparoscopic surgery. Dependent variables were the circumferential resection margin (CMR) and the quality of the mesorectum. Results: Sixty-four patients underwent laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision. Resection was complete in 79.1% of specimens and CMR was positive in 9.7%. Univariate analysis showed tumor depth (T status) (P=0.04) and promontorium-subsacrum angle (P=0.02) independently predicted CRM positivity. Tumor depth (P<0.05) and promontorium-subsacrum axis (P<0.05) independently predicted mesorectum quality. Multivariate analysis identified the promontorium-subsacrum angle (P= 0.012) as the only independent predictor of CRM. Conclusion: Bony pelvis dimensions influenced the quality of the specimen obtained by laparoscopy. These measurements may be useful to predict which patients will benefit most from laparoscopic surgery and also to select patients in accordance with the learning curve of trainee surgeons. Keywords: rectal cancer, total mesorectal excision, laparoscopy, pelvimetry, quality of mesorectum, circumferential resection margin Introduction Total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the gold standard for rectal cancer surgery since 1982 when Heald et al 1,2 published their seminal paper showing that this approach led to a sharp decrease in the local recurrence rate and an increase in survival. TME preserves the integrity of the mesorectal fascia as dissection is based on the anatomical embryological planes, and it provides an optimal mesorectum, reducing the recurrence rate by 5-10% 3. Many studies have tried to show the advantages of the laparoscopic approach in TME. Regarding short-term outcome, several series and prospective randomized trials, performed by specifically trained surgeons, have demonstrated the immediate postoperative clinical advantages of the minimally invasive approach. They have also shown that features of pathological specimens obtained by the laparoscopic approach are similar to those obtained in open surgery 4,5. These positive results, however, are difficult to achieve in general surgical practice6. As long-term results of large prospective randomized trials are lacking, it is not yet clear whether the incidence of local recurrence (LR) differs in open and laparoscopic approaches. Despite the advantages of the laparoscopic dissection technique, this approach may be specially challenging in certain situations, and a conversion rate of up to 25% has been reported 3. In a previous study we investigated the factors that had an impact on immediate clinical outcome, showing that BMI, tumor size and gender had a significant influence on operative time, conversion and morbidity7. On the basis of these previous findings, we hypothesized that intraoperative technical difficulties may have an impact on the quality of the pathological specimen. The aim of the present study was to analyze preoperatively whether pelvic dimensions and tumour characteristics also influence the quality of the specimen. Material and Methods Patient selection We performed a prospective study in consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent TME by laparoscopy with curative intent from January 2010 to July 2013. The inclusion criteria were rectal cancer located at or below 12 cm from the anal verge. Exclusion criteria were patients with a T1 tumor treated by local excision, preoperative clinical evidence of locally advanced disease (T4), abdominoperineal resections, obstructive and perforated tumours, and any major contraindication for laparoscopic surgery. All the patients included in the study were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team of surgeons, medical oncologists, radiotherapists, radiologists and pathologists. Table 1 shows the demographic parameters, pelvimetry measurements, and surgical and pathological features. All the patients were analyzed on an intentionto- treat basis, including those converted to open surgery. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee at our institution and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Preoperative staging All patients underwent a CT scan, an MRI, and a total colonoscopy that included tumour biopsy. According to the hospital protocol, patients with Stage III rectal cancer received a long course of preoperative radiochemotherapy (45 Gy for 5 weeks, plus capecitabine (Xeloda®) at a dose of 825 mgr/m2/12 hours/day or continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 225-250 mgr/m2). Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy underwent a repeat MRI immediately before surgery to determine downsizing or downstaging. In patients treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy, pelvimetrics and tumour measurements were performed in the MRI post-neoadjuvant treatment. Radiologic study Preoperative pelvic MRI images were acquired on a Philips Intera 1.5 Tesla and Achieva 3 Tesla (Philips Medical System). Pelvis was studied in the three spatial planes from iliac crests to ischiatic tuberosities using a 3 mm slice thickness. We measured the promontorium-retropubic, subsacrum-retropubic, promontorium-subsacrum, and intertuberous axes, the circumferential resection margin (CRM), and maximum and minimum pelvic diameters, at the tumour level. We also measured tumour and prostate volume in men. MRI pelvimetry angles measured were the promontorium-subsacrum, and the sagittal and coronal depth. The sagittal depth angle was calculated from two lines drawn tangentially from the sacral promontory and the anterosuperior tip of the pubis to the superior and inferior edges of the tumour8. Coronal depth angle was calculated by two lines drawn from the inferior edge of the two sacroiliac joints to the lateral edges of the tumour. Volumetric analysis of minor pelvis, rectal ampulla, rectal tumour and prostate was analyzed using specific software (Osirix, Apple, Cupertino, CA, USA). a DICOM file was used to make a 3-dimensional reconstruction from planar slices obtained during the MRI reconstruction . Pelvimetry measurements were performed by two consultant radiologists (J.C.P and D.H) Surgical treatment Surgery was performed 8 weeks after completion of the neoadjuvant treatment. All patients in the series underwent laparoscopic sphincter-preserving low anterior resection (LAR) with TME. The characteristics of the technique are described in our previous study7. A protective ileostomy was made in all cases. Pathological analyses Specimens were examined following the scheme proposed by Quircke9, including fresh examination of the integrity of the mesorectum and its corresponding classification (complete: intact mesorectum with only minor irregularities of a smooth mesorectal surface; nearly complete: rude mesorectum defects, not disrupting the muscle layer; incomplete: little bulk to mesorectum with defects down to muscularis propia). To simplify the data, we grouped mesorectal quality into two subgroups: optimal (complete) and suboptimal (nearly complete and incomplete groups). The mesorectum surface was stained and fixed in formalin block. The resection specimens were sectioned in parallel cuts of 0.5 cm perpendicular to the length of the bowel, allowing measurement of the deepest point of tumour invasion. Microscopic study was conducted and pCRM and ypCRM were measured. CRM were considered positive if the tumour was located less than 1 mm from the rectal fascia. Statistical analysis Results are given as number of cases and percentages for categorical data, as mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables. Data were analyzed by use of bivariate analysis, contingency tables, and the chi squared or Fisher´s exact test for categorical variables and ANOVA or t test for quantitative variables. The statistical significance level was set at 5% (alpha= 0.05). All variables that were significant in univariate analyses and those considered clinically relevant were entered in a multivariate stepwise (forward selection/backward elimination) to determine which variables were significant independent risk factors. All the analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 21.0; SPSS. Inc. Chicago, IL)

Mesh placement for hiatal hernia repair : Can we solve the controversy?

Hiatal hernia is a common disorder characterized by the protrusion of abdominal structures other than esophagus in thoracic cavity. Large hiatal hernias, also called paraesophageal hernia (PEH), contain a large part of the stomach, including other organs, into the mediastinum. The Guidelines of Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) recommends that patients' age and comorbidities must be considered before to decide the routine elective repair of asymptomatic PEH. Nevertheless, truly asymptomatic PEH are rare and post-prandial chest fullness or shortness of breath are often the symptoms present instead of heartburn and reflux. The complete reduction of the mediastinal sac with a wide esophageal mobilization and a tension-free hiatal closure are necessary for a correct PEH repair. However, a tension-free cruroplasty is not easy, with a recurrence rate of up to 42%. The introduction of synthetic mesh (SM) reinforcement, could ameliorate the results and several studies have reported lower recurrence rates with its use. However, also severe complications have been reported and biological meshes (BMs) have been proposed as an alternative although with conflicting results regarding efficacy. On the other hand, several studies describe better clinical results on long term follow-up than expected even with a high radiological recurrence rate

Abordaje laparoscópico en el cáncer de recto. Factores predictivos de la calidad del mesorrecto

La escisión total del mesorrecto se considera la técnica quirúrgica gold standard para la cirugía de cáncer de recto, desde que en 1982 Heald et al publicaran un artículo seminal que demostró que este procedimiento era el responsable de un notable descenso en la tasa de recidiva local y consecuentemente un trascendente aumento de la supervivencia. La escisión total del mesorrecto preserva la integridad de la fascia mesorrectal, debido al hecho de que la disección se lleva a cabo siguiendo los planos embriológicos anatómicos, proporcionando así, la obtención de un mesorrecto óptimo y por consiguiente, la reducción de la tasa de la recurrencia en un 5-­-10% . En los últimos años, numerosos estudios han tratado de demostrar las ventajas del abordaje laparoscópico en la escisión total del mesorrecto. En relación a resultados a corto plazo, varias series y estudios prospectivos aleatorizados, llevados a cabo por cirujanos especialistas en cáncer de recto, han demostrado las ventajas clínicas postoperatorias inmediatas del abordaje mínimamente invasivo. De la misma manera, estos trabajos también han documentado que las características de los espécimenes patológicos obtenidos por la vía laparoscópica son similares a los obtenidos en cirugía abierta. No obstante, estas conclusiones tan optimistas, son difíciles de lograr en práctica diaria. De todos modos, aún carecemos de los resultados a largo plazo derivados de los ensayos aleatorizados, por lo que aún no se puede determinar si la incidencia de recidiva local difiere según sea el abordaje elegido. A pesar de las ventajas que ofrece la cirugía laparoscópica, este enfoque puede ser especialmente complejo en ciertas situaciones, tal y cómo refleja la tasa de conversión de hasta 25% publicada en destacadas series. En un estudio anterior, nuestro grupo investigó qué factores afectaban en el resultado clínico inmediato del cáncer de recto abordado por laparoscopia, concluyendo que tanto el IMC, el tamaño del tumor y el género tienen una influencia significativa en la duración operatoria, la tasa de conversión y la morbilidad. Teniendo en cuenta estos hallazgos previos, nace la hipótesis del trabajo actual, qué consiste en determinar si existen factores preoperatorios, tanto clínicos, quirúrgicos, como pelvimétricos, que puedan tener un impacto en la calidad de las muestras patológicas del cáncer de recto tras el abordaje laparoscópico. El trabajo actual es un estudio prospectivo formado por una serie consecutiva de pacientes diagnosticados de un adenocarcinoma de recto situado a menos de 12 cm de margen anal, sometidos a escisión total del mesorrecto laparoscópica con preservación esfinteriana e intención curativa , en el Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau entre enero de 2010 y julio de 2012. Se excluyeron tumores estadiados como T1 o T4, amputaciones abdomino-­-perineales, tumores perforados u obstructivos y aquellos pacientes que presentaban contraindicación mayor para la cirugía laparoscópica. Se consideraron más de veinte variables (ver Tabla 8) relacionadas con las características clínicas y anatómicas del paciente, con el acto quirúrgico y con el tumor. Cómo variables dependientes se tomaron dos variables anatomopatológicas ampliamente reconocidas: el margen de resección circunferencial y la integridad macroscópica del mesorrecto. Se llevó a cabo un estudio descriptivo, así como un análisis univariante y multivariante. ¿Cuáles son los principales puntos de interés en este estudio? En primer lugar, nuestras conclusiones ayudan a identificar los casos en los que el mesorrecto está en riesgo y para los qué se requiere un cirujano altamente especializado. Además, nuestros resultados relacionados con las mediciones pelvimétricas pueden ser útiles en la programación del acto quirúrgico, ya que ayudan a predecir el tiempo operatorio. En el caso de dificultades intraoperatorias, el conocimiento de los factores obstaculizadores permite considerar al cirujano la conversión a cirugía abierta, seleccionar a priori la técnica de abordaje, o aumentar el cuidado disección quirúrgica para evitar el riesgo de lesiones en el mesorrecto. Por último, nuestros datos finales ayudan a seleccionar a los pacientes que podrían beneficiarse de la cirugía laparoscópica y por lo tanto contribuir a la formación y la curva de aprendizaje de los cirujanos jóvenes.Background: Pelvic anatomy and tumour features play a role in the difficulty of the laparoscopic approach to total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze whether these characteristics also influence the quality of the surgical specimen. Material and Methods: We performed a prospective study in consecutive patients with rectal cancer located less than 12 cm from the anal verge who underwent laparoscopic surgery between January 2010 and July 2013. Exclusion criteria were T1 and T4 tumours, abdominoperineal resections, obstructive and perforated tumours, or any major contraindication for laparoscopic surgery. Dependent variables were the circumferential resection margin (CMR) and the quality of the mesorectum. Results: Sixty-four patients underwent laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision. Resection was complete in 79.1% of specimens and CMR was positive in 9.7%. Univariate analysis showed tumor depth (T status) (P=0.04) and promontorium-subsacrum angle (P=0.02) independently predicted CRM positivity. Tumor depth (P 0.05) and promontorium-subsacrum axis (P 0.05) independently predicted mesorectum quality. Multivariate analysis identified the promontorium-subsacrum angle (P= 0.012) as the only independent predictor of CRM. Conclusion: Bony pelvis dimensions influenced the quality of the specimen obtained by laparoscopy. These measurements may be useful to predict which patients will benefit most from laparoscopic surgery and also to select patients in accordance with the learning curve of trainee surgeons. Keywords: rectal cancer, total mesorectal excision, laparoscopy, pelvimetry, quality of mesorectum, circumferential resection margin Introduction Total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the gold standard for rectal cancer surgery since 1982 when Heald et al 1,2 published their seminal paper showing that this approach led to a sharp decrease in the local recurrence rate and an increase in survival. TME preserves the integrity of the mesorectal fascia as dissection is based on the anatomical embryological planes, and it provides an optimal mesorectum, reducing the recurrence rate by 5-10% 3. Many studies have tried to show the advantages of the laparoscopic approach in TME. Regarding short-term outcome, several series and prospective randomized trials, performed by specifically trained surgeons, have demonstrated the immediate postoperative clinical advantages of the minimally invasive approach. They have also shown that features of pathological specimens obtained by the laparoscopic approach are similar to those obtained in open surgery 4,5. These positive results, however, are difficult to achieve in general surgical practice6. As long-term results of large prospective randomized trials are lacking, it is not yet clear whether the incidence of local recurrence (LR) differs in open and laparoscopic approaches. Despite the advantages of the laparoscopic dissection technique, this approach may be specially challenging in certain situations, and a conversion rate of up to 25% has been reported 3. In a previous study we investigated the factors that had an impact on immediate clinical outcome, showing that BMI, tumor size and gender had a significant influence on operative time, conversion and morbidity7. On the basis of these previous findings, we hypothesized that intraoperative technical difficulties may have an impact on the quality of the pathological specimen. The aim of the present study was to analyze preoperatively whether pelvic dimensions and tumour characteristics also influence the quality of the specimen. Material and Methods Patient selection We performed a prospective study in consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent TME by laparoscopy with curative intent from January 2010 to July 2013. The inclusion criteria were rectal cancer located at or below 12 cm from the anal verge. Exclusion criteria were patients with a T1 tumor treated by local excision, preoperative clinical evidence of locally advanced disease (T4), abdominoperineal resections, obstructive and perforated tumours, and any major contraindication for laparoscopic surgery. All the patients included in the study were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team of surgeons, medical oncologists, radiotherapists, radiologists and pathologists. Table 1 shows the demographic parameters, pelvimetry measurements, and surgical and pathological features. All the patients were analyzed on an intentionto- treat basis, including those converted to open surgery. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee at our institution and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Preoperative staging All patients underwent a CT scan, an MRI, and a total colonoscopy that included tumour biopsy. According to the hospital protocol, patients with Stage III rectal cancer received a long course of preoperative radiochemotherapy (45 Gy for 5 weeks, plus capecitabine (Xeloda®) at a dose of 825 mgr/m2/12 hours/day or continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 225-250 mgr/m2). Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy underwent a repeat MRI immediately before surgery to determine downsizing or downstaging. In patients treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy, pelvimetrics and tumour measurements were performed in the MRI post-neoadjuvant treatment. Radiologic study Preoperative pelvic MRI images were acquired on a Philips Intera 1.5 Tesla and Achieva 3 Tesla (Philips Medical System). Pelvis was studied in the three spatial planes from iliac crests to ischiatic tuberosities using a 3 mm slice thickness. We measured the promontorium-retropubic, subsacrum-retropubic, promontorium-subsacrum, and intertuberous axes, the circumferential resection margin (CRM), and maximum and minimum pelvic diameters, at the tumour level. We also measured tumour and prostate volume in men. MRI pelvimetry angles measured were the promontorium-subsacrum, and the sagittal and coronal depth. The sagittal depth angle was calculated from two lines drawn tangentially from the sacral promontory and the anterosuperior tip of the pubis to the superior and inferior edges of the tumour8. Coronal depth angle was calculated by two lines drawn from the inferior edge of the two sacroiliac joints to the lateral edges of the tumour. Volumetric analysis of minor pelvis, rectal ampulla, rectal tumour and prostate was analyzed using specific software (Osirix, Apple, Cupertino, CA, USA). a DICOM file was used to make a 3-dimensional reconstruction from planar slices obtained during the MRI reconstruction . Pelvimetry measurements were performed by two consultant radiologists (J.C.P and D.H) Surgical treatment Surgery was performed 8 weeks after completion of the neoadjuvant treatment. All patients in the series underwent laparoscopic sphincter-preserving low anterior resection (LAR) with TME. The characteristics of the technique are described in our previous study7. A protective ileostomy was made in all cases. Pathological analyses Specimens were examined following the scheme proposed by Quircke9, including fresh examination of the integrity of the mesorectum and its corresponding classification (complete: intact mesorectum with only minor irregularities of a smooth mesorectal surface; nearly complete: rude mesorectum defects, not disrupting the muscle layer; incomplete: little bulk to mesorectum with defects down to muscularis propia). To simplify the data, we grouped mesorectal quality into two subgroups: optimal (complete) and suboptimal (nearly complete and incomplete groups). The mesorectum surface was stained and fixed in formalin block. The resection specimens were sectioned in parallel cuts of 0.5 cm perpendicular to the length of the bowel, allowing measurement of the deepest point of tumour invasion. Microscopic study was conducted and pCRM and ypCRM were measured. CRM were considered positive if the tumour was located less than 1 mm from the rectal fascia. Statistical analysis Results are given as number of cases and percentages for categorical data, as mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables. Data were analyzed by use of bivariate analysis, contingency tables, and the chi squared or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and ANOVA or t test for quantitative variables. The statistical significance level was set at 5% (alpha= 0.05). All variables that were significant in univariate analyses and those considered clinically relevant were entered in a multivariate stepwise (forward selection/backward elimination) to determine which variables were significant independent risk factors. All the analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 21.0; SPSS. Inc. Chicago, IL)

The era of the large databases. Outcomes after gastroesophageal surgery according to NSQIP, NIS, and NCDB databases. Systematic literature review

Background. The term big data refers to databases that include large amounts of information used in various areas of knowledge. Currently, there are large databases that allow the evaluation of postoperative evolution, such as the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS), and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical impact of information obtained from these registries regarding gastroesophageal surgery. Methods. A systematic review using the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines was performed. The research was carried out using the PubMed database identifying 251 articles. All outcomes related to gastroesophageal surgery were analyzed. Results. A total of 34 articles published between January 2007 and July 2017 were included, for a total of 345 697 patients. Studies were analyzed and divided according to the type of surgery and main theme in (1) esophageal surgery and (2) gastric surgery. Conclusions. The information provided by these databases is an effective way to obtain levels of evidence not obtainable by conventional methods. Furthermore, this information is useful for the external validation of previous studies, to establish benchmarks that allow comparisons between centers and have a positive impact on the quality of care

Outcomes after bariatric surgery according to large databases. A systematic review

Purpose: The rapid development of technological tools to record data allows storage of enormous datasets, often termed “big data”. In the USA, three large databases have been developed to store data regarding surgical outcomes: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP). We aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of studies found in these databases concerning outcomes of bariatric surgery. Methods: We performed a systematic review using the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Research carried out using the PubMed database identified 362 papers. All outcomes related to bariatric surgery were analysed. Results: Fifty-four studies, published between 2005 and February 2017, were included. These articles were divided into (1) outcomes related to surgical techniques (12 articles), (2) morbidity and mortality (12), (3) 30-day hospital readmission (10), (4) outcomes related to specific diseases (11), (5) training (2) and (6) socio-economic and ethnic observations in bariatric surgery (7). Forty-two papers were based on data from ACS-NSQIP, nine on data from NIS and three on data from MBSAQIP. Conclusions: This review provides an overview of surgical management and outcomes of bariatric surgery in the USA. Large databases offer useful complementary information that could be considered external validation when strong evidence-based medicine data are lacking. They also allow us to evaluate infrequent situations for which randomized control trials are not feasible and add specific information that can complement the quality of surgical knowledge

A Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Gastrectomy : The Overall and Disease-Free Survival

Gastric cancer remains a significant global health challenge with varied survival rates, emphasizing the need for research into effective surgical treatments. In this retrospective study, we compared the 72-month overall and disease-free survival between laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (AG) in a cohort of 139 patients treated for gastric cancer. The analysis revealed that patients undergoing LG exhibited a significantly higher overall survival rate at 72 months compared to those undergoing AG. Although disease-free survival rates were comparable between the two groups, LG showed a marginal advantage. Subgroup analyses based on the type of gastrectomy and anastomosis demonstrated varied survival probabilities, with laparoscopic-assisted partial gastrectomy yielding the most favorable outcomes. These results highlight the importance of the choice of surgical technique in influencing survival outcomes in gastric cancer

Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Gastrectomy : Postoperative Complications

The evolution of laparoscopic surgery in gastric cancer has advanced significantly, with benefits over open surgery initially demonstrated in early gastric cancer and later in advanced stages. This study aims to evaluate postoperative complications, surgical outcomes, and anastomosis safety by comparing laparoscopic gastrectomy and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. This retrospective, observational, analytical study included patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy at a university hospital from January 2006 to February 2018. Patients were initially divided into two groups based on the type of anastomosis: laparoscopic gastrectomy (intracorporeal anastomosis) and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (extracorporeal anastomosis). Further secondary analysis was done with subgroups based on the type of gastrectomy and anastomosis performed. A total of 139 patients were analyzed, showing significant differences in postoperative complications between the two surgical approaches. The laparoscopic-assisted group exhibited a higher rate of complications. The laparoscopic approach (with intracorporeal anastomosis) was found to have a lower risk of complications and morbidity/mortality compared to the laparoscopic-assisted approach. Laparoscopic gastrectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis resulted in lower morbidity and mortality than laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. The technique of partial gastrectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis was associated with the lowest rate of postoperative complications