Genome-wide analysis of genetic correlation in dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases

This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.Open Access funded by Wellcome TrustThe similarities between dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and both Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are many and range from clinical presentation, to neuropathological characteristics, to more recently identified, genetic determinants of risk. Because of these overlapping features, diagnosing DLB is challenging and has clinical implications since some therapeutic agents that are applicable in other diseases have adverse effects in DLB. Having shown that DLB shares some genetic risk with PD and AD, we have now quantified the amount of sharing through the application of genetic correlation estimates, and show that, from a purely genetic perspective, and excluding the strong association at the APOE locus, DLB is equally correlated to AD and PD.Rita Guerreiro and Jose Bras are supported by Research Fellowships from the Alzheimer's Society. This work was supported in part by a Parkinson's UK Innovation Award (K-1204) in collaboration with the Lewy Body Society and by the Wellcome Trust/MRC Joint Call in Neurodegeneration award (WT089698) to the UK Parkinson's Disease Consortium whose members are from the UCL Institute of Neurology, the University of Sheffield, and the MRC Protein Phosphorylation Unit at the University of Dundee and by an anonymous Foundation. The authors would like to acknowledge Elena Lorenzo for her technical assistance. This study was supported in part by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Science and InnovationSAF2006-10126 (2006–2009) and SAF2010-22329-C02-01 (2011–2013) and SAF2013-47939-R (2013–2015) to Pau Pastor and by the UTE project FIMA to Pau Pastor. They acknowledge the Oxford Brain Bank, supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC), Brains for Dementia Research (BDR) (Alzheimer Society and Alzheimer Research UK), Autistica UK, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. The sample collection and database of the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort was funded by Stichting Dioraphte and Stichting VUMC fonds. Glenda M. Halliday is a Senior Principal Research Fellow of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. For the neuropathologically confirmed samples from Australia, brain tissue was received from the Sydney Brain Bank, which is supported by Neuroscience Research Australia, the University of New South Wales, and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. This study was also partially funded by the Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ontario Research Fund. The Nottingham Genetics Group is supported by ARUK and The Big Lottery Fund. The effort from Columbia University was supported by the Taub Institute, the Panasci Fund, the Parkinson's Disease Foundation, and NIH grants NS060113 (Lorraine Clark), P50AG008702 (P.I. Scott Small), P50NS038370 (P.I. R. Burke), and UL1TR000040 (P.I. H. Ginsberg). Owen A. Ross is supported by the Michael J. Fox Foundation, NINDS R01# NS078086. The Mayo Clinic Jacksonville is a Morris K. Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of Excellence (NINDS P50 #NS072187) and is supported by the Mangurian Foundation for Lewy body research. This work has received support from The Queen Square Brain Bank at the UCL Institute of Neurology. Some of the tissue samples studies were provided by the MRC London Neurodegenerative Diseases Brain Bank and the Brains for Dementia Research project (funded by Alzheimer's Society and ARUK). This research was supported in part by the NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, the Queen Square Dementia Biomedical Research Unit, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Dementia Biomedical Research Unit and Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College Hospital, London. This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services; project AG000951-12. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the Wellcome Trust and the Medical Research Council

A comprehensive screening of copy number variability in dementia with Lewy bodies

The role of genetic variability in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is now indisputable; however, data regarding copy number variation (CNV) in this disease has been lacking. Here, we used whole-genome genotyping of 1454 DLB cases and 1525 controls to assess copy number variability. We used 2 algorithms to confidently detect CNVs, performed a case-control association analysis, screened for candidate CNVs previously associated with DLB-related diseases, and performed a candidate gene approach to fully explore the data. We identified 5 CNV regions with a significant genome-wide association to DLB; 2 of these were only present in cases and absent from publicly available databases: one of the regions overlapped LAPTM4B, a known lysosomal protein, whereas the other overlapped the NME1 locus and SPAG9. We also identified DLB cases presenting rare CNVs in genes previously associated with DLB or related neurodegenerative diseases, such as SNCA, APP, and MAPT. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting genome-wide CNVs in a large DLB cohort. These results provide preliminary evidence for the contribution of CNVs in DLB risk.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Heritability and genetic variance of dementia with Lewy bodies

Recent large-scale genetic studies have allowed for the first glimpse of the effects of common genetic variability in dementia withLewy bodies (DLB), identifying risk variants with appreciable effect sizes. However, it is currently well established that asubstantial portion of the genetic heritable component of complex traits is not captured by genome-wide significant SNPs. Toovercome this issue, we have estimated the proportion of phenotypic variance explained by genetic variability (SNP heritability)in DLB using a method that is unbiased by allele frequency or linkage disequilibrium properties of the underlying variants. Thisshows that the heritability of DLB is nearly twice as high as previous estimates based on common variants only (31% vs 59.9%).We also determine the amount of phenotypic variance in DLB that can be explained by recent polygenic risk scores from eitherParkinson’s disease (PD) or Alzheimer's disease (AD), and show that, despite being highly significant, they explain a low amountof variance. Additionally, to identify pleiotropic events that might improve our understanding of the disease, we performed geneticcorrelation analyses of DLB with over 200 diseases and biomedically relevant traits. Our data shows that DLB has a positivecorrelation with education phenotypes, which is opposite to what occurs in AD. Overall, our data suggests that novel genetic riskfactors for DLB should be identified by larger GWAS and these are likely to be independent from known AD and PD risk variants

Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium

The Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) Consortium has refined its recommendations about the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of DLB, updating the previous report, which has been in widespread use for the last decade. The revised DLB consensus criteria now distinguish clearly between clinical features and diagnostic biomarkers, and give guidance about optimal methods to establish and interpret these. Substantial new information has been incorporated about previously reported aspects of DLB, with increased diagnostic weighting given to REM sleep behavior disorder and $^{123}$iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) myocardial scintigraphy. The diagnostic role of other neuroimaging, electrophysiologic, and laboratory investigations is also described. Minor modifications to pathologic methods and criteria are recommended to take account of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change, to add previously omitted Lewy-related pathology categories, and to include assessments for substantia nigra neuronal loss. Recommendations about clinical management are largely based upon expert opinion since randomized controlled trials in DLB are few. Substantial progress has been made since the previous report in the detection and recognition of DLB as a common and important clinical disorder. During that period it has been incorporated into DSM-5, as major neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies. There remains a pressing need to understand the underlying neurobiology and pathophysiology of DLB, to develop and deliver clinical trials with both symptomatic and disease-modifying agents, and to help patients and carers worldwide to inform themselves about the disease, its prognosis, best available treatments, ongoing research, and how to get adequate support.The DLB Consortium meeting was organized by the Mayo School of Continuous Professional Development (MSCPD) and supported by Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Alzheimer’s Association, Axovant Sciences, Banner Health, GE Healthcare, the Lewy Body Dementia Association, the Lewy Body Society, Lundbeck, the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute on Neurologic Disease and Stroke, and an NIH grant (R13 NS095618). Kathy Fuqua, Julie Reed, and colleagues at the MSCPD provided administrative support to the consortium meeting in Fort Lauderdale. I.G.M., D.B., J.-P.T., J.A., and A.T. receive support from the UK NIHR Biomedical Research Centre awarded to the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University. Travel grant support was provided by the Alzheimer’s Research UK ARUK NE Network Centre. B.F.B., D.W.D., K.K., and T.J.F. are supported by the NIH (P50-AG016574) and the Mangurian Foundation for Lewy Body Research. G.H. is a senior principal research fellowship holder from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1079679). D.A. is a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award Holder and thanks the Wolfson Foundation and the Royal Society for their support. C.G.B. thanks the Maudsley BRC for Mental Health and BRU dementia for supporting his involvement in the work. A.C.-P. receives research support from the NIH (RO1 NS082265, UO1 NS082134, P50 NS053488), the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the Alzheimer’s Association/Michael J. Fox Foundation/Weston Biomarkers Across Neurodegenerative Disease initiative, and the Pechenik Montague Award Fund. D.f. acknowledges support from NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research (RP-PG-0610-10100 SHAPED). O.E.-A. acknowledges support for OE laboratory from the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research (New York). S.N.G. receives support from R21 NS 090243 and the National Parkinson’s Foundation. O.A.R. is supported through the Mayo Clinic: A Morris K. Udall Parkinson’s Disease Research Center of Excellence (NINDS P50 NS072187), NINDS R01 NS078086, the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, the Mayo Clinic AD and Related Dementias Genetics Program, and The Little Family Foundation. A.S.’s work is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging, Department of Health and Human Services. D.T. acknowledges the work of Cyrus Zabetian, MD, and Ignacio Mata, PhD, from VA Puget Sound Health Care System. J.Q.T. and V.M.Y.L.’s contributions were supported in part by a P50 NS053488 Morris K. Udall Parkinson’s Disease Research Center of Excellence grant from NINDS. P.T. acknowledges support from the Italian Ministry of Health “Ricerca Corrente.” M.Y. acknowledges support from the Japan Foundation for Neuroscience and Mental Health

Insular atrophy at the prodromal stage of dementia with Lewy bodies: a VBM DARTEL study

Abstract Diffuse atrophy including the insula was previously demonstrated in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) patients but little is known about the prodromal stage of DLB (pro-DLB). In this prospective study, we used SPM8-DARTEL to measure gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) atrophy in pro-DLB patients (n = 54), prodromal Alzheimer’s disease (pro-AD) patients (n = 16), DLB patients at the stage of dementia (mild-DLB) (n = 15), and Alzheimer’s disease patients at the stage of dementia (mild-AD) (n = 28), and compared them with healthy elderly controls (HC, n = 22). Diminished GM volumes were found in bilateral insula in pro-DLB patients, a trend to significance in right hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus in pro-AD patients, in left insula in mild-DLB patients, and in medial temporal lobes and insula in mild-AD patients. The comparison between prodromal groups did not showed any differences. The comparison between groups with dementia revealed atrophy around the left middle temporal gyrus in mild-AD patients. Reduced WM volume was observed in mild-DLB in the pons. The insula seems to be a key region in DLB as early as the prodromal stage. MRI studies looking at perfusion, and functional and anatomical connectivity are now needed to better understand the role of this region in DLB