Pre-hospital management of patients with chest pain and/or dyspnoea of cardiac origin. A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) of the ESC.

Chest pain and acute dyspnoea are frequent causes of emergency medical services activation. The pre-hospital management of these conditions is heterogeneous across different regions of the world and Europe, as a consequence of the variety of emergency medical services and absence of specific practical guidelines. This position paper focuses on the practical aspects of the pre-hospital treatment on board and transfer of patients taken in charge by emergency medical services for chest pain and dyspnoea of suspected cardiac aetiology after the initial assessment and diagnostic work-up. The objective of the paper is to provide guidance, based on evidence, where available, or on experts' opinions, for all emergency medical services' health providers involved in the pre-hospital management of acute cardiovascular care.Peer reviewe

Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies

SummaryBackgroundThe transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a better outcome in myocardial infarction (MI), but patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) were excluded from most trials.AimsTo compare outcomes of PCI for MI-related CS via the transradial versus transfemoral approach.MethodsA prospective cohort of 101 consecutive patients admitted for PCI for MI-related CS were treated via the transradial (n=74) or transfemoral (n=27) approach. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for prespecified variables and a propensity score for approach were used to compare mortality, death/MI/stroke and bleeding between the two groups. A complementary meta-analysis of six studies was also performed.ResultsPatients in the transradial group were younger (P=0.039), more often male (P=0.002) and had lower GRACE and CRUSADE scores (P=0.003 and 0.001, respectively) and rates of cardiac arrest before PCI (P=0.009) and mechanical ventilation (P=0.006). Rates of PCI success were similar. At a mean follow-up of 756 days, death occurred in 40 (54.1%) patients in the transradial group versus 22 (81.5%) in the transfemoral group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.84; P=0.012). The transradial approach was associated with reduced rates of death/MI/stroke (adjusted HR: 0.53, 95%CI: 0.31–0.91; P=0.02) and major bleeding (adjusted HR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.13–0.87; P=0.02). The meta-analysis confirmed the benefit of transradial access in terms of mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.58–0.68) and major bleeding (RR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.32–0.59).ConclusionThe transradial approach in the setting of PCI for ischaemic CS is associated with a dramatic reduction in mortality, ischaemic and bleeding events, and should be preferred to the transfemoral approach in radial expert centres

Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies

SummaryBackgroundThe transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a better outcome in myocardial infarction (MI), but patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) were excluded from most trials.AimsTo compare outcomes of PCI for MI-related CS via the transradial versus transfemoral approach.MethodsA prospective cohort of 101 consecutive patients admitted for PCI for MI-related CS were treated via the transradial (n=74) or transfemoral (n=27) approach. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for prespecified variables and a propensity score for approach were used to compare mortality, death/MI/stroke and bleeding between the two groups. A complementary meta-analysis of six studies was also performed.ResultsPatients in the transradial group were younger (P=0.039), more often male (P=0.002) and had lower GRACE and CRUSADE scores (P=0.003 and 0.001, respectively) and rates of cardiac arrest before PCI (P=0.009) and mechanical ventilation (P=0.006). Rates of PCI success were similar. At a mean follow-up of 756 days, death occurred in 40 (54.1%) patients in the transradial group versus 22 (81.5%) in the transfemoral group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.84; P=0.012). The transradial approach was associated with reduced rates of death/MI/stroke (adjusted HR: 0.53, 95%CI: 0.31–0.91; P=0.02) and major bleeding (adjusted HR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.13–0.87; P=0.02). The meta-analysis confirmed the benefit of transradial access in terms of mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.58–0.68) and major bleeding (RR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.32–0.59).ConclusionThe transradial approach in the setting of PCI for ischaemic CS is associated with a dramatic reduction in mortality, ischaemic and bleeding events, and should be preferred to the transfemoral approach in radial expert centres

038 Major bleeding still predicts death with a radial invasive strategy in NSTE-ACS: an analysis from theABOARD Study

AimWe sought to determine the incidence and type of major bleeding in moderate-to-high risk acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with intense antiplatelet therapy and systematic invasive strategy using predominantly the radial approach. We also examined whether these bleedings has an impact on mortality after multivariable adjustment.MethodsIn the multicenter randomized ABOARD study, 352 patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation were randomized for a “primary PCI” strategy or a strategy of intervention deferred to the next working day. No difference was observed in clinical outcomes between the two groups. Major bleeding complications (STEEPLE definitions) were correlated to 1 month mortality.ResultsPatients were treated by intense antiplatelet therapy: with a mean 660mg (±268) loading of clopidogrel and 111mg (±40) maintenance dose while 99% of the PCI patients receive abciximab the radial approach was predominant (84%).During the first 30 days major bleeding complications occurred in 19 patients (5.4%) with transfusion in 16 patients (4.5%). Occurrence of major bleeding did not differ between immediate and delayed intervention. The most frequent overt bleeding complications were from the gastrointestinal tract. The composite of GI bleeding and occult bleeding (loss of Hb of >3g/dL) represented n = 11 (57.9%) of all major bleeding complications. Major bleeding was associated with a significantly higher peak of creatinine during hospitalization 170.16 μmol/L ± 169.34 vs. 97.05 μmol/L ± 56.96 (p = 0.005) and a higher mortality rate 26.3% vs. 0.6%. After adjustment for all baseline characteristics, major bleeding was independently associated with an impressive increased hazard of death during the first 30 days (Odd ratio 75.7; 95% CI, 11.3 to 505.3; p<0.0001).ConclusionIn a population of radial catheterization for NSTEACS, GI bleeding is the most frequent bleeding complication. Despite the reduction of access site bleeding, major bleeding still remains a major independent predictor of mortality

Aldosterone, atherosclerosis and vascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease

AbstractBackground and aimsPlasma aldosterone has been associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in high-risk cardiovascular populations, including patients with heart failure, myocardial infarction and high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. In the present study, we evaluated the association of plasma aldosterone levels with vascular events in a large prospective cohort of stable CAD patients recruited in an outpatient setting. Moreover, we investigated the relationship between aldosterone and atherosclerotic burden.Methods and resultsBaseline plasma aldosterone levels were measured in 2699 subjects with CAD (mean age 60±10years, 82% male). During a median follow-up of 4.7years, 308 (11%) patients died, of which 203 were from a vascular cause. Vascular endpoints of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or vascular death occurred in 355 (13%) patients. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed, adjusting for multiple confounders. Aldosterone (median 96pg/mL, interquartile range 70–138pg/mL, normal range 58–362pg/mL) was independently associated with major vascular events (hazard ratio (HR) 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13–2.15) and vascular mortality (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.27–3.00). By multivariable regression analysis, aldosterone was also associated with the presence of atherosclerosis in additional vascular territories (cerebrovascular disease and/or peripheral artery disease) (p=0.026).ConclusionsIn patients with stable coronary artery disease, plasma aldosterone is independently associated with the risk of major vascular events and vascular mortality and with atherosclerotic burden

Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention

Individual participant data analysis of two trials on aldosterone blockade in myocardial infarction

Background: Two recent randomised trials studied the benefit of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) irrespective or in absence of heart failure. The studies were both undersized to assess hard clinical endpoints. A pooled analysis was preplanned by the steering committees. Methods: We conducted a prespecified meta-analysis of patient-level data of patients with STEMI recruited in two multicentre superiority trials, randomised within 72 hours after symptom onset. Patients were allocated (1:1) to two MRA regimens: (1) an intravenous bolus of potassium canrenoate (200 mg) followed by oral spironolactone (25 mg once daily) versus standard therapy or (2) oral eplerenone (25–50 mg) versus placebo. The primary and key secondary outcomes, all-cause death and the composite of all-cause death or resuscitated sudden death, respectively, were assessed in the intention-to-treat population using a Cox model stratified on the study identifier. Results: Patients were randomly assigned to receive (n=1118) or not the MRA regimen (n=1123). After a median follow-up time of 188 days, the primary and secondary outcomes occurred in 5 (0.4%) and 17 (1.5%) patients (adjusted HR (adjHR) 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.86, p=0.03) and 6 (0.5%) and 22 (2%) patients (adjHR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.65, p=0.004) in the MRA and control groups, respectively. There were also trends towards lower rates of cardiovascular death (p=0.06) and ventricular fibrillation (p=0.08) in the MRA group. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that compared with standard therapy, MRA regimens are associated with a reduction of death and death or resuscitated sudden death in STEMI