1,043 research outputs found
Hypergraph Acyclicity and Propositional Model Counting
We show that the propositional model counting problem #SAT for CNF- formulas
with hypergraphs that allow a disjoint branches decomposition can be solved in
polynomial time. We show that this class of hypergraphs is incomparable to
hypergraphs of bounded incidence cliquewidth which were the biggest class of
hypergraphs for which #SAT was known to be solvable in polynomial time so far.
Furthermore, we present a polynomial time algorithm that computes a disjoint
branches decomposition of a given hypergraph if it exists and rejects
otherwise. Finally, we show that some slight extensions of the class of
hypergraphs with disjoint branches decompositions lead to intractable #SAT,
leaving open how to generalize the counting result of this paper
Performance Evaluation and Optimization of Math-Similarity Search
Similarity search in math is to find mathematical expressions that are
similar to a user's query. We conceptualized the similarity factors between
mathematical expressions, and proposed an approach to math similarity search
(MSS) by defining metrics based on those similarity factors [11]. Our
preliminary implementation indicated the advantage of MSS compared to
non-similarity based search. In order to more effectively and efficiently
search similar math expressions, MSS is further optimized. This paper focuses
on performance evaluation and optimization of MSS. Our results show that the
proposed optimization process significantly improved the performance of MSS
with respect to both relevance ranking and recall.Comment: 15 pages, 8 figure
Mapping Analysis in Ontology-based Data Access: Algorithms and Complexity (Extended Abstract)
Probabilistic Algorithmic Knowledge
The framework of algorithmic knowledge assumes that agents use deterministic
knowledge algorithms to compute the facts they explicitly know. We extend the
framework to allow for randomized knowledge algorithms. We then characterize
the information provided by a randomized knowledge algorithm when its answers
have some probability of being incorrect. We formalize this information in
terms of evidence; a randomized knowledge algorithm returning ``Yes'' to a
query about a fact \phi provides evidence for \phi being true. Finally, we
discuss the extent to which this evidence can be used as a basis for decisions.Comment: 26 pages. A preliminary version appeared in Proc. 9th Conference on
Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK'03
Proof-theoretic Analysis of Rationality for Strategic Games with Arbitrary Strategy Sets
In the context of strategic games, we provide an axiomatic proof of the
statement Common knowledge of rationality implies that the players will choose
only strategies that survive the iterated elimination of strictly dominated
strategies. Rationality here means playing only strategies one believes to be
best responses. This involves looking at two formal languages. One is
first-order, and is used to formalise optimality conditions, like avoiding
strictly dominated strategies, or playing a best response. The other is a modal
fixpoint language with expressions for optimality, rationality and belief.
Fixpoints are used to form expressions for common belief and for iterated
elimination of non-optimal strategies.Comment: 16 pages, Proc. 11th International Workshop on Computational Logic in
Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA XI). To appea
Probabilistic Consensus of the Blockchain Protocol
We introduce a temporal epistemic logic with probabilities as an extension of temporal epistemic logic. This extension enables us to reason about properties that characterize the uncertain nature of knowledge, like “agent a will with high probability know after time s same fact”. To define semantics for the logic we enrich temporal epistemic Kripke models with probability functions defined on sets of possible worlds. We use this framework to model and reason about probabilistic properties of the blockchain protocol, which is in essence probabilistic since ledgers are immutable with high probabilities. We prove the probabilistic convergence for reaching the consensus of the protocol
How Many Topics? Stability Analysis for Topic Models
Topic modeling refers to the task of discovering the underlying thematic
structure in a text corpus, where the output is commonly presented as a report
of the top terms appearing in each topic. Despite the diversity of topic
modeling algorithms that have been proposed, a common challenge in successfully
applying these techniques is the selection of an appropriate number of topics
for a given corpus. Choosing too few topics will produce results that are
overly broad, while choosing too many will result in the "over-clustering" of a
corpus into many small, highly-similar topics. In this paper, we propose a
term-centric stability analysis strategy to address this issue, the idea being
that a model with an appropriate number of topics will be more robust to
perturbations in the data. Using a topic modeling approach based on matrix
factorization, evaluations performed on a range of corpora show that this
strategy can successfully guide the model selection process.Comment: Improve readability of plots. Add minor clarification
Randomisation and Derandomisation in Descriptive Complexity Theory
We study probabilistic complexity classes and questions of derandomisation
from a logical point of view. For each logic L we introduce a new logic BPL,
bounded error probabilistic L, which is defined from L in a similar way as the
complexity class BPP, bounded error probabilistic polynomial time, is defined
from PTIME. Our main focus lies on questions of derandomisation, and we prove
that there is a query which is definable in BPFO, the probabilistic version of
first-order logic, but not in Cinf, finite variable infinitary logic with
counting. This implies that many of the standard logics of finite model theory,
like transitive closure logic and fixed-point logic, both with and without
counting, cannot be derandomised. Similarly, we present a query on ordered
structures which is definable in BPFO but not in monadic second-order logic,
and a query on additive structures which is definable in BPFO but not in FO.
The latter of these queries shows that certain uniform variants of AC0
(bounded-depth polynomial sized circuits) cannot be derandomised. These results
are in contrast to the general belief that most standard complexity classes can
be derandomised. Finally, we note that BPIFP+C, the probabilistic version of
fixed-point logic with counting, captures the complexity class BPP, even on
unordered structures
- …