33 research outputs found

    DNA Dosimetry Assessment for Sunscreen Genotoxic Photoprotection

    Get PDF
    Background: Due to the increase of solar ultraviolet radiation (UV) incidence over the last few decades, the use of sunscreen has been widely adopted for skin protection. However, considering the high efficiency of sunlight-induced DNA lesions, it is critical to improve upon the current approaches that are used to evaluate protection factors. An alternative approach to evaluate the photoprotection provided by sunscreens against daily UV radiation-induced DNA damage is provided by the systematic use of a DNA dosimeter. Methodology/Principal Findings: The Sun Protection Factor for DNA (DNA-SPF) is calculated by using specific DNA repair enzymes, and it is defined as the capacity for inhibiting the generation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and oxidised DNA bases compared with unprotected control samples. Five different commercial brands of sunscreen were initially evaluated, and further studies extended the analysis to include 17 other products representing various formulations and Sun Protection Factors (SPF). Overall, all of the commercial brands of SPF 30 sunscreens provided sufficient protection against simulated sunlight genotoxicity. In addition, this DNA biosensor was useful for rapidly screening the biological protection properties of the various sunscreen formulations. Conclusions/Significance: The application of the DNA dosimeter is demonstrated as an alternative, complementary, and reliable method for the quantification of sunscreen photoprotection at the level of DNA damage.Natura Inovacao e Tecnologia de Produtos LTDA (Sao Paulo, Brazil)Natura Inovacao e Tecnologia de Produtos LTDA (Sao Paulo, Brazil)FAPESP (Sao Paulo, Brazil)FAPESP (Sao Paulo, Brazil)CNPq (Brasilia, Brazil)CNPq (Brasilia, Brazil)Natura Inovacao e Tecnologia de Produtos LTDANatura Inovacao e Tecnologia de Produtos LTD

    DMTs and Covid-19 severity in MS: a pooled analysis from Italy and France

    Get PDF
    We evaluated the effect of DMTs on Covid-19 severity in patients with MS, with a pooled-analysis of two large cohorts from Italy and France. The association of baseline characteristics and DMTs with Covid-19 severity was assessed by multivariate ordinal-logistic models and pooled by a fixed-effect meta-analysis. 1066 patients with MS from Italy and 721 from France were included. In the multivariate model, anti-CD20 therapies were significantly associated (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.39–3.02, p < 0.001) with Covid-19 severity, whereas interferon indicated a decreased risk (OR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.18–0.99, p = 0.047). This pooled-analysis confirms an increased risk of severe Covid-19 in patients on anti-CD20 therapies and supports the protective role of interferon

    Isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor alpha and melphalan for locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma: three time periods at risk for amputation.

    Get PDF
    Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term limb salvage rate and overall survival after isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor alpha and melphalan for locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS: From 1991 to 2003, 73 patients (36 men, 37 women, median age 54 [range 14-80] years) with biopsy-proven STS underwent 77 perfusions followed by delayed surgical resection, with or without adjuvant radiation. Limb salvage and overall survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 21 amputations (28%) were performed. Overall 1, 5, and 10 years' limb salvage was 80.1% +/- 4.8%, 68.2% +/- 6.5%, and 60.6% +/- 9.2%, respectively. We found that the risk of amputation was linked to three time periods. The first was within a year after perfusion, mainly as a result of massive necrosis of the tumor and overlying skin, resulting in soft tissue deficit or recurrent disease (n = 17). The second was within 5 years, with two amputations performed for late local recurrence. The third occurred 10 years after perfusion, with two amputations performed for critical leg ischemia. Another two patients developed a pathological fracture of the femur due to radiation osteonecrosis. These four patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Overall, 1, 5, and 10 years' survival was 82.9% +/- 9.2%, 58.7% +/- 13.1%, and 42.5% +/- 18.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ILP treatment with tumor necrosis factor alpha and melphalan followed by delayed surgical resection and adjuvant radiation treatment is an effective limb salvage treatment regimen for locally advanced STS. However, we observed late morbidity, with two amputations performed for critical leg ischemia and two pathological fractures of the femur in patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy
    corecore