UK pneumonectomy outcome study (UKPOS): a prospective observational study of pneumonectomy outcome

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In order to assess the short term risks of pneumonectomy for lung cancer in contemporary practice a one year prospective observational study of pneumonectomy outcome was made. Current UK practice for pneumonectomy was observed to note patient and treatment factors associated with major complications.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study was performed. All 35 UK thoracic surgical centres were invited to submit data to the study. All adult patients undergoing pneumonectomy for lung cancer between 1 January and 31 December 2005 were included. Patients undergoing pleuropneumonectomy, extended pneumonectomy, completion pneumonectomy following previous lobectomy and pneumonectomy for benign disease, were excluded from the study.</p> <p>The main outcome measure was suffering a major complication. Major complications were defined as: death within 30 days of surgery; treated cardiac arrhythmia or hypotension; unplanned intensive care admission; further surgery or inotrope usage.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>312 pneumonectomies from 28 participating centres were entered. The major complication incidence was: 30-day mortality 5.4%; treated cardiac arrhythmia 19.9%; unplanned intensive care unit admission 9.3%; further surgery 4.8%; inotrope usage 3.5%. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥ P3, pre-operative diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and epidural analgesia were collectively the strongest risk factors for major complications. Major complications prolonged median hospital stay by 2 days.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The 30 day mortality rate was less than 8%, in agreement with the British Thoracic Society guidelines. Pneumonectomy was associated with a high rate of major complications. Age, ASA physical status, DLCO and epidural analgesia appeared collectively most associated with major complications.</p

Escalas de risco de Torrington e Henderson e de Epstein: aplicabilidade e efetividade nas ressecções pulmonares Torrington and Henderson and Epstein risk assessment scales: applicability and effectiveness in lung resection

OBJETIVO: Comparar a incidência de complicações pulmonares e cardiopulmonares estimadas, respectivamente, pelas escalas de Torrington e Henderson e de Epstein, em amostra populacional submetida à ressecção pulmonar para tratamento de câncer de pulmão. MÉTODOS: Dados de doentes submetidos à ressecção de um lobo pulmonar ou mais foram retirados de dois bancos de dados montados de forma prospectiva, oriundos de dois hospitais terciários. As medidas de desfecho analisadas foram complicações pulmonares, cardíacas e óbito. Teste exato de Fisher foi usado para avaliar a concordância das taxas de complicações obtidas com as estimadas previamente. RESULTADOS: A escala de Torrington e Henderson foi aplicada em 50 doentes (12 apresentaram risco leve, 32 moderado e 6 grave) e subestimou a taxa de complicações pulmonares nas categorias leve e moderado (p = 0,0003 e p = 0,0006, respectivamente), porém foi capaz de reconhecer os pacientes com alto risco de desenvolver complicações. A escala de Epstein foi aplicada em 38 doentes (4 apresentaram risco alto e 34 baixo) e também subestimou a taxa de complicações cardiopulmonares pós-operatórias da categoria de risco leve, que continha a maioria dos doentes (p < 0,0001), mas reconheceu, também, os pacientes com chance alta de complicar. CONCLUSÃO: As duas escalas não foram adequadas para estimar ocorrência de complicações pulmonares e cardiopulmonares na maioria dos doentes.<br>OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidences of pulmonary and cardiopulmonary postoperative complications estimated using, respectively, the scoring systems devised by Torrington and Henderson and by Epstein in a populational sample undergoing lung resection for the treatment of lung cancer. METHODS: Prospective data from patients submitted to resection of one or more pulmonary lobes were selected from the databases of two tertiary-care hospitals. The outcome measures were pulmonary complications, cardiac complications and mortality rates. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the concordance between the predicted and observed complications. RESULTS: The Torrington and Henderson scoring system was applied to 50 patients, in which the risk was found to be mild in 12, moderate in 32, and high in 6. Although accurately identifying patients at high risk, the Torrington and Henderson scale underestimated the rate of postoperative cardiopulmonary complications in the mild and moderate risk categories (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0006, respectively). The Epstein scoring system was applied to 38 patients, 4 of which were found to be at high risk, and 34 of which were found to be at mild risk. The Epstein scale also underestimated the risk in the patients (the majority) that were classified as being at mild risk (p < 0.0001) and yet, like the Torrington and Henderson scale, accurately identified those at high risk. CONCLUSION: Neither of the two scoring systems analyzed were found to be appropriate for predicting the risk of pulmonary and cardiopulmonary complications in most cases

Inhibitor of neuronal nitric oxide synthase improves gas exchange in ventilator-induced lung injury after pneumonectomy

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Mechanical ventilation with high tidal volumes may cause ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and enhanced generation of nitric oxide (NO). We demonstrated in sheep that pneumonectomy followed by injurious ventilation promotes pulmonary edema. We wished both to test the hypothesis that neuronal NOS (nNOS), which is distributed in airway epithelial and neuronal tissues, could be involved in the pathogenesis of VILI and we also aimed at investigating the influence of an inhibitor of nNOS on the course of VILI after pneumonectomy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Anesthetized sheep underwent right pneumonectomy, mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes (V_T) of 6 mL/kg and FiO₂ 0.5, and were subsequently randomized to a protectively ventilated group (PROTV; n = 8) keeping V_T and FiO₂ unchanged, respiratory rate (RR) 25 inflations/min and PEEP 4 cm H₂O for the following 8 hrs; an injuriously ventilated group with V_T of 12 mL/kg, zero end-expiratory pressure, and FiO₂ and RR unchanged (INJV; n = 8) and a group, which additionally received the inhibitor of nNOS, 7-nitroindazole (NI) 1.0 mg/kg/h intravenously from 2 hours after the commencement of injurious ventilation (INJV + NI; n = 8). We assessed respiratory, hemodynamic and volumetric variables, including both the extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) and the pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI). We measured plasma nitrite/nitrate (NOx) levels and examined lung biopsies for lung injury score (LIS).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Both the injuriously ventilated groups demonstrated a 2–3-fold rise in EVLWI and PVPI, with no significant effects of NI. In the INJV group, gas exchange deteriorated in parallel with emerging respiratory acidosis, but administration of NI antagonized the derangement of oxygenation and the respiratory acidosis significantly. NOx displayed no significant changes and NI exerted no significant effect on LIS in the INJV group.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Inhibition of nNOS improved gas exchange, but did not reduce lung water extravasation following injurious ventilation after pneumonectomy in sheep.</p