24 research outputs found

    A Physiological Model to Quantify Impacts of Climate Change Variables on Cocoa Productivity

    No full text
    <p>Climate change has the potential to alter cocoa production through, for example, changes in rainfall patterns (more intense droughts and/or more intense wet seasons), higher temperatures and increased carbon dioxide concentrations. A crop modelling approach allows prediction of yield changes in relation to climate events and quantification of interventions designed to ameliorate such changes (e.g. use of overhead shade or planting of different cocoa varieties more adapted to climate change). </p><p>A physiological model is described that is parameterised using experimental data collected under controlled environment conditions. The model is compartmentalised into interacting modules that include assimilation of carbohydrates through canopy photosynthesis, respiration, partitioning of assimilates between vegetative and reproductive growth, partitioning of assimilates within the pod and the dynamics of pod-setting and wilting. Canopy photosynthesis is calculated from the parameters of photosynthetic light response curves of genotypes, specified by the user, and the properties of the canopy (leaf area index and light attenuation through the canopy, quantified as the extinction coefficient). Environmental parameters that can be modulated in the model include carbon dioxide concentration, soil water content, air temperature, vapour pressure deficit and solar radiation. These parameters then influence the outputs of the different modules, for example temperature impacts on photosynthetic rate and also on the amount of cherelle wilt.</p><p>A range of model simulations are presented on the impacts of elevated CO2 concentration, increases in temperature, water deficit and their interaction on productivity and yield. The potential impact of interventions such as changing variety and use of overhead shade in ameliorating the effects of climate change is also discussed.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Climate change; crop model; adaptation</p&gt

    An integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) to support grouping and read-across of nanomaterials in aquatic systems

    Get PDF
    Even small changes in physicochemical properties of nanoforms (NFs), can drive differences in their environmental fate and hazard. The large number of new materials being developed means it will not be feasible to test and characterise the fate, behaviour and (eco)toxicity of each individual NF. This is further amplified by transformations of NFs over their lifecycle, changing the processes governing their risk. A common complexity arises from dissolution, where the combined toxicity of the exposure arises from both the solutes and any remaining particles contribution to the overall toxicity of the exposure. For efficient and effective risk assessment, it is the most relevant form of the NF for a given exposure that should be targeted for testing and assessment. In aquatic systems, functional fate processes (including dissolution, dispersion stability and chemical and biological transformations) determine the NF’s exposure relevant form. Whilst transformations in the environment alter the initial properties of an NF, different NFs may follow a shared functional fate pathway and ultimately present a similar fate and hazard profile in the environment. Therefore, these processes may be used to scientifically justify grouping NFs and read-across for specific endpoints from data rich NF(s) to verified members of the group that have not been tested yet. Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) have been used in other regulatory contexts to support the collection and integration of relevant existing information as well as the targeted generation of new data to support grouping and read-across. Here, a new IATA is presented consisting of decision nodes focused on dissolution, dispersion stability, chemical transformations and the relative contribution to toxicity of the particle and dissolved component of the overall exposure. The IATA focuses on the fate of NFs in aquatic systems outside of the body, but it can be considered a template for future assessment of in vivo kinetics, which will require further development. Guidance on tiered testing approaches and thresholds for grouping within each decision node are critically discussed. Worked examples for ecotoxicity of metal oxide NFs in aqueous systems (in microbial communities isolated from soils and for lettuce plants in hydroponic systems) demonstrate successful identification of the exposure relevant form of the NF in these case studies and allows for different grouping of NFs through application of the IATA

    Hazard strategy for nanoforms and nano-enabled products to implement safe-and-sustainable-by-design

    No full text
    Background: The European Commission (EC) has the ambition to use chemicals and materials that are toxic-free and safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) as published in the Green Deal[1] and the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability[2]. Within the EU-project SAbyNA[3], we aim to contribute to the implementation of SSbD of nanoforms (NF) and nano-enabled products (NEPs) by developing a user-friendly platform that supports industry in a step-wise approach to identify and implement SSbD interventions for their material, product or process. An important part of SSbD principles involves hazard assessment. We developed a hazard assessment strategy that can be used at an early stage of product innovation

    Microplastics in terrestrial ecosystems: Moving beyond the state of the art to minimize the risk of ecological surprise

    Get PDF
    Microplastic (plastic particles measuring <5mm) pollution is ubiquitous. Unlike in other well-studied ecosystems, for example, marine and freshwater environments, microplastics in terrestrial systems are relatively understudied. Their potential impacts on terrestrial environments, in particular the risk of causing ecological surprise, must be better understood and quantified. Ecological surprise occurs when ecosystem behavior deviates radically from expectations and generally has negative consequences for ecosystem services. The properties and behavior of microplastics within terrestrial environments may increase their likelihood of causing ecological surprises as they (a) are highly persistent global pollutants that will last for centuries, (b) can interact with the abiotic environment in a complex manner, (c) can impact terrestrial organisms directly or indirectly and (d) interact with other contaminants and can facilitate their transport. Here, we compiled findings of previous research on microplastics in terrestrial environments. We systematically focused on studies addressing different facets of microplastics related to their distribution, dispersion, impact on soil characteristics and functions, levels of biological organization of tested terrestrial biota (single species vs. assemblages), scale of experimental study and corresponding ecotoxicological effects. Our systematic assessment of previous microplastic research revealed that most studies have been conducted on single species under laboratory conditions with short-term exposures; few studies were conducted under more realistic long-term field conditions and/or with multi-species assemblages. Studies targeting multi-species assemblages primarily considered soil bacterial communities and showed that microplastics can alter essential nutrient cycling functions. More ecologically meaningful studies of terrestrial microplastics encompassing multi-species assemblages, critical ecological processes (e.g., biogeochemical cycles and pollination) and interactions with other anthropogenic stressors must be conducted. Addressing these knowledge gaps will provide a better understanding of microplastics as emerging global stressors and should lower the risk of ecological surprise in terrestrial ecosystems

    Feeding behavioural studies with Freshwater Gammarus spp.: The importance of a standardised methodology

    No full text
    Freshwater Gammarids are common leaf-shredding detritivores, and they usually feed on naturally conditioned organic material, in other words leaf litter that is characterised by an increased palatability, due to the action and presence of microorganisms (Chaumot et al. 2015; Cummins 1974: Maltby et al. 2002). Gammarus spp. are biologically omnivorous organisms, so they are involved in shredding leaf litter and are also prone to cannibalism, predation behaviour (Kelly et al. 2002) and coprophagy when juveniles (McCahon and Pascoe 1988). Gammarus spp. is a keystone species (Woodward et al. 2008), and it plays an important role in the decomposition of organic matter (Alonso et al. 2009; Bundschuh et al. 2013) and is also a noteworthy prey for fish and birds (Andrén and Eriksson Wiklund 2013; Blarer and Burkhardt-Holm 2016). Gammarids are considered to be fairly sensitive to different contaminants (Ashauer et al. 2010; Bloor et al. 2005; Felten et al. 2008a; Lahive et al. 2015; Kunz et al. 2010); in fact Amphipods have been reported to be one of the most sensitive orders to metals and organic compounds (Wogram and Liess 2001), which makes them representative test organisms for ecotoxicological studies and valid sentinel species for assessing water quality status (Garcia-Galan et al. 2017)
    corecore