10 research outputs found

    Unexpected Complication of R-CHOP Chemotherapy: Rapidly Progressive Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome

    Get PDF
    Background: Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is the term used for the progressive obliteration of small airways before the patient has had a confirmatory lung biopsy. It is also recognized as a transplant-related complication. There have been no reports of BOS during initial standard chemotherapy. Case presentation: A 50-year-old woman with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma grade 2, stage 3A, presented with hypoxia and progressive dyspnoea after the fifth cycle of R-CHOP. High-resolution computed tomography showed air trapping enhanced at the end-expiratory phase. Pulmonary function testing revealed severe obstructive and restrictive failure without bronchodilator response. We diagnosed BOS based on current criteria and treated the patient with glucocorticoids and cyclosporin. She was discharged home on oxygen therapy. However, soon after discharge, her respiratory symptoms deteriorated and she was hospitalized in a palliative care unit. She died of respiratory failure within a year of symptom onset. Conclusions: This is the first case report to describe rapidly progressive BOS in a patient undergoing R-CHOP treatment, which strongly suggests the condition was caused by the chemotherapy. Although a pathological diagnosis was not obtained, the clinical diagnosis of BOS was important so that the patient could receive appropriate treatment and palliative care based on the prognosis of this incurable condition

    Secondary Leukemia Associated with the Anti-Cancer Agent, Etoposide, a Topoisomerase II Inhibitor

    Get PDF
    Etoposide is an anticancer agent, which is successfully and extensively used in treatments for various types of cancers in children and adults. However, due to the increases in survival and overall cure rate of cancer patients, interest has arisen on the potential risk of this agent for therapy-related secondary leukemia. Topoisomerase II inhibitors, including etoposide and teniposide, frequently cause rearrangements involving the<em> mixed lineage leukemia</em> (<em>MLL</em>) gene on chromosome 11q23, which is associated with secondary leukemia. The prognosis is extremely poor for leukemias associated with rearrangements in the <em>MLL</em> gene, including etoposide-related secondary leukemias. It is of great importance to gain precise knowledge of the clinical aspects of these diseases and the mechanism underlying the leukemogenesis induced by this agent to ensure correct assessments of current and future therapy strategies. Here, I will review current knowledge regarding the clinical aspects of etoposide-related secondary leukemia, some probable mechanisms, and strategies for treating etoposide-induced leukemia

    Efficacy and Safety of Yokukansan in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

    Get PDF
    Objectives. We aimed at evaluating both the efficacy and safety of TJ-54 (Yokukansan) in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted. Methods. One hundred and twenty antipsychotic-treated inpatients were included. Patients were randomized to adjuvant treatment with TJ-54 or placebo. During a 4-week follow-up, psychopathology was assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Results. TJ-54 showed a tendency of being superior to placebo in reduction total, positive, and general PANSS scores in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but the difference was not statistically significant in both per-protocol set (PPS) and intention-to-treat (ITT). However, in PPS analysis, compared to the placebo group, the TJ-54 group showed statistically significant improvements in the individual PANSS subscale scores for lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation (TJ-54: −0.23±0.08; placebo: −0.03±0.08, P<0.018), tension (TJ-54: −0.42±0.09; placebo: −0.18±0.09, P<0.045), and poor impulse control (TJ-54: −0.39±0.10; placebo: −0.07±0.10, P<0.037). Conclusions. The results of the present study indicate that TJ-54 showed a tendency of being superior to placebo in reduction PANSS scores in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, compared to the placebo group, TJ-54 group showed statistically significant improvements in the individual PANSS subscale scores

    FIP1L1-PDGFRα Imposes Eosinophil Lineage Commitment on Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells*

    No full text
    Although leukemogenic tyrosine kinases (LTKs) activate a common set of downstream molecules, the phenotypes of leukemia caused by LTKs are rather distinct. Here we report the molecular mechanism underlying the development of hypereosinophilic syndrome/chronic eosinophilic leukemia by FIP1L1-PDGFRα. When introduced into c-KithighSca-1+Lineage- cells, FIP1L1-PDGFRα conferred cytokine-independent growth on these cells and enhanced their self-renewal, whereas it did not immortalize common myeloid progenitors in in vitro replating assays and transplantation assays. Importantly, FIP1L1-PDGFRα but not TEL-PDGFRβ enhanced the development of Gr-1+IL-5Rα+ eosinophil progenitors from c-KithighSca-1+Lineage- cells. FIP1L1-PDGFRα also promoted eosinophil development from common myeloid progenitors. Furthermore, when expressed in megakaryocyte/erythrocyte progenitors and common lymphoid progenitors, FIP1L1-PDGFRα not only inhibited differentiation toward erythroid cells, megakaryocytes, and B-lymphocytes but aberrantly developed eosinophil progenitors from megakaryocyte/erythrocyte progenitors and common lymphoid progenitors. As for the mechanism of FIP1L1-PDGFRα-induced eosinophil development, FIP1L1-PDGFRα was found to more intensely activate MEK1/2 and p38MAPK than TEL-PDGFRβ. In addition, a MEK1/2 inhibitor and a p38MAPK inhibitor suppressed FIP1L1-PDGFRα-promoted eosinophil development. Also, reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed that FIP1L1-PDGFRα augmented the expression of C/EBPα, GATA-1, and GATA-2, whereas it hardly affected PU.1 expression. In addition, short hairpin RNAs against C/EBPα and GATA-2 and GATA-3KRR, which can act as a dominant-negative form over all GATA members, inhibited FIP1L1-PDGFRα-induced eosinophil development. Furthermore, FIP1L1-PDGFRα and its downstream Ras inhibited PU.1 activity in luciferase assays. Together, these results indicate that FIP1L1-PDGFRα enhances eosinophil development by modifying the expression and activity of lineage-specific transcription factors through Ras/MEK and p38MAPK cascades
    corecore