Determinantes de los ingresos laborales de los economistas en Colombia : un análisis de modelación micro econométrica.

This research analyzes the determinants of labor income of economists in Colombia for the third quarter of 2010 and 2016, within the framework of a theoretical perspective of human capital. With information from the Large Integrated Household Survey of the National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE), a classical mincerian equation is estimated to measure the effect of schooling and potential experience on the incomes of graduates in economics. After applying the Ordinary Least Squares method, the results suggest that an additional year of school education and on-the-job job training has a positive effect on the probability of earning higher job earnings. Additionally, applying the Mincer model for related professions, it was evident that the human capital variables have significantly different impacts for each group of professionals, therefore the hypothesis of a homogeneous labor market is not fulfilled for the study period.En la presente investigación se analizan los factores determinantes de los ingresos laborales de los economistas en Colombia para el tercer trimestre de los años 2010 y 2016, en el marco de una perspectiva teórica de capital humano. Con información de la Gran Encuesta Integrada de Hogares del Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE), se estima una ecuación minceriana clásica para medir el efecto de la escolaridad y la experiencia potencial en los ingresos de los titulados en economía. Después de aplicar el método de Mínimos Cuadrados Ordinarios, los resultados sugieren que un año adicional de formación escolar y entrenamiento laboral en el puesto de trabajo genera un efecto positivo sobre la probabilidad de devengar ingresos laborales más altos. Adicionalmente, aplicando el modelo de Mincer para las profesiones afines se pudo evidenciar que las variables de capital humano tienen impactos significativamente diferentes para cada grupo de profesionales, por lo cual la hipótesis planteada de un mercado laboral homogéneo no se cumple para el periodo de estudio

Determinantes de los ingresos laborales de los economistas en Colombia: Un análisis de modelación micro econométrica

Vol. 27, No. 1 (2019)En la presente investigación se analizan los factores determinantes de los ingresos laborales de los economistas en Colombia para el tercer trimestre de los años 2010 y 2016, en el marco de una perspectiva teórica de capital humano. Con información de la Gran Encuesta Integrada de Hogares del Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE), se estima una ecuación minceriana clásica para medir el efecto de la escolaridad y la experiencia potencial en los ingresos de los titulados en economía. Después de aplicar el método de Mínimos Cuadrados Ordinarios, los resultados sugieren que un año adicional de formación escolar y entrenamiento laboral en el puesto de trabajo genera un efecto positivo sobre la probabilidad de devengar ingresos laborales más altos. Adicionalmente, aplicando el modelo de Mincer para las profesiones afines se pudo evidenciar que las variables de capital humano tienen impactos significativamente diferentes para cada grupo de profesionales, por lo cual la hipótesis planteada de un mercado laboral homogéneo no se cumple para el periodo de estudio.This research analyzes the determinants of labor income of economists in Colombia for the third quarter of 2010 and 2016, within the framework of a theoretical perspective of human capital. With information from the Large Integrated Household Survey of the National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE), a classical mincerian equation is estimated to measure the effect of schooling and potential experience on the incomes of graduates in economics. After applying the Ordinary Least Squares method, the results suggest that an additional year of school education and on-the-job job training has a positive effect on the probability of earning higher job earnings. Additionally, applying the Mincer model for related professions, it was evident that the human capital variables have significantly different impacts for each group of professionals, therefore the hypothesis of a homogeneous labor market is not fulfilled for the study period

Use of Telemedicine for Post-discharge Assessment of the Surgical Wound: International Cohort Study, and Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether remote wound reviews using telemedicine can be safely upscaled, and if standardised assessment tools are needed. Summary background data: Surgical site infection is the most common complication of surgery worldwide, and frequently occurs after hospital discharge. Evidence to support implementation of telemedicine during postoperative recovery will be an essential component of pandemic recovery. Methods: The primary outcome of this study was surgical site infection reported up to 30-days after surgery (SSI), comparing rates reported using telemedicine (telephone and/or video assessment) to those with in-person review. The first part of this study analysed primary data from an international cohort study of adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery who were discharged from hospital before 30-days after surgery. The second part combined this data with the results of a systematic review to perform a meta-analysis of all available data conducted in accordance with PRIMSA guidelines (PROSPERO:192596). Results: The cohort study included 15,358 patients from 66 countries (8069 high, 4448 middle, 1744 low income). Of these, 6907 (45.0%) were followed up using telemedicine. The SSI rate reported using telemedicine was slightly lower than with in-person follow-up (13.4% vs. 11.1%, P<0.001), which persisted after risk adjustment in a mixed-effects model (adjusted odds ratio: 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.84, P<0.001). This association was consistent across sensitivity and subgroup analyses, including a propensity-score matched model. In nine eligible non-randomised studies identified, a pooled mean of 64% of patients underwent telemedicine follow-up. Upon meta-analysis, the SSI rate reported was lower with telemedicine (odds ratio: 0.67, 0.47-0.94) than in-person (reference) follow-up (I2=0.45, P=0.12), although there a high risk of bias in included studies. Conclusions: Use of telemedicine to assess the surgical wound post-discharge is feasible, but risks underreporting of SSI. Standardised tools for remote assessment of SSI must be evaluated and adopted as telemedicine is upscaled globally