Atypical Metastasis to the Head and Neck Region: An Analysis of 11 Patients

Objective:We present 11 patients with distant metastases to the head and neck from an infraclavicularly located primary tumor and discuss the management strategies including the clinical presentation, treatment modalities, and prognosis.Methods:The retrospective data of the pathology reports and operation notes of 1239 patients who had undergone any kind of oncological surgical intervention between 2005 and 2017 were analyzed. All of the 11 patients included in the study were evaluated in our department’s tumor board, and all patients with an operable lesion had undergone surgery. Inoperable patients were treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.Results:The average age of the patients was 64.3 (48– 88) years. Primary tumors were located in the lung (2), breast (2), ovary (2), prostate (2), kidney (1), and colon (1) and the primary lesion could not be determined in one patient. The most common symptom was newly occurred painless swelling (9/11, 81.8%) at the metastatic site. Four patients without any other distant metastases were operated. Of these four patients, two died during follow-up due to systemic disease, and the other two are alive and disease-free. Three of the seven inoperable patients were treated with chemotherapy and the other four with radiotherapy. The prognosis of this group was worse.Conclusion:Although metastasis to the head and neck is not common, it is vital to keep in mind while approaching a patient with a lesion at the head and neck region especially if there is a history of lung, breast, and genitourinary cancers. Despite the poor prognosis, diminishing the tumor burden would increase the treatment success

Thrombotic risk assessment in antiphospholipid syndrome: The role of new antibody specificities and thrombin generation assay

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in subjects presenting with thrombosis and/or pregnancy loss. The currently used classification criteria were updated in the international consensus held in Sidney in 2005. Vascular events seem to result of local procoagulative alterations upon triggers influence (the so called “second-hit theory”), while placental thrombosis and complement activation seem to lead to pregnancy morbidity. The laboratory tests suggested by the current classification criteria include lupus anticoagulant, a functional coagulation assay, and anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein-I antibodies, generally detected by solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The real challenge for treating physicians is understanding what is the actual weight of aPL in provoking clinical manifestations in each case. As thrombosis has a multi-factorial cause, each patient needs a risk-stratified approach. In this review we discuss the role of thrombotic risk assessment in primary and secondary prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolic disease in patients with APS, focusing on new antibody specificities, available risk scoring models and new coagulation assays

OBEZİTE KONUSU BASINDA NASIL ÇERÇEVELENMEKTEDİR?

Küresel bir sorun olarak obezite konusunun 2010 yılında ülke genelinde yayımlanan tüm gazete ve eklerinde nasıl yayımlandığını ortaya koymayı amaçlayan bu çalışmada sistematik rastsal örneklemle belirlenen 172 yazı içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Yazıların yayımlandığı yayınların niteliği, yazıların sayfada yer alış biçiminden hareketle önemlilik derecesi, yazıların tonu, haber kaynakları, obezitenin nedenleri, sonuçları ve çözüm önerilerine ilişkin anlatımlarının değerlendirildiği çalışmada, elde edilen bulgular konunun gündemde pek de önemli bir yer bulmadığını, daha çok negatif tonda yazılar yayımlanmış olsa da literatürdeki çalışmalarla da paralel şekilde obezitenin nedenleri ve çözüm önerileri arasında daha çok bireysel/davranışsal unsurların öne çıktığı anlaşılmıştır. Toplumsal, çevresel ve sistematik unsurlar ise ikinci planda görülmüştür

Pregnancy outcomes in antiphospholipid antibody positive patients: prospective results from the AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION) Clinical Database and Repository ('Registry').

Objectives: To describe the outcomes of pregnancies in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients since the inception of the AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking Registry. Methods: We identified persistently aPL-positive patients recorded as 'pregnant' during prospective follow-up, and defined 'aPL-related outcome' as a composite of: (1) Preterm live delivery (PTLD) at or before 37th week due to pre-eclampsia (PEC), eclampsia, small-for-gestational age (SGA) and/or placental insufficiency (PI); or (2) Otherwise unexplained fetal death after the 10th week of gestation. The primary objective was to describe the characteristics of patients with and without aPL-related composite outcomes based on their first observed pregnancies following registry recruitment. Results: Of the 55 first pregnancies observed after registry recruitment among nulliparous and multiparous participants, 15 (27%) resulted in early pregnancy loss <10 weeks gestation. Of the remaining 40 pregnancies: (1) 26 (65%) resulted in term live delivery (TLD), 4 (10%) in PTLD between 34.0 weeks and 36.6 weeks, 5 (12.5%) in PTLD before 34th week, and 5 (12.5%) in fetal death (two associated with genetic anomalies); and (2) The aPL-related composite outcome occurred in 9 (23%). One of 26 (4%) pregnancies with TLD, 3/4 (75%) with PTLD between 34.0 weeks and 36.6 weeks, and 3/5 (60%) with PTLD before 34th week were complicated with PEC, SGA and/or PI. Fifty of 55 (91%) pregnancies were in lupus anticoagulant positive subjects, as well as all pregnancies with aPL-related composite outcome. Conclusion: In our multicentre, international, aPL-positive cohort, of 55 first pregnancies observed prospectively, 15 (27%) were complicated by early pregnancy loss. Of the remaining 40 pregnancies, composite pregnancy morbidity was observed in 9 (23%) pregnancies

Fluctuation of Anti-Domain 1 and Anti-Β2 Glycoprotein I Antibody Titers Over Time in Patients with Persistently Positive Antiphospholipid Antibodies

OBJECTIVE: This work aims at evaluating longitudinally titers of antibodies against β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) and domain 1 (anti-D1), identifying predictors of the variation of anti-D1 and anti-β2GPI antibody titers and clarifying whether antibody titer fluctuations predict thrombosis in a large international cohort of patients persistently positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), the "APS ACTION Registry". METHODS: Patients with available blood samples from at least 4 time points were included. Anti-β2GPI and anti-D1 IgG were tested by chemiluminescence (BioFlash, INOVA Diagnostics). RESULTS: In a cohort of 230 patients, anti-D1 and anti-β2GPI titers decreased significantly over time (p<0.0001 and p=0.010, respectively). After adjustment for age, gender, and number of positive aPL tests, the fluctuation of anti-D1 and anti-β2GPI titers was associated with treatment with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) at each time-point. Treatment with HCQ, but not immunosuppressors, was associated with 1.3-fold and 1.4-fold decrease in anti-D1 and anti-β2GPI titers, respectively. Incident vascular events were associated with 1.9-fold and 2.1-fold increase of anti-D1 and anti-β2GPI titers, respectively. Anti-D1 and anti-β2GPI titers at the time of thrombosis were lower compared to the other time-points: 1.6-fold decrease in anti-D1 titers and 2-fold decrease in anti-β2GPI titers conferred an OR for incident thrombosis of 6.0 (95%CI 0.62-59.3) and 9.4 (95%CI 1.1-80.2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with HCQ and incident vascular events significant predicted anti-D1 and anti-β2GPI titer fluctuation over time. Both anti-D1 and anti-β2GPI titers drop around the time of thrombosis, with potential clinical relevance. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

The adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) and the risk of recurrent thrombosis: Results from the APS ACTION cohort

Objectives: To assess whether patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and history of recurrent thrombosis have higher levels of adjusted Global AntiphosPholipid Syndrome Score (aGAPSS) when compared to patients without recurrent thrombosis. Methods: In this cross-sectional study of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients, we identified APS patients with a history of documented thrombosis from the AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance For Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION) Clinical Database and Repository (“Registry”). Data on aPL-related medical history and cardiovascular risk factors were retrospectively collected. The aGAPSS was calculated at Registry entry by adding the points corresponding to the risk factors: three for hyperlipidemia, one for arterial hypertension, five for positive anticardiolipin antibodies, four for positive anti-β2 glycoprotein-I antibodies and four for positive lupus anticoagulant test. Results: The analysis included 379 APS patients who presented with arterial and/or venous thrombosis. Overall, significantly higher aGAPSS were seen in patients with recurrent thrombosis (arterial or venous) compared to those without recurrence (7.8 ± 3.3 vs. 6 ± 3.9, p<0.05). When analyzed based on the site of the recurrence, patients with recurrent arterial, but not venous, thrombosis had higher aGAPSS (8.1 ± SD 2.9 vs. 6 ± 3.9; p<0.05). Conclusions: Based on analysis of our international large-scale Registry of aPL-positive patients, the aGAPSS might help risk stratifying patients based on the likelihood of developing recurrent thrombosis in APS

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: To Classify or Not to Classify?

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder resulting in thrombosis, microvascular disease, morbidity in pregnancy, and/or non-thrombotic manifestations. The recently introduced 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) APS classification criteria, with significantly higher specificity compared to the revised Sapporo criteria, now reflect the current thinking about APS and provide a new foundation for future APS research. The purpose of this short commentary is to discuss the appropriate circumstances under which the 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria could be used and to demonstrate how the new criteria can be applied to simple case scenarios