Effects of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin and fluid replacement on nerve conduction velocity in experimental sepsis

WOS: 000273855400003PubMed ID: 20209389BACKGROUND Neuromuscular abnormalities in sepsis, termed critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP), have been suggested to be induced by inflammatory mechanisms and/or relative hypovolemia. CIP is characterized by early electrophysiological findings before the clinical symptoms. This study aimed to investigate the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and volume replacement therapies on the possible nerve conduction velocity (NCV) alterations in the early phase of experimental sepsis. METHODS Forty-six Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups. Cecal ligation/perforation was performed to induce experimental sepsis. NCV was assessed in the tail nerve. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in NCV levels within and among the Sham-operated, colloid-and IVIG-treated groups. In the sepsis without treatment group, there was a statistically significant decrease in NCV levels. CONCLUSION NCV is decreased in the early stage of experimental sepsis and it may be accepted as an early electrophysiological sign in CIP. Treatment with either IgM-enriched IVIG or early volume replacement appears to prevent the decrease in NCV in the early phase of experimental sepsis. Results were statistically indistinguishable between the IVIG- and colloid-treated groups. No statistical difference between these groups is noteworthy. There is a need to clarify the mechanisms of action with further randomized, clinical and experimental trials

Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit