20 research outputs found

    MIR137 is an androgen regulated repressor of an extended network of transcriptional coregulators

    Get PDF
    Androgens and the androgen receptor (AR) play crucial roles in male development and the pathogenesis and progression of prostate cancer (PCa). The AR functions as a ligand dependent transcription factor which recruits multiple enzymatically distinct epigenetic coregulators to facilitate transcriptional regulation in response to androgens. Over-expression of AR coregulators is implicated in cancer. We have shown that over-expression of KDM1A, an AR coregulator, contributes to PCa recurrence by promoting VEGFA expression. However the mechanism(s) whereby AR coregulators are increased in PCa remain poorly understood. In this study we show that the microRNA hsa-miR-137 (miR137) tumor suppressor regulates expression of an extended network of transcriptional coregulators including KDM1A/LSD1/AOF1, KDM2A/JHDM1A/FBXL11, KDM4A/JMJD2A, KDM5B JARID1B/PLU1, KDM7A/JHDM1D/PHF8, MED1/TRAP220/DRIP205 and NCoA2/SRC2/TIF2. We show that expression of miR137 is increased by androgen in LnCaP androgen PCa responsive cells and that the miR137 locus is epigenetically silenced in androgen LnCaP:C4-2 and PC3 independent PCa cells. In addition, we found that restoration of miR137 expression down-regulates expression of VEGFA, an AR target gene, which suggests a role of miR137 loss also in cancer angiogenesis. Finally we show functional inhibition of mIR137 function enhanced androgen induction of PSA/KLK3 expression. Our data indicate that miR137 functions as an androgen regulated suppressor of androgen signaling by modulating expression of an extended network of transcriptional coregulators. Therefore, we propose that epigenetic silencing of miR137 is an important event in promoting androgen signaling during prostate carcinogenesis and progression

    Differential Roles of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFR) 1, 2 and 3 in the Regulation of S115 Breast Cancer Cell Growth

    Get PDF
    Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) regulate the growth and progression of breast cancer. FGF signaling is transduced through FGF receptors 1-4, which have oncogenic or anti-oncogenic roles depending on the ligand and the cellular context. Our aim was to clarify the roles of FGFR1-3 in breast cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Pools of S115 mouse breast cancer cells expressing shRNA against FGFR1, 2 and 3 were created by lentiviral gene transfer, resulting in cells with downregulated expression of FGFR1, FGFR2 or FGFR3 (shR1, shR2 and shR3 cells, respectively) and shLacZ controls. FGFR1-silenced shR1 cells formed small, poorly vascularized tumors in nude mice. Silencing of FGFR2 in shR2 cells was associated with strong upregulation of FGFR1 expression and the formation of large, highly vascularized tumors compared to the control tumors. Silencing FGFR3 did not affect cell survival or tumor growth. Overexpressing FGFR2 in control cells did not affect FGFR1 expression, suggesting that high FGFR1 expression in shR2 cells and tumors was associated with FGFR2 silencing by indirect mechanisms. The expression of FGFR1 was, however, increased by the addition of FGF-8 to starved shLacZ or MCF-7 cells and decreased by the FGFR inhibitor PD173074 in shR2 cells with an elevated FGFR1 level. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that FGFR1 is crucial for S115 breast cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth and angiogenesis, whereas FGFR2 and FGFR3 are less critical for the growth of these cells. The results also suggest that the expression of FGFR1 itself is regulated by FGF-8 and FGF signaling, which may be of importance in breast tumors expressing FGFs at a high level

    Molecular characterization of adipose tissue in the African elephant (Loxodonta africana)

    Get PDF
    Adipose tissue (AT) is a dynamic and flexible organ with regulatory roles in physiological functions including metabolism, reproduction and inflammation; secreted adipokines, including leptin, and fatty acids facilitate many of these roles. The African elephant (Loxodonta africana) is experiencing serious challenges to optimal reproduction in captivity. The physiological and molecular basis of this impaired fertility remains unknown. AT production of leptin is a crucial molecular link between nutritional status, adiposity and fertility in many species. We propose that leptin has a similar function in the African elephant. African elephant visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (AT) was obtained from both sexes and a range of ages including females with known pregnancy status. RNA was extracted and histological sections created and analyzed by microarray, PCR and immunohistochemistry respectively. Gas-chromatography was used to determine the fatty acid composition of AT. Microarray expression profiling was used to compare gene expression profiles of AT from pre-pubertal versus reproductively competent adult African elephants. This study demonstrates, for the first time, leptin mRNA and protein expression in African elephant AT. The derived protein sequence of the elephant leptin protein was exploited to determine its relationship within the class I helical cytokine superfamily, which indicates that elephant leptin is most closely related to the leptin orthologs of Oryctolagus cuniculus (European rabbit), Lepus oiostolus (woolly hare), and members of the Ochotonidae (Pika). Immunohistological analysis identified considerable leptin staining within the cytoplasm of adipocytes. Significant differences in fatty acid profiles between pregnant and non-pregnant animals were revealed, most notably a reduction in both linoleic and α linoleic acid in pregnant animals. This report forms the basis for future studies to address the effect of nutrient composition and body condition on reproduction in captive and wild elephants

    The KDM5B and KDM1A lysine demethylases cooperate in regulating androgen receptor expression and signalling in prostate cancer

    Get PDF
    Histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation is key epigenetic mark associated with active transcription and is a substrate for the KDM1A/LSD1 and KDM5B/JARID1B lysine demethylases. Increased expression of KDM1A and KDM5B is implicated in many cancer types, including prostate cancer (PCa). Both KDM1A and KDM5B interact with AR and promote androgen regulated gene expression. For this reason, there is great interested in the development of new therapies targeting KDM1A and KDM5B, particularly in the context of castrate resistant PCa (CRPC), where conventional androgen deprivation therapies and androgen receptor signalling inhibitors are no longer effective. As there is no curative therapy for CRPC, new approaches are urgently required to suppress androgen signalling that prevent, delay or reverse progression to the castrate resistant state. While the contribution of KDM1A to PCa is well established, the exact contribution of KDM5B to PCa is less well understood. However, there is evidence that KDM5B is implicated in numerous pro-oncogenic mechanisms in many different types of cancer, including the hypoxic response, immune evasion and PI3/AKT signalling. Here we elucidate the individual and cooperative functions of KDM1A and KDM5B in PCa. We show that KDM5B mRNA and protein expression is elevated in localised and advanced PCa. We show that the KDM5 inhibitor, CPI-455, impairs androgen regulated transcription and alternative splicing. Consistent with the established role of KDM1A and KDM5B as AR coregulators, we found that individual pharmacologic inhibition of KDM1A and KDM5 by namoline and CPI-455 respectively, impairs androgen regulated transcription. Notably, combined inhibition of KDM1A and KDM5 downregulates AR expression in CRPC cells. Furthermore, combined KDM1A and KDM5 inhibition impairs PCa cell proliferation and invasion more than individual inhibition of KDM1A and KDM5B. Collectively our study has identified individual and cooperative mechanisms involving KDM1A and KDM5 in androgen signalling in PCa. Our findings support the further development of KDM1A and KDM5B inhibitors to treat advanced PCa. Further work is now required to confirm the therapeutic feasibility of combined inhibition of KDM1A and KDM5B as a novel therapeutic strategy for targeting AR positive CRPC

    Complement C4 Copy Number Variation is Linked to SSA/Ro and SSB/La Autoantibodies in Systemic Inflammatory Autoimmune Diseases

    Get PDF
    Objective Copy number variation of the C4 complement components, C4A and C4B, has been associated with systemic inflammatory autoimmune diseases. This study was undertaken to investigate whether C4 copy number variation is connected to the autoimmune repertoire in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS), or myositis. Methods Using targeted DNA sequencing, we determined the copy number and genetic variants of C4 in 2,290 well-characterized Scandinavian patients with SLE, primary SS, or myositis and 1,251 healthy controls. Results A prominent relationship was observed between C4A copy number and the presence of SSA/SSB autoantibodies, which was shared between the 3 diseases. The strongest association was detected in patients with autoantibodies against both SSA and SSB and 0 C4A copies when compared to healthy controls (odds ratio [OR] 18.0 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 10.2–33.3]), whereas a weaker association was seen in patients without SSA/SSB autoantibodies (OR 3.1 [95% CI 1.7–5.5]). The copy number of C4 correlated positively with C4 plasma levels. Further, a common loss-of-function variant in C4A leading to reduced plasma C4 was more prevalent in SLE patients with a low copy number of C4A. Functionally, we showed that absence of C4A reduced the individuals’ capacity to deposit C4b on immune complexes. Conclusion We show that a low C4A copy number is more strongly associated with the autoantibody repertoire than with the clinically defined disease entities. These findings may have implications for understanding the etiopathogenetic mechanisms of systemic inflammatory autoimmune diseases and for patient stratification when taking the genetic profile into account.publishedVersio

    The lysine specific demethylase-1 (LSD1/KDM1A) regulates VEGF-A expression in prostate cancer

    No full text
    Recurrent prostate cancer remains a major clinical challenge. The lysine specific demethylase-1 (LSD1/KDM1A), together with the JmjC domain-containing JMJD2A and JMJD2C proteins, have emerged as critical regulators of histone lysine methylation. The LSD1-JMJD2 complex functions as a transcriptional co-regulator of hormone activated androgen and estrogen receptors at specific gene promoters. LSD1 also regulates DNA methylation and p53 function. LSD1 is overexpressed in numerous cancers including prostate cancer through an unknown mechanism. We investigated expression of the LSD1 and JMJD2A in malignant human prostate specimens. We correlated LSD1 and JMJD2A expression with known mediators of prostate cancer progression: VEGF-A and cyclin A1. We show that elevated expression of LSD1, but not JMJD2A, correlates with prostate cancer recurrence and with increased VEGF-A expression. We show that functional depletion of LSD1 expression using siRNA in prostate cancer cells decreases VEGF-A and blocks androgen induced VEGF-A, PSA and Tmprss2 expression. We demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition of LSD1 reduces proliferation of both androgen dependent (LnCaP) and independent cell lines (LnCaP: C42, PC3). We show a direct mechanistic link between LSD1 overexpression and increased activity of pro-angiogenic pathways. New therapies targeting LSD1 activity should be useful in the treatment of hormone dependent and independent prostate cancer. (C) 2013 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

    FGF-induced ERK1/2 activation in sh cells.

    No full text
    <p>Cells were pre-cultured in DC-FBS for 48 h and then treated with A) 25 ng/ml FGF-8b, B) 10 ng/ml FGF-2 or 100 ng/ml FGF-7 or PBS vehicle for indicated time periods. Whole-cell lysates were generated from cells and protein was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with antibodies against p-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2. The intensity of the bands was determined by scanning densitometry and is presented in columns as the p-ERK1/2 expression relative to ERK expression. The experiment was repeated twice with similar results.</p

    Regulation of FGFR1 mRNA expression in sh cells and MCF-7 cells.

    No full text
    <p>Expression of total FGFR1 or FGFR1IgIIIc was quantified by qRT-PCR in the cells cultured as follows: A) The cells grown in standard growth medium were treated with PD173074 for 24 h. B) The cells were grown without testosterone (Te) for 5 days and without serum for 48 h. C) The FGF-8b-overexpressing S115 cell lines (FGF8b1 and FGF8b14) and the transfection control cell lines (Mock1 and Mock3) were cultured in 4% DC-FBS in the absence of Te. D) shLacZ cells were grown without Te for 2 days and without serum for 24 h followed by treatment with FGF-8b (25 ng/ml) for 24 h. E) MCF-7 cells were grown in standard growth medium and treated similarly with FGF-8. The experiment was performed as triplicates and repeated twice with similar results. The statistical difference between the vehicle- and FGF-8b-treated cells was determined by independent sample t-test, * <i>P</i><0.05.</p

    Growth of sh cells in nude mouse tumors.

    No full text
    <p>1*10<sup>6</sup> cells were inoculated subcutaneously (s.c.) into male nude mice (n = 5–6). A) Tumor growth was monitored every 3–4 days with a caliper until the end of the experiment. Representative growth curves from one of the two experiments with similar results are shown. Mean ± SE from each group is shown. Statistical significance of the growth rate differences were tested by Repeated Measures ANOVA, * <i>P</i><0.05, ** <i>P</i><0.01, *** <i>P</i><0.001. B) FGFR inhibitor PD173074 was administered to mice bearing shR2 cell tumors, starting from day 13 (indicated by an arrow), at a dose of 25 mg/kg 5 times/week until the end of the experiment. Mean ± SE from each group is shown. C) FGFR mRNA levels were quantified by qRT-PCR analysis from shLacZ, shR1 and shR2 tumors from a separate experiment, in which the tumors were grown for 8 weeks in nude mice. Statistical difference between mRNA levels were tested by independent sample t-test, * <i>P</i><0.05. D) P-HisH3 immunohistochemical staining of shLacZ, shR1, shR2 and shR3 tumor sections (upper panel). Scale bar = 100 µm. Lower panel shows the number of P-HisH3-positive cells per field. P-HisH3-positive cells were counted in 5–15 fields per tumor section and each group contained six tumor sections. Statistical differences between groups were tested by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test, * <i>P</i><0.05.</p

    Morphology and vascularization of the sh cell tumors.

    No full text
    <p>A) Morphology of shLacZ, shR1, shR2 and shR3 tumors visualized by H-E staining with 100× magnification, scale bar = 100 µm and B) 40× magnification, scale bar = 500 µm. Necrotic areas are indicated by arrows. C) Vascularization in tumors was demonstrated by Pecam-1 immunoreactivity. The upper panel shows representative photomicrographs of immunohistochemical Pecam-1 staining in shLacZ, shR1, shR2 and shR3 tumors, scale bar = 100 µm. The density of Pecam-1-positive capillaries was counted in a blinded manner from 3 fields per tumor, 4–6 tumors per group and is presented as graphs (lower panel). The difference in the number of positive capillaries between the shLacZ tumors and the other tumors was tested by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test, * <i>P</i><0.05.</p
    corecore