Public Perceptions of the Role of Lifestyle Factors in Cancer Development: Results from the Spanish Onco-Barometer 2020

The European Code against Cancer recommends not to smoke, to avoid alcohol consumption, to eat a healthy diet, and maintain a healthy weight to prevent cancer. To what extent is the public aware of the influence of these lifestyle factors on cancer development? The goal of the current study was to describe the perceived influence of four lifestyle factors (tobacco, alcohol, diet, and weight) on cancer development in the general population and identify factors related to low perceptions of influence. We analyzed data from the 2020 Onco-barometer (n = 4769), a representative population-based survey conducted in Spain. With the exception of smoking, lifestyle factors were among those with the least perceived influence, more so among the demographic groups at higher risk from cancer including men and older individuals (65+ years). Individuals from lower socio-economic groups were more likely to report not knowing what influence lifestyle factors have on cancer. Lower perceived influence was also consistently related to perceiving very low risk from cancer. Overall, although there is variation in perceptions regarding the different lifestyle factors, low perceived influence clusters among those at higher risk for cancer. These results signal the need for public health campaigns and messages informing the public about the preventive potential of lifestyle factors beyond avoiding tobacco consumption.Cancer Observatory of the Spanish Association against CancerCancer Epidemiological Surveillance Subprogram (VICA) of the CIBERESP, Health Institute Carlos III, Madrid, SpainHealth Institute Carlos III (Expde: CD19/00203)Juan de la Cierva Fellowship from the Ministry of Science and the National Research Agency (MCIN/AEI, JC2019- 039691-I, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100011033, 3 October 2021)

Conocimiento y evaluación de la toma de decisiones compartidas en la práctica oncológica desde el punto de vista médico

Background: Implementation of Shared Decision Making (SDM) in oncology is limited. The objective of the study was to determine the extent of physicians’ awareness of Shared Decision Making (SDM) in their treatment of cancer patients, the usefulness that they assign to SDM, the role they play, their assessment of SDM, and perceptions of the main barriers and facilitators to its use. Methods: A questionnaire was completed by medical oncologists, radiation oncologists and general surgeons working in Andalusia (Spain). Sociodemographic, clinical-care and aspects of SDM variables were collected. SDM was evaluated using the SDM-Q-Doc questionnaire. Non-parametric contrasts were used to determine the possible differences between medical specialties. Results: The questionnaire was sent to 351 physicians. The response rate was 37.04%, 63 women and 67 men, with an average age of 45.6 years and 18.04 years’ experience. Of these, 33.08% were medical oncologists, 34.61% radiation oncologists and 29.23% general surgeons. A total of 82.3% stated they had received no training in SDM, whereas 33.8% said they knew a lot about SDM and applied it in practice; 80% considered it to be very useful. In addition, 60% of respondents said they were mainly the ones who made the decisions on treatment. An evaluation of SDM on the SDM-Q-Doc scale showed that all the specialities scored more than 80/100. The main barriers to applying SDM were the difficulty patients experienced in understanding what they needed to know, the lack of decision aids and time. Conclusions: Some 82% of physicians have no training in SDM and 66% don´t use it in practice, with decisions on treatment taken mainly by the physicians themselves. Strategies to increase training in SDM and to implement it into clinical practice are important.Fundamentos: La implementación de la Toma de Decisiones Compartidas (TDC) en oncología es escasa. El objetivo del estudio fue determinar el conocimiento de la TDC que tienen los médicos que tratan a pacientes con cáncer, la utilidad que le conceden, el rol que desempeñan, la evaluación que hacen, y las barreras y facilitadores que encuentran para su uso. Métodos: Se realizó una encuesta a oncólogos médicos, oncólogos radioterápicos y cirujanos generales que ejercían en Andalucía (España). Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas, clínico-asistenciales y de aspectos de la TDC. La TDC se evaluó mediante el cuestionario SDM-Q-Doc. Se emplearon contrastes no paramétricos para determinar las posibles diferencias entre especialidades médicas. Resultados: El cuestionario se envió a 351 médicos y la tasa de respuesta fue del 37,04%. Respondieron 63 mujeres y 67 hombres, con un promedio de 45,6 años de edad y 18,04 años de experiencia. El 33,08% eran oncólogos médicos, el 34,61% oncólogos radioterápicos y el 29,23% cirujanos generales. El 82,3% no tenía formación en TDC y el 33,8% reconocía saber bastante y utilizarla en su práctica habitual. El 80% consideró que era muy útil. El 60% respondió que la decisión sobre el tratamiento la tomaban mayormente ellos. Al evaluar la TDC con la escala SDM-Q-Doc, todas las especialidades obtuvieron más de 80 puntos sobre 100. Las principales barreras para aplicar la TDC fueron la dificultad del paciente para entender lo que necesitaba saber, la falta de instrumentos de apoyo, así como la falta de tiempo. Conclusiones: Un 82% de los médicos no tiene formación en TDC y un 66% no la utiliza en su práctica habitual, tomando la decisión sobre el tratamiento mayoritariamente ellos. Es importante adoptar estrategias para aumentar la formación en TDC e implementarla en la práctica clínica diaria

Public perceptions of the role of lifestyle factors in cancer. Development: Results from the Spanish Onco-Barometer 2020.

The European Code against Cancer recommends not to smoke, to avoid alcohol consumption, to eat a healthy diet, and maintain a healthy weight to prevent cancer. To what extent is the public aware of the influence of these lifestyle factors on cancer development? The goal of the current study was to describe the perceived influence of four lifestyle factors (tobacco, alcohol, diet,and weight) on cancer development in the general population and identify factors related to low perceptions of influence. We analyzed data from the 2020 Onco-barometer (n = 4769), a representative population-based survey conducted in Spain. With the exception of smoking, lifestyle factors were among those with the least perceived influence, more so among the demographic groups at higher risk from cancer including men and older individuals (65+ years). Individuals from lower socioeconomic groups were more likely to report not knowing what influence lifestyle factors haveon cancer. Lower perceived influence was also consistently related to perceiving very low risk from cancer. Overall, although there is variation in perceptions regarding the different lifestyle factors,low perceived influence clusters among those at higher risk for cancer. These results signal the need for public health campaigns and messages informing the public about the preventive potential of lifestyle factors beyond avoiding tobacco consumption

Physical Comorbidities and Depression in Recent and Long-Term Adult Cancer Survivors: NHANES 2007–2018

Many adult cancer patients present one or more physical comorbidities. Besides interfering with treatment and prognosis, physical comorbidities could also increase the already heightened psychological risk of cancer patients. To test this possibility, we investigated the relationship between physical comorbidities with depression symptoms in a sample of 2073 adult cancer survivors drawn from the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2007–2018) in the U.S. Based on information regarding 16 chronic conditions, the number of comorbidities diagnosed before and after the cancer diagnosis was calculated. The number of comorbidities present at the moment of cancer diagnosis was significantly related to depression risk in recent but not in long-term survivors. Recent survivors who suffered multimorbidity had 3.48 (95% CI 1.26–9.55) times the odds of reporting significant depressive symptoms up to 5 years after the cancer diagnosis. The effect of comorbidities was strongest among survivors of breast cancer. The comorbidities with strongest influence on depression risk were stroke, kidney disease, hypertension, obesity, asthma, and arthritis. Information about comorbidities is usually readily available and could be useful in streamlining depression screening or targeting prevention efforts in cancer patients and survivors. A multidimensional model of the interaction between cancer and other physical comorbidities on mental health is proposed.Sara Borrell - the Health Institute Carlos III (Expde: CD19/00203

Estudio observacional post-introducción de las pruebas predictivo/pronósticas en cáncer de mama del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (SSPA)

YesEste trabajo se lleva a cabo para dar respuesta a las siguientes preguntas de investigación: 1. ¿Se han seleccionado de manera adecuada a las pacientes candidatas a las pruebas genómicas en función de los criterios de inclusión establecidos? 2. ¿Los resultados de las plataformas genómicas modifican la decisión terapéutica del profesional? 3. ¿Qué implicaciones económicas suponen la incorporación de estas plataformas a la cartera de Servicios del SSPA

Physical comorbidities and depression in recent and long-term adult cancer survivors: NHANES 2007-2018

Thisstudy uses data from the NHANES survey, waves 2007-2018. The majority of cancer patients suffer one or more physical comorbidities (other somatic diseas-es present at the moment of cancer diagnosis). Previous research has shown that these comor-bidities can interfere with cancer treatment and shorten the patient’s survival time. We propose that comorbidities could also interfere with the mental health of cancer patients and increase the risk of suffering depression in the years following the cancer diagnosis. We tested this possibil-ity in a study of 2,073 adult cancer survivors. We found that the number of physical comorbidi-ties present at the moment of cancer diagnosis was related to higher risk of reporting depression in cancer survivors who were diagnosed up to 5 years before the study. This relationship was strongest among survivors of breast cancer. Information about comorbidities is usually readily available and could be useful in streamlining depression screening or targeting prevention ef-forts in cancer patients and survivors

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer induces changes in the expression of nuclear β-catenin: prognostic significance.

Journal Article;BACKGROUND Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Although high local control is achieved, overall rates of distant control remain suboptimal. Colorectal carcinogenesis is associated with critical alterations of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway involved in proliferation and survival. The aim of this study was to assess whether CRT induces changes in the expression of β-catenin/E-cadherin, and to determine whether these changes are associated with survival. METHODS The Immunohistochemical expression of nuclear β-catenin and membranous E-cadherin was prospectively analysed in tumour blocks from 98 stage II/III rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative CRT. Tumour samples were collected before and after CRT treatment. All patients were treated with pelvic RT (46-50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) intravenous infusion (225 mg/m2) or capecitabine (825 mg/m2) during RT treatment, followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Disease-free survival (DFS) was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate Cox regression model was employed for the Multivariate analysis. RESULTS CRT induced significant changes in the expression of nuclear β-catenin (49% of patients presented an increased expression after CRT, 17% a decreased expression and 34% no changes; p = 0.001). After a median follow-up of 25 months, patients that overexpressed nuclear β-catenin after CRT showed poor survival compared with patients that experienced a decrease in nuclear β-catenin expression (3-year DFS 92% vs. 43%, HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.8; p = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis for DFS, increased nuclear β-catenin expression after CRT almost reached the cut-off for significance (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS In our study, preoperative CRT for LARC induced significant changes in nuclear β-catenin expression, which had a major impact on survival. Finding a way to decrease CRT resistance would significantly improve LARC patient survival.This work has been undertaken with a grant from the Fundación Progreso y Salud (Consejería de Salud de Andalucía, PI-0198/2008)Ye

Evaluation of the utilization of external radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer in Andalusia, Spain.

Journal Article;BACKGROUND Around 27,000 new cases of prostate cancer are diagnosed every year in Spain and 5400 die from this disease. Radiotherapy (RT), alone or combined, has proven to be effective as initial treatment in patients with localized disease. Our objective was to evaluate the use of external beam RT (EBRT) in our region, comparing the indication rate and irradiation rate and examining variability in its application among hospitals. METHODS We conducted a review of RT guidelines and indication studies for prostate cancer (% expected irradiation). Data were gathered from all twelve public healthcare centers in Andalusia (Spain) on RT-treated prostate cancer patients during 2013 (% actual irradiation) and from nine of the centers on RT discharge reports. Information was classified according to type of hospital, tumor risk category and RT treatment (technique, dosage, volume, toxicity). RESULTS The estimated RT rate was 67 % (1289/1917), 43 % were aged > 70 years, 44.7 % had ECOG performance status of 0); 44.7 % had high-risk tumors; 57 % underwent RT associated with hormone therapy; 70 % of patients receiving RT were treated with 3D planning (30 % IGRT); and doses were 70-76 Gy in 70 % of cases and >76 Gy in 10.7 %. Acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were < grade 2 in 79 and 89 % of patients, respectively. An irradiation rate significantly below the mean for the study was found in four provinces. There was a significant difference among provinces in the distribution of risk groups. CONCLUSIONS Underutilization of EBRT was estimated to be around 30 % in prostate cancer patients, with an elevated variability in irradiation rates among hospitals related to differences in available technology and in the distribution of patients with different risk levels. These data should be a matter of concern to regional health managers, given the negative and measurable impact on the survival of patients.Ye

Cáncer Colorrectal: proceso asistencial integrado. 3ª ed

YesEl cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es uno de los cánceres más frecuentes en nuestro entorno, con una incidencia en aumento en las últimas décadas. Esto pone de relieve la importancia de la actualización del proceso asistencial integrado como elemento vehicular en la mejora de la atención al paciente con cáncer colorrectal y por otro lado la necesidad de ahondar en el acceso y la concienciación de la población para participar en los programas de vigilancia y diagnóstico precoz. La presente actualización del Proceso Asistencial Integrado genera el marco adecuado para el abordaje multidisciplinar de esta patología con una definición de actividades y características de calidad que implican a todos los profesionales y se resumen en recomendaciones de hacer y no hacer basadas en la mejor evidencia disponibles en las guías de práctica clínica revisadas e incluidas en este documento