Reduction in anaesthetic drug consumption is correlated with mean titrated intra-operative Bispectral Index values.

Contains fulltext : 50473.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown a reduction in anaesthetic drug consumption with Bispectral Index (BIS) titration compared with standard clinical practice. However, the amount of reduction varied widely between 1% and 40%. We investigated the correlation between reduction in anaesthetic drug consumption and mean titrated BIS values. METHODS: An analysis upon randomized controlled trials cited until January 2006 in MEDLINE and other databases investigating the potential reduction in anaesthetic (hypnotic) drug consumption with BIS titration was performed. Investigations with a marked difference (> 15%) in opioid drug consumption between the BIS group and the standard practice group were excluded. Correlations between amount of reduction in hypnotic drug use and the mean titrated BIS value were analysed with linear regression. RESULTS: Fourteen manuscripts covering 2582 patients were included into the analysis. The mean BIS value in the standard clinical practice group averaged over all studies was 43.6 +/- 3.2 and the mean BIS value in the BIS-titrated group was 49.9 +/- 5.4. The amount of reduction in hypnotic drug use correlated significantly with the mean BIS values in the BIS-titrated groups (r =0.68) and with the differences between the mean BIS value in the BIS-titrated group and the mean BIS value in the standard clinical practice group (r = 0.70). Every point of BIS difference between the two groups resulted in a reduced hypnotic drug use of approximately 2%. CONCLUSION: Despite differences in the study designs and in the drugs used, a linear correlation between the mean titrated BIS value and the hypnotic drug saving potential was found

The Entropy Module and Bispectral Index as guidance for propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia in combination with regional anaesthesia compared with a standard clinical practice group.

Item does not contain fulltextThis study was designed to investigate the impact of the Entropy Module and Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring on drug consumption and recovery times compared with standard anaesthetic practice in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery using a combination of regional and general anaesthesia as performed by an experienced anaesthesiologist. We hypothesised that electroencephalogram monitoring would lead to a lower drug consumption as well as shorter recovery times. With institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 90 adult patients undergoing surgery to the upper or lower extremity received regional anaesthesia for post- and intraoperative pain control and were randomised to receive general anaesthesia by propofol/remifentanil infusion controlled either solely by clinical parameters or by targeting Entropy or BIS values of 50. Recovery times and drug consumption were recorded. Data from 79 patients were analysed. Compared with standard practice, patients with Entropy or BIS monitoring showed a similar propofol consumption (standard practice 101 +/- 22 microg/kg/minute, Entropy 106 +/- 24 microg/kg/minute, BIS 104 +/- 20 microg/kg/minute) and showed similar Aldrete scores (10/10) one minute after extubation: 9.1 +/- 0.3, 9.2 +/- 0.6 and 9.3 +/- 0.5, respectively. Time points of extubation were 7.3 +/- 2.9 minutes, 9.2 +/- 3.9 minutes and 6.8 +/- 2.9 minutes, respectively, demonstrating a significant difference between Entropy and BIS (P = 0.023). Compared with standard practice, targeting an Entropy or BIS value of 50 did not result in a reduction of propofol consumption during general anaesthesia combined with regional anaesthesia as performed by an experienced anaesthesiologist in orthopaedic patients.1 januari 201

Patient state index vs bispectral index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of propofol.

Contains fulltext : 89815.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: The patient state index (PSI) and the bispectral index (BIS) quantify anaesthetic depth based on the EEG using different algorithms. We compared both indices with regard to the prediction of the depth of propofol anaesthesia. METHODS: In 17 patients, propofol was infused until burst suppression occurred and stopped thereafter until BIS recovered to values above 60. This was repeated; afterwards, patients were intubated, for subsequent surgery. Without surgical stimulus, PSI and BIS were measured simultaneously and compared with the estimated effect-site concentrations of propofol. These were derived from simultaneous pharmacokinetic and -dynamic modelling in an individual two-stage and a population-based NONMEM approach. RESULTS: A close sigmoid relationship was observed between the propofol effect-site concentration and both PSI [coefficient of determination rho(2)=0.91 (sd 0.05)] and BIS [rho(2)=0.92 (0.03)], which was significantly steeper for PSI [gamma=2.2 (0.6)] than for BIS [gamma=1.8 (0.4)], and reached significantly lower values for PSI [E(max)=0.3 (1.1)] than for BIS [E(max)=5.3 (6.7)] at maximal propofol concentrations. A significantly smaller k(e0) was obtained for PSI [0.09 (0.03) min(-1)] compared with BIS [0.10 (0.02) min(-1)]. PSI and BIS correlated significantly with each other (rho(2)=0.866) and predicted propofol effect-site concentration with a comparable probability [P(K)=0.87 (0.05) and 0.86 (0.05), respectively]. NONMEM revealed E(0)=89.3 and 92.3, E(max)=1.9 and 8.6, C(e50)=1.38 and 1.92 microg ml(-1), gamma=1.6 and 1.48, and k(e0)=0.103 and 0.131 min(-1) as typical values for PSI and BIS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PSI and the BIS monitors performed equally well in predicting depth of propofol anaesthesia. However, PSI was lower than BIS by approximately 10-15 points at high propofol concentrations.1 augustus 201

The Entropy Module and Bispectral Index as guidance for propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia in combination with regional anaesthesia compared with a standard clinical practice group.

This study was designed to investigate the impact of the Entropy Module and Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring on drug consumption and recovery times compared with standard anaesthetic practice in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery using a combination of regional and general anaesthesia as performed by an experienced anaesthesiologist. We hypothesised that electroencephalogram monitoring would lead to a lower drug consumption as well as shorter recovery times. With institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 90 adult patients undergoing surgery to the upper or lower extremity received regional anaesthesia for post- and intraoperative pain control and were randomised to receive general anaesthesia by propofol/remifentanil infusion controlled either solely by clinical parameters or by targeting Entropy or BIS values of 50. Recovery times and drug consumption were recorded. Data from 79 patients were analysed. Compared with standard practice, patients with Entropy or BIS monitoring showed a similar propofol consumption (standard practice 101 +/- 22 microg/kg/minute, Entropy 106 +/- 24 microg/kg/minute, BIS 104 +/- 20 microg/kg/minute) and showed similar Aldrete scores (10/10) one minute after extubation: 9.1 +/- 0.3, 9.2 +/- 0.6 and 9.3 +/- 0.5, respectively. Time points of extubation were 7.3 +/- 2.9 minutes, 9.2 +/- 3.9 minutes and 6.8 +/- 2.9 minutes, respectively, demonstrating a significant difference between Entropy and BIS (P = 0.023). Compared with standard practice, targeting an Entropy or BIS value of 50 did not result in a reduction of propofol consumption during general anaesthesia combined with regional anaesthesia as performed by an experienced anaesthesiologist in orthopaedic patients

Comparison between bispectral index and patient state index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of sevoflurane.

Contains fulltext : 70983.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)BACKGROUND: The Bispectral Index (BIS) and the Patient State Index (PSI) quantify depth of anesthesia by analyzing the electroencephalogram. The authors examined the response of BIS and PSI to sevoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: In 22 patients, sevoflurane anesthesia was induced by inhalation with a tight-fitting facemask and was maintained via a laryngeal mask. Sevoflurane concentrations were increased until burst suppression occurred and subsequently decreased until BIS recovered to values above 60. This procedure was repeated twice until patients underwent intubation for subsequent surgery. End-tidal sevoflurane concentrations, BIS, and PSI were recorded simultaneously. The performance of PSI and BIS to predict the estimated sevoflurane effect site concentration, as derived from simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling, was compared by determination coefficients (rho(2)) and prediction probabilities (P(K)). RESULTS: A significant (P < 0.001) correlation between BIS and PSI was found (r(2) = 0.75), and a close sigmoid relation between sevoflurane effect site concentration and both BIS (rho(2) = 0.84 +/- 0.09) and PSI (rho(2) = 0.85 +/- 0.15) was observed. The maximum sevoflurane electroencephalographic effect resulted in PSI values (1.3 +/- 4.3) that were significantly (P = 0.019) lower than BIS values (7.9 +/- 12.1), and the effect site efflux constant k(e0) was significantly smaller (P = 0.001) for PSI (0.13 +/- 0.08 min(-1)) than for BIS (0.24 +/- 0.15 min(-1)). The probability of BIS (P(K) = 0.80 +/- 0.11) to predict sevoflurane effect site concentration did not differ (P = 0.76) from that of PSI (P(K) = 0.79 +/- 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The BIS reacted faster to changes in sevoflurane concentrations, whereas the PSI made better use of the predefined index range. However, despite major differences in their algorithms and minor differences in their dose-response relations, both PSI and BIS predicted depth of sevoflurane anesthesia equally well