122 research outputs found

    The winter ranges of the Finnish reindeer management area.

    Get PDF

    Clostridium difficile infektiot ja niiden hoito

    Get PDF
    Background and aims. Standard treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficileinfection (CDI) with antibiotics leads to recurrences in up to 50% of patients.In recent years the incidence and mortality of Clostridium difficile (C.difficile)enteritis have increased. Nevertheless, C.difficile has rarely been isolated in extraintestinal infections. The aims of the study were to investigate efficacy of rifaximin, metronidazole, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and Clostridium difficile immune whey (CDIW) in the treatment of recurrent CDI and to characterize clinical feature and risk factors for extra-intestinal CDI. Subjects and methods. Study I was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study designed to compare CDIW with metronidazole for treatment of laboratory confirmed,mild to moderate episodes of recurrent CDI. CDIW was manufactured by immunization of cows in their gestation period with inactivated C. difficile vaccine.The resulting colostrum was processed, immunoglubulins were concentrated and the end product containing high titres of C. difficile immunoglobulin was used as CDIW. 20 patients received metronidazole at a dosage of 400 mg t.i.d. and 18 patients CDIW 200 ml t.i.d. Study II was a retrospective review of 70 patients with recurrent CDI who had undergone fecal transplantation. FMT was performed at colonoscopy by infusing fresh donor feces into cecum. Before transplantation, the patients had whole-bowel lavage with polyethylene glycol solution. Study III was a retrospective study of 32 patients who were treated with rifaximin for recurrent CDI. In Study IV extra-intestinal CDIs were searched for in an electronic database of all C. difficile positive isolates found during a 10-year period. The medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Disease severity and co-morbidities of the patients were evaluated using Horn disease severity and Charlson co-morbidity indexes. Results. In Study I, 10 weeks after the beginning of treatment, sustained responses were observed in 11 (55%) of 20 patients receiving metronidazole and 10(56%) of 18 patients treated with CDIW. In Study II, 12 weeks after FMT, 66 (94%)of 70 patients had a favourable response. In Study III, 12 weeks after rifaximin treatment 17 (53%) of 30 patients had no relapse. In Study IV extra-intestinal CDI was found in 31 patients who comprised 0.17% of all CDIs. One-year mortalityrate was 36% and it correlated with the severity of underlying diseases Conclusions. CDIW was as effective as metronidazole in the prevention of CDI recurrences and it was well tolerated. FMT through colonoscopy seems to be an effective treatment also for recurrent CDI caused by the virulent C difficile 027 strain. The MIC value of rifampin seemed to predict the response to rifaximin treatment. Extra-intestinal CDIs occur mainly in hospitalized patients with significant comorbidities.Extra-intestinal CDIs in the abdominal area may result either from intestinal perforation after infection or after intestinal surgery. C. difficile may reach distant sites via bacteremia. Mortality in extra-intestinal CDIs is associated with the severity of underlying diseasesClostridium difficile on suolistobakteeri, joka pystyy parhaiten lisääntymään muun suoliston bakteeriston vaurioiduttua, eli useimmiten antibioottikuurin aikana tai pian sen jälkeen. Perinteisesti C. difficile -infektioita on hoidettu joko metronidatsolilla tai vankomysiinillä. Nämä molemmat ovat antibiootteja, jotka vaikuttavat myös suoliston normaalin bakteerikantaan, altistaen ripulin uusiutumiselle. Osittain tästä johtuen C difficile -infektio uusiutuu 15%-35%:lla niistä, joilla on ollut yksi edeltävä suoliston tulehdus ja 33%-65%:lla, joilla on ollut kaksi tai useampaa tulehdusta. Viime vuosina C. difficile infektion luonne on muuttunut, taudin ilmaantuvuus, vakavien tapausten osuus ja kuolleisuus ovat lisääntyneet. Vuonna 2012 THL:n tartuntatautirekisteriin ilmoitettiin 5259 tapausta. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli tutkia hyvin erilaisilla vaiktusmekanismeilla vaikuttavien hoitojen tehoa, eli antibioottien kuten rifaksiimin ja metronidatsolin, bakteerihoidon eli ulosteensiirron sekä vasta-ainehoidon, eli immuunimaidon tehoa uusiutuvan C. diffile-infektion hoidossa. Lisäksi tutkittiin suoliston ulkopuolisen C. difficile infektion riskitekijöitä ja taudinkuvaa. Immuunimaito valmistettiin rokottomalla tiineenä olevia lehmiä, ja vasta-aineet kerättiin ternimaidosta. Ulosteensiirto suoritettiin ruiskuttamalla tuore siirre paksusuolen tähystimen kautta paksusuolen alkuosaan. Ennen siirtoa potilaiden paksusuoli oli tyhjennetty tavanomaisin paksusuolen tähýstyksiin liittyvin menetelmin. Kaikki HUS-piirin suoliston ulkopuoliset C. difficile-infektiot arvioitiin 10 vuoden ajalta. Ulosteensiirrolla 94 % potilaista parani, immuunimaidolla parani 56 %, metronidatsoli-antibiootilla 55 % ja rifaksiimi-antibiootilla 53 %.Ulosteensiirron hoitotulokset olivat parhaita. Ulosteensiirto oli myös tehokas vaikeisiin C. difficile 027 bakteerikantoihin. Suoliston ulkopuolisia löydöksiä oli 0.17 %:lla kaikista C. difficile potilaista. 36 % potilaista kuoli vuoden seurannan aikana. Kuolleisuus oli yhteydessä taustalla olevan perustaudin vaikeusasteeseen. Useimmiten suoliston ulkopuolisen infektion taustalla oli joko suoliston puhkeama tai leikkauksen jälkeinen infektio. C. difficile voi myös aiheuttaa verenmyrkytyksiä ja haavainfektioita

    Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes

    Get PDF
    Background and purpose - Revision surgery after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty is sometimes required. Varying revision rates and outcomes have been reported in rather small patient series. Data on risk factors for revision surgery, on the final outcome of revision, and possible factors affecting the outcome of revision are also limited. We evaluated these factors in 50 patients.Patients and methods - From 1,142 trapeziometacarpal arthroplasties performed during a 10-year period, 50 patients with 65 revision surgeries were retrospectively identified and invited to participate in a follow-up study involving subjective, objective, and radiologic evaluation. The revision rate, risk factors for revision, and factors affecting the outcome of revision were analyzed.Results - The revision rate was 5%. Scaphometacarpal impingement was the most common reason for revision surgery. Patient age ≤ 55 years was a risk factor with a revision rate of 9% in this age group, whereas an operation on both thumbs during the follow-up period was a negative risk factor for revision surgery. There was no difference in revision risk between ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition with or without a bone tunnel. 9 patients had multiple revision procedures and their final outcome did not differ significantly from patients revised only once. Most of the patients felt subjectively that they had benefited from revision surgery and the subjective outcome measures (QuickDash and pain VAS) and the Conolly score were in the same range as previously described for revision trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty.Interpretation ? Age ≤ 55 years is a risk factor for revision surgery. The type of primary surgery does not affect the risk of revision surgery and multiple revision procedures do not result in worse outcomes than cases revised only once. Mechanical pain caused by contact between the metacarpal and scaphoid is the most common indication for revision surgery. In general, patients seem to benefit from revision surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.Peer reviewe

    Stand treatment grounds. A compilation of study results and description of a literature database.

    Get PDF
    bibliografiaHankkeen 3191 loppuraporttiThis paper is the final report of a five-year research project concerning stand treatment alternatives as are implemented in modern-day Finnish silviculture. The various alternatives and their consequences are discussed mainly on the basis of older and more recent research results. The rapid and at time abrupt changes in silvicultural practices in the 1990 s necessitated this research project. It was thought that new research is not able to sufficiently quickly provide all the decision-making support needed. Consequently, in order to avoid making far-reaching mistakes, it was decided to review and bring together all existing knowledge applicable in the new situation.ALKUSANAT 5 1. JOHDANTO 9-14 2. YLEISTÄ LOPPURAPORTIN SISÄLLÖSTÄ 15-16 3. METSIKKÖ PUUNTUOTANNON PERUSYKSIKKÖNÄ 17-23 4. METSIKÖN UUDISTAMINEN 24-128 5. TAIMIKONHOITO 129-140 6. PIENPUUN JA HAKKUUTÄHTEEN HYÖDYNTÄMINEN 141-153 7. NUORTEN JA VARTTUNEIDEN HARVENNUSMETSIEN KÄSITTELY 154-281 8. TÄYDENTÄVÄ YHTEENVETO 282 LIITE 1. Oppi-ja käsikirjoja sekä oppaita yms 298-357 LIITE 2. Suunnitellun uuden kokoomateoksen sisältö - lukujen otsikot ja työryhmän kommentit 358-363 LIITE 3. Kirjallisuustietokannan rakenne ja toiminta 364-38
    corecore