Sepsis and septic shock in patients with malignancies : a Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Réanimation Onco-Hématologique study

Objectives: Cancer affects up to 20% of critically ill patients, and sepsis is one of the leading reasons for ICU admission in this setting. Early signals suggested that survival might be increasing in this population. However, confirmation studies have been lacking. The goal of this study was to assess trends in survival rates over time in cancer patients admitted to the ICU for sepsis or septic shock over the last 2 decades. Data Source: Seven European ICUs. Study Selection: A hierarchical model taking into account the year of admission and the source dataset as random variables was used to identify risk factors for day 30 mortality. Data Extraction: Data from cancer patients admitted to ICUs for sepsis or septic shock were extracted from the Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Reanimation Onco-Hematologique database (1994-2015). Data Synthesis: Overall, 2,062 patients (62% men, median [interquartile range] age 59 yr [48-67 yr]) were included in the study. Underlying malignancies were solid tumors (n = 362; 17.6%) or hematologic malignancies (n = 1,700; 82.4%), including acute leukemia (n = 591; 28.7%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 461; 22.3%), and myeloma (n = 244; 11.8%). Two-hundred fifty patients (12%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and 640 (31.0%) were neutropenic at ICU admission. Day 30 mortality was 39.9% (823 deaths). The year of ICU admission was associated with significant decrease in day 30 mortality over time (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98; p = 0.001). Mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.52-4.19; p < 0.01) and vasopressors use (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10-1.83; p < 0.01) were independently associated with day 30 mortality, whereas underlying malignancy, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and neutropenia were not. Conclusions: Survival in critically ill oncology and hematology patients with sepsis improved significantly over time. As outcomes improve, clinicians should consider updating admission policies and goals of care in this population

Hyperprogressive Disease during Anti-PD-1 (PDCD1) / PD-L1 (CD274) Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a recently acknowledged pattern of rapid tumor progression after the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors. HPD has been observed across various types of tumors and has been associated with poor survival. We performed a meta-analysis to identify baseline (i.e., prior to programmed cell death 1 [PD-1, PDCD1] / programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 [PD-L1, CD274] inhibitor therapy) patient factors associated with risks of developing HPD during PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. We searched eight databases until 6 June 2019. We calculated the summary odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model and explored between-study heterogeneity and small-study effects. A total of nine articles was eligible (217 HPD cases, 1519 cancer patients) for meta-analysis. There was no standard definition of HPD, and the incidence of HPD ranged from 1 to 30%. We identified twenty-three baseline patient factors, of which five factors were statistically significantly associated with HPD. These were serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) above the upper normal limit (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.02-3.49, p = 0.043), more than two metastatic sites (OR = 1.86, 1.34-2.57, p &lt; 0.001), liver metastases (OR = 3.33, 2.07-5.34, p &lt; 0.001), Royal Marsden Hospital prognostic score of 2 or above (OR = 3.33, 1.96-5.66, p &lt; 0.001), and positive PD-L1 expression status that was inversely correlated with HPD (OR = 0.60, 0.36-0.99, p = 0.044). Between-study heterogeneity was low. Evidence of small-study effect was found in one association (PD-L1 expression). Subset analyses of patients with non-small cell lung cancer showed similar results. Future studies are warranted to identify underlying molecular mechanisms and to test their roles as predictive biomarkers of HPD

HDAC Inhibition to Prime Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immunotherapy has made a breakthrough in medical oncology with the approval of several immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical routine, improving overall survival of advanced cancer patients with refractory disease. However only a minority of patients experience a durable response with these agents, which has led to the development of combination strategies and novel immunotherapy drugs to further counteract tumor immune escape. Epigenetic regulations can be altered in oncogenesis, favoring tumor progression. The development of epidrugs has allowed targeting successfully these altered epigenetic patterns in lymphoma and leukemia patients. It has been recently shown that epigenetic alterations can also play a key role in tumor immune escape. Epidrugs, like HDAC inhibitors, can prime the anti-tumor immune response, therefore constituting interesting partners to develop combination strategies with immunotherapy agents. In this review, we will discuss epigenetic regulations involved in oncogenesis and immune escape and describe the clinical development of combining HDAC inhibitors with immunotherapies

Pembrolizumab in cervical cancer: latest evidence and clinical usefulness

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. With the development of detection of precancerous lesions and preventive human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program, a survival improvement has been observed in these patients in developed countries, although disparities in accessibility to treatments exist across countries. While early-stage cervical cancer can be curable with surgery, prognosis of patients who recur remains poor, with limited treatment options. In this latter setting, recently, bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has been shown to improve overall survival in combination with chemotherapy as compared with chemotherapy alone. No standard treatments exist beyond this treatment regimen. New effective treatments are therefore much needed in this setting. Immunotherapy has represented a breakthrough in recent years in oncology, with antitumor activity reported with immune-checkpoint inhibitors in a variety of tumor types. We discuss here the latest evidence and clinical usefulness of pembrolizumab, anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor, in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer

Antibody drug conjugates: The future of chemotherapy?

International audiencePurpose of review The current review describes the rationale and current clinical development of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), along with their perspectives for the future. Recent findings Trastuzumab emtansine was the first ADC approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive metastatic breast cancer in the second-line setting, with a high efficacy and a favorable safety profile. ADC represents an exciting new class of cancer therapeutics that combines a targeted approach for delivering cytotoxic agents. About 30 new ADCs are currently under investigation in oncology. Summary ADCs are empowered antibodies designed to exploit the targeting ability of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) by linking them to cytotoxic agents, giving them higher tumor selectivity, and potentially an increased therapeutic window, as compared with cytotoxic agents alone. The key components of ADCs include a mAb, a stable linker and a cytotoxic agent. In linking mAbs with cytotoxic agents, the aim is to optimize the properties of both components, bringing their complementary features together. Trastuzumab emtansine has been the first ADC to be marketed in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive metastatic breast cancer. Current clinical development of ADCs includes a variety of targets, as well as combinations with other therapeutic agents, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors

Hyperprogression under Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy is now widely prescribed in oncology, leading to the observation of new types of responses, including rapid disease progression sometimes reported as hyperprogression. However, only a few studies have assessed the question of hyperprogression and there is no consensual definition of this phenomenon. We reviewed existing data on hyperprogression in published studies, focusing on reported definitions, predictive factors, and potential biological mechanisms. Seven studies retrospectively assessed hyperprogression incidence, using various definitions, some based on the tumoral burden variation across time with repeated computed-tomography (CT) scan, others based on an association of radiological and clinical criteria. Reported hyperprogression incidence varied between 4% and 29% of all responses, mostly in multi-tumor cohorts and with patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Hyperprogression correlated with worse chances of survival than standard progression in two studies. However, no strong predictive factors of hyperprogression were identified, and none were consistent across studies. In total, hyperprogression is a frequent pattern of response under immunotherapy, with a strong impact on patient outcome. There is a need for a consensual definition of hyperprogression. Immunotherapy should be stopped early in cases where there is suspicion of hyperprogression

HDAC Inhibition to Prime Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immunotherapy has made a breakthrough in medical oncology with the approval of several immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical routine, improving overall survival of advanced cancer patients with refractory disease. However only a minority of patients experience a durable response with these agents, which has led to the development of combination strategies and novel immunotherapy drugs to further counteract tumor immune escape. Epigenetic regulations can be altered in oncogenesis, favoring tumor progression. The development of epidrugs has allowed targeting successfully these altered epigenetic patterns in lymphoma and leukemia patients. It has been recently shown that epigenetic alterations can also play a key role in tumor immune escape. Epidrugs, like HDAC inhibitors, can prime the anti-tumor immune response, therefore constituting interesting partners to develop combination strategies with immunotherapy agents. In this review, we will discuss epigenetic regulations involved in oncogenesis and immune escape and describe the clinical development of combining HDAC inhibitors with immunotherapies

First‐line cetuximab + platinum‐based therapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A real‐world observational study—ENCORE

Abstract Background ENCORE, an observational, prospective, open‐label study, investigated real‐world treatment practices and outcomes with cetuximab plus platinum‐based therapy (PBT) in first‐line (1L) recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). Aims This multinational study aimed to investigate the long‐term use of cetuximab plus PBT for 1L R/M SCCHN in a clinical setting. In particular, this study aimed to explore clinical considerations such as the decision to prescribe cetuximab plus PBT in R/M SCCHN, the mode and duration of treatment, and patient outcomes. Methods and Results Previously untreated patients with R/M SCCHN whose planned treatment was cetuximab plus PBT were enrolled from 6 countries. Among 221 evaluable patients, planned treatments included cetuximab plus carboplatin (31.2%), cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (31.7%), or carboplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (23.1%); 3.2% included a taxane, and 45.2% did not include 5‐fluorouracil. Cetuximab treatment was planned for a fixed duration (≤24 weeks) in 15 patients (6.8%) and until disease progression in 206 (93.2%). Median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 6.5 and 10.8 months, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 39.8% of patients. Serious adverse events occurred in 25.8% of patients; 5.4% were cetuximab‐related. Conclusion In patients with R/M SCCHN, first‐line cetuximab plus PBT was feasible and modifiable in a real‐world setting with similar toxicity and efficacy as in the pivotal phase III EXTREME trial. Clinical trial registration number: EMR 062202‐566

Inhibition of PI3K pathway increases immune infiltrate in muscle-invasive bladder cancer

International audienceAlthough immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown improvement in survival in comparison to chemotherapy in urothelial bladder cancer, many patients still fail to respond to these treatments and actual efforts are made to identify predictive factors of response to immunotherapy. Understanding the tumor-intrinsic molecular basis, like oncogenic pathways conditioning the presence or absence of tumor-infiltrating T cells (TILs), should provide a new rationale for improved anti-tumor immune therapies. In this study, we found that urothelial bladder cancer from human samples bearing PIK3CA gene mutations was significantly associated with lower expression of a defined immune gene signature, compared to unmutated ones. We identified a reduced 10-gene immune gene signature that discriminates muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) samples according to immune infiltration and PIK3CA mutation. Using a humanized mouse model, we observed that BKM120, a pan-PI3K inhibitor, significantly inhibited the growth of a human bladder cancer cell line bearing a PIK3CA mutation, associated to increased immune cell infiltration (hCD45+). Using qRT-PCR, we also found an increase in the expression of chemokines and immune genes in PIK3CA-mutated tumors from mice treated with BKM120, reflecting an active immune infiltrate in comparison to untreated ones. Moreover, the addition of BKM120 rendered PIK3CA-mutated tumors sensitive to PD-1 blockade. Our results provide a relevant rationale for combination strategies of PI3K inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors to overcome resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune gene expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients

International audienceBackground: Nivolumab and pembrolizumab targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have recently been approved among patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who failed platinum therapy. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of selected immune gene expression in HNSCC.Patients and methods: We retrospectively assessed the expression of 46 immune-related genes and immune-cell subpopulation genes including immune checkpoints by real-time polymerase chain reaction among 96 patients with HNSCC who underwent primary surgery at Institut Curie between 1990 and 2006. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the prognostic value of dysregulated genes.Results: The Median age of the population was 56 years [range: 35-78]. Primary tumour location was oral cavity (45%), oropharynx (21%), larynx (18%) and hypopharynx (17%). Twelve patients (13%) had an oropharyngeal human papillomavirus-positive tumour. Most significantly overexpressed immune-related genes were TNFRSF9/4-1BB (77%), IDO1 (75%), TNFSF4/OX40L (74%) and TNFRSF18/GITR (74%), and immune-cell subpopulation gene was FOXP3 (62%). Eighty-five percent of tumours analysed overexpressed actionable immunity genes, including PD-1/PD-L1, TIGIT, OX40/OX40L and/or CTLA4. Among the immune-related genes, high OX40L mRNA level (p = 0.0009) and low PD-1 mRNA level (p = 0.004) were associated with the highest risk of recurrence. Among the immune-cell subpopulation genes, patients with high PDGFRB mRNA level (p < 0.0001) and low CD3E (p = 0.0009) or CD8A mRNA levels (p = 0.004) were also at the highest risk of recurrence.Conclusions: OX40L and PDGFRB overexpression was associated with poor outcomes, whereas PD-1 overexpression was associated with good prognosis in patients with HNSCC treated with primary surgery, suggesting their relevance as potential prognostic biomarkers and major therapeutic targets