8 research outputs found
Mycobacterial disease in patients with rheumatic disease.
Item does not contain fulltextThis Review focuses on the emergence of mycobacterial disease in patients undergoing treatment for rheumatic disease with four new drug classes--tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, human interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonists, anti-CD20 antibodies and CD4(+) T-cell costimulation modulators--collectively referred to as biologic agents. Mycobacterial disease is a major cause of severe infection in patients undergoing anti-TNF therapy. Reports are now emerging of an association between mycobacterial infection and antirheumatic treatment with anti-IL-1 or anti-CD20 antibodies. Although tuberculosis is the most common mycobacterial disease, nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease is an increasingly recognized problem in this setting. Among the antirheumatic drugs currently in development, agents that target IL-17, IL-23, Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription signaling, and metalloproteinases are likely to confer an increased risk of mycobacterial disease. Although screening and preventive treatments have lowered the incidence of active tuberculosis, these tools are not applicable to patients with NTM disease. All patients receiving drugs associated with an increased risk of mycobacterial disease should be carefully monitored, and suspect lesions should undergo Mycobacterium culture. Further studies are needed to determine the prevalence of NTM disease in this setting, and to evaluate the safety of simultaneous anti-TNF and antimycobacterial treatment
Recommended from our members
A pilot external quality assurance study of transfusion screening for HIV, HCV and HBsAG in 12 African countries
Background and Objectives: Serologic screening for the major transfusion transmissible viruses (TTV) is critical to blood safety and has been widely implemented. However, actual performance as measured by proficiency testing has not been well studied in sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, we conducted an external quality assessment of laboratories engaged in transfusion screening in the region. Materials and Methods: Blinded test panels, each comprising 25 serum samples that were pedigreed for HIV, HBsAg, HCV and negative status, were sent to participating laboratories. The panels were tested using the laboratories' routine donor screening methods and conditions. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated, and multivariable analysis was used to compare performance against mode of testing, country and infrastructure. Results: A total of 12 African countries and 44 laboratories participated in the study. The mean (range) sensitivities for HIV, HBsAg and HCV were 91路9% (14路3-100), 86路7% (42路9-100) and 90路1% (50-100), respectively. Mean specificities for HIV, HBsAg and HCV were 97路7%, 97% and 99路5%, respectively. After adjusting for country and infrastructure, rapid tests had significantly lower sensitivity than enzyme immunoassays for both HBsAg (P < 0路0001) and HCV (P < 0路05). Sensitivity also varied by country and selected infrastructure variables. Conclusion: While specificity was high, sensitivity was more variable and deficient in a substantial number of testing laboratories. These findings underscore the importance of proficiency testing and quality control, particularly in Africa where TTV prevalence is high
Recommended from our members
A pilot external quality assurance study of transfusion screening for HIV, HCV and HBsAG in 12 African countries
Background and Objectives: Serologic screening for the major transfusion transmissible viruses (TTV) is critical to blood safety and has been widely implemented. However, actual performance as measured by proficiency testing has not been well studied in sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, we conducted an external quality assessment of laboratories engaged in transfusion screening in the region. Materials and Methods: Blinded test panels, each comprising 25 serum samples that were pedigreed for HIV, HBsAg, HCV and negative status, were sent to participating laboratories. The panels were tested using the laboratories' routine donor screening methods and conditions. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated, and multivariable analysis was used to compare performance against mode of testing, country and infrastructure. Results: A total of 12 African countries and 44 laboratories participated in the study. The mean (range) sensitivities for HIV, HBsAg and HCV were 91路9% (14路3-100), 86路7% (42路9-100) and 90路1% (50-100), respectively. Mean specificities for HIV, HBsAg and HCV were 97路7%, 97% and 99路5%, respectively. After adjusting for country and infrastructure, rapid tests had significantly lower sensitivity than enzyme immunoassays for both HBsAg (P < 0路0001) and HCV (P < 0路05). Sensitivity also varied by country and selected infrastructure variables. Conclusion: While specificity was high, sensitivity was more variable and deficient in a substantial number of testing laboratories. These findings underscore the importance of proficiency testing and quality control, particularly in Africa where TTV prevalence is high