Do differences in understory light contribute to species distributions along a tropical rainfall gradient?

In tropical forests, regional differences in annual rainfall correlate with differences in plant species composition. Although water availability is clearly one factor determining species distribution, other environmental variables that covary with rainfall may contribute to distributions. One such variable is light availability in the understory, which decreases towards wetter forests due to differences in canopy density and phenology. We established common garden experiments in three sites along a rainfall gradient across the Isthmus of Panama in order to measure the differences in understory light availability, and to evaluate their influence on the performance of 24 shade-tolerant species with contrasting distributions. Within sites, the effect of understory light availability on species performance depended strongly on water availability. When water was not limiting, either naturally in the wetter site or through water supplementation in drier sites, seedling performance improved at higher light. In contrast, when water was limiting at the drier sites, seedling performance was reduced at higher light, presumably due to an increase in water stress that affected mostly wet-distribution species. Although wetter forest understories were on average darker, wet-distribution species were not more shade-tolerant than dry-distribution species. Instead, wet-distribution species had higher absolute growth rates and, when water was not limiting, were better able to take advantage of small increases in light than dry-distribution species. Our results suggest that in wet forests the ability to grow fast during temporary increases in light may be a key trait for successful recruitment. The slower growth rates of the dry-distribution species, possibly due to trade-offs associated with greater drought tolerance, may exclude these species from wetter forests

Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systems

sequential systems, simultaneous systems Abstract. The rate and extent to which biophysical resources are captured and utilized by the components of an agroforestry system are determined by the nature and intensity of interac-tions between the components. The net effect of these interactions is often determined by the influence of the tree component on the other component(s) and/or on the overall system, and is expressed in terms of such quantifiable responses as soil fertility changes, microclimate modification, resource (water, nutrients, and light) availability and utilization, pest and disease incidence, and allelopathy. The paper reviews such manifestations of biophysical interactions in major simultaneous (e.g., hedgerow intercropping and trees on croplands) and sequential (e.g., planted tree fallows) agroforestry systems. In hedgerow intercropping (HI), the hedge/crop interactions are dominated by soil fertility improvement and competition for growth resources. Higher crop yields in HI than in sole cropping are noted mostly in inherently fertile soils in humid and subhumid tropics, and are caused by large fertility improvement relative to the effects of competition. But, yield increases are rare in semiarid tropics and infertile acid soils because fertility improvement does not offse

Methods to assess tropical rain forest canopy structure: an overview

Forest canopy structure (sensu latu) is the combination of forest texture (the qualitative and quantitative composition of the vegetation as to different morphological elements), and forest structure (sensu strictu, the spatial arrangement of these elements). Scale is an aspect of major importance. At a regional scale forest types can be distinguished, like broadleaf or coniferous forest. At local scale, distribution and size and shape of tree crowns, and the spatial distribution of leaves and branches within tree crowns determine to a large extent the canopy structure. Which components and sub-components are used, and also the scale at which their spatial arrangements are studied, is of great importance for the possible outcome of the analysis of canopy structure. This is specially the case when canopy structure is needed as a correlate to ecological questions, e.g., on habitat specificity of animals, or epiphytes. Methods available for describing and analysing canopy structure are discussed. At large scale levels remote sensing data are used to describe differences in structure. High-resolution radar images are used to describe canopy structure in detail and over large areas. Repeated measurements over time can be used for monitoring purposes. Ways to measure the three dimensional structure of (components within) individual trees in detail are being developed, and are coupled to physiological models. Currently, use of such methods is only feasible for small plants. Forest tomography (where the vegetation occupation and empty spaces are determined in horizontal and vertical slices of the forest) is proposed as a way to describe vertical and horizontal structure. Vegetation cover and occupation is analysed above grid points in a forest. As an example the vertical structure of a Cameroonian forest is described at several levels of detail. The research question asked should govern completely the choice of the parameters and the methods used for the description of forest canopy structure

Unexpected phenology and lifespan of shallow and deep fine roots of walnut trees grown in a silvoarable Mediterranean agroforestry system

International audienceBackground and Aims Fine roots play a major role in the global carbon cycle through respiration, exudation and decomposition processes, but their dynamics are poorly understood. Current estimates of root dynamics have principally been observed in shallow soil horizons (< 1 m), and mainly in forest systems. We studied walnut (Juglans regia x nigra L.) fine root dynamics in an agroforestry system in a Mediterranean climate, with a focus on deep soils (down to 5 m), and root dynamics throughout the year. Methods Sixteen minirhizotron tubes were installed in a soil pit, at depths of 0.0-0.7, 1.0-1.7, 2.5-3.2 and 4.0-4.7 m and at two distances from the nearest trees (2 and 5 m). Fine root (diameter 2.5 m. Conclusions The unexpected growth of very deep fine roots during the winter months, which is unusual for a deciduous tree species, suggests that deep and shallow roots share different physiological strategies and that current estimates based on the shortest root growth periods (i.e., during spring and summer) may be underestimating root production. Although high fine root turnover rates might partially result from the minirhizotron approach used, our results help gain insight into some of the factors driving soil organic carbon content