16 research outputs found

    Duloxetine Inhibits Effects of MDMA (“Ecstasy") In Vitro and in Humans in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Laboratory Study

    Get PDF
    This study assessed the effects of the serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporter inhibitor duloxetine on the effects of 3,4–methylenedioxy­methamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) in vitro and in 16 healthy subjects. The clinical study used a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, four-session, crossover design. In vitro, duloxetine blocked the release of both 5-HT and NE by MDMA or by its metabolite 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine from transmitter-loaded human cells expressing the 5-HT or NE transporter. In humans, duloxetine inhibited the effects of MDMA including elevations in circulating NE, increases in blood pressure and heart rate, and the subjective drug effects. Duloxetine inhibited the pharmacodynamic response to MDMA despite an increase in duloxetine-associated elevations in plasma MDMA levels. The findings confirm the important role of MDMA-induced 5-HT and NE release in the psychotropic effects of MDMA. Duloxetine may be useful in the treatment of psychostimulant dependence

    Gene expression analysis indicates CB1 receptor upregulation in the hippocampus and neurotoxic effects in the frontal cortex 3 weeks after single-dose MDMA administration in Dark Agouti rats.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy") is a widely used recreational drug known to impair cognitive functions on the long-run. Both hippocampal and frontal cortical regions have well established roles in behavior, memory formation and other cognitive tasks and damage of these regions is associated with altered behavior and cognitive functions, impairments frequently described in heavy MDMA users. The aim of this study was to examine the hippocampus, frontal cortex and dorsal raphe of Dark Agouti rats with gene expression arrays (Illumina RatRef bead arrays) looking for possible mechanisms and new candidates contributing to the effects of a single dose of MDMA (15 mg/kg) 3 weeks earlier. RESULTS: The number of differentially expressed genes in the hippocampus, frontal cortex and the dorsal raphe were 481, 155, and 15, respectively. Gene set enrichment analysis of the microarray data revealed reduced expression of 'memory' and 'cognition', 'dendrite development' and 'regulation of synaptic plasticity' gene sets in the hippocampus, parallel to the upregulation of the CB1 cannabinoid- and Epha4, Epha5, Epha6 ephrin receptors. Downregulated gene sets in the frontal cortex were related to protein synthesis, chromatin organization, transmembrane transport processes, while 'dendrite development', 'regulation of synaptic plasticity' and 'positive regulation of synapse assembly' gene sets were upregulated. Changes in the dorsal raphe region were mild and in most cases not significant. CONCLUSION: The present data raise the possibility of new synapse formation/synaptic reorganization in the frontal cortex three weeks after a single neurotoxic dose of MDMA. In contrast, a prolonged depression of new neurite formation in the hippocampus is suggested by the data, which underlines the particular vulnerability of this brain region after the drug treatment. Finally, our results also suggest the substantial contribution of CB1 receptor and endocannabinoid mediated pathways in the hippocampal impairments. Taken together the present study provides evidence for the participation of new molecular candidates in the long-term effects of MDMA

    Molecular gated nanoporous anodic alumina for the detection of cocaine

    Full text link
    [EN] We present herein the use of nanoporous anodic alumina (NAA) as a suitable support to implement molecular gates for sensing applications. In our design, a NAA support is loaded with a fluorescent reporter (rhodamine B) and functionalized with a short single-stranded DNA. Then pores are blocked by the subsequent hybridisation of a specific cocaine aptamer. The response of the gated material was studied in aqueous solution. In a typical experiment, the support was immersed in hybridisation buffer solution in the absence or presence of cocaine. At certain times, the release of rhodamine B from pore voids was measured by fluorescence spectroscopy. The capped NAA support showed poor cargo delivery, but presence of cocaine in the solution selectively induced rhodamine B release. By this simple procedure a limit of detection as low as 5 × 10−7 M was calculated for cocaine. The gated NAA was successfully applied to detect cocaine in saliva samples and the possible re-use of the nanostructures was assessed. Based on these results, we believe that NAA could be a suitable support to prepare optical gated probes with a synergic combination of the favourable features of selected gated sensing systems and NAA.We thank Projects MAT2015-64139-C4-1-R and TEC2015-71324-R (MINECO/FEDER), the Catalan Government (Project 2014 SGR 1344), the ICREA (ICREA2014 Academia Award) and the Generalitat Valenciana (Project PROMETEOII/2014/047) for support. We also thank to the Agencia Espanola del Medicamento y Productos Sanitarios for its concessions. A.R. thanks the UPV for her predoctoral fellowship. The authors also thank the Electron Microscopy Service at UPV for support.Ribes, À.; Xifre Perez, E.; Aznar, E.; Sancenón Galarza, F.; Pardo Vicente, MT.; Marsal, LF.; Martínez-Máñez, R. (2016). Molecular gated nanoporous anodic alumina for the detection of cocaine. Scientific Reports. 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38649S386496Nadrah, P., Planinšek, O. & Gaberšček, M. Stimulus-responsive Mesoporous Silica Particles. J. Mater. Sci. 49, 481–495 (2014).Baeza, A., Colilla, M. & Vallet-Regí, M. Advances in Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Targeted Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 12, 319–337 (2015).Karimi, M., Mirshekari, H., Aliakbari, M., Zangabad, P. S. & Hamblin, M. R. Smart Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Controlled-Release Drug Delivery. Nanotech. Rev. 5, 195–207 (2016).Aznar, E. et al. Gated Materials for On-Command Release of Guest Molecules. Chem. Rev. 116, 561−718 (2016).Sancenón, F., Pascual, Ll., Oroval, M., Aznar, E. & Martínez-Máñez, R. Gated Silica Mesoporous Materials in Sensing Applications. Chemistry Open. 4, 418–437 (2015).Lu, C.-H., Willner, B. & Willner, I. DNA nanotechnology: From sensing and DNA machines to drug-delivery systems. ACSNano 7, 8320–8332 (2013).Klajn, R., Stoddart, J. F. & Grzybowski, B. A. Nanoparticles Functionalized With Reversible Molecular And Supramolecular Switches. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 2203–2237 (2010).Wei, R., Martin, T. G., Rant, U. & Dietz, H. DNA Origami Gatekeepers for Solid-State Nanopores. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 4864 4867 (2012).Zhu, C. L., Lu, C. H., Song, X. Y., Yang, H. H. & Wang, X. R. Bioresponsive Controlled Release Using Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Capped with Aptamer-Based Molecular Gate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1278–1281 (2011).Özalp, V. C., Pinto, A., Nikulina, E., Chulivin, A. & Schäfer, T. In Situ Monitoring of DNA-Aptavalve Gating Function on Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. Part. Part. Sys. Charact. 31, 161–167 (2014).Choi, Y. L., Jaworski, J., Seo, M. L., Lee, S. J. & Jung, J. H. Controlled release using mesoporous silica nanoparticles functionalized with 18-crown-6 derivative. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 7882–7885 (2011).Zhang, Z., Wang, F., Balogh, D. & Willner, I. pH-controlled release of substrates from mesoporous SiO2 nanoparticles gated by metal ion-dependent DNAzymes. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2, 4449–4455 (2014).Fu, L. et al. Portable and Quantitative Monitoring of Heavy Metal Ions Using Dnazyme-Capped Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with a Glucometer Readout. J. Mater. Chem. B. 1, 6123–6128 (2013).Díez, P. et al. Toward the Design of Smart Delivery Systems Controlled by Integrated Enzyme-Based Biocomputing Ensembles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9116–9123 (2014).Tang, D. et al. Low-Cost and Highly Sensitive lmmunosensing Platform for Aflatoxins Using One-Step Competitive Displacement Reaction Mode and Portable Glucometer-Based Detection. Anal. Chem. 86, 11451–11458 (2014).Hou, L., Zhu, C., Wu, X., Chen, G. & Tang, D. Bioresponsive Controlled Release from Mesoporous Silica Nanocontainers with Glucometer Readout. Chem. Commun. 50, 1441–1443 (2014).Chen, Z. et al. Stimulus-response mesoporous silica nanoparticle-based chemiluminescence biosensor for cocaine determination. Biosens. Bioelectro. 75, 8–14 (2016).Pascual, L. L. et al. Oligonucleotide-Capped Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as DNA-Responsive Dye Delivery Systems for Genomic DNA Detection. Chem. Commun. 51, 1414–1416 (2015).Qian, R., Ding, I. & Ju, H. Switchable Fluorescent Imaging of Intracellular Telomerase Activity Using Telomerase-Responsive Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 13282–13285 (2013).Ren, K., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., Yan, F. & Ju, H. Proximity Hybridization Regulated DNA Biogate for Sensitive Electrochemical Immunoassay. Anal. Chem. 86, 7494–7499 (2014).Chen, Y., Santos, A., Wang, Y., Wang, C. & Losic, D. Biomimetic Nanoporous Anodic Alumina Distributed Bragg Reflectors in the Form of Films and Microsized Particles for Sensing Applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 7, 19816–19824 (2015).Aw, M. S., Bariana, M. & Losic, D. In Nanoporous Alumina. Fabrication, Structure, Properties and Applications (ed. Losic, D., Santos, A. ) 319–354 (Springer International Publishing, 2015).Urteaga, R. & Berli, C. L. In Nanoporous Alumina. Fabrication, Structure, Properties and Applications (ed. Losic, D., Santos, A. ) 249–269 (Springer International Publishing, 2015).Vojkuvka, L., Marsal, L. F., Ferré-Borrull, J., Formentin, P. & Pallarés, J. Self-Ordered Porous Alumina Membranes with Large Lattice Constant Fabricated by Hard Anodization. Superlattices Microstruct. 44, 577–582 (2008).De la Escosura-Muñiz, A. & Merkoçi, A. Nanochannels Preparation and Application in Biosensing. ACS Nano. 6, 7556–7583 (2012).Kumeria, T. et al. Nanoporous Anodic Alumina Rugate Filters for Sensing of Ionic Mercury: Toward Environmental Point-of-Analysis Systems. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 6, 12971−12978 (2014).Santos, A., Kumeria, T. & Losic, D. Nanoporous Anodic Alumina: A Versatile Platform for Optical Biosensors. Materials. 7, 4297–4320 (2014).Ferré-Borrull, J., Pallarès, J., Macías, G. & Marsal, L. F. Nanostructural Engineering of Nanoporous Anodic Alumina for Biosensing Applications. Materials. 7, 5225–5253 (2014).Gong, D., Yadavalli, V., Paulose, M., Pishko, M. & Grimes, C. A. Controlled Molecular Release Using Nanoporous Alumina Capsules. Biomed Microdevices. 5, 75–80 (2003).Alvarez, S. D., Li, C.-P., Chiang, C. E., Schuller, I. K. & Sailor, M. J. A Label-Free Porous Alumina Interferometric Immunosensor. ACSNano. 3, 3301–3307 (2009).Krismastuti, F. S. H., Bayat, H., Voelcker, N. H. & Schönherr, H. Real Time Monitoring of Layer-by-Layer Polyelectrolyte Deposition and Bacterial Enzyme Detection in Nanoporous Anodized Aluminum Oxide Anal. Chem. 87, 3856–3863 (2015).Ma, D.-L. et al. A Luminescent Cocaine Detection Platform Using a Split G-Quadruplex-Selective Iridium (III) Complex and a Three-Way DNA Junction Architecture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 7, 19060−19067 (2015).Kohli, P. et al. DNA-Functionalized Nanotube Membranes with Single-Base Mismatch Selectivity. Science 305, 984–986 (2004).Abelow, A. E. et al. Biomimetic glass nanopores employing aptamer gates responsive to a small molecule. Chem. Commun. 46, 7984–7986 (2010).Ma, D.-L., Chan, D. S.-H. & Leung, C.-H. Group 9 Organometallic Compounds for Therapeutic and Bioanalytical Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 3614–3631 (2014).Wanga, G., Zhua, Y., Chena, L. & Zhanga, X. Photoinduced electron transfer (PET) based label-free aptasensor for platelet-derived growth factor-BB and its logic gate application. Biosens. Bioelectron. 63, 552–557 (2015).Laptenko, O. et al. The p53 C Terminus Controls Site-Specific DNA Binding and Promotes Structural Changes within the Central DNA Binding Domain. Molec. Cell. 57, 1034–1046 (2015).McKeague, M. & DeRosa, M. C. Challenges and Opportunities for Small Molecule Aptamer Development. J. Nucleic Acids. 2012, 1–20 (2012).McKeague, M. et al. Analysis of In Vitro Aptamer Selection Parameters, J. Mol. Evol. 81, 150–161 (2015).Ellington, A. D. & Szostak, J. W. In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature. 346, 818–822 (1990).Wochner, A. et al. A DNA aptamer with high affinity and specificity for therapeutic anthracyclines. Anal Biochem. 373, 34–42 (2008).Song, K. M., Jeong, E., Jeon, W., Cho, M. & Ban, C. Aptasensor for ampicillin using gold nanoparticle based dual fluorescence-colorimetric methods. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 402, 2153–2161 (2012).Özalp, V. C. & Schäfer, T. Aptamer-Based Switchable Nanovalves for Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 9893–9896 (2011).Stojanovic, M. N., de Prada, P. & Landry, D. W. Aptamer-Based Folding Fluorescent Sensor for Cocaine. J. Am. Chem Soc. 123, 4928–4931 (2001).Wen, Y. et al. DNA-based intelligent logic controlled release systems. Chem. Commun. 48, 8410–8412 (2012).Chen, L. et al. Programmable DNA switch for bioresponsive controlled release. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 13811–13816 (2011).Oroval, M. et al. An aptamer-gated silica mesoporous material for thrombin detection. Chem. Commun. 49, 5480–5482 (2013).Barroso, M., Gallardo, E. & Queiroz, J. A. Bioanalytical methods for the determination of cocaine and metabolites in human biological samples. Bioanalysis. 1, 977–1000 (2009).Phan, H. M., Yoshizuka, K., Murry, D. J. & Perry, P. J. Drug testing in the workplace. Pharmacotherapy. 32, 649–656 (2012).Kidwell, D. A., Blanco, M. A. & P. Smith, F. P. Cocaine detection in a university population by hair analysis and skin swab testing. Forensic Sci. Int. 84, 75–86 (1997).Swensen, J. S. et al. Continuous, Real-Time Monitoring of Cocaine in Undiluted Blood Serum via a Microfluidic, Electrochemical Aptamer-Based Sensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 4262–4266 (2009).Cai, Q. et al. Determination of cocaine on banknotes through an aptamer-based electrochemiluminescence biosensor. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 400, 289–294 (2011).Zou, R. et al. Highly specific triple-fragment aptamer for optical detection of cocaine. RSC Adv. 2, 4636–4638 (2012).Qiu, L. et al. A novel label-free fluorescence aptamer-based sensor method for cocaine detection based on isothermal circular strand-displacement amplification and graphene oxide absorption. New J. Chem. 37, 3998 (2013).Marsal, L. F., Vojkuvka, L., Formentin, P., Pallarés, J. & Ferré-Borrull, J. Fabrication and Optical Characterization of Nanoporous Alumina Films Annealed at Different Temperatures. Optical Mater. 31, 860–864 (2009).Bosker, W. M. & Huestis, M. A. Oral Fluid Testing for Drugs of Abuse. Clinical Chem. 55, 1910–1931 (2009).Kolbrich, E. A. et al. Cozart® RapiScan Oral Fluid Drug Testing System: An Evaluation of Sensitivity, Specificity, and Efficiency for Cocaine Detection Compared with ELISA and GC-MS Following Controlled Cocaine Administration. J. Anal Toxicol. 27, 407–411 (2003).Cooper, G., Wilson, L., Reid, C., Main, L. & Hand, C. Evaluation of the Cozart® RapiScan drug test system for opiates and cocaine in oral fluid. Forensic Sci. Int. 150, 239–243 (2005).Chang, Y. H. et al. Cocaine detection by a mid-infrared waveguide integrated with a microfluidic chip. Lab Chip. 12, 3020–3023 (2012).Walczak, R. et al. Toward Portable Instrumentation for Quantitative Cocaine Detection with Lab-on-a-Paper and Hybrid Optical Readout. Procedia Chem. 1, 999–1002 (2009).Qiu, L. et al. A novel label-free fluorescence aptamer-based sensor method for cocaine detection based on isothermal circular strand-displacement amplification and graphene oxide absorption. New J. Chem. 37, 3998–4003 (2013)

    Involvement of inferior parietal lobules in prospective memory impairment during acute MDMA (ecstasy) intoxication: an event-related fMRI study

    Get PDF
    Prospective memory refers to the realization of delayed intentions. Several studies have shown that 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA) users perform worse on measures of prospective memory as compared to nondrug users. Interpretation of these data may be limited because of polydrug use, psychosocial stressors, and increased psychopathology that have been reported in MDMA users. This study was designed to directly assess the pharmacological effect of MDMA on prospective memory and brain activity in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Twelve recreational MDMA users received MDMA 75 mg and placebo and performed an objective prospective memory task during functional imaging. During prospective memory task performance subjects were engaged in a foreground task that consisted of a simple reaction time to visual stimuli (Go trials) and a prospective task of withholding a response during trials that were part of a dynamic memory set (No go trials). Behavioral data showed that a single dose of MDMA increased prospective memory failures in the No go trials, and that number of prospective memory failures was positively correlated to MDMA concentration in plasma. Functional imaging showed that MDMA decreased BOLD activation during Go trials in the thalamus (left), putamen (left), precuneus (left), and the inferior parietal lobules (bilateral), as compared to placebo. During No go trials, MDMA reduced BOLD deactivation in the inferior parietal lobules (bilateral), as compared to placebo. It is concluded that the loss of deactivation in inferior parietal lobules may account for increments in memory failures observed during MDMA intoxication
    corecore