325 research outputs found

    Canonical Filtrations of Gorenstein Injective Modules

    Full text link
    The principle "Every result in classical homological algebra should have a counterpart in Gorenstein homological algebra" is given in [3]. There is a remarkable body of evidence supporting this claim (cf. [2] and [3]). Perhaps one of the most glaring exceptions is provided by the fact that tensor products of Gorenstein projective modules need not be Gorenstein projective, even over Gorenstein rings. So perhaps it is surprising that tensor products of Gorenstein injective modules over Gorenstein rings of finite Krull dimension are Gorenstein injective. Our main result is in support of the principle. Over commutative, noetherian rings injective modules have direct sum decompositions into indecomposable modules. We will show that Gorenstein injective modules over Gorenstein rings of finite Krull dimension have filtrations analogous to those provided by these decompositions. This result will then provide us with the tools to prove that all tensor products of Gorenstein injective modules over these rings are Gorenstein injective.Comment: 9 pages; It has been accepted for publication in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Societ

    Transfinite tree quivers and their representations

    Full text link
    The idea of "vertex at the infinity" naturally appears when studying indecomposable injective representations of tree quivers. In this paper we formalize this behavior and find the structure of all the indecomposable injective representations of a tree quiver of size an arbitrary cardinal κ\kappa. As a consequence the structure of injective representations of noetherian κ\kappa-trees is completely determined. In the second part we will consider the problem whether arbitrary trees are source injective representation quivers or not.Comment: to appear in Mathematica Scandinavic

    Deconstructibility and the Hill lemma in Grothendieck categories

    Full text link
    A full subcategory of a Grothendieck category is called deconstructible if it consists of all transfinite extensions of some set of objects. This concept provides a handy framework for structure theory and construction of approximations for subcategories of Grothendieck categories. It also allows to construct model structures and t-structures on categories of complexes over a Grothendieck category. In this paper we aim to establish fundamental results on deconstructible classes and outline how to apply these in the areas mentioned above. This is related to recent work of Gillespie, Enochs, Estrada, Guil Asensio, Murfet, Neeman, Prest, Trlifaj and others.Comment: 20 pages; version 2: minor changes, misprints corrected, references update

    Locally projective monoidal model structure for complexes of quasi-coherent sheaves on P^1(k)

    Full text link
    We will generalize the projective model structure in the category of unbounded complexes of modules over a commutative ring to the category of unbounded complexes of quasi-coherent sheaves over the projective line. Concretely we will define a locally projective model structure in the category of complexes of quasi-coherent sheaves on the projective line. In this model structure the cofibrant objects are the dg-locally projective complexes. We also describe the fibrations of this model structure and show that the model structure is monoidal. We point out that this model structure is necessarily different from other known model structures such as the injective model structure and the locally free model structure

    Balance with Unbounded Complexes

    Get PDF
    Given a double complex XX there are spectral sequences with the E2E_2 terms being either HI_I (HII(X))_{II}(X)) or HII(_{II}(HI(X))_I (X)). But if HI(X)=HII(X)=0H_I(X)=H_{II}(X)=0 both spectral sequences have all their terms 0. This can happen even though there is nonzero (co)homology of interest associated with XX. This is frequently the case when dealing with Tate (co)homology. So in this situation the spectral sequences may not give any information about the (co)homology of interest. In this article we give a different way of constructing homology groups of XX when HI(X)=_I(X)=HII(X)=0_{II}(X)=0. With this result we give a new and elementary proof of balance of Tate homology and cohomology

    Public Utilities Commission

    Get PDF
    corecore