11 research outputs found

    Duration of post-surgical antibiotic therapy for adult chronic osteomyelitis: a single-centre experience

    Get PDF
    Purpose: The optimal duration of concomitant antibiotic therapy after surgical intervention for implant-free chronic osteomyelitis is unknown. No randomized data exist. Available recommendations are based on expert's opinion. We evaluated the duration of post-surgical antibiotic treatment related to remission of chronic osteomyelitis. Methods: This was a retrospective single-centre study at Geneva University Hospitals with a minimal follow-up of two years after treatment. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis with exclusion of pediatric cases and of implant-related chronic osteomyelitis. Results: A total of 49 episodes of implant-free chronic osteomyelitis in 49 adult patients were studied. The median number of surgical interventions was two (range, 1-10). The median duration of post-debridement antibiotic treatment was eightweeks (range, 4-14weeks). Thirty-nine patients (80%) were in remission after a minimal follow-up of twoyears. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, one week of intravenous therapy had the same remission as two to threeweeks (0.2, 0.1-1.9) or ≥ 3weeks (0.3, 0.1-2.4). More than sixweeks of total antibiotic treatment equalled ≤ six weeks (0.8, 0.1-5.2). Conclusions: In chronic osteomyelitis in adults, a post-debridement antibiotic therapy beyond six weeks, or an IV treatment longer than one week, did not show enhanced remission incidences. Prospective randomized trials are required to confirm this observatio

    Are there clinical variables determining antibiotic prophylaxis-susceptible versus resistant infection in open fractures?

    Get PDF
    Purpose: In Gustilo grade III open fractures, it remains unknown which demographic or clinical features may be associated with an infection resistant to the administered prophylactic agent, compared to one that is susceptible. Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study on patients hospitalized from 2004 to 2009. Results: We identified 310 patients with Gustilo-III open fractures, 36 (12%) of which became infected after a median of tendays. In 26 (72%) of the episodes the pathogen was susceptible to the prophylactic antibiotic agent prescribed upon admission, while in the other ten it was resistant. All antibiotic prophylaxis was intravenous; the median duration of treatment was threedays and the median delay between trauma and surgery was oneday. In multivariate analysis adjusting for case-mix, only Gustilo-grade-IIIc fractures (vascular lesions) showed tendency to be infected with resistant pathogens (odds ratio 10; 95% confidence interval 1.0-10; p = 0.058). There were no significant differences between cases caused by antibiotic resistant and susceptible pathogen cases in patient's sex, presence of immune suppression, duration and choice of antibiotic prophylaxis, choice of surgical technique or materials, time delay until surgery, use of bone reaming, fracture localization, or presence of compartment syndrome. Conclusion: We were unable to identify any specific clinical parameters associated with infection with antibiotic resistant pathogens in Gustilo-grade III open fractures, other than the severity of the fracture itself. More research is needed to identify patients who might benefit from a broader-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis

    Wound dehiscence and stump infection after lower limb amputation: risk factors and association with antibiotic use

    No full text
    Optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis following major lower limb amputation in preventing adverse stump outcomes is controversial

    Short duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in open fractures does not enhance risk of subsequent infection

    No full text
    We undertook a retrospective case-control study to assess the clinical variables associated with infections in open fractures. A total of 1492 open fractures were retrieved; these were Gustilo and Anderson grade I in 663 (44.4%), grade II in 370 (24.8%), grade III in 310 (20.8%) and unclassifiable in 149 (10.0%). The median duration of prophylaxis was three days (interquartile range (IQR) 1 to 3), and the median number of surgical interventions was two (1 to 9). We identified 54 infections (3.6%) occurring at a median of ten days (IQR 5 to 20) after trauma. Pathogens intrinsically resistant to the empirical antibiotic regimen used (enterococci, Enterobacter spp, Pseudomonas spp) were documented in 35 of 49 cases (71%). In multivariable regression analyses, grade III fractures and vascular injury or compartment syndrome were significantly associated with infection. Overall, compared with one day of antibiotic treatment, two to three days (odds ratio (OR) 0.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2 to 2.0)), four to five days (OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.3 to 4.9)), or > five days (OR 1.4 (95% CI 0.4 to 4.4)) did not show any significant differences in the infection risk. These results were similar when multivariable analysis was performed for grade III fractures only (OR 0.3 (95% CI 0.1 to 3.4); OR 0.6 (95% CI 0.2 to 2.1); and OR 1.7 (95% CI 0.5 to 6.2), respectively). Infection in open fractures is related to the extent of tissue damage but not to the duration of prophylactic antibiotic therapy. Even for grade III fractures, a one-day course of prophylactic antibiotics might be as effective as prolonged prophylaxis

    Effectiveness and safety of dalbavancin in France: a prospective, multicentre cohort study

    No full text
    International audienceOBJECTIVES: Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. However, several studies have suggested that it is used mostly for off-label indications. We aimed to describe the use of dalbavancin in patients who received at least one dose of the antibiotic in France. METHODS: Prospective, observational, multicentre study conducted in France from September 2018 to April 2020. The primary outcome was the clinical response at 30 days after the last dalbavancin dose. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients in 16 centres were included in this study. The main infection sites were bone and joint infections (55.0%), multisite infections (15.9%), and vascular infections (14.6%), and the primary pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (N = 82), Staphylococcus aureus (N = 51), and enterococci (N = 27). Most patients (71.5%) received three previous antibiotic treatments. The number of dalbavancin injections per patient was 1 in 26 patients (17.2%), 2 in 95 patients (62.9%), 3 in 17 patients (11.3%), and more than 3 in 13 patients (8.6%), with a mean cumulative dose of 3089 ± 1461 mg per patient. Among the 129 patients with a complete follow-up, clinical success was achieved in 119 patients (92.2%). At least 1 adverse event was reported in 67 patients (44.4%), including 12 (7.9%) patients with dalbavancin-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study showed that dalbavancin is used mostly for off-label indications and in heavily pretreated patients in France. The clinical response at 30 days after the last dose was favourable in most patients, with a good safety profile

    Are there clinical variables determining antibiotic prophylaxis-susceptible versus resistant infection in open fractures?

    No full text
    In Gustilo grade III open fractures, it remains unknown which demographic or clinical features may be associated with an infection resistant to the administered prophylactic agent, compared to one that is susceptible

    Should the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage status be used as a guide to treatment for skin and soft tissue infections?

    No full text
    Previous skin carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) leads frequently to empiric antibiotic MRSA coverage for skin & soft tissue infections

    Duration of post-surgical antibiotic therapy for adult chronic osteomyelitis: a single-centre experience

    No full text
    The optimal duration of concomitant antibiotic therapy after surgical intervention for implant-free chronic osteomyelitis is unknown. No randomized data exist. Available recommendations are based on expert's opinion. We evaluated the duration of post-surgical antibiotic treatment related to remission of chronic osteomyelitis
    corecore