Response to the publication by Ueberall and Mueller-Schwefe

© 2017 Duarte et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms. php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

The ARCANE Project: how an ecological dynamics framework can enhance performance assessment and prediction in football

This paper discusses how an ecological dynamics framework can be implemented to interpret data, design practice tasks and interpret athletic performance in collective sports, exemplified here by research ideas within the Augmented peRCeption ANalysis framEwork for Football (ARCANE) project promoting an augmented perception of football teams for scientists and practitioners. An ecological dynamics rationale can provide an interpretation of athletes’ positional and physiological data during performance, using new methods to assess athletes’ behaviours in real-time and, to some extent, predict health and performance outcomes. The proposed approach signals practical applications for coaches, sports analysts, exercise physiologists and practitioners through merging a large volume of data into a smaller set of variables, resulting in a deeper analysis than typical measures of performance outcomes of competitive games

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Low fibrinogen levels are associated with an increased risk of perioperative bleeding. However, there is an ongoing debate over the ideal treatment threshold, the benefits of prophylactic supplementation with fibrinogen concentrate, and the best source of fibrinogen. While fibrinogen concentrate supplementation is being widely used to treat bleeding related to acquired haemostatic deficiencies, there is a lack of evidence regarding its dosage, effectiveness, and safety. This systematic review provides an up-to-date summary of the relationship between fibrinogen concentrate supplementation and safety measures in the perioperative care of non-trauma, non-obstetric adult patients. Methods: A comprehensive online search was conducted on PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis encompasses ten studies involving 1391 patients. There was a decreased risk of total thromboembolic events in patients treated with fibrinogen compared to the control (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.98, I2 = 0%). In addition, when fibrinogen was used prophylactically, it resulted in shorter ICU stays (MD −1.50, 95% CI −2.64 to −0.36), when set against its therapeutic use. A sensitivity analysis on cardiovascular surgery studies did not reveal any statistically significant difference. Conclusions: The use of fibrinogen concentrate in the perioperative care of non-trauma and non-obstetric adult patients may lead to potential benefits.publishersversionpublishe

so much work, so many lost opportunities

Mainoli, B., Machado, T., Duarte, G. S., Prada, L., Gonçalves, N., Ferreira, J. J., & Costa, J. (2021). Analysis of clinical and methodological characteristics of early COVID-19 treatment clinical trials: so much work, so many lost opportunities. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21(1), 1-10. [42]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01233-wBackground: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to rage on, and clinical research has been promoted worldwide. We aimed to assess the clinical and methodological characteristics of treatment clinical trials that have been set forth as an early response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: First, we reviewed all registered clinical trials on COVID-19. The World Health Organization International Trials Registry Platform and national trial registries were searched for COVID-19 trials through April 19th, 2020. For each record, independent researchers extracted interventions, participants, and methodological characteristics. Second, on September 14th, 2020 we evaluated the recruitment status and availability of the results of COVID-19 treatment trials previously identified. Results: In April 2020, a total of 580 trials evaluating COVID-19 treatment were registered. Reporting quality was poor (core participant information was missing in 24.1 to 92.7%). Between 54.0 and 93.8% of the trials did not plan to include older people or those with a higher baseline risk. Most studies were randomised (67.9%), single-centre (58.3%), non-industry-funded (81.1%), to be conducted in China (47.6%), with a median duration of 184 days and a median sample size of 100 participants. Core endpoints (mortality, clinical status, and hospitalization length) were planned to be assessed in 5.2 to 13.1% of the trials. Five months later, 66 trials (11.4%) were reported as “Completed”, and only 46 (7.9%) had public results available. One hundred forty-four of 580 trials (24.8%) either had the status “Not yet recruiting” or “Suspended”, and 18 (3.1%) trials were prematurely stopped (“Terminated” or “Withdrawn”) The number of completed trials and trials with results are much lower than anticipated, considering the planned follow-up. Conclusions: Our results raise concerns about the success of the initial global research effort on COVID-19 treatment. The clinical and methodological characteristics of early COVID-19 treatment trials limit their capability to produce clear answers to critical questions in the shortest possible time.publishersversionpublishe

Placebo response in chronic peripheral neuropathic pain trials: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: To estimate the magnitude of the placebo and nocebo responses in chronic peripheral neuropathic pain (CNP) and explore possible associations with trial characteristics. // Methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to May 2020. We included placebo-controlled RCTs of ≥8 weeks investigating first-line pharmacological interventions for CNP. Primary endpoints were the placebo response, the proportion of patients receiving placebo with pain intensity reduction (PIR) ≥30% from baseline, and the nocebo response, the proportion of patients receiving placebo experiencing adverse events (AEs). Screening, data extraction, and bias assessment (with the Cochrane risk of bias tool) were conducted by independent reviewers. We pooled data using a random-effects model. // Results: We included 50 trials, with a combined 5,693 participants allocated to placebo, conducted between 1998 and 2020. Overall, 38% of patients receiving placebo reported PIR≥30% (95% CI 34 to 42, I2=86%); 23% reported PIR≥50% (95% CI 20 to 26; I2=81%). 50% of patients receiving placebo reported AEs (95% CI 0.43 to 0.58; I2=97%); 2% reported serious AEs (95% CI 2 to 3; I2=58%). In patients receiving active interventions, the placebo response accounts for 75% of the treatment effect on PIR≥30%, and the nocebo response accounts for 75% of the AEs. Interpreted inversely, only 25% of responses and 25% of adverse events can be attributed to the intervention. Publication year positively correlated with PIR≥30% and negatively correlated with AEs. Female sex negatively correlated with AEs. // Conclusions: The placebo and nocebo responses in parallel-designed RCTs in CNP are substantial and should be considered in trial interpretation and in the design of future trials

GLP-1 receptor agonists for Parkinson's disease (Protocol)

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists for Parkinson’s disease. We will differentiate, as far as possible between neuroprotective and symptomatic effects

GLP-1 receptor agonists for Parkinson's disease (Review)

Background Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive disorder characterised by both motor and non-motor problems. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, licensed fortreatment oftype 2 diabetes, work by stimulating GLP-1 receptors in the pancreas, which triggers the release of insulin. GLP-1 receptors have been found in the brain. Insulin signalling in the brain plays a key role in neuronal metabolism and repair and in synaptic eEicacy, but insulin signalling is desensitised in the brain of people with PD. Researchers are exploring the neuroprotective effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists in neurodegenerative disorders such as PD. Objectives To evaluate the eEectiveness and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists for Parkinson's disease. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group trials register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library; and Ovid MEDLINE and Embase. We also searched clinical trials registries, and we handsearched conference abstracts. The most recent search was run on 25 June 2020. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with PD that compared GLP-1 receptor agonists with conventional PD treatment, placebo, or no treatment. Data collection and analysis Two reviewauthors independently assessed studies forinclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias.We rated the quality of evidence using GRADE. We resolved discrepancies between the two data extractors by consultation with a third review author. Main results Through our searches, we retrieved 99 unique records, of which two met ourinclusion criteria. One double-blind study of exenatide versus placebo randomised 62 participants, who self-administered exenatide or placebo for 48 weeks and were followed up at 60 weeks after a 12-week washout. One single-blind study of exenatide versus no additional treatment randomised 45 participants; participants in the intervention group self-administered exenatide for 12 months, and all participants were followed up at 14 months and 24 months following absence of exenatide for 2 months and 12 months, respectively. These trials had low risk of bias, except risk of performance bias was high for Aviles-Olmos 2013. Exenatide versus placebo Primary outcomes We found low-certainty evidence suggesting that exenatide improves motor impairment as assessed by the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III in the oE-medication state (mean difference (MD) -3.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.11 to -0.09). The diEerence in scores was slightly greater when scores were adjusted for baseline severity of the condition (as reported by study authors) (MD -3.5, 95% CI -6.7 to -0.3), exceeding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). We found low-certainty evidence suggesting that exenatide has little or no eEect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as assessed by the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ)-39 Summary Index (SI) (MD -1.80, 95% CI -6.95 to 3.35), the EuroQol scale measuring health status in five dimensions (EQ5D) (MD 0.07, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.16), or the EQ5D visual analogue scale (VAS) (MD 5.00, 95% CI -3.42 to 13.42). Eight serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded, but all were considered unrelated to the intervention. Low-certainty evidence suggests that exenatide has little or no effect on weight loss (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.76). Exenatide versus no treatment Primary outcomes at 14 months We found very low-certainty evidence suggesting that exenatide improves motor impairment as assessed by MDS-UPDRS Part III off medication (MD -4.50, 95% CI -8.64 to -0.36), exceeding the MCID. We are uncertain whether exenatide improves HRQoL as assessed by the PDQ-39 SI (MD 3.50, 95% CI -2.75 to 9.75; very low-quality evidence). We found very low-certainty evidence suggesting that exenatide has little or no eEect on the number of SAEs (RR 1.60, 95% 0.40 to 6.32). We found very low-certainty evidence suggesting that exenatide may lead to weight loss (MD -2.40 kg, 95% CI -4.56 to -0.24). Primary outcomes at 24 months We found evidence as reported by study authors to suggest that exenatide improves motor impairment as measured by MDS-UPDRS Part III off medication (MD 5.6 points, 95% CI 2.2 to 9.0). Exenatide may not improve HRQoL as assessed by the PDQ-39 SI (P = 0.682) and may not result in weight loss (MD 0.1 kg, 95% CI 3.0 to 2.8). Authors' conclusions Low- or very low-certainty evidence suggests that exenatide may improve motor impairment for people with PD. The difference in motor impairment observed between groups may persistfor some time following cessation of exenatide. This raises the possibility that exenatide may have a disease-modifying eEect. SAEs were unlikely to be related to treatment. The eEectiveness of exenatide for improving HRQoL, non-motor outcomes, ADLs, and psychological outcomes is unclear. Ongoing studies are assessing other GLP-1 receptor agonists

Anti-TNF Drugs for Chronic Uveitis in Adults—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs for adult chronic non-infectious uveitis (NIU).Methods: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, were searched from inception to January 2019. Double-masked randomized placebo-controlled trials, assessing any anti-TNF vs. best medical intervention/standard of care in adults with chronic NIU were considered. The PRISMA and SAMPL guidelines were followed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Overall quality of the evidence was assessed according to GRADE. PROSPERO registration: #CRD42016039068. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were preservation of visual acuity (VA) and withdrawals due to adverse events, respectively. Meta-analysis of efficacy analysis was not performed due to significant clinical heterogeneity between studies' population and interventions.Results: A total of 1,157 references were considered and 3 studies were included. The overall risk of bias was moderate. In active NIU, adalimumab group showed an increased likelihood of VA preservation (risk ratio (RR) 1.75, 95%CI 1.32 to 2.32, n = 217), whereas the etanercept group did not (RR 0.81, 95%CI 0.57 to 1.14, n = 20). In inactive NIU, adalimumab was associated with increased likelihood of VA preservation (RR 1.31, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.53, n = 226). The rate of adverse events did not differ between anti-TNF and control arms (RR 1.03, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.13, n = 410).Conclusions: There is high quality evidence that adalimumab decreases the risk of worsening VA in active and inactive NIU and very low quality evidence that the risk of etanercept worsening VA in inactive NIU is not different from placebo. Moderate quality evidence suggests that anti-TNF agents are not different from placebo on the risk of study withdrawal

Can Biofluids Metabolic Profiling Help to Improve Healthcare during Pregnancy?

This paper describes a metabonomics study of 2nd trimester biofluids (amniotic fluid, maternal urine, and blood plasma), in an attempt to correlate biofluid metabolic changes with suspected/diagnosed fetal malformations (FM) and chromosomal disorders as well as with later occurring gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preterm delivery (PTD), and premature rupture of membranes (PROM). The global biochemical picture given by the threesome of biofluids should enable the definition of potential disease signatures and unveil potential metabolite markers for clinical use in predictive prenatal diagnostics. Results show that relatively strong metabolic disturbances accompany FM, reflected in all three biofluids and thus suggesting the involvement of both fetal and maternal metabolisms. Regarding GDM, amniotic fluid and maternal urine seem potential good media to detect early metabolic changes, and PTD subjects show small metabolite changes in the same biofluids, undergoing work being focused on plasma composition. Chromosomal disorders show an interestingly marked effect on maternal urine, whereas no statistically relevant early changes have been observed for PROM subjects. Interestingly, in the case of FM and chromosomal disorders, maternal biofluids show some sensitivity to disorder type, for example, for central nervous system malformations and trisomy 21, respectively. These results show the usefulness of biofluid metabonomics to probe overall metabolic disturbances in relation to prenatal disorders