An optically pure P-alkene-ligated Ir(I) complex

The asymmetric unit of (P)-chloridobis[(S)-(+)-5-(3,5-dioxa-4-phosphacyclo­hepta­[2,1-a:3,4-a']dinaphthalen-4-yl)dibenz[b,f]azepine]iridium(I)-benzene-pentane (1/1/1), [IrCl(C34H22NO2P)2]·C6H6·C5H12, contains two formula units. The two symmetry-independent mol­ecules of the Ir complex have similar conformations and approximate C2 symmetry, with small deviations arising from slightly different puckering of the seven-membered di­oxa­phospha­cyclo­hepta­di­ene rings. The Ir atoms have trigonal-bipyramidal coordination geometry, with the P atoms in axial positions. The steric strain of the bidentate coordination of the P-alkene ligand through its P and alkene C atoms causes the N atom to have pyramidal geometry, compared with the trigonal-planar geometry observed in the free ligand. The coordination also results in an anti conformation of the binaphthyl and alkene groups within the P-alkene ligand

(Z)-4-(2,5-Di-tert-butyl­anilino)pent-3-en-2-one

In the crystal structure of the title ketoamine, C19H29NO, the bond lengths from the N atom through the alkene group to the ketone O atom show the presence of an extensively delocalized π-system. The dihedral angle between the plane of the phenyl ring and that of the alkene component is 63.45 (7)° due to steric hindrance exerted by the tert-butyl groups. The mol­ecule has a Z-configured alkene function, which is facilitated by an intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond between the amine and ketone groups. The mol­ecules are linked into extended chains, which run parallel to the [010] direction, by a very weak C—H⋯O inter­action between the methyl substituent of the alkene group and the ketone O atom of a neighbouring mol­ecule

Chiral (SO)–N–(SO) Sulfoxide Pincer Complexes of Mg, Rh, and Ir: N–H Activation and Selective Sulfoxide Reduction upon Ligand Coordination

Multigram quantities of the optically pure amino−bis-sulfoxide ligand (S,S)-bis(4-tert-butyl-2-(ptolylsulfinyl) phenyl)amine ((S,S)-3) are accessible by in situ lithiation of bis(2-bromo-4-tert-butylphenyl)amine (1) followed by a nucleophilic displacement reaction with Andersen’s sulfinate 2. Deprotonation of (S,S)-3 with MgPh2 yields the magnesium amido−bis-sulfoxide salt (S,S)-4 quantitatively. Metathetical exchange of (S,S)-4 with [RhCl(COE)2]2 affords the optically pure pseudo-C2-symmetric Rh(I)−amido bissulfoxide pincer complex mer-(R,R)-[Rh(bis(4-(tert-butyl)-2- (p-tolylsulfinyl)phenyl)amide)(COE)] (mer-(R,R)-5). This complex reacts with 3 equiv of HCl to give the facial Rh(III) complex fac-(S,R,R)-[Rh(bis(4-(tert-butyl)-2-(p-tolylsulfinyl)- phenyl)amine)Cl3] (fac-(S,R,R)-6), in which one of the sulfoxide functions has been reduced to the sulfide and in which the resulting sulfoxide−sulfide−amine ligand is facially coordinated. The same complexes 5 and 6 form in a 1:2 ratio in a disproportionation reaction when [RhCl(COE)2]2 is treated with 2 equiv of neutral ligand 3. N−H activation is directly observed in the reaction of [IrCl(COE)2]2 with 3, affording the amido−hydrido−Ir(III) complex [Ir(bis(4-(tert-butyl)-2-(ptolylsulfinyl) phenyl)amide)(Cl)(H)(COE)] (8)

(E)-3-(1-Naphthyl­amino)­methyl­ene-(+)-camphor

In the crystal structure of the title ketoamine {systematic name: (E)-1,7,7-trimethyl-3-[(1-naphthyl­amino)­methyl­idene]bicyclo­[2.2.1]heptan-2-one}, C21H23NO, there are two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. Both mol­ecules have an E configuration about the alkene function. The main conformational difference between the mol­ecules is in the orientation of the plane of the naphthyl rings with respect to the camphor fragment. The torsion angle about the enamine C—N bond is 21.3 (7)° for mol­ecule A, but −24.4 (8)° for mol­ecule B. Inter­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the amino and ketone groups of adjacent independent mol­ecules sustain the crystal, and the resulting extended chains, containing an alternating sequence of the two independent mol­ecules, run parallel to the [001] direction and can be described by a graph-set motif of C 2 2(12)

Towards enantiopure macrocyclic trans-dinucleating hemilabile P-Alkene ligands: Syntheses, structures, and Chiral Pd-Complexes

Dibenzazepinyl dichlorophosphine 2 reacts with (R,R)-2,3-O-isopropylidene-threitol (3) in $Et2_O$ solution to afford gram-quantities of the enantiopure macrocylic phosphoramidite (all-R)-6, which may be seen as a formal dimer of classic phosphoramidite P-alkene hybrid ligands. Complexation experiments with $PdCl_2$ reveal highly selective formation of the trans-dinuclear complex (all-R)-11. The corresponding bulkier and rigidly trans-eclipsed 1,4-diol (S,S)-bis-hydroximethyl-9,10- dihydro-9,10-ethaneanthracene (4), does not favor macrocycle formation and exclusively leads to the new dibenzazepinyl phsophormaidite P-alkene ligand 7, which in Pd-catalyzed asymmetric allylic amination comes the well-known ‘privileged’ binol-derived P-alkene analogue 1 close in terms of enantioselection

Chiral amino-phosphine and amido-phosphine complexes of Ir and Mg. Catalytic applications in olefin hydroamination

The reactions of rac- and (S,S)-trans-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene-11,12-diamine (ANDEN) with PClPh2 in the presence of NEt3 yield the chiral amino-phosphine ligands rac-6 and (S,S)-6, respectively, on multi-gram scales. Both forms of 6 react quantitatively with MgPh2 to afford the C2-symmetric, N-bound Mg amidophosphine complexes rac-7 and (S,S)-7. The former crystallizes as a racemic conglomerate, which is a rare occurrence. Mixing (S,S)- or rac-6 with [IrCl(COE)2]2 leads in both cases to the homochiral dinuclear chloro-bridged P-ligated aminophosphine iridium complexes (S,S,S,S)-9 and rac-9 in excellent yields. X-ray quality single crystals only grow as the racemic compound (or ‘true racemate’) rac-9 thanks to its lowered solubility. In the coordinating solvent CH3CN, rac-9 transforms in high yield into mononuclear Ir-complex rac-10. The crystal structures of compounds rac-6, (S,S)-7, rac-9, and rac-10 reveal the ambidentate nature of the P–N function: amide-coordination in the Mg-complex (S,S)-7 and P-chelation of the softer Ir(I) centres in complexes rac-9 and rac-10. Furthermore, the crystal structures show flexible, symmetry lowering seven-membered P-chelate rings in the Ir complexes and a surprising amount of deformation within the ANDEN backbone. The simulation of this deformation by DFT and SCF calculations indicates low energy barriers. (S,S)-7 and (S,S,S,S)-9 catalyze the intra- and intermolecular hydroamination of alkenes, respectively: 5 mol% of (S,S)-7 affords 2-methyl-4,4′-diphenylcyclopentyl amine quantitatively (7% ee), and 2.5 mol% of (S,S,S,S)-9 in the presence of 5.0 mol% co-catalyst (LDA, PhLi, or MgPh2) gives exo-(2-arylamino)bornanes in up to 68% yield and up to 16% ee

(4R)-3-Hydroxy-7-isopropyl-4-methyl-5,6-dihydrobenzofuran-2(4H)-one

In the title compound, alternatively called α-hydroxy-γ-alkylidenebutenolide, C12H16O3, two independent molecules (A and B) crystallize in the asymmetric unit in each of which the 5,6-dihydrobenzo ring has an envelope conformation. The torsion angle along the butadiene chain in the γ-alkylidenebutenolide core is −177.9 (2)° for molecule A and 179.9 (2)° for molecule B. In the crystal, O—H...O hydrogen bonds between hydroxyl and carbonyl groups of adjacent independent molecules form dimers with R22(10) loops

“Chiral-at-Metal” Hemilabile Nickel Complexes with a Latent d¹⁰-ML₂ Configuration: Receiving Substrates with Open Arms

Complexes with highly reactive stereogenic metal centers are of great interest to asymmetric synthesis. Thus, by reacting [Ni­(COD)₂] with 2 equiv of the P-alkene ligand (<i>S</i>)-<b>5</b> ((<i>S</i>)-(+)-<i>N</i>-(3,5-dioxa-4-phosphacyclohepta­[2,1-<i>a</i>;3,4-<i>a</i>′]­dinaphthalen-4-yl)­dibenz­[<i>b</i>,<i>f</i>]­azepine) or (<i>S</i>_<i>P</i><i>,S</i>_<i>C</i>)<i>-</i><b>6</b> ((2<i>S</i>,5<i>S</i>)-(-)-<i>N</i>-(aza-3-oxa-2-phosphabicyclo­[3.3.0]­octan-4-on-2-yl)­dibenz­[<i>b</i>,<i>f</i>]­azepine), the diastereomerically and enantiomerically pure tetrahedral complexes (Δ,<i>S,S</i>)-[Ni­(<b>5</b>-κ<i>P</i>,η²-alkene)₂] (<b>2a</b>) and (Δ,<i>S</i>_P<i>,S</i>_C<i>,S</i>_P<i>′</i><i>,S</i>_C<i>′</i>)-[Ni­(<b>6</b>-κ<i>P</i>,η²-alkene)₂] (<b>2b</b>) were obtained in almost quantitative yields on multigram scales. The Ni atoms showed in both cases stable Δ configurations. Even though these Ni(0) complexes were air stable in the solid state, once dissolved, complex <b>2a</b> readily activated CS₂, alkynes, and enones as the formal d¹⁰-ML₂ fragment [Ni­(<b>5</b>-κ<i>P</i>)₂] (<b>4</b>) to form adducts <b>8</b>–<b>11</b>. This is possible thanks to the decoordination of the hemilabile alkene arms of the P-alkene ligands, and the X-ray crystal structures of the CS₂ and 4-ethynyltoluene adducts confirmed the η² coordination modes of the substrates and the concomitant opening up of the alkene arms of ligand <b>5</b>. The coordination of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds in complexes <b>11a</b>–<b>c</b> was reversible

“Chiral-at-Metal” Hemilabile Nickel Complexes with a Latent d¹⁰-ML₂ Configuration: Receiving Substrates with Open Arms

Complexes with highly reactive stereogenic metal centers are of great interest to asymmetric synthesis. Thus, by reacting [Ni­(COD)₂] with 2 equiv of the P-alkene ligand (<i>S</i>)-<b>5</b> ((<i>S</i>)-(+)-<i>N</i>-(3,5-dioxa-4-phosphacyclohepta­[2,1-<i>a</i>;3,4-<i>a</i>′]­dinaphthalen-4-yl)­dibenz­[<i>b</i>,<i>f</i>]­azepine) or (<i>S</i>_<i>P</i><i>,S</i>_<i>C</i>)<i>-</i><b>6</b> ((2<i>S</i>,5<i>S</i>)-(-)-<i>N</i>-(aza-3-oxa-2-phosphabicyclo­[3.3.0]­octan-4-on-2-yl)­dibenz­[<i>b</i>,<i>f</i>]­azepine), the diastereomerically and enantiomerically pure tetrahedral complexes (Δ,<i>S,S</i>)-[Ni­(<b>5</b>-κ<i>P</i>,η²-alkene)₂] (<b>2a</b>) and (Δ,<i>S</i>_P<i>,S</i>_C<i>,S</i>_P<i>′</i><i>,S</i>_C<i>′</i>)-[Ni­(<b>6</b>-κ<i>P</i>,η²-alkene)₂] (<b>2b</b>) were obtained in almost quantitative yields on multigram scales. The Ni atoms showed in both cases stable Δ configurations. Even though these Ni(0) complexes were air stable in the solid state, once dissolved, complex <b>2a</b> readily activated CS₂, alkynes, and enones as the formal d¹⁰-ML₂ fragment [Ni­(<b>5</b>-κ<i>P</i>)₂] (<b>4</b>) to form adducts <b>8</b>–<b>11</b>. This is possible thanks to the decoordination of the hemilabile alkene arms of the P-alkene ligands, and the X-ray crystal structures of the CS₂ and 4-ethynyltoluene adducts confirmed the η² coordination modes of the substrates and the concomitant opening up of the alkene arms of ligand <b>5</b>. The coordination of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds in complexes <b>11a</b>–<b>c</b> was reversible