55 research outputs found

    Vasopressors may reduce systemic bioavailability of LMWHs

    No full text

    Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for preventing cardiovascular disease

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Aspirin is the prophylactic antiplatelet drug of choice for people with cardiovascular disease. However, protection with antiplatelet therapy in people with a high risk of cardiovascular disease is unsatisfactory in absolute terms. Adding a second antiplatelet drug to aspirin may produce additional benefit for those at high risk and those with established cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effects (both benefit and harm) of adding clopidogrel to standard long-term aspirin therapy for preventing cardiovascular events in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease and those with established cardiovascular disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: CENTRAL (Issue 2 2006), MEDLINE (2002 to May 2006) and EMBASE (2002 to May 2006) were searched. Online registers of ongoing trials and reference lists from original articles and reviews were checked. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials comparing long term (>30 days) use of aspirin plus clopidogrel with aspirin plus placebo or aspirin alone in patients with coronary disease, ischemic cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, or at high risk of atherothrombotic disease (with data for at least one of the outcomes) were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected on the following outcomes and analysed where appropriate: mortality (from myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular causes, all-causes), non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, unstable angina, heart failure, revascularizations, major and minor bleeding, and all adverse events. Quantitative analysis of outcome was based on an intention-to-treat principle. The overall treatment effect was estimated by the pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a fixed-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel). MAIN RESULTS: Two RCTs were found. Patients enrolled in the CHARISMA study were at high risk for cardiovascular events, either with or without an established cardiovascular disease. Patients enrolled in the CURE study had a recent non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. The use of clopidogrel plus aspirin, compared with placebo plus aspirin, was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (OR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.94; P <0.01) and a higher risk of major bleeding (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.57; P <0.01). Overall, we would expect 13 cardiovascular events to be prevented for every 1000 patients treated with the combination, but 6 major bleeds would be caused. Treatment effects differed in the two trials: the CURE trial, confined to people with acute non-ST segment coronary syndromes, showed definite evidence of benefit from treatment. For every 1000 people treated for an average of 9 months, 23 events would be avoided and 10 major bleeds would be caused. In the CHARISMA trial that randomized people at high cardiovascular risk defined either in terms of pre-existing cardiovascular diseases or risk factors, the effects of treatment were less marked and were consistent with the play of chance. For every 1000 people treated for an average of 28 months, 5 cardiovascular events would be avoided and 3 major bleeds would be caused. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence demonstrates that the use of clopidogrel plus aspirin is associated with a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events compared with aspirin alone in patients with acute non-ST coronary syndrome. In patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease but not presenting acutely, there is only weak evidence of benefit and hazards of treatment almost match any benefit obtaine

    Successful lower extremity angioplasty improves brachial artery flow-mediated dilation in patients with peripheral arterial disease

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with systemic impaired flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and increased risk for cardiovascular events. Decreased FMD may be caused by a decrease in arterial shear stress due to claudication and inflammation due to muscle ischemia and reperfusion. We assumed that endovascular revascularization of lower limb arterial obstructions ameliorates FMD and lowers inflammation through improvement of peripheral perfusion. METHODS: The study was a prospective, open, randomized, controlled, single-center follow-up evaluation assessing the effect of endovascular revascularization on brachial artery reactivity (FMD) measured by ultrasound, white blood cell (WBC) count, high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and fibrinogen. We investigated 33 patients (23 men) with chronic and stable PAD (Rutherford 2 to 3) due to femoropopliteal obstruction. Variables were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks in 17 patients (group A) who underwent endovascular revascularization and best medical treatment, and in 16 patients (group B) who received best medical treatment only. RESULTS: FMD did not differ between group A and B (4.96% +/- 1.86% vs 4.60% +/- 2.95%; P = .87) at baseline. It significantly improved after revascularization in group A (6.44% +/- 2.88%; P = .02) compared with group B at 4 weeks of follow-up (4.53% +/- 3.17%; P = .92), where it remained unchanged. The baseline ankle-brachial index (ABI) was similar for group A and B (0.63 +/- 0.15 vs 0.66 +/- 0.10; P = .36). At 4 weeks of follow-up, ABI was significantly increased in group A (1.05 +/- 0.15; P = .0004) but remained unchanged in group B (0.62 +/- 0.1). WBC counts of the two groups were comparable at baseline (group A: 7.6 +/- 2.26 x 10(6)/mL and group B: 7.8 +/- 2.02 x 10(6)/mL, P = .81). In group A, the leukocyte count significantly decreased after angioplasty from 7.6 +/- 2.26 to 6.89 +/- 1.35 x 10(6)/mL (P = .03). For group B, WBC count did not differ significantly compared with baseline (7.76 +/- 2.64 x 10(6)/mL; P = .94). No effects were observed on hs-CRP or fibrinogen from endovascular therapy. CONCLUSION: Endovascular revascularization with reestablishment of peripheral arterial perfusion improves FMD and reduces WBC count in patients with claudication. Revascularization may therefore have clinical implications beyond relief of symptoms, for example, reducing oxidative stress caused by repeated muscle ischemia or increased shear stress due to improved ambulatory activity
    corecore