Energy and Emission Implications of Electric Vehicles Integration with Nearly and Net Zero Energy Buildings

Buildings and the mobility sectors are the two sectors that currently utilize large amount of fossil-based energy. The aim of the paper is to, critically analyse the integration of electric vehicles (EV) energy load with the building’s energy load. The qualitative and quantitative methods are used to analyse the nearly/net zero energy buildings and the mobility plans of the Europe along with the challenges of the plans. It is proposed to either include or exclude the EV load within the building’s energy load and follow the emissions calculation path, rather than energy calculation path for buildings to identify the benefits. Two real case studies in a central European climate are used to analysis the energy performance of the building with and without EV load integration and the emissions produced due to their interaction. It is shown that by replacing fossil-fuel cars with EVs within the building boundary, overall emissions can be reduced by 11–35% depending on the case study. However, the energy demand increased by 27–95% when the EV load was added with the building load. Hence, the goal to reach the nearly/net zero energy building target becomes more challenging. Therefore, the emission path can present the benefits of EV and building load integration

Sorption heat storage for long-term low-temperature applications: A review on the advancements at material and prototype scale

Sorption heat storage has the potential to store large amounts of thermal energy from renewables and other distributed energy sources. This article provides an overview on the recent advancements on long-term sorption heat storage at material- and prototype- scales. The focus is on applications requiring heat within a temperature range of 30–150 °C such as space heating, domestic hot water production, and some industrial processes. At material level, emphasis is put on solid/gas reactions with water as sorbate. In particular, salt hydrates, adsorbents, and recent advancements on composite materials are reviewed. Most of the investigated salt hydrates comply with requirements such as safety and availability at low cost. However, hydrothermal stability issues such as deliquescence and decomposition at certain operating conditions make their utilization in a pure form challenging. Adsorbents are more hydrothermally stable but have lower energy densities and higher prices. Composite materials are investigated to reduce hydrothermal instabilities while achieving acceptable energy densities and material costs. At prototype-scale, the article provides an updated review on system prototypes based on the reviewed materials. Both open and closed system layouts are addressed, together with the main design issues such as heat and mass transfer in the reactors and materials corrosion resistance. Especially for open systems, the focus is on pure adsorbents rather than salt hydrates as active materials due to their better stability. However, high material costs and desorption temperatures, coupled with lower energy densities at typical system operating conditions, decrease their commercial attractiveness. Among the main conclusions, the implementation within the scientific community of common key performance indicators is suggested together with the inclusion of economic aspects already at material-scale investigations.This project receives the support of the European Union, the European Regional Development Fund ERDF, Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship and the Province of Limburg. TU/e has received funding from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 657466 (INPATH-TES). The results of this study can contribute to the development of educational material within INPATH-TES

Energy density and storage capacity cost comparison of conceptual solid and liquid sorption seasonal heat storage systems for low-temperature space heating

Sorption heat storage can potentially store thermal energy for long time periods with a higher energy density compared to conventional storage technologies. A performance comparison in terms of energy density and storage capacity costs of different sorption system concepts used for seasonal heat storage is carried out. The reference scenario for the analysis consisted of satisfying the yearly heating demand of a passive house. Three salt hydrates (MgCl2, Na2S, and SrBr2), one adsorbent (zeolite 13X) and one ideal composite based on CaCl2, are used as active materials in solid sorption systems. One liquid sorption system based on NaOH is also considered in this analysis. The focus is on open solid sorption systems, which are compared with closed sorption systems and with the liquid sorption system. The main results show that, for the assumed reactor layouts, the closed solid sorption systems are generally more expensive compared to open systems. The use of the ideal composite represented a good compromise between energy density and storage capacity costs, assuming a sufficient hydrothermal stability. The ideal liquid system resulted more affordable in terms of reactor and active material costs but less compact compared to the systems based on the pure adsorbent and certain salt hydrates. Among the main conclusions, this analysis shows that the costs for the investigated ideal systems based on sorption reactions, even considering only the active material and the reactor material costs, are relatively high compared to the acceptable storage capacity costs defined for different users. However, acceptable storage capacity costs reflect the present market condition, and they can sensibly increase or decrease in a relatively short period due to for e.g. the variation of fossil fuels prices. Therefore, in the upcoming future, systems like the ones investigated in this work can become more competitive in the energy sector.This project receives the support of the European Union, the European Regional Development Fund ERDF, Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship and the Province of Limburg. TU/e has received funding from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement Nº 657466 (INPATH-TES). The results of this study can contribute to the development of educational material within INPATH-TES

IEA SHC Task 42/ECES Annex 29 – A Simple Tool for the Economic Evaluation of Thermal Energy Storages

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Solar Heating and Cooling for Buildings and Industry (SHC 2015)Within the framework of IEA SHC Task 42 / ECES Annex 29, a simple tool for the economic evaluation of thermal energy storages has been developed and tested on various existing storages. On that account, the storage capacity costs (costs per installed storage capacity) of thermal energy storages have been evaluated via a Top-down and a Bottom-up approach. The Top-down approach follows the assumption that the costs of energy supplied by the storage should not exceed the costs of energy from the market. The maximum acceptable storage capacity costs depend on the interest rate assigned to the capital costs, the intended payback period of the user class (e.g. industry or building), the reference energy costs, and the annual number of storage cycles. The Bottom-up approach focuses on the realised storage capacity costs of existing storages. The economic evaluation via Top-down and Bottom-up approach is a valuable tool to make a rough estimate of the economic viability of an energy storage for a specific application. An important finding is that the annual number of storage cycles has the largest influence on the cost effectiveness. At present and with respect to the investigated storages, seasonal heat storage is only economical via large sensible hot water storages. Contrary, if the annual number of storage cycles is sufficiently high, all thermal energy storage technologies can become competitive.This study is part of IEA SHC Task 42 / ECES Annex 29 „Compact Thermal Energy Storage - Material Development and System Integration“ (http://task42.iea-shc.org). The work of ZAE Bayern is part of the project PC-Cools_V and supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy under the project code 03ESP138A. University of Zaragoza thanks the Spanish Government for the funding of their work under the projects ENE2008-06687-C02-02, ENE2011-28269-C03-01 and ENE2014-57262-R. University of Lleida would like to thank the Catalan Government for the quality accreditation given to their research group (2014 SGR 123). The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° PIRSES-GA-2013-610692 (INNOSTORAGE) and European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovationprogramme under grant agreement No 657466 (INPATH-TES). Laia Miró would like to thank the Spanish Government for her research fellowship (BES-2012-051861). The University of the Basque Country acknowledges the financial support of the Spanish’s Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the MicroTES (ENE2012- 38633) research project. The responsibility for the content of this publication is with the author

Quantification Method For The Active Demand Response Potential By Structural Storage In Buildings

Active demand response (ADR) using the thermal mass of buildings is often suggested as a key technology to enable the transition to a sustainable energy market. Nevertheless, a generic method to quantify the ADR potential of structural thermal energy storage and that enables a comparison with other buildings or even different storage technologies, is currently missing. In this paper, the available storage capacity, efficiency of the storage process and power shifting capability are defined and demonstrated as key performance indicators for the ADR potential of structural storage. Building energy simulations are used to quantify these indicators as function of building design parameters, showing that the ADR potential mainly depends on the heat loss coefficient and available thermal mass. Moreover, it is shown that the efficiency and the available storage capacity are not constant but depend on the dynamic boundary conditions.status: accepte

Generic characterization method for energy flexibility: Applied to structural thermal storage in residential buildings

The use of structural thermal storage is often suggested as a key technology to improve the penetration of renewable energy sources and mitigate potential production and distribution capacity issues. Therefore, a quantitative assessment of the energy flexibility provided by structural thermal energy storage is a prerequisite to instigate a large scale deployment of thermal mass as active storage technologies in an active demand response (ADR) context. In the first part of the work, a generic, simulation-based and dynamic quantification method is presented for the characterization of the ADR potential, or energy flexibility, of structural thermal energy storage. The quantification method is based on three ADR characteristics – i.e. available storage capacity, storage efficiency and power-shifting capability – which can be used to quantify the ADR potential in both design and operation. In the second part of the work, the methodology is applied to quantify the ADR characteristics for the structural thermal energy storage capacity for the different typologies of the Belgian residential building stock. Thereby an in-depth analysis demonstrates the relation between the building properties and its energy flexibility as well as the dependence of the energy flexibility on the dynamic boundary conditions.status: publishe

Bottom-up modeling of the Belgian residential building stock: influence of model complexity

Demand-side management using the thermal storage capacity of buildings is often suggested as an efficient and economically feasible technology to enable a wide-spread integration of intermittent renewable energy sources. Nevertheless, to quantify the potential benefits of activating the structural storage capacity on a national level, a dynamic bottom-up building stock model is needed. Thereby the aim is not only on the calculation of the annual heat demand, but mostly on an accurate dynamic simulation of the instantaneous heat demand and the indoor temperature, since these are directly linked to active demand response measures. In this paper the suitability of reduced-order models for the application in a dynamic bottom-up building stock model for Belgium is evaluated. Thereby a detailed building energy simulation is compared to reduced-order models of increasing complexity. For the latter both a theoretical approach and a parameter estimation method are analyzed. The building stock description is based on the typical housing approach of the TABULA-project. The reduced-order models show an acceptable prediction of the dynamic temperature profile and heat demand during the heating season, whilst reducing the calculation time significantly. Nevertheless, the reduced-order models are, due to the strong simplifications, less accurate when applied on boundary conditions which significantly differ from the identification data. Especially the coupling between two adjacent rooms is found to reduce the identifiability of the model parameters, resulting in unreliable estimates of inter-zonal heat flows.status: publishe

Quantifying the active demand response potential: impact of dynamic boundary conditions

The use of thermal energy storage using the thermal mass of buildings is often suggested as a key technology to improve the penetration of renewable energy sources and counter grid stability problems. Therefore a quantitative assessment of the flexibility provided by structural thermal energy storage and its relation to the building design is a prerequisite to instigate a large scale deployment of dwellings as active storage technologies that can be used in a demand response context. In this work a generic, simulation-based, dynamic quantification method is presented to characterize the potential of structural thermal storage for active demand response (ADR). Thereby it is shown that, in contrast to traditional storage technologies, the ADR characteristics are not constant but vary significantly as result of the dynamic boundary conditions.status: publishe