Safety and efficacy of a single intraarticular injection of a novel enhanced protein solution (JTA-004) compared to hylan G-F 20 in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase II/ III study

peer reviewedBackground: New minimally invasive treatments are vital to delay joint replacement surgery in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This study was designed to select the most effective among three formulations of an enhanced protein solution containing clonidine, hyaluronic acid, and human plasma (JTA-004), and compare the safety and efficacy of intra-articular administration of the selected formulation with a reference treatment (hyaluronic acid) in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis patients. Methods: In this two-stage, double-blind, phase II/III study conducted in 12 Belgian centers, 50–79 year-old patients with primary knee osteoarthritis were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one dose of one of three JTA 004 formulations (differing in clonidine concentration [50 or 100 μg/ml] and volume [2 or 4 ml]) or the reference treatment (hylan G-F 20). Patients were evaluated using Western Ontario McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) Scores and the Short-Form health survey up to 6 months post-injection (Month 6). Drug consumption and safety were evaluated. Results: Among 164 treated patients, 147 completed the study. The JTA-004 formulation containing 200 μg clonidine and 20 mg hyaluronic acid in 2 ml (JTA-200/2) was selected based on interim results at Month 6. The difference in adjusted mean change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score from baseline (JTA-200/2 minus reference group) at Month 6 was − 9.49 mm; statistical superiority of JTA-200/2 over the reference was not demonstrated. No statistically significant differences in adjusted mean changes from baseline between JTA-200/2 and reference groups were observed for Pain, Physical Function and Stiffness Subscales WOMAC Scores, Total WOMAC Score, and Well being Score at any timepoint, although JTA-200/2 induced larger improvements in WOMAC Scores than the reference. Statistically significantly larger improvements in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores for JTA-004 versus the reference were observed in post-hoc analyses on pooled data from all JTA-004 formulations at Month 6 (p = 0.030) and Month 3 (p = 0.014). All JTA-004 formulations had clinically acceptable safety profiles. Conclusions: This study provided preliminary evidence of the safety of intra-articular injection of JTA 004 in knee osteoarthritis patients. Phase III randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the efficacy of JTA-004 in knee osteoarthritis

Safety and efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of a novel enhanced protein solution (JTA-004) compared to hylan G-F 20 in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase II/III study

Background: New minimally invasive treatments are vital to delay joint replacement surgery in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This study was designed to select the most effective among three formulations of an enhanced protein solution containing clonidine, hyaluronic acid, and human plasma (JTA-004), and compare the safety and efficacy of intra-articular administration of the selected formulation with a reference treatment (hyaluronic acid) in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis patients. Methods: In this two-stage, double-blind, phase II/III study conducted in 12 Belgian centers, 50–79-year-old patients with primary knee osteoarthritis were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one dose of one of three JTA-004 formulations (differing in clonidine concentration [50 or 100 μg/ml] and volume [2 or 4 ml]) or the reference treatment (hylan G-F 20). Patients were evaluated using Western Ontario McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) Scores and the Short-Form health survey up to 6 months post-injection (Month 6). Drug consumption and safety were evaluated. Results: Among 164 treated patients, 147 completed the study. The JTA-004 formulation containing 200 μg clonidine and 20 mg hyaluronic acid in 2 ml (JTA-200/2) was selected based on interim results at Month 6. The difference in adjusted mean change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score from baseline (JTA-200/2 minus reference group) at Month 6 was − 9.49 mm; statistical superiority of JTA-200/2 over the reference was not demonstrated. No statistically significant differences in adjusted mean changes from baseline between JTA-200/2 and reference groups were observed for Pain, Physical Function and Stiffness Subscales WOMAC Scores, Total WOMAC Score, and Well-being Score at any timepoint, although JTA-200/2 induced larger improvements in WOMAC Scores than the reference. Statistically significantly larger improvements in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores for JTA-004 versus the reference were observed in post-hoc analyses on pooled data from all JTA-004 formulations at Month 6 (p = 0.030) and Month 3 (p = 0.014). All JTA-004 formulations had clinically acceptable safety profiles. Conclusions: This study provided preliminary evidence of the safety of intra-articular injection of JTA-004 in knee osteoarthritis patients. Phase III randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the efficacy of JTA-004 in knee osteoarthritis. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov/identifier NCT02740231; clinicaltrialsregister.eu/identifier 2015–002117-30. Retrospectively registered 13/4/2016.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Safety and efficacy of intra-articular injection of JTA-004, a novel viscosupplement, in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind controlled phase II/III study

Objective: The objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of a single intra-articular administration of JTA-004, a novel viscosupplement, in patients suffering from symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) at 6 months. Design and methods: In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind phase II/III trial (NCT02740231), 164 patients with primary OA knee pain were randomly assigned to one of the three JTA-004 strengths or the comparator treatment (Hylan G-F 20) in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Safety was assessed by monitoring and reporting vital signs, physical examination, adverse events and concomitant medications. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline at 6 months in WOMAC® VA3.1 pain subscale. Results: JTA-004 was shown to be well tolerated at all strengths evaluated. At 6 months, patients in the three JTA-004 groups showed a better improvement in pain compared to patients in the comparator group although statistical significance was not achieved. As the three JTA-004 strengths had a similar efficacy, a post hoc analysis was subsequently performed between the pooled JTA-004 treated patients and the comparator group. The exploratory analysis showed a 26.1±2.4 (adjusted mean±SE) mm improvement in pain in the pooled JTA-004 group vs. 15.6±4.1 mm in the comparator group at 6 months, demonstrating a statistically significant superiority of JTA-004 over the comparator (p = 0.030). Conclusions: This study provides first evidences of safety and efficacy of JTA-004 in the treatment of symptomatic knee OA. Efficacy will be further confirmed in a subsequent pivotal Phase III study

Low-dose hydroxychloroquine therapy and mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a nationwide observational study of 8075 participants

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been largely used and investigated as therapy for COVID-19 across various settings at a total dose usually ranging from 2400 mg to 9600 mg. In Belgium, off-label use of low-dose HCQ (total 2400 mg over 5 days) was recommended for hospitalised patients with COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective analysis of in-hospital mortality in the Belgian national COVID-19 hospital surveillance data. Patients treated either with HCQ monotherapy and supportive care (HCQ group) were compared with patients treated with supportive care only (no-HCQ group) using a competing risks proportional hazards regression with discharge alive as competing risk, adjusted for demographic and clinical features with robust standard errors. Of 8075 patients with complete discharge data on 24 May 2020 and diagnosed before 1 May 2020, 4542 received HCQ in monotherapy and 3533 were in the no-HCQ group. Death was reported in 804/4542 (17.7%) and 957/3533 (27.1%), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, mortality was lower in the HCQ group compared with the no-HCQ group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.684, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.617-0.758]. Compared with the no-HCQ group, mortality in the HCQ group was reduced both in patients diagnosed ≤5 days (n = 3975) and >5 days (n = 3487) after symptom onset [aHR = 0.701 (95% CI 0.617-0.796) and aHR = 0.647 (95% CI 0.525-0.797), respectively]. Compared with supportive care only, low-dose HCQ monotherapy was independently associated with lower mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 diagnosed and treated early or later after symptom onset.status: publishe

Low-dose hydroxychloroquine therapy and mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a nationwide observational study of 8075 participants

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been largely used and investigated as therapy for COVID-19 across&nbsp;various settings at a total dose usually ranging from 2400 mg to 9600 mg. In Belgium, off-label use&nbsp;of low-dose HCQ (total 2400 mg over 5 days) was recommended for hospitalised patients with COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective analysis of in-hospital mortality in the Belgian national COVID-19&nbsp;hospital surveillance data. Patients treated either with HCQ monotherapy and supportive care (HCQ group)&nbsp;were compared with patients treated with supportive care only (no-HCQ group) using a competing risks&nbsp;proportional hazards regression with discharge alive as competing risk, adjusted for demographic and&nbsp;clinical features with robust standard errors. Of 8075 patients with complete discharge data on 24 May&nbsp;2020 and diagnosed before 1 May 2020, 4542 received HCQ in monotherapy and 3533 were in the no-HCQ group. Death was reported in 804/4542 (17.7%) and 957/3533 (27.1%), respectively. In the&nbsp;multivariable analysis, mortality was lower in the HCQ group compared with the no-HCQ group [adjusted hazard&nbsp;ratio (aHR) = 0.684, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.617–0.758]. Compared with the no-HCQ group,&nbsp;mortality in the HCQ group was reduced both in patients diagnosed ≤5 days ( n = 3975) and &gt; 5 days ( n =&nbsp;3487) after symptom onset [aHR = 0.701 (95% CI 0.617–0.796) and aHR = 0.647 (95% CI 0.525–0.797),&nbsp;respectively]. Compared with supportive care only, low-dose HCQ monotherapy was independently&nbsp;associated with lower mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 diagnosed and treated early or later&nbsp;after symptom&nbsp;onset.</p

Impact of solid cancer on in-hospital mortality overall and among different subgroups of patients with COVID-19: a nationwide, population-based analysis

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe