Theory Construction and Existential Description in Schelling's Treatise on Freedom

Despite considerable recent attention, important features of Schelling?s famous work, the 1809 treatise On the Essence of Human Freedom, remain under-explored. One of these is the methodological dualism which Schelling advocates at the very start of the text. Schelling aims to weld together into a coherent position a first-person phenomenology of freedom and an explanation achieved by locating freedom within a conceptual system articulating the basic structure of the world. Most interpretations of the Freiheitsschrift, however, concentrate on only one of these approaches, thus foreshortening their understanding of Schelling?s enterprise. The article explores this tendency towards one-sidedness by considering two sophisticated recent interpretations of the work, taking opposite tacks. One, by Markus Gabriel, focuses on the distinctive, self-reflexive metaphysics which Schelling proposes, while the other, by Sebastian Gardner, claims that Schelling?s ontology is extrapolated entirely from his account of our moral consciousness, a procedure pioneered by Kant. The article argues that neither of these interpretations can do full justice to Schelling?s project. Furthermore, although the Freiheitsschrift is not entirely successful, and hence points towards later developments in Schelling?s thinking, its treatment of freedom is superior to the ?soft naturalism? pioneered by Peter Strawson, and currently influential across various philosophical traditions

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives

This report represents the first phase of a study by a task group convened by the Space Studies Board to ascertain whether it should attempt to develop a methodology for recommending priorities among the various initiatives in space research (that is, scientific activities concerned with phenomena in space or utilizing observations from space). The report argues that such priority statements by the space research community are both necessary and desirable and would contribute to the formulation and implementation of public policy. The report advocates the establishment of priorities to enhance effective management of the nation's scientific research program in space. It argues that scientific objectives and purposes should determine how and under what circumstances scientific research should be done. The report does not take a position on the controversy between advocates of manned space exploration and those who favor the exclusive use of unmanned space vehicles. Nor does the report address questions about the value or appropriateness of Space Station Freedom or proposals to establish a permanent manned Moon base or to undertake a manned mission to Mars. These issues lie beyond the charge to the task group

Beyond power:unbridging Foucault and Weber

Today, very few would doubt that there are plenty of reasons to liken Weber’s and Foucault’s theories of power. Nevertheless, their respective works have divergent ethical and ontological preoccupations which should be reconsidered. This paper explores Foucault’s account of a historical episode in Discipline and Punish and Weber’s theory of life spheres, uncovering evidence that there is a need to reassess the conceptual bridges which have been built so far. The exploration reveals a radical difference between a monological theory of power (Foucault) and a multidimensional approach to power (Weber). Yet by unbridging the two thinkers and focusing on other aspects of their theories along with their ideas about power, we also find that alternative links between the two frameworks may offer a more promising critical theory

'Throughout my life I've had people walk all over me': trauma in the lives of violent men

In this article we present original qualitative data gathered during prolonged ethnographic fieldwork with violent men in deindustrialised communities in the north of England. We use the data as an empirical platform for a theoretical exploration of the symbolism and subjectivising influences of traumatic life experiences in these men’s biographies. We conclude by making the tentative suggestion that there is a complex and mediated causal link between traumatic experience and a deep subjective commitment to aggression and violence in adulthood

First dose behavioral tolerance to phencyclidine on food-rewarded bar pressing behavior in the rat

The behavioral effects of single doses of phencyclidine (PCP) were examined in drug-naive adult male Holtzman rats trained to press a bar on a fixed ratio (4) schedule (FR 4 ), i.e., a reward of sugarsweetened milk was earned on every fourth bar press. Groups of rats (four to eight rats per group) received specific doses of PCP which were held constant for each group throughout the study. Dose-response curves for PCP given in doses of 1.0, 1.8, 2.4, and 3.2 mg/kg IP were first determined and then redetermined at weekly intervals. A drug-free interval of 7–8 days was maintained between injections given weekly over a period of 4 weeks. The final dose of PCP was administered after a 4-week drug-free period. Evidence was obtained for first dose behavioral tolerance as shown by the significantly shortened duration of suppression of bar pressing on subsequent injections. Although subsequent weekly effects of equal doses of PCP showed no significant differences, they all differed significantly from the first injection. The reduced response to PCP was shown to be due to learned behavioral tolerance as demonstrated when PCP (3.2 mg/kg IP) was given to drug-naive animals in their home cages and 1 week later given the second dose in the operant behavioral situation. Under these circumstances, the second dose of PCP showed a similarly protracted depression of FR 4 responding as other animals given the drug for the first time in the operant situation. Subsequent weekly injections in the operant situation produced similar behavioral tolerance.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46412/1/213_2004_Article_BF00426513.pd

Beyond the ontological turn: affirming the relative autonomy of politics

In this article, I critically evaluate a characteristic tendency that is found across the various traditions of poststructuralism, both narrowly and more broadly defined. This is an increasing propensity to be preoccupied with ontological questions and seemingly at the expense of either a refinement of political concepts or a concrete analysis of forms of power and domination. I consider the reasons for this development and stress how this characteristic feature of poststructuralism appears to follow from the very fact of ontological pluralism. What we see in contemporary continental thought is a proliferation of different traditions, and each side seeks to defend their position in ontological terms. Following this, I advance the idea of a relative autonomy between ontology and politics, where the former does not determine the latter in any direct or straightforward fashion. I argue that we need to stress this relative autonomy to open a little space between ontology and politics, space where we can return poststructuralism to a more concrete engagement with ‘the political’