No evidence for the benefit of PPIs in the treatment of acute pancreatitis : a systematic review and meta-analysis

Although current guidelines do not recommend the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the standard of care of acute pancreatitis (AP), they are often prescribed in clinical practice, mainly for ulcer stress prophylaxis. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we evaluated the association between the use of PPIs in the management of AP and various clinical outcomes. We conducted the systematic research in six databases without restrictions on January 24th, 2022. We investigated adult patient with AP, who were treated with PPI compared to conventional therapy. The pooled odds ratios, mean differences, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated with random effect model. We included six RCTs and three cohort studies, consisting of 28,834 patients. We found a significant decrease in the rate of pancreatic pseudocyst formation in patients who received PPI treatment. PPI use was associated with a higher risk of GI bleeding, however this finding could be due to the patients' comorbid conditions. We found no significant difference in the rates of 7-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and acute respiratory distress syndrome between the groups. The available data on this topic are limited; therefore, further well designed RCTs are needed to evaluate the potential benefits and adverse effects of PPIs in AP

Arg236 in human chymotrypsin B2 (CTRB2) is a key determinant of high enzyme activity, trypsinogen degradation capacity, and protection against pancreatitis.

Pancreatic chymotrypsins (CTRs) are digestive proteases that in humans include CTRB1, CTRB2, CTRC, and CTRL. The highly similar CTRB1 and CTRB2 are the products of gene duplication. A common inversion at the CTRB1-CTRB2 locus reverses the expression ratio of these isoforms in favor of CTRB2. Carriers of the inversion allele are protected against the inflammatory disorder pancreatitis presumably via their increased capacity for CTRB2-mediated degradation of harmful trypsinogen. To reveal the protective molecular determinants of CTRB2, we compared enzymatic properties of CTRB1, CTRB2, and bovine CTRA (bCTRA). By evolving substrate-like Schistocerca gregaria proteinase inhibitor 2 (SGPI-2) inhibitory loop variants against the chymotrypsins, we found that the substrate binding groove of the three enzymes had overlapping specificities. Based on the selected sequences, we produced eight SGPI-2 variants. Remarkably, CTRB2 and bCTRA bound these inhibitors with significantly higher affinity than CTRB1. Moreover, digestion of peptide substrates, beta casein, and human anionic trypsinogen unequivocally confirmed that CTRB2 is a generally better enzyme than CTRB1 while the potency of bCTRA lies between those of the human isoforms. Unexpectedly, mutation D236R alone converted CTRB1 to a CTRB2-like high activity protease. Modeling indicated that in CTRB1 Met210 partially obstructed the substrate binding groove, which was relieved by the D236R mutation. Taken together, we identify CTRB2 Arg236 as a key positive determinant, while CTRB1 Asp236 as a negative determinant for chymotrypsin activity. These findings strongly support the concept that in carriers of the CTRB1-CTRB2 inversion allele, the superior trypsinogen degradation capacity of CTRB2 protects against pancreatitis

PPIs Are Not Responsible for Elevating Cardiovascular Risk in Patients on Clopidogrel—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Contradictory results have been reported on possible complications of simultaneous PPI and clopidogrel use. Our aim was to investigate the clinical relevance of this debate with a systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases were searched for human studies [randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies] using the PICO format (P: patients on clopidogrel; I: patients treated with PPI; C: patients without PPI treatment; O: cardiovascular risk). We screened eligible studies from 2009 to 2016. After study exclusions, we extracted data from 27 articles for three outcomes: major adverse cardiac event (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular (CV) death. The meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017054316).Results: Data were extracted on 156,823 patients from the 27 trials included (MACE: 23, CV death: 10, MI: 14). The risks of MACE (RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.06–1.396, p = 0.004) and MI (RR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.24–1.66, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the PPI plus clopidogrel group. However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that this significance disappeared in RCTs (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.76–1.28, p = 0.93) in the MACE outcome group. There was no effect of combined PPI and clopidogrel therapy on CV death outcome (RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.97–1.50, p = 0.09).Conclusion: Concomitant use of PPIs and clopidogrel has been proved not to be associated with elevated cardiovascular risks according to RCTs. Based on our results, no restrictions should be applied whenever PPIs and clopidogrel are administered simultaneously

Novel chymotrypsin C (CTRC) variants from real-world genetic testing of pediatric chronic pancreatitis cases

Chymotrypsin C (CTRC) protects the pancreas against unwanted intrapancreatic trypsin activity through degradation of trypsinogen. Loss-of-function CTRC variants increase the risk for chronic pancreatitis (CP). The aim of the present study was to characterize novel CTRC variants found during genetic testing of CP cases at a pediatric pancreatitis center.We used next-generation sequencing to screen patients. We analyzed the functional effects of CTRC variants in HEK 293T cells and using purified enzymes.In 5 separate cases, we detected 5 novel heterozygous CTRC variants: c.407C>T (p.Thr136Ile), c.550G>A (p.Ala184Thr), c.627Cdup (p.Ser210Leufs∗?, where the naming indicates a frame shift with no stop codon), c.628T>C (p.Ser210Pro), and c.779A>G (p.Asp260Gly). Functional studies revealed that with the exception of p.Ser210Leufs∗?, the CTRC variants were secreted normally from transfected cells. Enzyme activity of purified variants p.Thr136Ile, p.Ala184Thr, and p.Asp260Gly was similar to that of wild-type CTRC, whereas variant p.Ser210Pro was inactive. The frame-shift variant p.Ser210Leufs∗? was not secreted but accumulated intracellularly, and induced endoplasmic reticulum stress, as judged by elevated mRNA levels of HSPA5 and DDIT3, and increased mRNA splicing of XBP1.CTRC variants p.Ser210Pro and p.Ser210Leufs∗? abolish CTRC function and should be classified as pathogenic. Mechanistically, variant p.Ser210Pro directly affects the amino acid at the bottom of the substrate-binding pocket while the frame-shift variant promotes misfolding and thereby blocks enzyme secretion. Importantly, 3 of the 5 novel CTRC variants proved to be benign, indicating that functional analysis is indispensable for reliable determination of pathogenicity and the correct interpretation of genetic test results

PPIs Are Not Responsible for Elevating Cardiovascular Risk in Patients on Clopidogrel–A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Contradictory results have been reported on possible complications of simultaneous PPI and clopidogrel use. Our aim was to investigate the clinical relevance of this debate with a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases were searched for human studies [randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies] using the PICO format (P: patients on clopidogrel; I: patients treated with PPI; C: patients without PPI treatment; O: cardiovascular risk). We screened eligible studies from 2009 to 2016. After study exclusions, we extracted data from 27 articles for three outcomes: major adverse cardiac event (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular (CV) death. The meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017054316). Results: Data were extracted on 156,823 patients from the 27 trials included (MACE: 23, CV death: 10, MI: 14). The risks of MACE (RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.06-1.396, p = 0.004) and MI (RR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.24-1.66, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the PPI plus clopidogrel group. However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that this significance disappeared in RCTs (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.76-1.28, p = 0.93) in the MACE outcome group. There was no effect of combined PPI and clopidogrel therapy on CV death outcome (RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.97-1.50, p = 0.09). Conclusion: Concomitant use of PPIs and clopidogrel has been proved not to be associated with elevated cardiovascular risks according to RCTs. Based on our results, no restrictions should be applied whenever PPIs and clopidogrel are administered simultaneously