21 research outputs found
Implementation of the Calypso system: a commissioning experience
Background: The aim of this study was to describe the clinical implementation of the Calypso system with its potential impact on the treatment delivery.
Materials and methods: The influence of the electromagnetic array was investigated on the kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) image quality using the CATPHAN 504 CBCT images. Then, the QFix kVue Calypso couch top and the array attenuation, and their dosimetric influence on the Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatments of prostate was evaluated.
Results: Regarding the image quality, a significant increase of noise (p < 0.01) was detected with the array in place, resulting in a significant decrease in signal noise ratio (SNR) (p < 0.01). No difference in absolute contrast was observed. Finally, there was a significant decrease in contrast noise ratio (CNR) (p < 0.01) even if the deviation was only of 2.5%. For the dosimetric evaluation, the maximum attenuation of the couch was 12.02% and 13.19% for X6 and X6 FFF, respectively (configuration of rails out). Besides, the mean attenuation of the array was 1.15% and 1.67% for X6 and X6 FFF, respectively. For the VMAT treatment plans, the mean dose was reduced by 0.61% for X6 and by 0.31% for X6 FFF beams when using the electromagnetic array.
Conclusions: The Calypso system does not affect significantly the kV-CBCT image quality and the VMAT plan dose distribution
Characterisation of a split gradient coil design induced systemic imaging artefact on 0.35 T MR-linac systems
International audienceAbstract Objective . The aim of this work was to highlight and characterize a systemic âstar-likeâ artefact inherent to the low field 0.35 T MRIdian MR-linac system, a magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy device. This artefact is induced by the original split gradients coils design. This design causes a surjection of the intensity gradient in Z (or head-feet) direction. This artefact appears on every sequence with phase encoding in the head-feet direction. Approach . Basic gradient echo sequence and clinical mandatory bSSFP sequence were used. Three setups using manufacturer provided QA phantoms were designed: two including the linearity control grid used for the characterisation and a third including two homogeneity control spheres dedicated to the artefact management in a more clinical like situation. The presence of the artefact was checked in four different MRidian sites. The tested parameters based on the literature were: phase encoding orientation, slab selectivity, excitation bandwidth (BW RF ), acceleration factor (R) and phase/slab oversampling (PO/SO). Main results . The position of this artefact is constant and reproducible over the tested MRIdian sites. The typical singularity saturated dot or star is visible even with the 3D slab-selection enabled. A management is proposed by decreasing the BW RF , the R in head-feet direction and increasing the PO/SO. The oversampling can be optimized using a formula to anticipate the location of artefact in the field of view. Significance . The star-like artefact has been well characterised. A manageable solution comes at the cost of acquisition time. Observed in clinical cases, the artefact may degrade the images used for the RT planning and repositioning during the treatment unless corrected
Characterisation of a split gradient coil design induced systemic imaging artefact on 0.35 T MR-linac systems
International audienceAbstract Objective . The aim of this work was to highlight and characterize a systemic âstar-likeâ artefact inherent to the low field 0.35 T MRIdian MR-linac system, a magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy device. This artefact is induced by the original split gradients coils design. This design causes a surjection of the intensity gradient in Z (or head-feet) direction. This artefact appears on every sequence with phase encoding in the head-feet direction. Approach . Basic gradient echo sequence and clinical mandatory bSSFP sequence were used. Three setups using manufacturer provided QA phantoms were designed: two including the linearity control grid used for the characterisation and a third including two homogeneity control spheres dedicated to the artefact management in a more clinical like situation. The presence of the artefact was checked in four different MRidian sites. The tested parameters based on the literature were: phase encoding orientation, slab selectivity, excitation bandwidth (BW RF ), acceleration factor (R) and phase/slab oversampling (PO/SO). Main results . The position of this artefact is constant and reproducible over the tested MRIdian sites. The typical singularity saturated dot or star is visible even with the 3D slab-selection enabled. A management is proposed by decreasing the BW RF , the R in head-feet direction and increasing the PO/SO. The oversampling can be optimized using a formula to anticipate the location of artefact in the field of view. Significance . The star-like artefact has been well characterised. A manageable solution comes at the cost of acquisition time. Observed in clinical cases, the artefact may degrade the images used for the RT planning and repositioning during the treatment unless corrected
Further characterisation of the p53 responsive element - identification of new candidate genes for trans-activation by p53
Characterisation of a split gradient coil design induced systemic imaging artefact on 0.35 T MR-linac systems
International audienceAbstract Objective . The aim of this work was to highlight and characterize a systemic âstar-likeâ artefact inherent to the low field 0.35 T MRIdian MR-linac system, a magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy device. This artefact is induced by the original split gradients coils design. This design causes a surjection of the intensity gradient in Z (or head-feet) direction. This artefact appears on every sequence with phase encoding in the head-feet direction. Approach . Basic gradient echo sequence and clinical mandatory bSSFP sequence were used. Three setups using manufacturer provided QA phantoms were designed: two including the linearity control grid used for the characterisation and a third including two homogeneity control spheres dedicated to the artefact management in a more clinical like situation. The presence of the artefact was checked in four different MRidian sites. The tested parameters based on the literature were: phase encoding orientation, slab selectivity, excitation bandwidth (BW RF ), acceleration factor (R) and phase/slab oversampling (PO/SO). Main results . The position of this artefact is constant and reproducible over the tested MRIdian sites. The typical singularity saturated dot or star is visible even with the 3D slab-selection enabled. A management is proposed by decreasing the BW RF , the R in head-feet direction and increasing the PO/SO. The oversampling can be optimized using a formula to anticipate the location of artefact in the field of view. Significance . The star-like artefact has been well characterised. A manageable solution comes at the cost of acquisition time. Observed in clinical cases, the artefact may degrade the images used for the RT planning and repositioning during the treatment unless corrected
Further characterisation of the p53 responsive element â identification of new candidate genes for trans-activation by p53
Magnetic Resonance-Guided Reirradiation for Local Recurrence within the Prostate or in the Prostate Bed: One-Year Clinical Results of a Prospective Registry Study
Around 33% of patients treated by EBRT or brachytherapy will present a biochemical recurrence. SBRT is a new option for the treatment of patients with local-only recurrence. MRgRT seems to be interesting for the treatment of these recurrences. This article presents the one-year late tolerance and biochemical recurrence-free survival results of a prospective registry study. Patients with intraprostatic (or in the prostate bed) recurrence were treated with 5 to 9 fractions (median dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions) with the MRIdianÂź system. PSA level and toxicities were evaluated before treatment and at three, six and 12 months after treatment. Thirty-seven patients with a median age of 74.5 years old were treated between 21 October 2019 and 7 December 2020. Acute tolerance was excellent with no grade >2 toxicities. Twelve months after treatment, we observed an increase of grade 1â2 dysuria (46% vs. 13% before treatment) and grade 1 polyuria (73% vs. 7%). The six, nine and 12-months biochemical-recurrence free survival were 97.3%, 86.5% and 65.0%. Fifteen patients (40%) presented a biochemical recurrence. Nine of these 15 patients (60%) had a persistent disease within the treated volume. In conclusion, MRgRT is safe and has promising survival results
Stereotactic MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Adrenal Gland Metastases: First Clinical Results
Stereotactic MR-guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) is an interesting treatment option for adrenal gland metastases (AGM). We reviewed data from 12 consecutive patients treated with MRgRT for an AGM in our center between 14 November 2019 and 17 August 2021. Endpoints were tolerance assessment, the impact of adaptive treatment on target volume coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing, local control (LC), and overall survival (OS). The majority of patients were oligometastatic (58.3%), with 6 right AGM, 5 left AGM and 1 left and right AGM. The prescribed dose was 35 to 50 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions. The median PTV V95% on the initial plan was 95.74%. The median V95% of the PTVoptimized (PTVopt) on the initial plan was 95.26%. Thirty-eight (69%) fractions were adapted. The PTV coverage was significantly improved for adapted plans compared to predicted plans (median PTV V95% increased from 89.85% to 91.17%, p = 0.0478). The plan adaptation also significantly reduced Dmax for the stomach and small intestine. The treatment was well tolerated with no grade > 2 toxicities. With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, the 1âyear LC and OS rate were 100% and 91.7%. Six patients (50%) presented a metastatic progression, and one patient (8.3%) died of metastatic evolution during the follow-up. Adaptation of the treatment plan improved the overall dosimetric quality of MRI-guided radiotherapy. A longer follow-up is required to assess late toxicities and clinical results