THE CORRELATION BETWEEN ENGLISH LEARNING MOTIVATION AND ENGLISH PROFICIENCY ACHIEVEMENT OF ENGLISH STUDY PROGRAM STUDENTS

This study is aimed at identifying English learning motivation and English proficiency achievement. Then, the researcher would like to see the correlation between the students’ motivation and their English proficiency achievement. The research was designed as quantitative correlation. Here, a total of 77 students were asked to complete the motivation questionnaire and set in a TOEFL test. The result of this research revealed that the English learning motivation of the students was in ‘high’ category. This can be seen from the grand total of mean 3.59 which indicated high intrinsic motivation as the dominant motivation. While, the scores of English proficiency achievement indicates that the students had ‘medium’ level of English Proficiency, the range score of medium level is 400-499. Another result showed that there was a significant correlation between English learning motivation and English proficiency achievement. It can be proven by rcount (0.346) > rtable (0.224), 5% level of significance; there was a correlation between students with intrinsic motivation and their English proficiency achievement, rcount (0.348) > rtable (0.233); while there was no correlation between students with extrinsic motivation and their English proficiency achievement, rcount (0.307) < rtable (0.811). It means that the correlation between English learning motivation and English proficiency achievement was in ‘weak’ level

ÁREAS DE DESARROLLO ENTRE LA GESTIÓN DE LA COMUNICACIÓN INSTITUCIONAL Y LA GESTIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO

En pleno auge de la sociedad en red, áreas prácticas y académicas de alto impacto en su progreso, como la gestión de la comunicación institucional y la gestión del conocimiento, exhiben diálogos tenues que hacen peligrar su importante papel en el desarrollo organizacional. Múltiples causas generan tales comportamientos, y sobre ello en Cuba ya se viene investigando y trabajando. El presente artículo de revisión bibliográfica, establece la existencia de una relación entre la gestión de la comunicación institucional y la gestión del conocimiento, la cual se hace visible en dimensiones objetivables en zonas de prácticas y conceptos que se identifican desde ambos lados del saber, pero que necesitan situarse en una ineludible demarcación que haga visible sus convergencias, más que las diferencias. Esto es necesario para potenciar la gestión de valores intangibles esenciales y lograr la eficiencia de la gestión organizacional que se requiere en la actualidad. También permite argumentar la relación interdisciplinaria que tiene lugar entre la gestión de la comunicación institucional y del conocimiento, y con ello contribuir a diálogos académicos más enriquecedores. Así quedan plasmadas y justificadas cinco áreas de desarrollo y criterios que permiten examinar y fomentar la citada relación

Funding Performance: How Great Donors Invest in Grantee Success

The Funding Performance campaign encourages funders to rise to the urgency of this moment. You'll find no pie-in-the-sky theory in the resources on this page. Instead, you'll find practical advice about the specific practices that produce outsized progress on urgent issues of our time.The centerpiece of this campaign is Funding Performance: How Great Donors Invest in Grantee Success (2021), a Jim Collins–style monograph intended to generate positive peer pressure among foundations and individual donors.The monograph features insightful essays by eight highly respected thinkers and doers: Hilary Pennington, Ford Foundation; Daniel Stid, Hewlett Foundation; Sam Cobbs, Tipping Point Community; Jeff Bradach and Jeri Eckhart Queenan, Bridgespan; Lowell Weiss, Leap Ambassadors support team; Hilda Polanco and Deborah Linnell, FMA. All of these essayists have vantage points that have given them a close-up look at the best and worst practices in our sector. In Funding Performance, they share both—in the hope of turning this moment of crisis into a moment of truth and then a moment of productive pivot

Category Fluency Test: Normative Data for English- and Spanish-Speaking Elderly

Category fluency tasks are an important component of neuropsychological assessment, especially when evaluating for dementia syndromes. The growth in the number of Spanish-speaking elderly in the United States has increased the need for appropriate neuropsychological measures and normative data for this population. This study provides norms for English and Spanish speakers, over the age of 50, on 3 frequently used measures of category fluency: animals, vegetables, and fruits. In addition, it examines the impact of age, education, gender, language, and depressed mood on total fluency scores and on scores on each of these fluency measures. A sample of 702 cognitively intact elderly, 424 English speakers, and 278 Spanish speakers, participated in the study. Normative data are provided stratified by language, age, education, and gender. Results evidence that regardless of the primary language of the examinee, age, education, and gender are the strongest predictors of total category fluency scores, with gender being the best predictor of performance after adjusting for age and education. English and Spanish speakers obtained similar scores on animal and fruit fluency, but English speakers generated more vegetable exemplars than Spanish speakers. Results also indicate that different fluency measures are affected by various factors to different degrees. (JINS, 2000, 6, 760–769.

Mechanisms That Promote and Support Family Preservation for Children at the Edge of Care: A Realist Synthesis

Children in care of the state are amongst the most disadvantaged in society. They have often experienced adverse childhood experiences leading to their care entry including abuse and neglect. Longitudinal data suggests problems children in care of the state experience within adolescence persist into adulthood, showing “a continuing legacy of adversity.” Emerging literature shows that edge of care interventions can bring about benefits. These interventions support families to meet their child’s needs and prevent, or reduce, the likelihood of children going into care. However, it is not clear how or why these interventions work. It is important to develop this understanding to inform the development of effective, theory-informed practice to benefit this population. We reviewed and synthesised published literature to expose mechanisms by which interventions may promote and support family preservation for children at the edge of care. Our synthesis uses a realist approach to examine mechanisms by which interventions, in various contexts, can promote and support family preservation for children at the edge of care. Previous work by the team shaped the initial search strategy and in line with RAMESES realist review guidelines, no restrictions were placed on the types of study to be included in the synthesis. From 7,530 potentially relevant references identified, 61 papers were included in final extraction. Extracted data was themed, prior to developing narrative and formulating programme theories. Effective edge of care service operation seemed to be based on four core programme theories pertaining to the need for family skills training, home-based delivery, dedicated worker, and rapid response to need

Prophetic Reading: Sisterhood and Psychoanalysis in H.D.’s HERmione

This article offers a comparative reading of H.D.’s 1927 kunstlerroman à clef, HERmione, and Freud’s Dora alongside an intertextual close reading of its dense web of literary allusions in order to argue that it offers a sustained critique of Freudian psychoanalysis and an alternative origin story for the condition of hysteria. Drawing on the notion of prophecy as it is thematised in the novel, the article demonstrates H.D.’s prefiguring of Juliet Mitchell’s recent reconfiguration of hysteria as a response to, replacement by, or failure of identification with a sibling

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Dolutegravir to Optimize Pediatric Dosing in HIV-1-Infected Infants, Children, and Adolescents

Background and Objective: HIV treatment options remain limited in children. Dolutegravir is a potent and well-tolerated, once-daily HIV-1 integrase inhibitor recommended for HIV-1 infection in both adults and children down to 4 weeks of age. To support pediatric dosing of dolutegravir in children, we used a population pharmacokinetic model with dolutegravir data from the P1093 and ODYSSEY clinical trials. The relationship between dolutegravir exposure and selected safety endpoints was also evaluated. // Methods: A population pharmacokinetic model was developed with data from P1093 and ODYSSEY to characterize the pharmacokinetics and associated variability and to evaluate the impact of pharmacokinetic covariates. The final population pharmacokinetic model simulated exposures across weight bands, doses, and formulations that were compared with established adult reference data. Exploratory exposure–safety analyses evaluated the relationship between dolutegravir pharmacokinetic parameters and selected clinical laboratory parameters and adverse events. // Results: A total of N = 239 participants were included, baseline age ranged from 0.1 to 17.5 years, weight ranged from 3.9 to 91 kg, 50% were male, and 80% were black. The final population pharmacokinetic model was a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination, enabling predictions of dolutegravir concentrations in the pediatric population across weight bands and doses/formulations. The predicted geometric mean trough concentration was comparable to the adult value following a 50-mg daily dose of dolutegravir for all weight bands at recommended doses. Body weight, age, and formulation were significant predictors of dolutegravir pharmacokinetics in pediatrics. Additionally, during an exploratory exposure–safety analysis, no correlation was found between dolutegravir exposure and selected safety endpoints or adverse events. // Conclusions: The dolutegravir dosing in children ≥ 4 weeks of age on an age/weight-band basis provides comparable exposures to those historically observed in adults. Observed pharmacokinetic variability was higher in this pediatric population and no additional safety concerns were observed. These results support the weight-banded dosing of dolutegravir in pediatric participants currently recommended by the World Health Organization

Dolutegravir dosing for children with HIV weighing less than 20 kg: pharmacokinetic and safety substudies nested in the open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority ODYSSEY trial.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy is a preferred first-line treatment for adults and children living with HIV; however, very little pharmacokinetic data for dolutegravir use are available in young children. We therefore aimed to evaluate dolutegravir dosing and safety in children weighing 3 kg to less than 20 kg by assessing pharmacokinetic parameters and safety data in children taking dolutegravir within the ODYSSEY trial. METHODS: We did pharmacokinetic substudies nested within the open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority ODYSSEY trial. We enrolled children from seven research centres in South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Children weighing 3 kg to less than 14 kg received 5 mg dispersible tablets of dolutegravir according to WHO weight bands: 5 mg for children weighing 3 kg to less than 6 kg and younger than 6 months, 10 mg for children weighing 3 kg to less than 6 kg and aged 6 months or older, 15 mg for children weighing 6 kg to less than 10 kg, and 20 mg for children weighing 10 kg to less than 14 kg. Children weighing 14 kg to less than 20 kg received a 25 mg film-coated tablet once per day early in the trial or 25 mg dispersible tablets (five 5 mg tablets once per day) later in the trial. A minimum of eight children per weight band or dose was targeted for 24 h pharmacokinetic profiling at steady state. The primary pharmacokinetic parameter was the trough concentration 24 h after observed dolutegravir intake (Ctrough). Pharmacokinetic targets were based on adult dolutegravir Ctrough and the 90% effective concentration (EC90; ie, 0·32 mg/L). Safety was evaluated in eligible children consenting to pharmacokinetic substudies. FINDINGS: Between May 25, 2017, and Aug 15, 2019, we enrolled 72 children aged between 3 months and 11 years. 71 children were included in the safety population and 55 (76%) of 72 children contributed 65 evaluable pharmacokinetic profiles. Geometric mean Ctrough in children on dispersible tablets in weight bands between 3 kg and less than 20 kg ranged between 0·53-0·87 mg/L, comparable to the adult geometric mean Ctrough of 0·83 mg/L. Variability was high with coefficient of variation percentages ranging between 50% and 150% compared with 26% in adults. Ctrough below EC90 was observed in four (31%) of 13 children weighing 6 kg to less than 10 kg taking 15 mg dispersible tablets, and four (21%) of 19 weighing 14 kg to less than 20 kg taking 25 mg film-coated tablets. The lowest geometric mean Ctrough of 0·44 mg/L was observed in children weighing 14 kg to less than 20 kg on 25 mg film-coated tablets. Exposures were 1·7-2·0 times higher on 25 mg dispersible tablets versus 25 mg film-coated tablets. 19 (27%) of 71 children had 29 reportable grade 3 or higher adverse events (13 serious adverse events, including two deaths), none of which were related to dolutegravir. INTERPRETATION: Weight-band dosing of paediatric dolutegravir dispersible tablets provides appropriate drug exposure in most children weighing 3 kg to less than 20 kg, with no safety signal. 25 mg film-coated tablets did not achieve pharmacokinetic parameters in children weighing 14 kg to less than 20 kg, which were comparable to adults, suggesting dosing with dispersible tablets is preferable or a higher film-coated tablet dose is required. FUNDING: Paediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS Foundation, ViiV Healthcare, and UK Medical Research Council

The practice of 'doing' evaluation: Lessons learned from nine complex intervention trials in action

Background: There is increasing recognition among trialists of the challenges in understanding how particular 'real-life' contexts influence the delivery and receipt of complex health interventions. Evaluations of interventions to change health worker and/or patient behaviours in health service settings exemplify these challenges. When interpreting evaluation data, deviation from intended intervention implementation is accounted for through process evaluations of fidelity, reach, and intensity. However, no such systematic approach has been proposed to account for the way evaluation activities may deviate in practice from assumptions made when data are interpreted.Methods: A collective case study was conducted to explore experiences of undertaking evaluation activities in the real-life contexts of nine complex intervention trials seeking to improve appropriate diagnosis and treatment of malaria in varied health service settings. Multiple sources of data were used, including in-depth interviews with investigators, participant-observation of studies, and rounds of discussion and reflection.Results and discussion: From our experiences of the realities of conducting these evaluations, we identified six key 'lessons learned' about ways to become aware of and manage aspects of the fabric of trials involving the interface of researchers, fieldworkers, participants and data collection tools that may affect the intended production of data and interpretation of findings. These lessons included: foster a shared understanding across the study team of how individual practices contribute to the study goals; promote and facilitate within-team communications for ongoing reflection on the progress of the evaluation; establish processes for ongoing collaboration and dialogue between sub-study teams; the importance of a field research coordinator bridging everyday project management with scientific oversight; collect and review reflective field notes on the progress of the evaluation to aid interpretation of outcomes; and these approaches should help the identification of and reflection on possible overlaps between the evaluation and intervention.Conclusion: The lessons we have drawn point to the principle of reflexivity that, we argue, needs to become part of standard practice in the conduct of evaluations of complex interventions to promote more meaningful interpretations of the effects of an intervention and to better inform future implementation and decision-making. © 2014 Reynolds et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd