82 research outputs found

    Clinical and epidemiological aspects and acceptability of larval therapy in patients with chronic wounds / Aspectos clínicos e epidemiológicos e aceitabilidade da terapia larval em pacientes com feridas crônicas

    Get PDF
    Objective: To evaluate the epidemiological and clinical profile of patients with wounds and acceptability to Larval Therapy (LT). Method: Followed 15 patients with chronic wounds and recorded in clinical records. Results: Patients didn’t know LT. Ages varied (45 to 73 y.o.), were black (46.66%), white (26.66%) and yellow (20.00%), predominantly women (73.33%). They had Elementary (53.33%), High (20.00%) and Higher education (26.60%). 60% lived in Rio de Janeiro; Wounds (mean age of 6 years; mean area of 9.4 cm²) in the distal third of the legs (53.00%) and feet (47.00%), with vascular origin (40.88%), pressure (31.69%), diabetic (16.66%) and infectious ulcers (10.77%). Patients had three (20.00%), two (20.00%) or one wound (60.00%), with necrosis (80.00%), infection (37.60%), granulation (50.30%), epithelialization (15.00%), pain (54.00%) and locomotion difficulty (47.00%). Venous insufficiency as the most observed pathological antecedent. Acceptability for LT was 93.33%. Conclusion: LT is an alternative to better quality of life.Objetivo: Evaluar el perfil epidemiológico y clínico de pacientes con heridas y aceptabilidad a Terapia Larvaria (TL).  Método: Seguimiento de 15 pacientes con heridas crónicas y registrados en historias clínicas. Resultados: Pacientes no conocían TL. Edades variaron (45 a 73%), negros (46,66%), blancos (26,66%) y morenos (20,00%), predominantemente mujeres (73,33%). Habían completado la educación primaria (53,33%), media (20,00%) y superior (26,6%). 60% vivían en RJ; Lesiones (edad media de 6 años y superficie media de 9,4 cm²) en el tercio distal de las piernas (53,00%) y pies (47,00%), con origen vascular (40,88%), úlceras por presión (31,69%), diabéticas (16,66%) e infecciosas (10,77%). Pacientes presentaban tres (20,00%), dos (20,00%) o una lesión (60,00%), con necrosis (80,00%), infección (37,60%), granulación (50,30%), epitelización (15,00%), dolor (54,0%) y dificultad locomotiva (47,00%). Insuficiencia venosa como antecedente patológico más observado. Aceptabilidad para TL fue del 93,33%. Conclusión: TL es una alternativa a una mejor calidad de vida.Objetivo: avaliar o perfil epidemiológico e clínico de pacientes com feridas e a aceitabilidade à Terapia Larval (TL).  Método: acompanhados 15 pacientes com feridas crônicas e registrados em fichas clínicas. Resultados: pacientes não conheciam a TL. Idades variaram (45 a 73), pretos (46,66%), brancos (26,66%) e pardos (20,00%), predominantemente mulheres (73,33%). Tinham ensino fundamental (53,33%), médio (20,00%) e superior (26,6%) completos. 60% residiam no RJ; Lesões, (idade média de 6 anos e área média de 9,4 cm²) no terço distal das pernas (53,00%) e nos pés (47,00%), com origem vascular (40,88%), úlceras por pressão (31,69%), diabéticas (16,66%) e infecciosa (10,77%). Pacientes apresentavam três (20,00%), duas (20,00%) ou uma lesão (60,00%), com necrose (80,00%), infecção (37,60%), granulação (50,30%), epitelização (15,00%), dor (54,0%) e dificuldade de locomoção (47,00%). Insuficiência venosa como antecedente patológico mais observado. A aceitabilidade para TL foi 93,33%. Conclusão: TL é alternativa para melhor qualidade de vida.

    Patients with artificial joints: do they need antibiotic cover for dental treatment?

    Get PDF
    The document attached has been archived with permission from the Australian Dental Association. An external link to the publisher’s copy is included.This study reviews whether patients with artificial joints need antibiotic cover for dental treatment. Generally in Australia the practice has developed of giving most patients with artificial joints antibiotic prophylaxis for a wide range of dental procedures. This is partly on anecdotal grounds, partly historical and partly for legal concerns. It has been encouraged by some guidelines. Scientifically, the risk and the benefit of each step in the process needs to be analysed. This review shows that the risk of an artificial joint becoming infected from a bacteraemia of oral origin is exceedingly low whereas the risk of an adverse reaction to the antibiotic prophylaxis is higher than the risk of infection. If all patients with artificial joints receive antibiotic prophylaxis then more will die from anaphylaxis than develop infections. Factors which balance the risk benefit are if the patient is seriously immunocompromised, if the joint prosthesis is failing or chronically inflamed and if the dental procedures, such as from extractions and deep periodontal scaling, produce high level bacteraemias. Recommendations to rationalize antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with artificial joints are presented.JF Scott, D Morgan, M Avent, S Graves and AN Gos

    Endodontics Manual for the General Dentist

    No full text
    ix. 74 hal.; 24 c

    In Vitro Yeast Infection of Human Dentin

    No full text

    Root canal adhesive filling in dogs' teeth with or without coronal restoration: A histopathological evaluation

    No full text
    The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo the response of the periradicular tissues after endodontic treatment and root filling with Epiphany/Resilon (Penntron Clinical Technologies, LLC, Wallingford, CT) or gutta percha and new Sealapex (SybronEndo, Glendora, CA) in dogs' teeth with or without coronal restoration. Teeth without coronal restorations were used to assess the influence of continuous exposure to the oral environment on the periradicular tissues. Sixty root canals with vital pulps in three dogs were instrumented and obturated in a single session and randomly assigned to one of four groups as follows. group 1: root canal filling with Epiphany/Resilon with coronal restoration, group 2: root canal filling with Sealapex sealer and gutta percha with restoration, group 3: root canal filling with Epiphany/Resilon without restoration, and group 4: root canal filling with Sealapex sealer and gutta percha without coronal restoration. After 90 days, the animals were euthanized, and the maxillas and mandibles were removed and submitted for histologic processing. Longitudinal sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Mallory's trichrome, and Brown and Brenn stains and examined under light microscopy. There were significant differences found between the four groups (p < 0.05). The results showed that roots canals filled with Epiphany/Resilon, with coronal restoration, had significantly less periradicular inflammation than roots canals filled with gutta percha and Sealapex, with coronal restoration (p = 0.021). No significant difference was observed in the intensity of inflammation between roots canals filled with Epiphany/ Resilon with no restoration and roots filled with gutta percha and Sealapex with restoration (p = 0.269). Roots canals filled with gutta percha and Sealapex sealer without coronal restoration showed the greatest degree of periradicular inflammation

    Detection of bacteraemias during non-surgical root canal treatment

    No full text
    Some dental procedures initiate a bacteraemia. In certain compromised patients, this bacteraemia may lead to distant site infections, most notably infective endocarditis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a detectable bacteraemia was produced during non-surgical root canal therapy. METHODS: Thirty patients receiving non-surgical root canal therapy were studied. Three blood samples were taken per patient: pre-operatively, peri-operatively and post-operatively. In addition, a paper point sample was collected from the root canal. The blood samples were cultured by pour plate and blood bottle methods. The isolated organisms were identified by standard techniques. Blood samples were analysed for the presence of bacterial DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In two cases where the same species of organism was identified in the root canal and the bloodstream, the isolates were typed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). RESULTS: By conventional culturing, a detectable bacteraemia was present in 9 (30%) of the 30 patients who had no positive pre-operative control blood sample. In 7 (23.3%) patients, the same species of organism was identified in both the bloodstream and in the paper point sample from the root canal system. Overall, PCR gave lower detection rates compared with conventional culture, with 10 of 90 (11%) of the blood samples displaying bacterial DNA. PFGE typing was undertaken for two pairs of culture isolates from blood and paper points; these were found to be genetically identical. CONCLUSIONS: Non-surgical root canal treatment may invoke a detectable bacteraemi
    corecore