19 research outputs found

    Pseudo-supersymmetry, Consistent Sphere Reduction and Killing Spinors for the Bosonic String

    Get PDF
    Certain supergravity theories admit a remarkable consistent dimensional reduction in which the internal space is a sphere. Examples include type IIB supergravity reduced on S^5, and eleven-dimensional supergravity reduced on S^4 or S^7. Consistency means that any solution of the dimensionally-reduced theory lifts to give a solution in the higher dimension. Although supersymmetry seems to play a role in the consistency of these reductions, it cannot be the whole story since consistent sphere reductions of non-supersymmetric theories are also known, such as the reduction of the effective action of the bosonic string in any dimension D on either a 3-sphere or a (D-3)-sphere, retaining the gauge bosons of SO(4) or SO(D-2) respectively. We show that although there is no supersymmetry, there is nevertheless a natural Killing spinor equation for the D-dimensional bosonic string. A projection of the full integrability condition for these Killing spinors gives rise to the bosonic equations of motion (just as happens in the supergravity examples). Thus it appears that by extending the notion of supersymmetry to "pseudo-supersymmetry" in this way, one may be able to obtain a broader understanding of a relation between Killing spinors and consistent sphere reductions.Comment: Latex, 15 page

    Consistent Pauli Sphere Reductions and the Action

    Get PDF
    It is a commonly held belief that a consistent dimensional reduction ansatz can be equally well substituted into either the higher-dimensional equations of motion or the higher-dimensional action, and that the resulting lower-dimensional theories will be the same. This is certainly true for Kaluza-Klein circle reductions and for DeWitt group-manifold reductions, where group-invariance arguments guarantee the equivalence. In this paper we address the question in the case of the non-trivial consistent Pauli coset reductions, such as the S^7 and S^4 reductions of eleven-dimensional supergravity. These always work at the level of the equations of motion. In some cases the reduction ansatz can only be given at the level of field strengths, rather than the gauge potentials which are the fundamental fields in the action, and so in such cases there is certainly no question of being able to substitute instead into the action. By examining explicit examples, we show that even in cases where the ansatz can be given for the fundamental fields appearing in an action, substituting it into the higher-dimensional action may not give the correct lower-dimensional theory. This highlights the fact that much remains to be understood about the way in which Pauli reductions work.Comment: 18 page
    corecore