63 research outputs found
What's Wrong with Early Medieval Medicine?
The medical writings of early medieval western Europe c. 700 â c. 1000 have often been derided for their disorganised appearance, poor Latin, nebulous conceptual framework, admixtures of magic and folklore, and general lack of those positive features that historians attribute to ancient or later medieval medicine. This paper attempts to rescue the period from its negative image. It examines a number of superficially bizarre writings so as to place them in an intellectual and sociological context, and to suggest that the presumed contrast between them and their ancient and later medieval counterparts has been wrongly drawn
âBETTER OFF DEAD THAN DISFIGUREDâ? THE CHALLENGES OF FACIAL INJURY IN THE PRE-MODERN PAST
This paper contrasts modern representations of facial disfigurement, which often focus on the personal story of 'triumph over adversity', with the problems of accessing such first-person accounts in the medieval past. It examines a number of approaches to the history of facial disfigurement in early medieval Europe, and suggests that this history has been neglected because it does not fit comfortably into existing disciplinary categories such as medical history or disability studies
Miraculous fish therapy for leprosy (âElephant Diseaseâ) and other skin diseases in Byzantium
Advancing the understanding of treponemal disease in the past and present
Syphilis was perceived to be a new disease in Europe in the late 15th century, igniting a debate about its origin that continues today in anthropological, historical, and medical circles. We move beyond this age-old debate using an interdisciplinary approach that tackles broader questions to advance the understanding of treponemal infection (syphilis, yaws, bejel, and pinta). How did the causative organism(s) and humans co-evolve? How did the related diseases caused by Treponema pallidum emerge in different parts of the world and affect people across both time and space? How are T. pallidum subspecies related to the treponeme causing pinta? The current state of scholarship in specific areas is reviewed with recommendations made to stimulate future work. Understanding treponemal biology, genetic relationships, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations is crucial for vaccine development today and for investigating the distribution of infection in both modern and past populations. Paleopathologists must improve diagnostic criteria and use a standard approach for recording skeletal lesions on archaeological human remains. Adequate contextualization of cultural and environmental conditions is necessary, including site dating and justification for any corrections made for marine or freshwater reservoir effects. Biogeochemical analyses may assess aquatic contributions to diet, physiological changes arising from treponemal disease and its treatments (e.g., mercury), or residential mobility of those affected. Shifting the focus from point of origin to investigating who is affected (e.g., by age/sex or socioeconomic status) and disease distribution (e.g., coastal/ inland, rural/urban) will advance our understanding of the treponemal disease and its impact on people through time
Parasitology in an archaeological context: analysis of medieval burials in Nivelles, Belgium
Medical Ethics: Premodern Negotiations between Medicine and Philosophy by Mariacarla Gadebusch Bondio ed.
Doctor Bernard de Gordon, professor and practitioner
http://catalogue.enc-sorbonne.fr/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=87603</a
- âŚ