2 research outputs found
Studies on human papillomavirus (HPV) in Ecuador, part I
Aprovechando la realización de las XL Jornadas Nacionales de Biología Espol en la ciudad de Guayaquil, se realizó una sesión dedicada a la epidemiología del virus de papiloma humano (VPH) y del cáncer cervical. Esta sesión tuvo la participación de varios investigadores provenientes de diferentes zonas del Ecuador. El presente artículo tiene como objeto presentar un resumen de estas charlas, junto a un análisis de la información mostrada además de una reflexión sobre las preguntas que quedan aún por responder en cuanto al perfil epidemiológico de esta patología en el país.Taking advantage of the realization of the XL National Conference on Espol Biology in the city of Guayaquil, a session was held dedicated to the epidemiology of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and cervical cancer. This session was attended by several researchers from different areas of Ecuador. The object of this article is to present a summary of these talks, together with an analysis of the information shown in addition to a reflection on the questions still to be answered regarding the epidemiological profile of this pathology in the country.Fil: Rivera, Angélica. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion En Salud Publica Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Perez; EcuadorFil: De la Plata, Janice. Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida; EcuadorFil: Montiel, Marynes. Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida; EcuadorFil: Romero, Christian. Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida; EcuadorFil: Piedrahíta, Paolo. Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida; EcuadorFil: Sanchez, Eduardo. Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida; EcuadorFil: Moreno, Arturo. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion En Salud Publica Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Perez; EcuadorFil: Espinosa, Maylen. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion En Salud Publica Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Perez; EcuadorFil: Bedoya, César. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion En Salud Publica Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Perez; EcuadorFil: Arreaga, Carlos. Universidad Técnica de Machala; EcuadorFil: España, Karool. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion En Salud Publica Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Perez; EcuadorFil: Parrales, Eduardo. Universidad de Guayaquil; EcuadorFil: Zhingre, Alicia. Universidad de Guayaquil; EcuadorFil: Sanchez, Sunny. Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo; EcuadorFil: Campoverde, Alfredo. Universidad de Cuenca; EcuadorFil: Dalgo, Paola. Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja; EcuadorFil: Arévalo, Paulina. Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja; EcuadorFil: García, Gustavo. Sociedad de Lucha Contra el Cáncer. Instituto Oncológico Nacional; EcuadorFil: Mendoza, Marcia. Sociedad de Lucha Contra el Cáncer. Instituto Oncológico Nacional; EcuadorFil: Ruiz, Juan. Sociedad de Lucha Contra el Cáncer. Instituto Oncológico Nacional; EcuadorFil: Sanchez, Martha. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion En Salud Publica Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Perez; EcuadorFil: Medina, Lex. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion En Salud Publica Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Perez; EcuadorFil: Párraga, Karla. United European Gastroenterology; AustriaFil: Ibarra, Alejandra. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Químicas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Quimís, María. No especifíca;Fil: Parrales, Johana. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion En Salud Publica Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Perez; EcuadorFil: Molina, Denisse. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion En Salud Publica Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Perez; EcuadorFil: Badano, Ines. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Químicas y Naturales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Nordeste; ArgentinaFil: Orlando, Alberto. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion En Salud Publica Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Perez; EcuadorFil: Vega Luzuriaga, Patricio. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion En Salud Publica Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Perez; Ecuado
General and abdominal adiposity and hypertension in eight world regions: a pooled analysis of 837 population-based studies with 7·5 million participants
International audienceSummaryBackground Adiposity can be measured using BMI (which is based on weight and height) as well as indices of abdominal adiposity. We examined the association between BMI and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) within and across populations of different world regions and quantified how well these two metrics discriminate between people with and without hypertension.MethodsWe used data from studies carried out from 1990 to 2023 on BMI, WHtR and hypertension in people aged 20–64 years in representative samples of the general population in eight world regions. We graphically compared the regional distributions of BMI and WHtR, and calculated Pearson’s correlation coefficients between BMI and WHtR within each region. We used mixed-effects linear regression to estimate the extent to which WHtR varies across regions at the same BMI. We graphically examined the prevalence of hypertension and the distribution of people who have hypertension both in relation to BMI and WHtR, and we assessed how closely BMI and WHtR discriminate between participants with and without hypertension using C-statistic and net reclassification improvement (NRI).FindingsThe correlation between BMI and WHtR ranged from 0·76 to 0·89 within different regions. After adjusting for age and BMI, mean WHtR was highest in south Asia for both sexes, followed by Latin America and the Caribbean and the region of central Asia, Middle East and north Africa. Mean WHtR was lowest in central and eastern Europe for both sexes, in the high-income western region for women, and in Oceania for men. Conversely, to achieve an equivalent WHtR, the BMI of the population of south Asia would need to be, on average, 2·79 kg/m² (95% CI 2·31–3·28) lower for women and 1·28 kg/m² (1·02–1·54) lower for men than in the high-income western region. In every region, hypertension prevalence increased with both BMI and WHtR. Models with either of these two adiposity metrics had virtually identical C-statistics and NRIs for every region and sex, with C-statistics ranging from 0·72 to 0·81 and NRIs ranging from 0·34 to 0·57 in different region and sex combinations. When both BMI and WHtR were used, performance improved only slightly compared with using either adiposity measure alone.InterpretationBMI can distinguish young and middle-aged adults with higher versus lower amounts of abdominal adiposity with moderate-to-high accuracy, and both BMI and WHtR distinguish people with or without hypertension. However, at the same BMI level, people in south Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the region of central Asia, Middle East and north Africa, have higher WHtR than in the other regions