Tecnologia de aplicação com o uso de diferentes adjuvantes na cultura da soja

The objective of this work has been to evaluate the efficiency of the effect of the addition of four types of adjuvants in the spray solution used in the soybean (Glycine max L.) crop. The experimental design was the randomized blocks with five treatments based on the application of adjuvants, as follows: without adjuvant (control) and with the adjuvants Blend®, Tech-Plus®, LI700®, and Protect®. For qualification, the number of droplets, relative dispersion, volume median diameter, volume applied to the target, droplet density, and percentage of coverage in the upper, middle, and lower third positions of the crop, as well as yield components, 1000-grain weight, and productivity were measured. In the upper third, the adjuvant Protect® presented the lowest relative dispersion, resulting in greater droplet spectrum homogeneity. In the middle third, the application with the adjuvant LI700® promoted greater effectiveness, and the application without adjuvants provided a greater number of droplets in the lower third of the crop. In the middle and lower position, the adjuvant Protect® presented a low-quality application, manifested by the lower number of droplets, applied volume, and droplet density. There was no significant difference in yield components resulting from the adverse weather conditions during the experiment. The addition of adjuvants showed greater application efficiency in the upper and middle third of the.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a eficiência do efeito da adição de quatro tipos de adjuvantes na calda de pulverização empregada na aplicação da cultura da soja (Glycine max L.). O delineamento experimental foi de blocos ao acaso, com cinco tratamentos baseados na aplicação de adjuvantes, sendo: sem adjuvante (testemunha), e com adjuvantes Blend®, Tech-Plus®, LI700® e Protect®. Para qualificação foi mensurado o número de gotas, dispersão relativa, diâmetro médio volumétrico, volume aplicado no alvo, densidade de gotas e porcentagem de cobertura nas posições terço superior, médio e inferior da cultura, bem como, componentes de rendimento, massa de mil grãos e produtividade. No terço superior, o adjuvante Protect® apresentou a menor dispersão relativa, resultando em maior homogeneidade do espectro de gotas. No terço médio, aplicação com adjuvante LI700® promoveu maior efetividade na aplicação, sendo que a aplicação sem adjuvantes, proporcionou maior número de gotas no terço inferior da cultura. Na posição mediana e inferior, o adjuvante Protect® apresentou uma baixa qualidade de aplicação, manifesta pelo menor número de gotas, volume aplicado e densidade de gotas. Não houve diferença significativa nos componentes de rendimento, fato advindo das condições climáticas adversas durante o experimento. A adição de adjuvantes demonstrou maior eficiência de aplicação no terço superior e médio da cultura

Draught requirement and physical properties in a Hapludalf at different management and traffic intensity levels

O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito da intensidade de tráfego e do sistema de manejo na demanda de tração de uma haste sulcadora de adubo, e nas propriedades físicas de um Argissolo Vermelho‑Amarelo. Os tratamentos foram: semeadura direta com tráfego natural, semeadura direta com tráfego adicional de intensidadede 24,79 Mg km ha‑1, semeadura direta com tráfego adicional de intensidade de 49,59 Mg km ha‑1, cultivo mínimo e cultivo mínimo em solo compactado com tráfego de 24,67 Mg km ha‑1. Foram coletados dados de: porosidade total; densidade do solo; resistência mecânica do solo à penetração; e de esforço horizontal, vertical e de tração da haste sulcadora de adubo da semeadora. A subsolagem do cultivo mínimo, utilizada como técnica isolada, não reduziu os efeitos da compactação ocasionados pela intensidade de tráfego de 24,67 Mg km ha‑1. O tráfego afeta a estrutura do solo, sem alterar, porém, a demanda de tração. A mudança da intensidade de tráfego, de 24,79 para 49,59 Mg km ha‑1, não ocasionou maiores alterações nas propriedades avaliadas.The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of traffic intensity and soil management on the draught demand of a fertilizer furrow‑opener, and on the physical properties of a Hapludalf. Treatments were: no‑tillage with natural traffic, no‑tillage with traffic intensity of 24.79 Mg km ha‑1, no‑tillage with traffic intensity of 49.59 Mg km ha‑1, minimum tillage and minimum tillage in compacted soil with 24.67 Mg km ha‑1. Data were collected for: total porosity; bulk density; penetration resistance; and for horizontal, vertical and draught forces demanded from the fertilizer planters. The subsoiling of minimum tillage used as an isolated technique did not reduce the compaction effects by a traffic intensity of 24,67 Mg km ha‑1. The traffic changes the soil structure but not the draught requirement. The changes in its intensity from 24.79 to 49.59 Mg km ha‑1 does not further affect in the evaluated properties

Soil and planter shank relation in an Oxisol chiseled at different times

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a duração dos efeitos da escarificação em Latossolo Vermelho argiloso, pelo estudo da relação entre solo e haste sulcadora de semeadora. Os tratamentos foram: solo sob semeadura direta há 13 anos; solo escarificado há quatro anos (2001); solo escarificado há dois anos (2003); e solo escarificado há seis meses (2005), todos com ou sem tráfego de máquinas agrícolas. Dados de esforço vertical, momento associado à haste sulcadora, área de solo efetivamente mobilizada, resistência específica operacional, macroporosidade, microporosidade, porosidade total e densidade do solo foram coletados, e o esforço de tração na haste sulcadora foi calculado. A demanda de esforços aumentou com o incremento no decurso do tempo de execução da escarificação, e o solo escarificado há seis meses apresentou a menor demanda. O solo escarificado há quatro anos apresentou comportamento similar ao solo sob semeadura direta, e ofereceu a menor área mobilizada e a maior resistência operacional. Nos parâmetros físicos, diferenças foram observadas apenas na camada 0–0,10 m, onde o solo recém escarificado apresentou a maior macroporosidade, e menor microporosidade e densidade do solo. Após quatro anos, não se evidenciou mais o efeito da escarificação na relação entre solo e haste sulcadora.The objective of this study was to evaluate the chiseling effect duration in an Oxisol, based on the study of soil and planter shank relation. The treatments were: no-till for 13 years; four years since chiseling (2001); two years since chiseling (2002); and six months since chiseling (2005), where all treatments were submitted or not to traffic with agricultural machinery. Data about vertical force and moment associated to: shank, soil mobilized area, specific operational resistance, macroporosity, microporosity, total porosity and soil density, were collected, and draught on shank was calculated. Increasing of time since chiseling required increasing of the forces, and six months since chiseling showed the smallest demand. Four years since chiseling had similar behavior to the no-till treatment, resulting in the smallest soil mobilized area and the greatest operational resistance. Physical property differences occurred only in layer 0–0.10 m, and recent chiseling showed the greatest soil macroporosity, and the smallest soil microporosity and bulk density. After four years, chiseling effect was not found on soil-planter shank relations

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear un derstanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5–7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8–11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world’s most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepre sented in biodiversity databases.13–15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may elim inate pieces of the Amazon’s biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological com munities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple or ganism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region’s vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most ne glected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lostinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Enabling planetary science across light-years. Ariel Definition Study Report

Ariel, the Atmospheric Remote-sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-survey, was adopted as the fourth medium-class mission in ESA's Cosmic Vision programme to be launched in 2029. During its 4-year mission, Ariel will study what exoplanets are made of, how they formed and how they evolve, by surveying a diverse sample of about 1000 extrasolar planets, simultaneously in visible and infrared wavelengths. It is the first mission dedicated to measuring the chemical composition and thermal structures of hundreds of transiting exoplanets, enabling planetary science far beyond the boundaries of the Solar System. The payload consists of an off-axis Cassegrain telescope (primary mirror 1100 mm x 730 mm ellipse) and two separate instruments (FGS and AIRS) covering simultaneously 0.5-7.8 micron spectral range. The satellite is best placed into an L2 orbit to maximise the thermal stability and the field of regard. The payload module is passively cooled via a series of V-Groove radiators; the detectors for the AIRS are the only items that require active cooling via an active Ne JT cooler. The Ariel payload is developed by a consortium of more than 50 institutes from 16 ESA countries, which include the UK, France, Italy, Belgium, Poland, Spain, Austria, Denmark, Ireland, Portugal, Czech Republic, Hungary, the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Estonia, and a NASA contribution