A critical role of tropomyosins in TGF-beta regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and cell motility in epithelial cells

We have investigated transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta)-mediated induction of actin stress fibers in normal and metastatic epithelial cells. We found that stress fiber formation requires de novo protein synthesis, p38Mapk and Smad signaling. We show that TGF-beta via Smad and p38Mapk up-regulates expression of actin-binding proteins including high-molecular-weight tropomyosins, alpha-actinin and calponin h2. We demonstrate that, among these proteins, tropomyosins are both necessary and sufficient for TGF-beta induction of stress fibers. Silencing of tropomyosins with short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) blocks stress fiber assembly, whereas ectopic expression of tropomyosins results in stress fibers. Ectopic-expression and siRNA experiments show that Smads mediate induction of tropomyosins and stress fibers. Interestingly, TGF-beta induction of stress fibers was not accompanied by changes in the levels of cofilin phosphorylation. TGF-beta induction of tropomyosins and stress fibers are significantly inhibited by Ras-ERK signaling in metastatic breast cancer cells. Inhibition of the Ras-ERK pathway restores TGF-beta induction of tropomyosins and stress fibers and thereby reduces cell motility. These results suggest that induction of tropomyosins and stress fibers play an essential role in TGF-beta control of cell motility, and the loss of this TGF-beta response is a critical step in the acquisition of metastatic phenotype by tumor cells

Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open -label phase III study

Background: Targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis has demonstrated clinical benefit in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Combining immunotherapies targeting PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) has shown evidence of additive activity in several tumor types. This phase III study evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab (an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody) versus standard of care (SoC) in R/M HNSCC patients. Patients and methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 : 1 : 1 durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks [q2w]), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (durvalumab 20 mg/kg q4w plus tremelimumab 1 mg/kg q4w 4, then durvalumab 10 mg/kg q2w), or SoC (cetuximab, a taxane, methotrexate, or a fluoropyrimidine). The primary end points were overall survival (OS) for durvalumab versus SoC, and OS for durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and duration of response. Results: Patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab (n 1⁄4 240), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n 1⁄4 247), or SoC (n 1⁄4 249). No statistically significant improvements in OS were observed for durvalumab versus SoC [hazard ratio (HR): 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72e1.08; P 1⁄4 0.20] or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85e1.26; P 1⁄4 0.76). The 12-month survival rates (95% CI) were 37.0% (30.9e43.1), 30.4% (24.7e36.3), and 30.5% (24.7 e36.4) for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were consistent with previous reports. The most common trAEs (any grade) were hypothyroidism for durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (11.4% and 12.2%, respectively), and anemia (17.5%) for SoC. Grade !3 trAE rates were 10.1%, 16.3%, and 24.2% for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in OS for durvalumab or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. However, higher survival rates at 12 to 24 months and response rates demonstrate clinical activity for durvalumab

Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is among the 10 most common cancers worldwide, with increasing incidence.1 Approximately 10% of patients with HNSCC will be diagnosed with metastatic disease, and even when treated early, around half will have disease recurrence.2,3 The platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with cetuximab regimen has been the most widely-used therapy and considered standard of care (SoC) since it was proven effective in 2007 for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC in the first-line setting.3,4 However, patients typically progress even after aggressive first-line therapy, and, until recently, the available options (e.g. cetuximab, methotrexate, and taxanes) have delivered limited survival benefits.3 Durvalumab is an immunotherapeutic agent that blocks the interaction between programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and its receptors.5 Durvalumab demonstrated encouraging response rates and duration of response (DoR) with a manageable safety profile in patients with HNSCC.6 Although monotherapy agents that block the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 axis have shown clinical activity, immunotherapy combinations have the potential to improve upon monotherapy activity.7e9 Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and PD-L1/PD-1 pathways have largely non-redundant roles, suggesting that blockade of both could have additive or synergistic effects.10 Indeed, the combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, was explored based on improved efficacy over monotherapy in other solid tumor types.7 This observation, in addition to the activity demonstrated by durvalumab in earlier R/M HNSCC studies, served as the rationale to evaluate durvalumab and tremelimumab in patients with R/M HNSCC. Several studies, including the EAGLE study, were initiated to evaluate combination immunotherapy regimens in various patient groups.11,12 The EAGLE study was the first phase III study to investigate durvalumab and tremelimumab in patients with R/M HNSCC who had progressed after platinumbased therapy. During the conduct of the EAGLE study, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies were approved for use for R/M HNSCC progression following a platinum-based regimen. Treatment with these immunotherapies resulted in a median overall survival (OS) of 7.5e8.4 months.13,14 These immunotherapies are now recommended for second-line treatment as monotherapies for patients with R/M HNSCC.3,13,14 More recently, immunotherapy alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy has shown improvements in OS in the first-line setting, underscoring the clinical utility of immunotherapy in HNSCC.15 Here, we report the results of the randomized phase III EAGLE trial evaluating durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC therapies in patients with R/M HNSCC who have progressed following a platinumcontaining regimen

Characterization of a fibroblastoid mammary carcinoma cell line (LM2) originated from a mouse adenocarcinoma

We established and characterized a new mammary tumor cell line, LM2, derived from M2 mammary adenocarcinoma which spontaneously appeared in a BALB/c female mouse. The LM2 cell line has been maintained in culture for more than 40 passages and grows as poorly differentiated elongated cells. Ultrastructural and immunocytochemistry analysis revealed characteristic features of adenocarcinoma. Cytogenetic studies showed that LM2 cells are fundamentally hypotetraploid. They express metalloproteinases (MMP) and show high levels of plasminogen activator type urokinase (uPA). They were sensitive to nitric oxide (NO)-mediated cytotoxicity when NO derived from an exogenous donor. In vivo, although LM2 cells were able to grow in the lungs, they could not metastasize to the same target organ from s.c. primary tumors. The LM2 mouse mammary adenocarcinoma cell line is a suitable model to examine different aspects of tumor biology, in particular those related to the different pathways involved in the metastatic cascade and in the cytotoxicity mediated by NO.Fil: Galli, S.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Oncología "Ángel H. Roffo"; ArgentinaFil: Colombo, Lucas Luis. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Oncología "Ángel H. Roffo"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Vanzuli, Silvia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Oncología "Ángel H. Roffo"; ArgentinaFil: Daroqui, Maria Cecilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Oncología "Ángel H. Roffo"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Vidal, María del Carmen C.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Oncología "Ángel H. Roffo"; ArgentinaFil: Jasnis, Maria Adela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Oncología "Ángel H. Roffo"; ArgentinaFil: Sacerdote de Lustig, Eugenia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Oncología "Ángel H. Roffo"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Eijan, Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Oncología "Ángel H. Roffo"; ArgentinaUnidad documental simpl