Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS)

Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Dariusz Leszczynski, published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 2021.Part of the population considers themselves as sensitive to the man-made electromagnetic radiation (EMF) emitted by powerlines, electric wiring, electric home appliance and the wireless communication devices and networks. Sensitivity is characterized by a broad variety of non-specific symptoms that the sensitive people claim to experience when exposed to EMF. While the experienced symptoms are currently considered as a real life impairment, the factor causing these symptoms remains unclear. So far, scientists were unable to find causality link between symptoms experienced by sensitive persons and the exposures to EMF. However, as presented in this review, the executed to-date scientific studies, examining sensitivity to EMF, are of poor quality to find the link between EMF exposures and sensitivity symptoms of some people. It is logical to consider that the sensitivity to EMF exists but the scientific methodology used to find it is of insufficient quality. It is time to drop out psychology driven provocation studies that ask about feelings-based non-specific symptoms experienced by volunteers under EMF exposure. Such research approach produces only subjective and therefore highly unreliable data that is insufficient to prove, or to disprove, causality link between EHS and EMF. There is a need for a new direction in studying sensitivity to EMF. The basis for it is the notion of a commonly known phenomenon of individual sensitivity, where individuals' responses to EMF depend on the genetic and epigenetic properties of the individual. It is proposed here that new studies, combining provocation approach, where volunteers are exposed to EMF, and high-throughput technologies of transcriptomics and proteomics are used to generate objective data, detecting molecular level biochemical responses of human body to EMF.Peer reviewe

Call for consensus debate on mobile phone radiation and health : Are current safety guidelines sufficient to protect everyone's health?

Peer reviewe

Ultraviolet-A radiation induces changes in cyclin G gene expression in mouse melanoma B16-F1 cells

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We have previously shown that ultraviolet-A (UVA) radiation enhances metastatic lung colonization capacity of B16-F1 melanoma cells. The aim of this study was to examine changes in expression profile of genes in mouse melanoma B16-F1 cells exposed to UVA radiation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>B16-F1 melanoma cells were exposed to a single UVA radiation dose of 8 J/cm²and mRNA was isolated 4 h after the end of UVA exposure. Atlas™ Mouse Cancer 1.2 cDNA expression arrays were used for the large-scale screening to identify the genes involved in the regulation of carcinogenesis, tumor progression and metastasis. Physiologically relevant UVA dose induced differential expression in 9 genes in the UVA exposed melanoma cells as compared to the unexposed control cells. The expression of seven genes out of nine was upregulated (HSC70, HSP86, α-B-crystallin, GST mu2, Oxidative stress induced protein OSI, VEGF, cyclin G), whereas the expression of two genes was down-regulated (G-actin, non-muscle cofilin). The gene expression of cyclin G was mostly affected by UVA radiation, increasing by 4.85-folds 4 hour after exposure. The analysis of cyclin G protein expression revealed 1.36-fold increase at the 6 hour time point after UVA exposure. Cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase, which is known to be regulated by cyclin G, occurred at 4-h hour time-point, peaking 8 hours after the end of UVA irradiation, suggesting that cyclin G might play a role in the cell cycle arrest.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results suggest that UVA radiation-induces changes in the expression of several genes. Some of these changes, e.g. in expression of cyclin G, possibly might affect cell physiology (cell cycle arrest).</p

Kännykät ja turvallisuusriski

Onko meidän syytä olla huolissamme matkapuhelimien säteilyn terveysvaikutuksista? Jos vastausvaihtoehdot ovat ainoastaan kyllä tai ei, vastauson kyllä. Minun mielestäni meidän on syytä olla huolissamme, koska matkapuhelimia käyttäessään monet ihmiset asettavat säännöllisesti radiotaajuuslähettimen päätään vasten. Tähänastiset matkapuhelimien turvallisuudesta raportoidut tutkimustulokset ovat olleet sekalaisia, ja ne ovat herättäneet enemmän hämmennystä kuin tuottaneet varmoja vastauksia huolestuneille kansalaisille

Analysis of proteome response to the mobile phone radiation in two types of human primary endothelial cells

Background Use of mobile phones has widely increased over the past decade. However, in spite of the extensive research, the question of potential health effects of the mobile phone radiation remains unanswered. We have earlier proposed, and applied, proteomics as a tool to study biological effects of the mobile phone radiation, using as a model human endothelial cell line EA.hy926. Exposure of EA.hy926 cells to 900 MHz GSM radiation has caused statistically significant changes in expression of numerous proteins. However, exposure of EA.hy926 cells to 1800 MHz GSM signal had only very small effect on cell proteome, as compared with 900 MHz GSM exposure. In the present study, using as model human primary endothelial cells, we have examined whether exposure to 1800 MHz GSM mobile phone radiation can affect cell proteome. Results Primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells and primary human brain microvascular endothelial cells were exposed for 1 hour to 1800 MHz GSM mobile phone radiation at an average specific absorption rate of 2.0 W/kg. The cells were harvested immediately after the exposure and the protein expression patterns of the sham-exposed and radiation-exposed cells were examined using two dimensional difference gel electrophoresis-based proteomics (2DE-DIGE). There were observed numerous differences between the proteomes of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and human brain microvascular endothelial cells (both sham-exposed). These differences are most likely representing physiological differences between endothelia in different vascular beds. However, the exposure of both types of primary endothelial cells to mobile phone radiation did not cause any statistically significant changes in protein expression. Conclusions Exposure of primary human endothelial cells to the mobile phone radiation, 1800 MHz GSM signal for 1 hour at an average specific absorption rate of 2.0 W/kg, does not affect protein expression, when the proteomes were examined immediately after the end of the exposure and when the false discovery rate correction was applied to analysis. This observation agrees with our earlier study showing that the 1800 MHz GSM radiation exposure had only very limited effect on the proteome of human endothelial cell line EA.hy926, as compared with the effect of 900 MHz GSM radiation.ISSN:1477-595

In vivo UVA irradiation of mouse is more efficient in promoting pulmonary melanoma metastasis than in vitro

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We have previously shown <it>in vitro </it>that UVA increases the adhesiveness of mouse B16-F1 melanoma cells to endothelium.</p> <p>We have also shown <it>in vivo </it>that UVA exposure of C57BL/6 mice, <it>i.v</it>. injected with B16-F1 cells, increases formation of pulmonary colonies of melanoma. The aim of the present animal study was to confirm the previously observed <it>in vivo </it>UVA effect and to determine whether <it>in vitro </it>UVA-exposure of melanoma cells, prior the <it>i.v</it>. injection, will have an enhancing effect on the pulmonary colonization capacity of melanoma cells. As a second aim, UVA-derived immunosuppression was determined.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Mice were <it>i.v</it>. injected with B16-F1 cells into the tail vein and then immediately exposed to UVA. Alternatively, to study the effect of UVA-induced adhesiveness on the colonization capacity of B16-F1 melanoma, cells were <it>in vitro </it>exposed prior to <it>i.v</it>. injection. Fourteen days after injection, lungs were collected and the number of pulmonary nodules was determined under dissecting microscope. The UVA-derived immunosuppression was measured by standard contact hypersensitivity assay.</p> <p>Results and Discussion</p> <p>Obtained results have confirmed that mice, <it>i.v</it>. injected with B16-F1 cells and thereafter exposed to UVA, developed 4-times more of melanoma colonies in lungs as compared with the UVA non-exposed group (p < 0.01). The <it>in vitro </it>exposure of melanoma cells prior to their injection into mice, led only to induction of 1.5-times more of pulmonary tumor nodules, being however a statistically non-significant change. The obtained results postulate that the UVA-induced changes in the adhesive properties of melanoma cells do not alone account for the 4-fold increase in the pulmonary tumor formation. Instead, it suggests that some systemic effect in a mouse might be responsible for the increased metastasis formation. Indeed, UVA was found to induce moderate systemic immunosuppression, which effect might contribute to the UVA-induced melanoma metastasis in mice lungs.</p

Mobile phone radiation might alter protein expression in human skin

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Earlier we have shown that the mobile phone radiation (radiofrequency modulated electromagnetic fields; RF-EMF) alters protein expression in human endothelial cell line. This does not mean that similar response will take place in human body exposed to this radiation. Therefore, in this pilot human volunteer study, using proteomics approach, we have examined whether a local exposure of human skin to RF-EMF will cause changes in protein expression in living people.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Small area of forearm's skin in 10 female volunteers was exposed to RF-EMF (specific absorption rate SAR = 1.3 W/kg) and punch biopsies were collected from exposed and non-exposed areas of skin. Proteins extracted from biopsies were separated using 2-DE and protein expression changes were analyzed using PDQuest software. Analysis has identified 8 proteins that were statistically significantly affected (Anova and Wilcoxon tests). Two of the proteins were present in all 10 volunteers. This suggests that protein expression in human skin might be affected by the exposure to RF-EMF. The number of affected proteins was similar to the number of affected proteins observed in our earlier in vitro studies.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This is the first study showing that molecular level changes might take place in human volunteers in response to exposure to RF-EMF. Our study confirms that proteomics screening approach can identify protein targets of RF-EMF in human volunteers.</p

Mobile phone radiation does not induce pro-apoptosis effects in human spermatozoa

Recent reports suggest that mobile phone radiation may diminish male fertility. However, the effects of this radiation on human spermatozoa are largely unknown. The present study examined effects of the radiation on induction of apoptosisrelated properties in human spermatozoa. Ejaculated, densitypurified, highly motile human spermatozoa were exposed to mobile phone radiation at specific absorption rates (SARs) of 2.0 and 5.7 W/kg. At various times after exposure, flow cytometry was used to examine caspase 3 activity, externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS), induction of DNA strand breaks, and generation of reactive oxygen species. Mobile phone radiation had no statistically significant effect on any of the parameters studied. This suggests that the impairment of fertility reported in some studies was not caused by the induction of apoptosis in spermatozoa.This research was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF), Pretoria, South Africa (Grant No: 2054206), NRF mobility fund, the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS), Pretoria, South Africa and the Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), Helsinki, Finland

Mobile phone radiation does not induce pro-apoptosis effects in human spermatozoa

Recent reports suggest that mobile phone radiation may diminish male fertility. However, the effects of this radiation on human spermatozoa are largely unknown. The present study examined effects of the radiation on induction of apoptosisrelated properties in human spermatozoa. Ejaculated, densitypurified, highly motile human spermatozoa were exposed to mobile phone radiation at specific absorption rates (SARs) of 2.0 and 5.7 W/kg. At various times after exposure, flow cytometry was used to examine caspase 3 activity, externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS), induction of DNA strand breaks, and generation of reactive oxygen species. Mobile phone radiation had no statistically significant effect on any of the parameters studied. This suggests that the impairment of fertility reported in some studies was not caused by the induction of apoptosis in spermatozoa.This research was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF), Pretoria, South Africa (Grant No: 2054206), NRF mobility fund, the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS), Pretoria, South Africa and the Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), Helsinki, Finland

The effect of pulsed 900-MHz GSM mobile phone radiation on the acrosome reaction, head morphometry and zona binding of human spermatozoa

Several recent studies have indicated that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RFEMF) have an adverse effect on human sperm quality, which could translate to an effect on fertilization potential. The present study evaluated the effect of RF-EMF on spermspecific characteristics in order to assess the fertilizing competence of sperm. Highly motile human spermatozoa, were exposed for one hour to 900 MHz mobile phone radiation at a specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2.0 W/kg and examined at various times after exposure. The acrosome reaction was evaluated using flow cytometry. The radiation did not affect sperm propensity for the acrosome reaction. Morphometric parameters were assessed by computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA). Significant reduction in sperm head area (9.2 ± 0.7 μm2 vs. 18.8 ± 1.4 μm2) and acrosome percentage of the head area (21.5 ± 4% vs. 35.5 ± 11.4%) were reported among exposed sperm compared with unexposed controls. Sperm–zona binding was assessed directly after exposure using the hemizona assay (HZA). The mean number of zona-bound sperm of the test hemizona and controls was 22.8 ± 12.4 and 31.8 ± 12.8 (p<0.05), respectively. This study concludes that while RF-EMF exposure did not adversely affect the acrosome reaction, it had a significant effect on sperm morphometry. In addition a significant decrease in sperm binding to the hemizona was observed. These results could indicate a significant effect of Several recent studies have indicated that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RFEMF) have an adverse effect on human sperm quality, which could translate to an effect on fertilization potential. The present study evaluated the effect of RF-EMF on spermspecific characteristics in order to assess the fertilizing competence of sperm. Highly motile human spermatozoa, were exposed for one hour to 900 MHz mobile phone radiation at a specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2.0 W/kg and examined at various times after exposure. The acrosome reaction was evaluated using flow cytometry. The radiation did not affect sperm propensity for the acrosome reaction. Morphometric parameters were assessed by computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA). Significant reduction in sperm head area (9.2 ± 0.7 μm2 vs. 18.8 ± 1.4 μm2) and acrosome percentage of the head area (21.5 ± 4% vs. 35.5 ± 11.4%) were reported among exposed sperm compared with unexposed controls. Sperm–zona binding was assessed directly after exposure using the hemizona assay (HZA). The mean number of zona-bound sperm of the test hemizona and controls was 22.8 ± 12.4 and 31.8 ± 12.8 (p<0.05), respectively. This study concludes that while RF-EMF exposure did not adversely affect the acrosome reaction, it had a significant effect on sperm morphometry. In addition a significant decrease in sperm binding to the hemizona was observed. These results could indicate a significant effect of RF-EMF on sperm fertilisation potential.This Research was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF), Pretoria, South Africa (Grant No: 2054206), NRF mobility fund and the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS).http://www.blackwell-synergy.co