Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept Biosimilars Compared With the Originator for Treatment of Juvenile Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Study

Objective Analysis of etanercept biosimilars in pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in comparison with the etanercept originator in terms of efficacy and safety. Methods Patients diagnosed with JIA who started treatment with either the etanercept originator or a biosimilar after January 1, 2017, were selected from the German BIKER registry (Biologics in Paediatric Rheumatology Registry). Furthermore, patients who started therapy with the originator and switched to a biosimilar during the course of therapy were identified. For both patient groups, disease activity and safety were examined and compared separately. Results After January 1, 2017, 348 patients started treatment with the etanercept originator (n = 293) or a biosimilar (n = 55). Another 57 patients switched to a biosimilar during the course of therapy. A significant decrease or a stable remission of disease activity was observed in both patient groups. The safety profiles were comparable, and frequencies and types of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were similar in patients starting therapy with the originator or a biosimilar. Only injection site reactions occurred slightly more frequently under biosimilar therapy, without having an impact on therapy adherence. In patients who switched therapy, the AE rate per 100 patient-years was comparable before (26.4) and after (32.1) the switch. Conclusion In patients with JIA who require treatment with etanercept, the originator is still used much more frequently. However, our study highlights the equivalence of etanercept biosimilars for therapy for JIA. Increased use of these biosimilars in pediatric patients can therefore be recommended without hesitation

Comparative risk of infections among real-world users of biologics for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: data from the German BIKER registry

To examine whether treatment with interleukin (IL)-1-, IL-6-, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha)-inhibitors or Abatacept is associated with an increased risk of common infections, infections requiring hospitalization (SAE) or opportunistic infections among real-world juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. Furthermore, the influence of other patient-related covariates on the occurrence of infections was investigated. Patients diagnosed with JIA and treated with biologics were selected from the German BIKER registry. Incidence rates (IR) of infections per 100 person years were calculated and compared between the different cohorts. Using multivariate logistic regression, odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined for the influence of patient-related covariates (age, diagnosis, laboratory data, concomitant medication, JIA activity, comorbidities, and premedication) on the occurrence of infections. 3258 patients entered the analysis. A total of 3654 treatment episodes were distributed among TNF alpha- (Etanercept, Adalimumab, Golimumab, Infliximab, n = 3044), IL-1- (Anakinra, Canakinumab, n = 105), IL-6- (Tocilizumab, n = 400) and T-cell activation inhibitors (Abatacept, n = 105). 813 (22.2%) patients had at least one infection, 103 (2.8%) patients suffered from an SAE infection. Both common and SAE infections were significantly more frequent in IL-1 (IR 17.3, 95% CI 12.5/24 and IR 4.3, 95% CI 2.3/8.3) and IL-6 cohort (IR 16.7, 95% CI 13.9/20 and IR 2.8, 95% CI 1.8/4.4) compared to TNF alpha-inhibitor cohort (IR 8.7, 95% CI 8.1/9.4 and IR 1, 95% CI 0.8/1.3). When comparing the influencing factors for various infectious diseases, the use of corticosteroids, younger age, cardiac comorbidities and higher JIA-activity are the most striking risk factors. Relative to TNF alpha inhibitors and Abatacept, IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of common and SAE infections. The influencing covariates identified may be helpful for the choice of a suitable biologic to treat JIA

Re-treatment with etanercept is as effective as the initial firstline treatment in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

ObjectivesTo determine (i) correlates for etanercept (ETA) discontinuation after achieving an inactive disease and for the subsequent risk of flare and (ii) to analyze the effectiveness of ETA in the re-treatment after a disease flare.MethodsData from two ongoing prospective registries, BiKeR and JuMBO, were used for the analysis. Both registries provide individual trajectories of clinical data and outcomes from childhood to adulthood in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients treated with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs).ResultsA total of 1724 patients were treated first with ETA treatment course (338 with second, 54 with third ETA course). Similar rates of discontinuation due to ineffectiveness and adverse events could be observed for the first (19.4%/6.2%), second (18.6%/5.9%), and third (14.8%/5.6%) ETA course. A total of 332 patients (+/-methotrexate, 19.3%) discontinued ETA after achieving remission with the first ETA course. Younger age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.08, p<0.001), persistent oligoarthritis (HR 1.89, p=0.004), and shorter duration between JIA onset and ETA start (HR 1.10, p<0.001), as well as good response to therapy within the first 6months of treatment (HR 1.11, p<0.001) significantly correlated to discontinuation with inactive disease. Reoccurrence of active disease was reported for 77% of patients with mean time to flare of 12.1months. We could not identify any factor correlating to flare risk. The majority of patients were re-treated with ETA (n=117 of 161; 72.7%) after the flare. One in five patients (n=23, 19.7%) discontinued ETA again after achieving an inactive disease and about 70% of the patients achieved an inactive disease 12months after restarting ETA.ConclusionThe study confirms the effectiveness of ETA even for re-treatment of patients with JIA. Our data highlight the association of an early bDMARD treatment with a higher rate of inactive disease indicating a window of opportunity

Biologics with or without methotrexate in treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: effectiveness, safety and drug survival

Objective To investigate the impact of additionally given MTX on biologic treatment of polyarticular JIA in terms of effectiveness, safety and drug survival. Methods Patients suffering from polyarticular JIA and treated with either monotherapy with a first biologic or a combination of a biologic and MTX were selected from the BIKER registry. The TNF-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) adalimumab, etanercept and golimumab and the IL-6 inhibitor tocilizumab were considered. Upon a non-randomized study design, we adjusted the different cohorts using propensity score matching to improve comparability. Results A total of 2148 patients entered the analysis, who were treated by either combination therapy (n = 1464) or monotherapy (n = 684). Disease activity declined significantly more in patients upon combination therapy than upon biologic monotherapy. Comparison of adjusted cohorts revealed that patients who received TNFi gained more benefit from additionally given MTX than patients treated with tocilizumab. Median survival time of therapy with biologics was significantly longer upon combination therapy (3.1 years) than with monotherapy (2.7 years), as demonstrated by a Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank test: P = 0.002). The safety profile was moderately affected by additional MTX due to increased incidence of gastrointestinal and hepatic adverse events. Serious adverse events occurred at an equal rate of 3.6 events per 100 patient-years in both cohorts. Conclusion Additionally given MTX improves the effectiveness of biologic treatment in polyarticular JIA without seriously compromising treatment safety. Especially TNFi benefit from combination, while no improvement in outcome has been observed by combining tocilizumab with MTX

Age-Related Vascularization and Ossification of Joints in Children: An International Pilot Study to Test Multiobserver Ultrasound Reliability

International audienceObjective: To determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of ultrasound (US)-detected age-related joint vascularization and ossification grading in healthy children. Methods: Following standardized image acquisition and machine setting protocols, 10 international US experts examined 4 joints (wrist, second metacarpophalangeal joint, knee, and ankle) in 12 healthy children (divided into 4 age groups: 2–4, 5–8, 9–12, and 13–16 years). Gray-scale was used to detect the ossification grade, and power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) was used to detect physiologic vascularization. Ossification was graded from 0 (no ossification) to 3 (complete ossification). A positive PDUS signal was defined as any PDUS signal inside the joint. Kappa statistics were applied for intra- and interobserver reliability. Results: According to the specific joint and age, up to 4 solitary PDUS signals (mean 1.5) were detected within each joint area with predominant localization of the physiologic vascularization in specific anatomic positions: fat pad, epiphysis, physis, and short bone cartilage. The kappa values for ossification grading were 0.87 (range 0.85–0.91) and 0.58 for intra- and interobserver reliability, respectively. The bias-adjusted kappa values for intra- and interobserver reliability were 0.71 (range 0.44–1.00) and 0.69, respectively. Conclusion: Detection of normal findings (i.e., grading of physiologic ossification during skeletal maturation and identification of physiologic vessels) can be highly reliable by using clear definitions and a standardized acquisition protocol. These data will permit development of a reliable and standardized US approach for evaluating pediatric joint pathologies

Standardised procedures for ultrasound imaging in paediatric rheumatology: progress of EULAR/PRES task force.

International audienc

Standardised procedures for ultrasound imaging in paediatric rheumatology: progress of EULAR/PRES task force.

International audienc

Experiences with IL-1 blockade in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis - data from the German AID-registry

BackgroundSystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a complex disease with dysregulation of the innate immune system driven by cytokines. A major role is ascribed to interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), supporting the autoinflammatory character of the disease and offering an effective blocking mechanism for treatment. Here we present clinical practice data from the German AID-registry for patients treated with IL-1 inhibition (IL-1i).MethodsIn 2009 a clinical and research consortium (AID-Net) was established, including an online AID-registry. Patients with documented sJIA diagnosis were identified. Data for this retrospective IL-1i study were recorded by 17 centers. Response to treatment was evaluated according to Wallace criteria and additionally by an own classifying clinical response system.ResultsIn 6years, 202 patients with confirmed sJIA were recorded in the AID-registry. Out of these, 111 children received therapy with Anakinra (ANA) (n=84, 39 f) and/or Canakinumab (CANA) (n=27, 15 f) at a median age of 8.7 y (range 0.6-19.1). During the first 12months 75/111 (ANA 55, CANA 20) patients were evaluated according to Wallace criteria (achievement of inactive disease 28/55 and 17/20, remission over 6months under medication 13/55 and 7/20 cases). Over the whole period of time, clinical response was preserved in the majority of patients (ANA 54/80, CANA 20/27). Arthritis mostly persisted in polyarticular (PA) courses. During treatment with IL-1i concomitant medication could be tapered in about 15%. IL-1i was discontinued in 59/111 patients. 45 (15) adverse events (AE)s in ANA (CANA) treated patients (19.7 (26.6) AE/100 ANA (CANA) exposure years, 95%CI: 14.4-26.4 (14.9-43.9)) were reported.ConclusionIn a large cohort of sJIA patients from Germany, we can confirm an overall favorable clinical response to both available IL-1 blocking agents. IL-1i was well tolerated with acceptable safety and effectiveness in a real-life clinical setting