9 research outputs found
Impact of Quantitative Feedback via High-Fidelity Airway Management Training on Success Rate in Endotracheal Intubation in Undergraduate Medical Students—A Prospective Single-Center Study
Endotracheal intubation is still the gold standard in airway management. For medical
students and young professionals, it is often difficult to train personal skills. We tested a high-fidelity
simulator with an additional quantitative feedback integration to elucidate if competence acquisition
for airway management is increased by using this feedback method. In the prospective trial, all
participants (n = 299; 4th-year medical students) were randomized into two groups—One had been
trained on the simulator with additional quantitative feedback (n = 149) and one without (n = 150).
Three simulator measurements were considered as quality criteria—The pressure on the upper front
row of teeth, the correct pressure point of the laryngoscope spatula and the correct depth for the
fixation of the tube. There were a total of three measurement time points—One after initial training
(with additional capture of cognitive load), one during the exam, and a final during the follow-up,
approximately 20 weeks after the initial training. Regarding the three quality criteria, there was only
one significant difference, with an advantage for the control group with respect to the correct pressure
point of the laryngoscope spatula at the time of the follow-up (p = 0.011). After the training session,
the cognitive load was significantly higher in the intervention group (p = 0.008) and increased in both
groups over time. The additional quantitative feedback of the airway management trainer brings no
measurable advantage in training for endotracheal intubation. Due to the increased cognitive load
during the training, simple airway management task training may be more efficient for the primary
acquisition of essential procedural steps
Oxidative stress stimulates alpha-tocopherol transfer protein in human trophoblast tumor cells BeWo
alpha-Tocopherol transfer protein (alpha-TTP) has been identified as the major intracellular transport protein for the antioxidant vitamin E (alpha-Tocopherol). Expression of alpha-TTP on the reproductive system has been described both in mouse uterus and lately in the human placenta. The aim of this study was to clarify if placental expression of alpha-TTP can be modified by substances causing oxidative reactions. The human choriocarcinoma cell line BeWo was, therefore, treated with two known pro-oxidants. alpha-TTP expression was determined with immunocytochemistry and evaluated by applying a semiquantitative score. The presence of pro-oxidants in BeWo cells induced alpha-TTP expression. We thus hypothesize that stimulation of alpha-TTP expression by oxidative stress, as this was induced by pro-oxidants, could be part of an antioxidant process occurring in the placenta in the aim of enhancing the supply of alpha-Tocopherol. This process could occur both in normal pregnancies, as well as in pregnancy disorders presented with intensified oxidative stress. In that view, this model is proposed for further oxidative stress studies on trophoblast and placenta, on the grounds of clarifying the role of alpha-Tocopherol in pregnancy physiology and pathophysiology
Students benefit from developing their own emergency medicine OSCE stations: a comparative study using the matched-pair method
Background: Students can improve the learning process by developing their own multiple choice questions. If a similar effect occurred when creating OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) stations by themselves it could be beneficial to involve them in the development of OSCE stations. This study investigates the effect of students developing emergency medicine OSCE stations on their test performance. Method: In the 2011/12 winter semester, an emergency medicine OSCE was held for the first time at the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Leipzig. When preparing for the OSCE, 13 students (the intervention group) developed and tested emergency medicine examination stations as a learning experience. Their subsequent OSCE performance was compared to that of 13 other students (the control group), who were parallelized in terms of age, gender, semester and level of previous knowledge using the matched-pair method. In addition, both groups were compared to 20 students who tested the OSCE prior to regular emergency medicine training (test OSCE group). Results: There were no differences between the three groups regarding age (24.3 +/- 2.6; 24.2 +/- 3.4 and 24 +/- 2.3 years) or previous knowledge (29.3 +/- 3.4; 29.3 +/- 3.2 and 28.9 +/- 4.7 points in the multiple choice {[} MC] exam in emergency medicine). Merely the gender distribution differed (8 female and 5 male students in the intervention and control group vs. 3 males and 17 females in the test OSCE group). In the exam OSCE, participants in the intervention group scored 233.4 +/- 6.3 points (mean +/- SD) compared to 223.8 +/- 9.2 points (p < 0.01) in the control group. Cohen's effect size was d = 1.24. The students of the test OSCE group scored 223.2 +/- 13.4 points. Conclusions: Students who actively develop OSCE stations when preparing for an emergency medicine OSCE achieve better exam results
Data from: Undergraduate ultrasound education at German-speaking medical faculties: a survey
Background: The purpose of this study was twofold: to assess the status of undergraduate medical ultrasound (US) education in the German-speaking area and to suggest a possible framework for a longitudinal undergraduate medical US curriculum based on the study results and a literature review. Methods: The survey included 44 medical faculties in the German-speaking area: 37 in Germany, four in Austria and three in German-speaking Switzerland. A standardized questionnaire focused on the following aspects of undergraduate medical US education: general information, organization, resources, assessment methods and evaluation. Results: Data from 28 medical faculties were analysed. 26 out of 28 medical faculties offered US courses, 21 offered compulsory as well as elective courses, four offered compulsory and one elective courses only. 27 medical faculties supported US skills implementation. Abdominal US (n=25) was most common in teaching basic US skills. A learning objective catalogue was provided at 15 medical faculties. At 22 medical faculties, medical specialists were involved in undergraduate medical US education. 24 out of 26 medical faculties thought that peer-teaching is important to convey US skills. Medical faculties used the following methods to assess US skills: objective structured clinical examination (OSCE, n=7), non-standardized practical exams (n=4), non-standardized combined oral-practical exams (n=2) or direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS, n=1). 25 out of 26 medical faculties evaluated their US courses and 19 made suggestions for improvements in undergraduate medical US education. Conclusion: Medical faculty members in the German-speaking area have recognized the relevance of undergraduate medical US education. So far, courses are offered heterogeneously with rather short hands-on scanning time and high student-instructor ratio. Based on the results of this study and a literature review we suggest a possible framework and milestones on the way to a longitudinal undergraduate medical US curriculum
Evaluation of an educational concept for risk-oriented prevention in undergraduate dental education
Background: Aim of this observational study with a three-month follow-up was to evaluate an educational concept for risk-oriented prevention applied by fifth-year undergraduate dental students.
Methods: Dental students from two clinical treatment courses of the last undergraduate year were included. The subjects were divided into two groups according to their assignment to the two clinical classes. Group A received a sequence of seminars, including the basics of a risk classification system (RCS) with the theoretical background and case studies in the context of preventive dentistry. Thereby, 1) a theoretical seminar (background, RCS, cases) and 2) the transfer of the RCS on a clinical patient case chosen by the student, and its presentation within a discussion round was applied. Group B served as a comparison group with students who did not receive any of teaching events in terms of RCS. The self-perceived knowledge and importance of RCS, as well as objective knowledge (qualitative questions), were assessed with a standardized questionnaire at baseline and after 3 months.
Results: Out of 90 students at baseline, 79 (group A: 39, group B: 40) were re-evaluated after 3 months. At this follow-up, Group A estimated their confidence in handling the medication (p = 0.02), the RCS (p < 0.01), and in identifying the risk of oral diseases (p = 0.02) higher than group B. Furthermore, group A felt it was more important to identify patients at risk (p = 0.02), the risk of complications (p = 0.02) and to apply an RCS (p = 0.03). At follow-up, group A exhibited more correct answers of qualitative questions than group B regarding risk of complications (p < 0.01) and bacteremia (p < 0.01). Group A felt more confident with at-risk patients and more competent concerning RCS than group B (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: The concept for educating risk-oriented prevention increased the self-perceived skills and the knowledge of undergraduate dental students after 3 months within a clinical treatment course
Impact of Quantitative Feedback via High-Fidelity Airway Management Training on Success Rate in Endotracheal Intubation in Undergraduate Medical Students—A Prospective Single-Center Study
Endotracheal intubation is still the gold standard in airway management. For medical students and young professionals, it is often difficult to train personal skills. We tested a high-fidelity simulator with an additional quantitative feedback integration to elucidate if competence acquisition for airway management is increased by using this feedback method. In the prospective trial, all participants (n = 299; 4th-year medical students) were randomized into two groups—One had been trained on the simulator with additional quantitative feedback (n = 149) and one without (n = 150). Three simulator measurements were considered as quality criteria—The pressure on the upper front row of teeth, the correct pressure point of the laryngoscope spatula and the correct depth for the fixation of the tube. There were a total of three measurement time points—One after initial training (with additional capture of cognitive load), one during the exam, and a final during the follow-up, approximately 20 weeks after the initial training. Regarding the three quality criteria, there was only one significant difference, with an advantage for the control group with respect to the correct pressure point of the laryngoscope spatula at the time of the follow-up (p = 0.011). After the training session, the cognitive load was significantly higher in the intervention group (p = 0.008) and increased in both groups over time. The additional quantitative feedback of the airway management trainer brings no measurable advantage in training for endotracheal intubation. Due to the increased cognitive load during the training, simple airway management task training may be more efficient for the primary acquisition of essential procedural steps
Impact of Quantitative Feedback via High-Fidelity Airway Management Training on Success Rate in Endotracheal Intubation in Undergraduate Medical Students—A Prospective Single-Center Study
Endotracheal intubation is still the gold standard in airway management. For medical
students and young professionals, it is often difficult to train personal skills. We tested a high-fidelity
simulator with an additional quantitative feedback integration to elucidate if competence acquisition
for airway management is increased by using this feedback method. In the prospective trial, all
participants (n = 299; 4th-year medical students) were randomized into two groups—One had been
trained on the simulator with additional quantitative feedback (n = 149) and one without (n = 150).
Three simulator measurements were considered as quality criteria—The pressure on the upper front
row of teeth, the correct pressure point of the laryngoscope spatula and the correct depth for the
fixation of the tube. There were a total of three measurement time points—One after initial training
(with additional capture of cognitive load), one during the exam, and a final during the follow-up,
approximately 20 weeks after the initial training. Regarding the three quality criteria, there was only
one significant difference, with an advantage for the control group with respect to the correct pressure
point of the laryngoscope spatula at the time of the follow-up (p = 0.011). After the training session,
the cognitive load was significantly higher in the intervention group (p = 0.008) and increased in both
groups over time. The additional quantitative feedback of the airway management trainer brings no
measurable advantage in training for endotracheal intubation. Due to the increased cognitive load
during the training, simple airway management task training may be more efficient for the primary
acquisition of essential procedural steps
Impact of Quantitative Feedback via High-Fidelity Airway Management Training on Success Rate in Endotracheal Intubation in Undergraduate Medical Students—A Prospective Single-Center Study
Endotracheal intubation is still the gold standard in airway management. For medical
students and young professionals, it is often difficult to train personal skills. We tested a high-fidelity
simulator with an additional quantitative feedback integration to elucidate if competence acquisition
for airway management is increased by using this feedback method. In the prospective trial, all
participants (n = 299; 4th-year medical students) were randomized into two groups—One had been
trained on the simulator with additional quantitative feedback (n = 149) and one without (n = 150).
Three simulator measurements were considered as quality criteria—The pressure on the upper front
row of teeth, the correct pressure point of the laryngoscope spatula and the correct depth for the
fixation of the tube. There were a total of three measurement time points—One after initial training
(with additional capture of cognitive load), one during the exam, and a final during the follow-up,
approximately 20 weeks after the initial training. Regarding the three quality criteria, there was only
one significant difference, with an advantage for the control group with respect to the correct pressure
point of the laryngoscope spatula at the time of the follow-up (p = 0.011). After the training session,
the cognitive load was significantly higher in the intervention group (p = 0.008) and increased in both
groups over time. The additional quantitative feedback of the airway management trainer brings no
measurable advantage in training for endotracheal intubation. Due to the increased cognitive load
during the training, simple airway management task training may be more efficient for the primary
acquisition of essential procedural steps