17 research outputs found

    European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia

    Get PDF
    The therapeutic landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has profoundly changed over the past 7 years. Most patients with chronic phase (CP) now have a normal life expectancy. Another goal is achieving a stable deep molecular response (DMR) and discontinuing medication for treatment-free remission (TFR). The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically evaluate and update the evidence to achieve these goals since its previous recommendations. First-line treatment is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; imatinib brand or generic, dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib are available first-line). Generic imatinib is the cost-effective initial treatment in CP. Various contraindications and side-effects of all TKIs should be considered. Patient risk status at diagnosis should be assessed with the new EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS)-score. Monitoring of response should be done by quantitative polymerase chain reaction whenever possible. A change of treatment is recommended when intolerance cannot be ameliorated or when molecular milestones are not reached. Greater than 10% BCR-ABL1 at 3 months indicates treatment failure when confirmed. Allogeneic transplantation continues to be a therapeutic option particularly for advanced phase CML. TKI treatment should be withheld during pregnancy. Treatment discontinuation may be considered in patients with durable DMR with the goal of achieving TFR

    Overall survival with ponatinib versus allogeneic stem cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias with the T315I mutation.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Effective treatment options for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have the threonine to isoleucine mutation at codon 315 (T315I) are few. The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) between patients with CML and those with Ph+ ALL who received treatment with ponatinib versus allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). METHODS: A post hoc, retrospective, indirect comparison of OS among patients who received single-agent ponatinib in the Ponatinib Ph+ ALL and CML Evaluation (PACE) trial with those who underwent allo-SCT as reported to the European Bone Marrow Transplant registry, stratified by CML disease phase and Ph+ ALL, was conducted. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models were used to compare OS between intervention groups, adjusting for time from diagnosis to intervention, age, sex, and geographic region; 24-month and 48-month OS rates and median OS were reported. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, 24-month and 48-month OS rates were significantly higher in patients with chronic-phase CML (CP-CML) who received ponatinib compared with those who underwent allo-SCT (24 months: 84% vs 60.5%, respectively; P = .004; 48 months: 72.7% vs 55.8%, respectively; P = .013), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.84; P = .017). In patients who had accelerated-phase CML, OS rates were not significantly different between the groups (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.20-4.10; P = .889). In patients who had blast-crisis CML and those with Ph+ ALL, ponatinib was associated with shorter OS compared with allo-SCT (blast-crisis CML: HR, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.08-4.82; P = .030]; Ph+ ALL: HR, 2.77 [95% CI, 0.73-10.56; P = .146]). CONCLUSIONS: Although allo-SCT remains an important treatment option for patients with T315I-positive advanced CML and Ph+ ALL, ponatinib represents a valuable alternative for patients with T315I-positive CP-CML

    Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) Compared with Bone Marrow (BM) as the Stem Cell Source for Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Transplantation with Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC-alloSCT) in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Complete Remission (CR): a Retrospective Analysis From the ALWP of EBMT

    No full text
    Of all the grave crises in Northern Ireland's history, the events of Bloody Sunday are perhaps the most notorious. The subject of an independent inquiry that is the longest and most expensive the British government has ever undertaken, this yet to be resolved issue continues to be one of the most significant events in the recent history of the Troubles. This book tackles the subject from a new angle that covers both the political and psychological aspects of what happened. Based on extensive interviews with families whose relatives were killed by British soldiers, it is a record of the trauma that they have suffered. Setting Bloody Sunday in social, political and historical contexts, the authors examine the events of the day itself, the aftermath, and the relationship between post-traumatic stress disorder, grief, mourning and storytelling. The authors conclude with accounts of state and community responses to the trauma, and the impact and implications of the Saville Inquiry, which has allowed family members to express publicly their stories about the events of Bloody Sunday

    Tumor incidence in related hematopoietic stem cell donors

    No full text
    Late malignancies have been discussed as a potential risk for growth factor mobilized donors of hematopoietic stem cells. Little is known about the incidence and potential risk factors. This single center retrospective cohort study evaluated all HLA-identical sibling pairs with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for a hematological malignancy, treated from 1974 to 2001 at the University Hospital of Basel. Three hundred eighteen pairs were identified, 291 donors (92%) could be contacted. Median observation time was 13.8 years (range 5-32 years). Sixteen (5%) donors had developed a total of 18 tumors, 17 recipients a secondary tumor. According to the age- and sex-adapted cancer incidence, 3.3 tumors in male and 6.8 in female donors were expected, 3 (relative risk (RR): 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.19-2.66) and 4 (RR: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.16-1.48), respectively, were found in donors between 0 and 49 years. Between 50 and 69 years, 4.5 tumors in males and 4.8 in females were expected, 5 (RR: 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 0.36-2.59) and 6 (RR: 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-2.67), respectively, were observed. Tumors do occur in donors of hematopoietic stem cells at least at the rate as expected in a normal population; whether incidence exceeds expected rates needs to be determined in larger international cohorts
    corecore