366 research outputs found

    Бвязи ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ срСднСмСсячных ОБО Π½Π°Π΄ Антарктикой ΠΈ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡ‰Π°Π΄ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ тропичСского бассСйна Π’ΠΈΡ…ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΊΠ΅Π°Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ соврСмСнном ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π°

    Get PDF
    ΠžΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ исслСдования Π²Ρ‹Π±Ρ€Π°Π½Ρ‹ измСнСния распрСдСлСния срСднСмСсячных Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ОБО Π½Π°Π΄ Антарктикой, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡ‰Π°Π΄ΠΈ Π’Π’Π‘ Π² Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡˆΠ°Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ. ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ исслСдования Π΅ΡΡ‚ΡŒ измСнСния статистичСских связСй ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ ΡƒΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ процСссами, ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΡΡ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΡˆΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ соврСмСнного потСплСния ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π°. ЦСлью Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹ Π΅ΡΡ‚ΡŒ выявлСниС ΠΈΡ… связСй, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ Π½Π° протяТСнии ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π° соврСмСнного потСплСния ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π° ΡƒΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ устойчиво ΠΈ Π½Ρ‹Π½Π΅ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ΠΌΠΈ

    Linguistic metaconcepts can improve grammatical understanding in L1 education evidence from a Dutch quasi-experimental study

    Get PDF
    This is the final version. Available on open access from Public Library of Science via the DOI in this recordData Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Data can also be found on the OSF repository at: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/EGKJD (https://osf.io/egkjd/?view_only=None).This mixed-method quasi-experimental study examined whether metaconceptual grammar teaching impacts on (a) students’ L1 grammatical understanding, (b) their β€˜blind’ use of grammatical concepts and (c) their preference of using explicit grammatical concepts over everyday concepts in explaining grammatical problems. Previous research, involving single group pre-postintervention designs, found positive effects for metaconceptual interventions on secondary school students’ grammatical reasoning ability, although a negative side effect seemed to be that some students started using grammatical concepts β€˜blindly’ (i.e., in an inaccurate way). While there are thus important clues that metaconceptual grammar teaching may lead to increased grammatical understanding, there is a great need for more robust empirical research. The current study, involving 196 Dutch 14-year old pre-university students, is a methodological improvement of previous work, adopting a switching replications design. Bayesian multivariate analyses indicate medium to large effects from the metaconceptual intervention on students’ grammatical understanding. The study found a similar effect of the intervention on students’ ability to use explicit grammatical concepts over everyday concepts in tackling grammatical problems. No evidence for increased β€˜blind’ concept use as a negative byproduct of the intervention was found. Additional qualitative analyses of in-intervention tasks provided further evidence for the effectiveness of metaconceptual interventions, and seemed to indicate that cases of blind concept use, rather than being a negative side effect, might actually be part of a gradual process of students’ growing understanding of grammatical (meta)concepts. We discuss these findings in relation to previous work and conclude that linguistic metaconcepts can improve L1 grammatical understanding.Netherlands Organisation of Scientific Research (NWO
    • …
    corecore