328 research outputs found
Clusters and Superclusters in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey
Two-dimensional high-resolution density field of galaxies of the Las Campanas
Redshift Survey (LCRS) with a smoothing length 0.8 Mpc/h is used to extract
clusters and groups of galaxies, and a low-resolution field with a smoothing
length 10 Mpc/h to find superclusters of galaxies. Properties of these density
field (DF) clusters and superclusters are studied and compared with the
properties of Abell clusters and superclusters, and LCRS loose groups. We
calculate the DF-cluster luminosity function, and show that most luminous
clusters in high-density environments are about ten times brighter than most
luminous clusters in low-density environments. We present a catalogue of
DF-superclusters and show that superclusters that contain Abell clusters are
richer and more luminous than superclusters without Abell clusters. A pdf file
of the paper with high-resolution figures is available in Tartu Observatory
web-site (http://www.aai.ee/~maret/cosmoweb.html)Comment: 19 pages LaTeX text, 15 PostScript Figures, submitted to Astronomy
and Astrophysic
Luminous superclusters: remnants from inflation
We derive the luminosity and multiplicity functions of superclusters compiled
for the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Data Release
4), and for three samples of simulated superclusters. We find for all
supercluster samples Density Field (DF) clusters, which represent high-density
peaks of the class of Abell clusters, and use median luminosities/masses of
richness class 1 DF-clusters to calculate relative luminosity/mass functions.
We show that the fraction of very luminous (massive) superclusters in real
samples is more than tenfolds greater than in simulated samples. Superclusters
are generated by large-scale density perturbations which evolve very slowly.
The absence of very luminous superclusters in simulations can be explained
either by non-proper treatment of large-scale perturbations, or by some yet
unknown processes in the very early Universe.Comment: 6 pages, 3 Figures, submitted for Astronomy and Astrophysic
Superclusters of galaxies from the 2dF redshift survey. II. Comparison with simulations
We investigate properties of superclusters of galaxies found on the basis of
the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, and compare them with properties of
superclusters from the Millennium Simulation. We study the dependence of
various characteristics of superclusters on their distance from the observer,
on their total luminosity, and on their multiplicity. The multiplicity is
defined by the number of Density Field (DF) clusters in superclusters. Using
the multiplicity we divide superclusters into four richness classes: poor,
medium, rich and extremely rich. We show that superclusters are asymmetrical
and have multi-branching filamentary structure, with the degree of asymmetry
and filamentarity being higher for the more luminous and richer superclusters.
The comparison of real superclusters with Millennium superclusters shows that
most properties of simulated superclusters agree very well with real data, the
main differences being in the luminosity and multiplicity distributions.Comment: 15 pages, 13 Figures, submitted for Astronomy and Astrophysic
Steps toward the power spectrum of matter. I.The mean spectrum of galaxies
We calculate the mean power spectrum of galaxies using published power
spectra of galaxies and clusters of galaxies. On small scales we use the power
spectrum derived from the 2-dimensional distribution of APM galaxies, on large
scales we use power spectra derived from 3-dimensional data for galaxy and
cluster samples. Spectra are reduced to real space and to the amplitude of the
power spectrum of APM galaxies. Available data indicate the presence of two
different populations in the nearby Universe. Clusters of galaxies sample a
relatively large region in the Universe where rich, medium and poor
superclusters are well represented. Their mean power spectrum has a spike on
scale 120 h^{-1}Mpc, followed by an approximate power-law spectrum of index n =
-1.9 towards small scales. The power spectrum found from LCRS and IRAS 1.2 Jy
surveys is flatter around the maximum, which may represent regions of the
Universe with medium-rich and poor superclusters.Comment: LaTex (sty files added), 35 pages, 5 PostScript figures and Table
with mean power spectrum embedded, Astrophysical Journal (accepted
Superclusters of galaxies from the 2dF redshift survey. I. The catalogue
We use the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey data to compile catalogues of
superclusters for the Northern and Southern regions of the 2dFGRS, altogether
543 superclusters at redshifts 0.009 < z < 0.2. We analyse methods of compiling
supercluster catalogues and use results of the Millennium Simulation to
investigate possible selection effects and errors. We find that the most
effective method is the density field method using smoothing with an
Epanechnikov kernel of radius 8 Mpc/h. We derive positions of the highest
luminosity density peaks and find the most luminous cluster in the vicinity of
the peak, this cluster is considered as the main cluster and its brightest
galaxy the main galaxy of the supercluster. In catalogues we give equatorial
coordinates and distances of superclusters as determined by positions of their
main clusters. We also calculate the expected total luminosities of the
superclusters.Comment: 16 pages, 11 figures, submitted for Astronomy and Astrophysics.
High-resolution pdf file and supplementary data can be found at
http://www.aai.ee/~maret/2dfscl.htm
Superclusters of galaxies in the 2dF redshift survey. III. The properties of galaxies in superclusters
We use catalogues of superclusters of galaxies from the 2dF Galaxy Redshift
Survey to study the properties of galaxies in superclusters. We compare the
properties of galaxies in high and low density regions of rich superclusters,
in poor superclusters and in the field, as well as in groups, and of isolated
galaxies in superclusters of various richness. We show that in rich
superclusters the values of the luminosity density smoothed on a scale of 8
\Mpc are higher than in poor superclusters: the median density in rich
superclusters is , in poor superclusters . Rich superclusters contain high density cores with densities while in poor superclusters such high density cores are absent. The
properties of galaxies in rich and poor superclusters and in the field are
different: the fraction of early type, passive galaxies in rich superclusters
is slightly larger than in poor superclusters, and is the smallest among the
field galaxies. Most importantly, in high density cores of rich superclusters
() there is an excess of early type, passive galaxies in groups
and clusters, as well as among those which do not belong to groups or clusters.
The main galaxies of superclusters have a rather limited range of absolute
magnitudes. The main galaxies of rich superclusters have larger luminosities
than those of poor superclusters and of groups in the field. Our results show
that both the local (group/cluster) environments and global (supercluster)
environments influence galaxy morphologies and their star formation activity.Comment: 13 pages, 10 figures, submitted to Astronomy and Astrophysic
Steps toward the power spectrum of matter. III. The primordial spectrum
Observed power spectrum of matter found in Papers I and II is compared with
analytical power spectra. Spatially flat cold and mixed dark matter models with
cosmological constant and open models are considered. The primordial power
spectrum of matter is determined using the power spectrum of matter and the
transfer functions of analytical models. The primordial power spectrum has a
break in amplitude. We conclude that a scale-free primordial power spectrum is
excluded if presently available data on the distribution of clusters and
galaxies represent the true mass distribution of the Universe.Comment: LaTex (sty files added), 22 pages, 5 PostScript figures embedded,
Astrophysical Journal (accepted
The supercluster-void network; 2, An oscillating cluster correlation function
We use rich clusters of galaxies in the Northern and Southern Galactic hemispheres up to a redshift z=0.12 to determine the cluster correlation function. We show that superclusters of galaxies and voids between them form a moderately regular network. As a result the correlation function determined for clusters located in rich superclusters oscillates: it has a series of regularly spaced secondary maxima and minima. The scale of the supercluster-void network, determined from the period of oscillations, is P=115 Mpc. The amplitude of oscillations is about 3 times larger than the estimated error. We compare the observed cluster correlation function with similar functions derived for popular models of structure formation. We find that the production of the observed cluster correlation function in any model with a smooth transition of the power spectrum from a Harrison-Zeldovich regime with positive spectral index on long wavelengths to a negative spectral index on short wavelengths is highly unlikely. The power spectrum must have an extra peak located at the wavelength equal to the period of oscillations of the correlation function
A 120-Mpc Periodicity in the Three-Dimensional Distribution of Galaxy Superclusters
Using a new compilation of available data on galaxy clusters and
superclusters we present evidence for a quasiregular three-dimensional network
of rich superclusters and voids, with the regions of high density separated by
about 120 Mpc. We calculate the power spectrum for clusters of galaxies; it has
a peak on the wavelength equal to the step of the network; the excess in the
amplitude of the spectrum over that of the cold dark matter model is by a
factor of 1.4. The probability that the spectrum can be formed within the
framework of the standard cosmogony is very small. If the cluster distribution
reflects the distribution of all matter (luminous and dark), then there must
exists some hithero unknown process that produces regular structure on large
scales.Comment: Tex, 6 pages, 2 PostScript figures embedded, accepted by Nature on
November 19, 199
Optical and X-ray clusters as tracers of the supercluster-void network. I Superclusters of Abell and X-ray clusters
We study the distribution of X-ray selected clusters of galaxies with respect
to superclusters determined by Abell clusters of galaxies and show that the
distribution of X-ray clusters follows the supercluster-void network determined
by Abell clusters. We find that in this network X-ray clusters are more
strongly clustered than other clusters. Poor, non-Abell X-ray clusters follow
the supercluster-void network as well: these clusters are embedded in
superclusters determined by rich clusters and populate filaments between them.
We present a new catalog of superclusters of Abell clusters out to a redshift
of z_{lim}=0.13, a catalog of X-ray clusters located in superclusters
determined by Abell clusters, and a list of additional superclusters of X-ray
clusters.Comment: LaTex (sty files added), 16 pages, 3 ps figures, submitted to
Astronomical Journal. Animations of the 3D distribution of superclusters of
Abell and X-ray clusters at http://www.aai.ee/~maret/SCLVnet.ht
- …
