Investigation of photoplethysmographic signals and blood oxygen saturation values obtained from human splanchnic organs using a fiber optic sensor

Objective A reliable, continuous method of monitoring splanchnic organ oxygen saturation could allow for the early detection of malperfusion, and may prevent the onset of multiple organ failure. Current monitoring techniques have not been widely accepted in critical care monitoring. As a preliminary to developing a continuous indwelling device, this study evaluates a new handheld fiber optic photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor for estimating the blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) of splanchnic organs during surgery. Methods A fiber optic splanchnic PPG sensor, instrumentation system and virtual instrument were developed to facilitate PPG and SpO2 measurement from splanchnic organs. Following Local Research Ethics Committee approval, the sensor was evaluated on seventeen ASA 1 and 2 patients undergoing open laparotomy. PPG signals were obtained from the large bowel, small bowel, liver and stomach. Simultaneous PPG signals from the finger were also obtained using an identical fiber optic sensor. Results Good quality PPG signals with high signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios were obtained from all splanchnic sites under investigation. Analysis of the ac and dc amplitudes of the red and infrared PPG signals showed there to be a statistically significant difference between PPG signals obtained from splanchnic organs with those obtained from the finger (using fiber optic sensors). Estimated SpO2 values from the splanchnic organs show good agreement with those obtained from the finger using both a fiber optic sensor and a commercial device. Furthermore, the results of a Bland and Altman analysis indicate that fiber optic splanchnic pulse oximetry, particularly of the bowel, may provide a suitable method for monitoring splanchnic organ perfusion. Conclusion The evaluation of a new fiber optic sensor on anaesthetized patients undergoing laparotomy demonstrated that good quality PPG signals and SpO2 estimates can be obtained from splanchnic organs. Such a sensor may provide a useful tool for the intraoperative assessment of splanchnic perfusion

Endovascular strategy or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: one-year outcomes from the IMPROVE randomized trial.

AIMS: To report the longer term outcomes following either a strategy of endovascular repair first or open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, which are necessary for both patient and clinical decision-making. METHODS AND RESULTS: This pragmatic multicentre (29 UK and 1 Canada) trial randomized 613 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ruptured aneurysm; 316 to an endovascular first strategy (if aortic morphology is suitable, open repair if not) and 297 to open repair. The principal 1-year outcome was mortality; secondary outcomes were re-interventions, hospital discharge, health-related quality-of-life (QoL) (EQ-5D), costs, Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALYs), and cost-effectiveness [incremental net benefit (INB)]. At 1 year, all-cause mortality was 41.1% for the endovascular strategy group and 45.1% for the open repair group, odds ratio 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62, 1.17], P = 0.325, with similar re-intervention rates in each group. The endovascular strategy group and open repair groups had average total hospital stays of 17 and 26 days, respectively, P < 0.001. Patients surviving rupture had higher average EQ-5D utility scores in the endovascular strategy vs. open repair groups, mean differences 0.087 (95% CI 0.017, 0.158), 0.068 (95% CI -0.004, 0.140) at 3 and 12 months, respectively. There were indications that QALYs were higher and costs lower for the endovascular first strategy, combining to give an INB of £3877 (95% CI £253, £7408) or €4356 (95% CI €284, €8323). CONCLUSION: An endovascular first strategy for management of ruptured aneurysms does not offer a survival benefit over 1 year but offers patients faster discharge with better QoL and is cost-effective. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 48334791

The effect of aortic morphology on peri-operative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Aims To investigate whether aneurysm shape and extent, which indicate whether a patient with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is eligible for endovascular repair (EVAR), influence the outcome of both EVAR and open surgical repair. Methods and results The influence of six morphological parameters (maximum aortic diameter, aneurysm neck diameter, length and conicality, proximal neck angle, and maximum common iliac diameter) on mortality and reinterventions within 30 days was investigated in rAAA patients randomized before morphological assessment in the Immediate Management of the Patient with Rupture: Open Versus Endovascular strategies (IMPROVE) trial. Patients with a proven diagnosis of rAAA, who underwent repair and had their admission computerized tomography scan submitted to the core laboratory, were included. Among 458 patients (364 men, mean age 76 years), who had either EVAR (n = 177) or open repair (n = 281) started, there were 155 deaths and 88 re-interventions within 30 days of randomization analysed according to a pre-specified plan. The mean maximum aortic diameter was 8.6 cm. There were no substantial correlations between the six morphological variables. Aneurysm neck length was shorter in those undergoing open repair (vs. EVAR). Aneurysm neck length (mean 23.3, SD 16.1 mm) was inversely associated with mortality for open repair and overall: adjusted OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.57, 0.92) for each 16 mm (SD) increase in length. There were no convincing associations of morphological parameters with reinterventions. Conclusion Short aneurysm necks adversely influence mortality after open repair of rAAA and preclude conventional EVAR. This may help explain why observational studies, but not randomized trials, have shown an early survival benefit for EVAR. Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN 48334791