Issues of consent for regional analgesia in labour: A survey of obstetric anaesthetists

Publisher's copy made available with the permission of the publisherAnaesthetists are legally obliged to obtain consent and inform patients of material risks prior to administering regional analgesia in labour. We surveyed consultant members of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists with a special interest in obstetric anaesthesia, in order to identify and compare which risks of regional analgesia they report discussing with women prior to and during labour. We also asked about obstetric anaesthetists’ beliefs about informed consent, the type of consent obtained and its documentation. Of 542 questionnaires distributed, 291 responses (54%) were suitable for analysis. The five most commonly discussed risks were post dural puncture headache, block failure, permanent neurological injury, temporary leg weakness and hypotension. Obstetric anaesthetists reported discussing a mean of 8.0 (SD 3.8) and 10 (SD 3.8) risks in the labour and antenatal settings respectively. Nearly 20% of respondents did not rank post dural puncture headache among their top five most important risks for discussion. Seventy percent of respondents indicated that they believe active labour inhibits a woman’s ability to give ‘fully informed consent’. Over 80% of respondents obtain verbal consent and 57 (20%) have no record of the consent or its discussion. Obstetric anaesthetists reported making a considerable effort to inform patients of risks prior to the provision of regional analgesia in labour. Verbal consent may be appropriate for labouring women, using standardized forms that serve as a reminder of the risks, and a record of the discussion. Consensus is required as to what are the levels of risk from regional analgesia in labour.J. D. B. Black, A. M. Cynahttp://www.aaic.net.au/Article.asp?D=200525

Unexpected difficulty administering an epidural top-up for caesarean section

Publisher's copy made available with the permission of the publisher © Australian Society of AnaesthetistsP-C. Lim, A. Cynahttp://www.aaic.net.au/Article.asp?D=200121

Antenatal self-hypnosis for labour and childbirth: A pilot study

Publisher's copy made available with the permission of the publisher © Australian Society of AnaesthetistsIn our institution we have used antenatal training in self-hypnosis for over three years as a tool to provide relaxation, anxiolysis and analgesia for women in labour. To assess the effects of hypnotherapy, we prospectively collected data related to the use of hypnosis in preparation for childbirth, and compared the birth outcomes of women experiencing antenatal hypnosis with parity and gestational age matched controls. Methods: Prospective data about women taught self-hypnosis in preparation for childbirth were collected between August 2002 and August 2004. Birth outcome data of women using hypnosis were compared with routinely collected retrospective data from parity and gestational age matched women delivering after 37 weeks gestation during 2003. Results: Seventy-seven antenatal women consecutively taught self-hypnosis in preparation for childbirth were compared with 3,249 parity and gestational age matched controls. Of the women taught antenatal self-hypnosis, nulliparous parturients used fewer epidurals: 36% (18/50) compared with 53% (765/1436) of controls (RR 0.68 [95% CI 0.47-0.98]); and required less augmentation: 18% (9/50) vs 36% (523/1436) (RR 0.48 [95%CI 0.27-0.90]). Conclusions: Our clinical findings are consistent with recent meta-analyses showing beneficial outcomes associated with the use of hypnosis in childbirth. Adequately powered, randomized trials are required to further elucidate the effects of hypnosis preparation for childbirth.A. M. Cyna, M. I. Andrew, G. L. McAuliff

Avoiding inadvertent epidural injection of drugs intended for non-epidural use

Publisher's copy made available with the permission of the publisher © Australian Society of AnaesthetistsInadvertent administration of non-epidural medications into the epidural space has the potential for serious morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to collate reported incidents of this type, describe the potential mechanisms of occurrence and identify possible solutions. We searched medical databases and reviewed reference lists of papers retrieved, covering a period of 35 years, regarding this type of medication incident. The 31 reports of 37 cases found is likely to represent a gross underestimation of the actual number of incidents that occur. 'Syringe swap', 'ampoule error', and epidural/intravenous line confusion were the main sources of error in 36/37 cases (97%). Given that no effective treatment for such errors has been identified, prevention should be the main defence strategy. Despite all the precautions that are currently undertaken, accidents will inevitably occur. We have identified areas for systemwide change that may prevent these types of incidents from occurring in future.http://www.aaic.net.au/Article.asp?D=200213

Fatal epidural infusion - call for a system-wide change

Publisher's copy made available with the permission of the publisher © Australian Society of Anaesthetistshttp://www.aaic.net.au/Article.asp?D=200132

Preoperative anemia management with intravenous iron: a systematic review

Background Iron deficiency anemia is a common condition in patients presenting for surgery, but despite its negative health impacts, the condition remains frequently unmanaged. Optimizing the patient's own red cell mass should be addressed in the preoperative period. Intravenous iron has been advocated as an effective treatment modality. Objectives The objective of this systematic review was to critically appraise and synthesize the best available evidence related to the effectiveness and economic aspects of intravenous iron administration on the correction of iron deficiency anemia in the preoperative period. Inclusion criteria Types of participants Adult patients 18 years of age and older receiving intravenous iron compared with those taking iron orally, and those who were not on iron or were transfused with red blood cells for the correction of anemia. Studies assessing the economic aspects of anemia management were also considered. Types of intervention(s)/phenomena of interest The quantitative component of the review considered studies that evaluated the management of anemia with iron infusions compared to oral iron treatment alone, oral iron in combination with erythropoietin, erythropoietin alone or hemoglobin correction with blood transfusion. The economic component of this review considered studies that evaluated the costs and benefits of iron infusions compared to oral iron treatment or hemoglobin correction with blood transfusion for the treatment of preoperative anemia. Types of studies The quantitative component of the review considered any experimental study design including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and quasi-experimental studies for inclusion. The economic component of the review considered cost effectiveness, cost utility and cost benefit studies for inclusion. Types of outcomes The quantitative component of this review considered studies that reported on the impact of intravenous iron administration on: hemoglobin levels, red blood cell transfusion, length of stay in hospital, rate of readmission within 30 days of discharge, incidence of transfusion-related complications and changes in functional outcomes. The economic component of the review focused on cost benefits resulting from intravenous iron administration. Search strategy The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy was utilized in this review. Studies published in English, German, Italian and Dutch from 2001 until December 2012 were considered for inclusion in this review. Methodological quality The studies were independently assessed by two reviewers using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data collection Quantitative data was extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute, specifically the Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI). Economic data was extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute Analysis of Cost, Technology and Utilisation Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-ACTUARI). Data synthesis This review set out to conduct both meta-analyses of the findings of effectiveness studies using JBI-MAStARI and pooling of economic findings using JBI-ACTUARI. Because of the number of studies found, this was not possible and the findings are therefore presented in tabular or narrative form. Results The quantitative component of the review identified two RCTs for inclusion with one of the trials favoring intravenous iron over oral iron for anemia correction. Only a subgroup could be included from the second trial and the results were inconclusive. Data was heterogeneous and did not allow a meta-analysis. The search for the economic component of the review revealed no examination of the cost effectiveness of preoperative correction of iron deficiency anemia with intravenous iron. Conclusions The review found insufficient data to make firm conclusions about the effectiveness of preoperative intravenous iron administration for the correction of anemia. Neither could we establish firm conclusions on the potential cost savings due to intravenous iron supplementation.Bernd Froessler, Catalin Tufanaru, Allan Cyna, Alan Pearso

Unexpected Consequences: Women’s experiences of a self-hypnosis intervention to help with pain relief during labour.

Background Self-hypnosis is becoming increasingly popular as a means of labour pain management. Previous studies have produced mixed results. There are very few data on women’s views and experiences of using hypnosis in this context. As part of a randomized controlled trial of self-hypnosis for intra-partum pain relief (the SHIP Trial) we conducted qualitative interviews with women randomized to the intervention arm to explore their views and experiences of using self-hypnosis during labour and birth. Methods Participants were randomly selected from the intervention arm of the study, which consisted of two antenatal self-hypnosis training sessions and a supporting CD that women were encouraged to listen to daily from 32 weeks gestation until the birth of their baby. Those who consented were interviewed in their own homes 8-12 weeks after birth. Following transcription, the interviews were analysed iteratively and emerging concepts were discussed amongst the authors to generate organizing themes. These were then used to develop a principal organizing metaphor or global theme, in a process known as thematic networks analysis. Results Of the 343 women in the intervention group, 48 were invited to interview, and 16 were interviewed over a 12 month period from February 2012 to January 2013. Coding of the data and subsequent analysis revealed a global theme of ‘unexpected consequences’, supported by 5 organising themes, ‘calmness in a climate of fear’, ‘from sceptic to believer’, ‘finding my space’, ‘delays and disappointments’ and ‘personal preferences’. Most respondents reported positive experiences of self-hypnosis and highlighted feelings of calmness, confidence and empowerment. They found the intervention to be beneficial and used a range of novel strategies to personalize their self-hypnosis practice. Occasionally women reported feeling frustrated or disappointed when their relaxed state was misinterpreted by midwives on admission or when their labour and birth experiences did not match their expectations. Conclusion The women in this study generally appreciated antenatal self-hypnosis training and found it to be beneficial during labour and birth. The state of focused relaxation experienced by women using the technique needs to be recognized by providers if the intervention is to be implemented into the maternity service

Hypnosis Antenatal Training for Childbirth (HATCh): a randomised controlled trial [NCT00282204]

BACKGROUND: Although medical interventions play an important role in preserving lives and maternal comfort they have become increasingly routine in normal childbirth. This may increase the risk of associated complications and a less satisfactory birth experience. Antenatal hypnosis is associated with a reduced need for pharmacological interventions during childbirth. This trial seeks to determine the efficacy or otherwise of antenatal group hypnosis preparation for childbirth in late pregnancy. METHODS/DESIGN: A single centre, randomised controlled trial using a 3 arm parallel group design in the largest tertiary maternity unit in South Australia. Group 1 participants receive antenatal hypnosis training in preparation for childbirth administered by a qualified hypnotherapist with the use of an audio compact disc on hypnosis for re-enforcement; Group 2 consists of antenatal hypnosis training in preparation for childbirth using an audio compact disc on hypnosis administered by a nurse with no training in hypnotherapy; Group 3 participants continue with their usual preparation for childbirth with no additional intervention. Women > 34 and < 39 weeks gestation, planning a vaginal birth, not in active labour, with a singleton, viable fetus of vertex presentation, are eligible to participate. Allocation concealment is achieved using telephone randomisation. Participants assigned to hypnosis groups commence hypnosis training as near as possible to 37 weeks gestation. Treatment allocations are concealed from treating obstetricians, anaesthetists, midwives and those personnel collecting and analysing data. Our sample size of 135 women/group gives the study 80% power to detect a clinically relevant fall of 20% in the number of women requiring pharmacological analgesia – the primary endpoint. We estimate that approximately 5–10% of women will deliver prior to receiving their allocated intervention. We plan to recruit 150 women/group and perform sequential interim analyses when 150 and 300 participants have been recruited. All participant data will be analysed, by a researcher blinded to treatment allocation, according to the "Intention to treat" principle with comprehensive pre-planned cost- benefit and subgroup analyses. DISCUSSION: If effective, hypnosis would be a simple, inexpensive way to improve the childbirth experience, reduce complications associated with pharmacological interventions, yield cost savings in maternity care, and this trial will provide evidence to guide clinical practice

A multidisciplinary program of preparation for childbirth and motherhood: maternal anxiety and perinatal outcomes

Background: To study maternal anxiety and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women submitted to a Multidisciplinary Program for Childbirth and Motherhood Preparation (MPCM).Methods: This is a not randomized controlled trial on 67 nulliparous pregnant women divided into two groups according to participation (MPCM Group; n = 38) or not (Control Group; n = 29) in MPCM. the program consisted of 10 meetings (between the 18th and the 38th gestational week) during which educational, physiotherapeutic and interaction activities were developed. Anxiety was quantified at the beginning and at the end of the gestational period by the Trace-State Anxiety Inventory (STAI).Results: Initial maternal anxiety was equivalent between the groups. At the end of the gestational period, it was observed that anxiety levels increased in the Control Group and were maintained in the MPCM Group. A higher occurrence of vaginal deliveries (83.8%) and hospital discharge of three-day-older newborns (81.6%) as a result of MPCM was also significant. Levels of state-anxiety at the end of pregnancy showed a negative correlation with vaginal delivery, gestational age, birth weight and Apgar index at the first minute and positive correlation with the hospital period remaining of the newborns.Conclusion: in the study conditions, MPCM was associated with lower levels of maternal anxiety, a larger number of vaginal deliveries and shorter hospitalization time of newborns. It was not related to adverse perinatal outcomes.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Sch Med, Dept Neurol Psychol & Psychiat, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Sagrado Coracao, Dept Hlth Sci, Physiotherapy Sch, Bauru, BrazilSão Paulo Fed Univ Unifesp, Dept Hlth Sci, Phys Therapy Program, Santos, BrazilSão Paulo Fed Univ Unifesp, Dept Hlth Sci, Phys Therapy Program, Santos, BrazilWeb of Scienc