Efficacy of Two Triple Eradication Regimens in Children with Helicobacter pylori Infection

Triple therapy with bismuth subsalicylate, amoxicillin, metronidazole (BAM) or with omeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin (OAC) has been commonly used for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. We compared the efficacy of these triple therapies in children with H. pylori infection. We retrospectively analyzed results in 233 children with H. pylori infection and treated with OAC (n=141) or BAM (n=92). Overall eradication rates of triple therapy with OAC and BAM were 74% and 85%, respectively, which showed no statistical difference. Our study showed that the triple therapy with BAM was more effective for the first-line eradication of H. pylori infection in Korean children, but has no statistical difference with OAC regimen

The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on intragastric pH during dosing with lansoprazole or ranitidine

BACKGROUND: The antisecretory effect of omeprazole on intragastric pH is decreased in the absence of Helicobacter pylori. AIM: To investigate the effect of H. pylori eradication on intragastric pH during lansoprazole or ranitidine dosing in 41 asymptomatic H. pylori-positive subjects. METHOD: Two groups of healthy H. pylori-positive volunteers were investigated. One group was dosed with lansoprazole 30 mg at 08.00 hours for at least 8 days, before and after 2 weeks of placebo-controlled double-blind eradication therapy using ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. The other group was dosed with ranitidine 300 mg at 23.00 hours for at least 8 days using the same trial design. An upper endoscopy was performed to establish H. pylori status by rapid urease test, culture and histology before both periods of dosing. Twenty-four hour intragastric pH recording was performed on the final day of all periods of dosing. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication significantly decreased the intragastric pH reached during lansoprazole treatment throughout all periods of the day. Intragastric pH during ranitidine treatment was not affected by H. pylori eradication, except for the late-night period. CONCLUSION: H. pylori eradication has a more pronounced effect on the acid-inhibiting properties of lansoprazole than on those of ranitidin

Phenylbutazone (Bute, PBZ, EPZ): one drug across two species

In this article we explore the different trajectories of this one drug, phenylbutazone, across two species, humans and horses in the period 1950–2000. The essay begins by following the introduction of the drug into human medicine in the early 1950s. It promised to be a less costly alternative to cortisone, one of the “wonder drugs” of the era, in the treatment of rheumatic conditions. Both drugs appeared to offer symptomatic relief rather than a cure, and did so with the risk of side effects, which with phenylbutazone were potentially so severe that it was eventually banned from human use, for all but a few diseases, in the early 1980s. Phenylbutazone had been used with other animals for many years without the same issues, but in the 1980s its uses in veterinary medicine, especially in horses, came under increased scrutiny, but for quite different reasons. The focus was primarily the equity, economics, and ethics of competition in equine sports, with differences in cross-species biology and medicine playing a secondary role. The story of phenylbutazone, a single drug, shows how the different biologies and social roles of its human/animal subjects resulted in very different and changing uses. While the drug had a seemingly common impact on pain and inflammation, there were inter-species differences in the drug’s metabolism, the conditions treated, dosages, and, crucially, in intended clinical outcomes and perceptions of its benefits and risks