9 research outputs found
An Observational Overview of Solar Flares
We present an overview of solar flares and associated phenomena, drawing upon
a wide range of observational data primarily from the RHESSI era. Following an
introductory discussion and overview of the status of observational
capabilities, the article is split into topical sections which deal with
different areas of flare phenomena (footpoints and ribbons, coronal sources,
relationship to coronal mass ejections) and their interconnections. We also
discuss flare soft X-ray spectroscopy and the energetics of the process. The
emphasis is to describe the observations from multiple points of view, while
bearing in mind the models that link them to each other and to theory. The
present theoretical and observational understanding of solar flares is far from
complete, so we conclude with a brief discussion of models, and a list of
missing but important observations.Comment: This is an article for a monograph on the physics of solar flares,
inspired by RHESSI observations. The individual articles are to appear in
Space Science Reviews (2011
The Immune Landscape of Cancer
We performed an extensive immunogenomic anal-ysis of more than 10,000 tumors comprising 33diverse cancer types by utilizing data compiled byTCGA. Across cancer types, we identified six im-mune subtypes\u2014wound healing, IFN-gdominant,inflammatory, lymphocyte depleted, immunologi-cally quiet, and TGF-bdominant\u2014characterized bydifferences in macrophage or lymphocyte signa-tures, Th1:Th2 cell ratio, extent of intratumoral het-erogeneity, aneuploidy, extent of neoantigen load,overall cell proliferation, expression of immunomod-ulatory genes, and prognosis. Specific drivermutations correlated with lower (CTNNB1,NRAS,orIDH1) or higher (BRAF,TP53,orCASP8) leukocytelevels across all cancers. Multiple control modalitiesof the intracellular and extracellular networks (tran-scription, microRNAs, copy number, and epigeneticprocesses) were involved in tumor-immune cell inter-actions, both across and within immune subtypes.Our immunogenomics pipeline to characterize theseheterogeneous tumors and the resulting data areintended to serve as a resource for future targetedstudies to further advance the field
Promoting walking amongst older patients in rehabilitation: are accelerometers the answer?
The role of physical activity amongst older people in inpatient rehabilitation settings has been little studied. Walking has a number of potential benefits for older people in rehabilitation but it is not known whether increased walking improves outcomes in this population. Until now mobility monitoring has not been possible in routine practice. Recently tri-axial accelerometers have been validated for ambulatory activity monitoring in older adults. Accelerometry has the potential to explore the role of walking in older patients in rehabilitation. Providing data regarding activity levels may improve patient motivation and assist clinicians with activity prescription. Future research could determine the relationship between activity levels and patient outcomes
A ‘VISUAL’ APPROACH TO MENANDER - (A.K.) Petrides Menander, New Comedy and the Visual. Pp. xii + 322, ills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Cased, £65, US$99. ISBN: 978-1-107-06843-8.
High-energy X-rays and gamma-rays from solar flares were discovered just over
fifty years ago. Since that time, the standard for the interpretation of
spatially integrated flare X-ray spectra at energies above several tens of keV
has been the collisional thick-target model. After the launch of the Reuven
Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI) in early 2002, X-ray
spectra and images have been of sufficient quality to allow a greater focus on
the energetic electrons responsible for the X-ray emission, including their
origin and their interactions with the flare plasma and magnetic field. The
result has been new insights into the flaring process, as well as more
quantitative models for both electron acceleration and propagation, and for the
flare environment with which the electrons interact. In this article we review
our current understanding of electron acceleration, energy loss, and
propagation in flares. Implications of these new results for the collisional
thick-target model, for general flare models, and for future flare studies are
discussed.Comment: This is an article from a monograph on the physics of solar flares,
inspired by RHESSI observations. The individual articles are to appear in
Space Science Reviews (2011
The Immune Landscape of Cancer
We performed an extensive immunogenomic analysis of more than 10,000 tumors comprising 33 diverse cancer types by utilizing data compiled by TCGA. Across cancer types, we identified six immune subtypes\u2014wound healing, IFN-\u3b3 dominant, inflammatory, lymphocyte depleted, immunologically quiet, and TGF-\u3b2 dominant\u2014characterized by differences in macrophage or lymphocyte signatures, Th1:Th2 cell ratio, extent of intratumoral heterogeneity, aneuploidy, extent of neoantigen load, overall cell proliferation, expression of immunomodulatory genes, and prognosis. Specific driver mutations correlated with lower (CTNNB1, NRAS, or IDH1) or higher (BRAF, TP53, or CASP8) leukocyte levels across all cancers. Multiple control modalities of the intracellular and extracellular networks (transcription, microRNAs, copy number, and epigenetic processes) were involved in tumor-immune cell interactions, both across and within immune subtypes. Our immunogenomics pipeline to characterize these heterogeneous tumors and the resulting data are intended to serve as a resource for future targeted studies to further advance the field. Thorsson et al. present immunogenomics analyses of more than 10,000 tumors, identifying six immune subtypes that encompass multiple cancer types and are hypothesized to define immune response patterns impacting prognosis. This work provides a resource for understanding tumor-immune interactions, with implications for identifying ways to advance research on immunotherapy
The Immune Landscape of Cancer (Immunity (2018) 48 (812–832), (S1074-7613(18)30121-3), (10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.023))
(Immunity 48, 812–830.e1–e14; April 17, 2018) In the originally published version of this article, the authors neglected to include Younes Mokrab and Aaron M. Newman as co-authors and misspelled the names of authors Charles S. Rabkin and Ilya Shmulevich. The author names have been corrected here and online. In addition, the concluding sentence of the subsection “Immune Signature Compilation” in the Method Details in the original published article was deemed unclear because it did not specify differences among the gene set scoring methods. The concluding sentences now reads “Gene sets from Bindea et al., Senbabaoglu et al., and the MSigDB C7 collection were scored using single-sample gene set enrichment (ssGSEA) analysis (Barbie et al., 2009), as implemented in the GSVA R package (Hänzelmann et al., 2013). All other signatures were scored using methods found in the associated citations.