33 research outputs found

    Thermoregulation in three southern African bat species inhabiting a hot, semi-arid environment

    Get PDF
    Bats inhabiting arid, subtropical environments face diverse challenges related to energy and water balance. First, they may have to conserve water and energy during cool, dry winters when water is scarce and insect availability reduced. Second, during hot summers when air temperature may routinely exceed body temperature, bats may need to avoid both hyperthermia and dehydration. A common response to the energetically challenging winter period in temperate, subtropical and tropical species is heterothermy (i.e. torpor and hibernation). Despite evidence suggesting that heterothermy is of major significance in the energy balance of tropical and subtropical bats, its occurrence in southern African species especially those in semi-arid subtropical regions have received relatively little attention. Moreover, the physiological and thermoregulatory responses of bats to high air temperatures (Ta) are relatively poorly known. The goal of my project was to investigate various seasonal physiological challenges imposed on bats in an arid, sub-tropical climate. I investigated the occurrence of winter heterothermy in Nycteris thebaica (Nycteridae) in the Limpopo Valley. Skin temperatures (Tskin) were measured using temperature-sensitive transmitters, and roost temperatures (Troost) were recorded using miniature temperature loggers. N. thebaica used multiple roosting sites, including a hollow baobab tree (Adansonia digitata) and several caves, and exhibited only moderate heterothermy. Tskin was maintained around normothermic levels, with differences of 3-9°C (7.5±1.7°C) between overall maximum and minimum Tbs. A minimum Tskin of 28.4°C occurred at Troost = 23.8°C, and patterns of thermoregulation did not appear to be influenced by prevailing weather conditions. Roost temperatures did not decrease below 10°C, and averaged 21.2±2.8°C and 23.3±2.9°C respectively. The lack of pronounced heterothermy in N. thebaica is surprising, particularly in view of the daily torpor cycles observed in many insectivorous bat species. I also investigated the physiological responses of three sympatric bat species during summer using an open-flow respirometry system to measure resting metabolic rates (RMR) and evaporative water loss (EWL) over a range of Tas ~ 10-42°C, with body temperatures (Tb) simultaneously recorded via temperature-sensitive passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags. Basal metabolic rates for Nycteris thebaica and Taphozous mauritianus were 8.9±2.7mW.g-1 and 6.6±2.2mW.g-1 respectively, falling within the 95% prediction intervals for bat BMR, whereas the value for Sauromys petrophilus (3.4±0.6mW.g-1) fell below the lower 95% prediction interval. Maximum EWL for N. thebaica, T. mauritianus and S. petrophilus were 18.6±2.1mg.g-1.h-1 (Ta=39.4°C), 14.7±3.1mg.g-1.h-1 (Ta=41.9°C) and 23.7±7.4mg.g-1.h-1 (Ta=41.7°C) respectively. Maximum individual Tbs recorded were 46.5°C in N. thebaica (Ta=39.3°C), 44.9°C in T. mauritianus (Ta=41.8°C) and 46.5°C in S. petrophilus (Ta=41.7°C). Overall, I found that N. thebaica was the least heat tolerant species, with T. mauritianus and S. petrophilus being more heat tolerant. In the face of climate change, heat tolerance together with specific thermal properties of a given roost may play a major role in the ability of a species to persist in a hot, arid environment.Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2012.Zoology and Entomologyunrestricte

    Interspecific variation in thermoregulation among three sympatric bats inhabiting a hot, semi-arid environment

    Get PDF
    Bats in hot roosts experience some of the most thermally challenging environments of any endotherms, but little is known about how heat tolerance and evaporative cooling capacity varies among species. We investigated thermoregulation in three sympatric species (Nycteris thebaica, Taphozous mauritianus, and Sauromys petrophilus) in a hot, semi-arid environment by measuring body temperature (Tb), metabolic rate and evaporative water loss (EWL) at air temperatures (Ta) of 10 - 42 °C. S. petrophilus was highly heterothermic with no clear thermoneutral zone, and exhibited rapid increases in EWL at high Ta to a maximum of 23.7 ± 7.4 mg g-1 hr-1 at Ta ≈ 42 °C, with a concomitant maximum Tb of 43.7±1.0 °C. T. mauritianus remained largely normothermic at Tas below thermoneutrality, and increased EWL to 14.7 ± 1.3 mg g-1 hr-1 at Ta ≈ 42 °C, with a maximum Tb of 42.9 ± 1.6 °C. In N. thebaica, EWL began increasing at lower Ta than in either of the other species, and reached a maximum of 18.6±2.1 mg g-1 hr-1 at Ta = 39.4 °C, with comparatively high maximum Tb values of 45.0±0.9°C. Under the conditions of our study, N. thebaica was considerably less heat tolerant than the other two species. Among seven species of bats for which data on Tb as well as roost temperatures in comparison to outside Ta are available, we found limited evidence for a correlation between overall heat tolerance and the extent to which roosts are buffered from high Ta.This study was facilitated by funding from Bat Conservation International, the National Research Foundation and the University of Pretoria.http://www.springer.com/life+sci/biochemistry/journal/360hb2013ab201

    Thermoregulation in free-ranging Nycteris thebaica (Nycteridae) during winter : no evidence of torpor

    Get PDF
    Bats are among the most heterothermic mammals, with nearly all species investigated under free-ranging conditions to date exhibiting some degree of daily torpor and/or hibernation. We investigated thermoregulation during late winter by seven Nycteris thebaica in a warm, semi-arid habitat in northern South Africa, using temperature-sensitive transmitters to measure skin temperature (Tskin). Unexpectedly, we found no evidence for any expression of daily torpor or hibernation based on a total of 86 days of data from 7 bats (one male and six females), despite air temperatures as low as ∌10 ◩C. Instead, daytime Tskin was distributed unimodally with most values in the 33–35 ◩C range, and a minimum Tskin of 28.4 ◩C at a roost temperature of 24.6 ◩C. There are several possible reasons why N. thebaica may avoid torpor, including predation in roosts, and the long nightly foraging periods of this species compared to many others.http://www.elsevier.com/locate /mambiohb201

    A burning question: what are the risks and benefits of mammalian torpor during and after fires?

    Get PDF
    Although wildfires are increasing globally, available information on how mammals respond behaviourally and physiologically to fires is scant. Despite a large number of ecological studies, often examining animal diversity and abundance before and after fires, the reasons as to why some species perform better than others remain obscure. We examine how especially small mammals, which generally have high rates of energy expenditure and food requirements, deal with fires and postfire conditions. We evaluate whether mammalian torpor, characterised by substantial reductions in body temperature, metabolic rate and water loss, plays a functional role in survival of mammals impacted by fires. Importantly, torpor permits small mammals to reduce their activity and foraging, and to survive on limited food. Torpid small mammals (marsupials and bats) can respond to smoke and arouse from torpor, which provides them with the possibility to evade direct exposure to fire, although their response is often slowed when ambient temperature is low. Post-fire conditions increase expression of torpor with a concomitant decrease in activity for free-ranging echidnas and small forest-dwelling marsupials, in response to reduced cover and reduced availability of terrestrial insects. Presence of charcoal and ash increases torpor use by captive small marsupials beyond food restriction alone, likely in anticipation of detrimental post-fire conditions. Interestingly, although volant bats use torpor on every day after fires, they respond by decreasing torpor duration, and increasing activity, perhaps because of the decrease in clutter and increase in foraging opportunities due to an increase in aerial insects. Our summary shows that torpor is an important tool for post-fire survival and, although the physiological and behavioural responses of small mammals to fire are complex, they seem to reflect energetic requirements and mode of foraging. We make recommendations on the conditions during management burns that are least likely to impact heterothermic mammals

    Satellite Tagging and Biopsy Sampling of Killer Whales at Subantarctic Marion Island: Effectiveness, Immediate Reactions and Long-Term Responses

    Get PDF
    Remote tissue biopsy sampling and satellite tagging are becoming widely used in large marine vertebrate studies because they allow the collection of a diverse suite of otherwise difficult-to-obtain data which are critical in understanding the ecology of these species and to their conservation and management. Researchers must carefully consider their methods not only from an animal welfare perspective, but also to ensure the scientific rigour and validity of their results. We report methods for shore-based, remote biopsy sampling and satellite tagging of killer whales Orcinus orca at Subantarctic Marion Island. The performance of these methods is critically assessed using 1) the attachment duration of low-impact minimally percutaneous satellite tags; 2) the immediate behavioural reactions of animals to biopsy sampling and satellite tagging; 3) the effect of researcher experience on biopsy sampling and satellite tagging; and 4) the mid- (1 month) and long- (24 month) term behavioural consequences. To study mid- and long-term behavioural changes we used multievent capture-recapture models that accommodate imperfect detection and individual heterogeneity. We made 72 biopsy sampling attempts (resulting in 32 tissue samples) and 37 satellite tagging attempts (deploying 19 tags). Biopsy sampling success rates were low (43%), but tagging rates were high with improved tag designs (86%). The improved tags remained attached for 26±14 days (mean ± SD). Individuals most often showed no reaction when attempts missed (66%) and a slight reaction-defined as a slight flinch, slight shake, short acceleration, or immediate dive-when hit (54%). Severe immediate reactions were never observed. Hit or miss and age-sex class were important predictors of the reaction, but the method (tag or biopsy) was unimportant. Multievent trap-dependence modelling revealed considerable variation in individual sighting patterns; however, there were no significant mid- or long-term changes following biopsy sampling or tagging

    Selection criteria for multievent capture recapture models of sighting histories of killer whales at Marion Island: long-term (up to 24 months) responses following sampling (tagging or biopsy) attempts.

    No full text
    <p>‘Season’ refers to the same seasonality affect for all individuals. ‘DH(1).season’ refers to seasonality applying only to one of two hidden mixture groups (suggesting ‘resident’ and ‘migrant’ animals) while ‘DH(2).season’ refers to seasonality applying to all individuals but independently for two hidden groups (suggesting variation between individuals). ‘trap’ refers to a trap-dependence effect, ‘sampling’ refers to a sampling effect and ‘t<sub>2008–2011;2011–2013</sub>’ accounts for two periods with differing field effort.</p><p>Notes: <sup>a</sup>ĉ = 1.75.</p><p>Selection criteria for multievent capture recapture models of sighting histories of killer whales at Marion Island: long-term (up to 24 months) responses following sampling (tagging or biopsy) attempts.</p

    Model selection for the generalized linear models (GL Ms) used to describe factors influencing the probability of hitting the target animal (<i>hit/miss</i>) during a sampling attempt.

    No full text
    <p>The full model was <i>hit/miss ∌experience + biopsy/tag + range + arbalester</i>. Only the predictor variables included in each model are shown.</p><p>Notes: <sup>a</sup>number of parameters; <sup>b</sup>small sample corrected Akaike Information Criterion; <sup>c</sup>difference between the AIC<sub>c</sub> score of the model in question and the best model; <sup>d</sup>Akaike weight: relative likelihood of model in question divided by the sum of relative likelihoods for all models.</p><p>Model selection for the generalized linear models (GL Ms) used to describe factors influencing the probability of hitting the target animal (<i>hit/miss</i>) during a sampling attempt.</p
    corecore