Cost-effectiveness analysis of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in <i>Clostridium difficile</i> infection

Fidaxomicin was non-inferior to vancomycin with respect to clinical cure rates in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) in two Phase III trials, but was associated with significantly fewer recurrences than vancomycin. This economic analysis investigated the cost-effectiveness of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin in patients with severe CDI and in patients with their first CDI recurrence. A 1 year time horizon Markov model with seven health states was developed from the perspective of Scottish public healthcare providers. Model inputs for effectiveness, resource use, direct costs and utilities were obtained from published sources and a Scottish expert panel. The main model outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), for fidaxomicin versus vancomycin; ICERs were interpreted using willingness-to-pay thresholds of A 20aEuroS000 pound/QALY and A 30aEuroS000 pound/QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Total costs were similar with fidaxomicin and vancomycin in patients with severe CDI (A 14aEuroS515 pound and A 14aEuroS344 pound, respectively) and in patients with a first recurrence (A 16aEuroS535 pound and A 16aEuroS926 pound, respectively). Improvements in clinical outcomes with fidaxomicin resulted in small QALY gains versus vancomycin (severe CDI, +0.010; patients with first recurrence, +0.019). Fidaxomicin was cost-effective in severe CDI (ICER A 16aEuroS529 pound/QALY) and dominant (i.e. more effective and less costly) in patients with a first recurrence. The probability that fidaxomicin was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of A 30aEuroS000 pound/QALY was 60% for severe CDI and 68% in a first recurrence. Fidaxomicin is cost-effective in patients with severe CDI and in patients with a first CDI recurrence versus vancomycin

Prophylaxis of infectious complications with colony-stimulating factors in adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy—evidence-based guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party AGIHO of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO)

We found convincing evidence from numerous randomised controlled trials that G-CSF, biosimilar G-CSF and pegfilgrastim reduce the risk to develop febrile neutropenia and infections. As a rule of thumb, it seems the relative benefit is highest for patients with an intermediate risk of infections. Compared to other guidelines, we rated the evidence for growth factors during AML induction chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim use in haematological malignancies lowe

Epidemiology and Outcome of Fungemia in a Cancer Cohort of the Infectious Diseases Group (IDG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC 65031)

In a prospective cohort study of 145 030 admissions of cancer patients from 13 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer centers fungemia occurred in 0.23%. Candida albicans was the predominant pathogen. Fungemia was associated with substantial mortality. Antifungal prophylaxis and remission of cancer predicted better surviva

Risk Factors for Primary Clostridium difficile Infection; Results From the Observational Study of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients With Infective Diarrhea (ORCHID)

Background: There are inconsistent data on the risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in the literature. Aims: To use two C. difficile infection (CDI) case-control study groups to compare risk factors in hospitalized patients with diarrhea across different countries. Methods: A multi-center group of CDI cases/controls were identified by standardized testing from seven countries from the prior EUropean, multi-center, prospective bi-annual point prevalence study of CLostridium difficile Infection in hospitalized patients with Diarrhea (EUCLID). A second group of CDI cases/controls was identified from a single center in Germany [parallel study site (PSS)]. Data were extracted from the medical notes to assess CDI risk factors. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify and compare risk factors between the two groups. Results: There were 253 and 158 cases and 921 and 584 controls in the PSS and EUCLID groups, respectively. Significant variables from univariate analyses in both groups were age ≥65, number of antibiotics (OR 1.2 for each additional antibiotic) and prior hospital admission (all p < 0.001). Congestive heart failure, diabetes, admission from assisted living or Emergency Department, proton pump inhibitors, and chronic renal disease were significant in PSS (all p < 0.05) but not EUCLID. Dementia and admitted with other bacterial diseases were significant in EUCLID (p < 0.05) but not PSS. Following multivariate analyses, age ≥ 65, number of antibiotics and prior hospital admission were consistently identified as CDI risk factors in each individual group and combined datasets. Conclusion: Our results show that the same CDI risk factors were identified across datasets. These were age ≥ 65 years, antibiotic use and prior hospital admission. Importantly, the odds of developing CDI increases with each extra antibiotic prescribed

Effect and Safety of Meropenem\u2013Vaborbactam versus Best-Available Therapy in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: The TANGO II Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction: Treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections are limited and CRE infections remain associated with high clinical failure and mortality rates, particularly in vulnerable patient populations. A Phase 3, multinational, open-label, randomized controlled trial (TANGO II) was conducted from 2014 to 2017 to evaluate the efficacy/safety of meropenem\u2013vaborbactam monotherapy versus best available therapy (BAT) for CRE. Methods: A total of 77 patients with confirmed/suspected CRE infection (bacteremia, hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, complicated intra-abdominal infection, complicated urinary tract infection/acute pyelonephritis) were randomized, and 47 with confirmed CRE infection formed the primary analysis population (microbiologic-CRE-modified intent-to-treat, mCRE-MITT). Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to meropenem\u2013vaborbactam (2&nbsp;g/2&nbsp;g over 3&nbsp;h, q8h for 7\u201314&nbsp;days) or BAT (mono/combination therapy with polymyxins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, tigecycline; or ceftazidime-avibactam alone). Efficacy endpoints included clinical cure, Day-28 all-cause mortality, microbiologic cure, and overall success (clinical cure + microbiologic eradication). Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and laboratory findings. Results: Within the mCRE-MITT population, cure rates were 65.6% (21/32) and 33.3% (5/15) [95% confidence interval (CI) of difference, 3.3% to 61.3%; P = 0.03)] at End of Treatment and 59.4% (19/32) and 26.7% (4/15) (95% CI of difference, 4.6% to 60.8%; P = 0.02) at Test of Cure;.Day-28 all-cause mortality was 15.6% (5/32) and 33.3% (5/15) (95% CI of difference, 12 44.7% to 9.3%) for meropenem\u2013vaborbactam versus BAT, respectively. Treatment-related AEs and renal-related AEs were 24.0% (12/50) and 4.0% (2/50) for meropenem\u2013vaborbactam versus 44.0% (11/25) and 24.0% (6/25) for BAT. Exploratory risk\u2013benefit analyses of composite clinical failure or nephrotoxicity favored meropenem\u2013vaborbactam versus BAT (31.3% [10/32] versus 80.0% [12/15]; 95% CI of difference, 12 74.6% to 12 22.9%; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Monotherapy with meropenem\u2013vaborbactam for CRE infection was associated with increased clinical cure, decreased mortality, and reduced nephrotoxicity compared with BAT. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02168946. Funding: The Medicines Company

Novel highly potent CD4bs bNAb with restricted pathway to HIV-1 escape

Purpose: Broadly HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) can suppress viremia in humans and represent a novel approach for effective immunotherapy. However, bNAb monotherapy selects for antibody-resistant viral variants. Thus, we focused on the identification of new antibody combinations and/or novel bNAbs that restrict pathways of HIV-1 escape. Methods: We screened HIV-1 positive patients for their neutralizing capacities. Following, we performed single cell sorting and PCR of HIV-1 Env-reactive mature B cells of identified elite neutralizers. Found antibodies were tested for neutralization and binding capacities in vitro. Further, their antiviral activity was tested in an HIV-1 infected humanized mouse model. Results: Here we report the isolation of antibody 1–18, a VH1–46-encoded CD4 binding site (CD4bs) bNAb identified in an individual ranking among the top 1% neutralizers of 2,274 HIV-1-infected subjects. Tested on a 119-virus panel, 1–18 showed to be exceptionally broad and potent with a coverage of 97% and a mean IC50 of 0.048 lg/mL, exceeding the activity of most potent CD4bs bNAbs described to-date. A 2.4 Å cryo-EM structure of 1–18 bound to a native-like Env trimer revealed that it interacts with HIV-1 env similar to other CD4bs bNAbs, but includes additional contacts to the V3 loop of the adjacent protomer. Notably, in vitro, 1–18 maintained activity against viruses carrying mutations associated with escape from VRC01-class bNAbs. Further, its HIV-1 env wide escape profile differed critically from other CD4bs bNAbs. In humanized mice, monotherapy with 1–18 was sufficient to prevent the development of viral escape variants that rapidly emerged during treatment with other CD4bs bNAbs. Finally, 1–18 overcame classical HIV-1 mutations that are driven by VRC01-like bNAbs in vivo. Conclusion: 1–18 is a highly potent and broad bNAb that restricts escape and overcomes frequent CD4bs escape pathways, providing new options for bNAb combinations to prevent and treat HIV-1 infection

Prognostic factors in 264 adults with invasive Scedosporium spp. and Lomentospora prolificans infection reported in the literature and FungiScope

Invasive Scedosporium spp. and Lomentospora prolificans infections are an emerging threat in immunocompromised and occasionally in healthy hosts. Scedosporium spp. is intrinsically resistant to most, L. prolificans to all the antifungal drugs currently approved, raising concerns about appropriate treatment decisions. High mortality rates of up to 90% underline the need for comprehensive diagnostic workup and even more for new, effective antifungal drugs to improve patient outcome. For a comprehensive analysis, we identified cases of severe Scedosporium spp. and L. prolificans infections from the literature diagnosed in 2000 or later and the FungiScopeVR registry. For 208 Scedosporium spp. infections solid organ transplantation (n¼58, 27.9%) and for 56 L. prolificans infection underlying malignancy (n¼28, 50.0%) were the most prevalent risk factors. L. prolificans infections frequently presented as fungemia (n¼26, 46.4% versus n¼12, 5.8% for Scedosporium spp.). Malignancy, fungemia, CNS and lung involvement predicted worse outcome for scedosporiosis and lomentosporiosis. Patients treated with voriconazole had a better overall outcome in both groups compared to treatment with amphotericin B formulations. This review discusses the epidemiology, prognostic factors, pathogen susceptibility to approved and investigational antifungals, and treatment strategies of severe infections caused by Scedosporium spp. and L. prolificans