211 research outputs found

    Respiratory muscle training with normocapnic hyperpnea improves ventilatory pattern and thoracoabdominal coordination, and reduces oxygen desaturation during endurance exercise testing in COPD patients

    Get PDF
    Background: Few data are available about the effects of respiratory muscle training with normocapnic hyperpnea (NH) in COPD. The aim is to evaluate the effects of 4 weeks of NH (Spirotiger®) on ventilatory pattern, exercise capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in COPD patients. Methods: Twenty-six COPD patients (three females), ages 49-82 years, were included in this study. Spirometry and maximal inspiratory pressure, St George Respiratory Questionnaire, 6-minute walk test, and symptom-limited endurance exercise test (endurance test to the limit of tolerance [tLim]) at 75%-80% of peak work rate up to a Borg Score of 8-9/10 were performed before and after NH. Patients were equipped with ambulatory inductive plethysmography (LifeShirt®) to evaluate ventilatory pattern and thoracoabdominal coordination (phase angle [PhA]) during tLim. After four supervised sessions, subjects trained at home for 4 weeks 10 minutes twice a day at 50% of maximal voluntary ventilation. The workload was adjusted during the training period to maintain a Borg Score of 5-6/10. Results: Twenty subjects completed the study. After NH, maximal inspiratory pressure significantly increased (81.5±31.6 vs 91.8±30.6 cmH2O, P<0.01); exercise endurance time (+150 seconds, P=0.04), 6-minute walk test (+30 meters, P=0.03), and QoL (-8, P<0.01) all increased. During tLim, the ventilatory pattern changed significantly (lower ventilation, lower respiratory rate, higher tidal volume); oxygen desaturation, PhA, and dyspnea Borg Score were lower for the same work intensity (P<0.01, P=0.02, and P<0.01, respectively; one-way ANOVA). The improvement in tidal volume and oxygen saturation after NH were significantly related (R2=0.65, P<0.01). Conclusion: As expected, NH improves inspiratory muscle performance, exercise capacity, and QoL. New results are significant change in ventilatory pattern, which improves oxygen saturation, and an improvement in thoracoabdominal coordination (lower PhA). These two facts could explain the reduced dyspnea during the endurance test. All these results together may play a role in improving exercise capacity after NH training

    Inflammatory and immunological mechanisms of virus induced asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations

    Get PDF
    Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are the two most prevalent chronic airway diseases. Much of the morbidity, mortality and health care costs of the diseases are associated with exacerbations. Exacerbations are acute episodes that punctuated the natural history of the disease characterized by increased symptoms and airflow obstruction determining quality of life impairment and with possible effect on long term history of the disease. Thus, the prevention and the treatment of exacerbations are major tasks in the management of both asthma and COPD. However currently available treatment are only partially effective in reducing the incidence of such events. Over the last decade evidence has emerged implicating virus respiratory tract infections as a major cause of exacerbations both in asthma and in COPD. In particular, rhinovirus (i.e. the etiologic cause of the common cold) is the most frequently identify virus during exacerbations of both asthma and COPD. The comprehension of the inflammatory and immunological mechanisms that pave the way for exacerbation following respiratory tract infection in asthmatic and COPD patients will give the opportunity to highlight novel potential targets for pharmacological intervention. The recent development of in vivo experimental models of rhinovirus induced asthma and COPD exacerbations represents the unique tool to evaluate pathogenetic mechanisms and novel pharmacological pathways for treating and preventing COPD and asthma exacerbations. The aim of the present thesis is to review the data available on inflammatory and immunological mechanisms of virus induced exacerbations of asthma and COPD and to present the results of the studies conducted by the Candidate to enlighten the emerging field of virus induced asthma and COPD exacerbations

    Inhaled corticosteroids and the lung microbiome in copd

    Get PDF
    The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2021 Report recommends inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing regimens as part of pharmacological treatment in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) and frequent exacerbations, particularly with eosinophilic inflammation. However, real-world studies reveal overprescription of ICS in COPD, irrespective of disease presentation and inflammatory endotype, leading to increased risk of side effects, mainly respiratory infections. The optimal use of ICS in COPD therefore remains an area of intensive research, and additional biomarkers of benefit and risk are needed. Although the interplay between inflammation and infection in COPD is widely acknowledged, the role of the microbiome in shaping lower airway inflammation has only recently been explored. Next-generation sequencing has revealed that COPD disease progression and exacerbation frequency are associated with changes in the composition of the lung microbiome, and that the immunosuppressive effects of ICS can contribute to potentially deleterious airway microbiota changes by increasing bacterial load and the abundance of potentially pathogenic taxa such as Streptococcus and Haemophilus. Here, we explore the relationship between microbiome, inflammation, ICS use and disease phenotype. This relationship may inform the benefit:risk assessment of ICS use in patients with COPD and lead to more personalised pharmacological management

    Sars-CoV-2 Infection Prompts IL-1β-Mediated Inflammation and Reduces IFN-λ Expression in Human Lung Tissue

    Get PDF
    Two years after its spreading, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2) is still responsible for more than 2000 deaths per day worldwide, despite vaccines and monoclonal antibody countermeasures. Therefore, there is a need to understand the immune–inflammatory pathways that prompt the manifestation of the disease to identify a novel potential target for pharmacological intervention. In this context, the characterization of the main players in the SARS-CoV-2-induced cytokine storm is mandatory. To date, the most characterized have been IL-6 and the class I and II interferons, while less is known about the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β and class III interferons. Here, we report a preliminary study aimed at the characterization of the lung inflammatory context in COVID-19 patients, with a special focus on IFN-λ and IL-1β. By investigating IFN and inflammatory cytokine patterns by IHC in 10 deceased patients due to COVID-19 infection, compared to 10 control subjects, we reveal that while IFN-β production was increased in COVID-19 patients, IFN-λ was almost abolished. At the same time, the levels of IL-1β were dramatically improved, while IL-6 lung levels seem to be unaffected by the infection. Our findings highlight a central role of IL-1β in prompting lung inflammation after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Together, we show that IFN-λ is negatively affected by viral infection, supporting the idea that IFN-λ administration together with the pharmaceutical blockage of IL-1β represents a promising approach to revert the COVID-19-induced cytokine storm

    Real-world, long-term effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: Subgroup analyses of the REACT study

    Get PDF
    Background: Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of allergy immunotherapy (AIT) in allergic rhinitis (AR) and the disease-modifying effects of the SQ grass sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet. // Objective: We sought to assess real-world, long-term effectiveness and safety across AIT subgroups: route of administration, therapeutic allergen, persistence to AIT, and SQ grass SLIT tablet. // Methods: The primary outcome of AR prescriptions from a retrospective cohort study (REAl-world effeCtiveness in allergy immunoTherapy; 2007-2017) was assessed across prespecified AIT subgroups in subjects with AR with and without AIT prescriptions (controls). Safety was assessed as anaphylaxis for 2 days or less of the first AIT prescription. Subgroup follow-up continued until samples were fewer than 200 subjects. // Results: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and SLIT tablets showed similarly greater reductions in AR prescriptions than controls (SCIT vs SLIT tablets: year 3, P = .15; year 5, P = .43). Comparably greater reductions in AR prescriptions were observed for grass- and house dust mite–specific AIT than for controls, but significantly smaller reductions were observed for tree-specific AIT (tree vs house dust mite, and vs grass: years 3 and 5, P < .0001). Persistence to AIT was associated with greater reductions in AR prescriptions versus nonpersistence (persistence vs nonpersistence: year 3, P = .09; year 5, P = .006). SQ grass SLIT tablet showed sustained reductions versus controls for up to 7 years (year 3, P = .002; year 5, P = .03). Rates of anaphylactic shock were low (0.000%-0.092%), with no events for SQ SLIT tablets. // Conclusions: These results demonstrate real-world, long-term effectiveness of AIT, complement disease-modifying effects observed in SQ grass SLIT-tablet randomized controlled trials, and highlight the importance of using newer evidence-based AIT products for tree pollen AR

    Satisfaction with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment: results from a multicenter, observational study

    Get PDF
    Background: Understanding the level of patients\u2019 satisfaction with treatment and its determinants have the potential to impact therapeutic management and clinical outcome in chronic conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: A national, multicenter, longitudinal, observational study of COPD from 20 Italian pulmonary centers to explore patients\u2019 satisfaction to treatment [assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, 9 items (TSQM-9)] and association with clinical parameters [including dyspnea score, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, exacerbation rate], adherence to treatment [Morisky Medication-Taking Adherence Scale (MMAS-4)], illness perception [evaluated by Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ)] in a 1-year follow up. Results: A total of 401 COPD patients were enrolled [69.4% group B Global Initiative for COPD (GOLD), considering 366 patients with available GOLD 2017 classification at enrollment]. At enrollment, satisfaction with treatment was moderate, being TSQM-9 mean scores for effectiveness 64.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 62.5\u201365.9], for convenience 75.8 (95% CI 74.2\u201377.3), and for global satisfaction 65.7 (95% CI 64.0\u201367.4). Global satisfaction was negatively associated with disease perception (\u3b2 = 120.4709, p &lt; 0.0001), and grade of dyspnea (\u3b2 = 124.2564, p = 0.009). Satisfaction with treatment was lower in patients with poor compared with optimal adherence to treatment (\u3b2 = 124.5608, p = 0.002). Changes in inhalation regimens during follow up did not modify the satisfaction with treatment. Conclusions: The results of this real-life study showed that the patients\u2019 satisfaction with treatments is only moderate in COPD. A high grade of patients\u2019 satisfaction is associated mainly with a low perception of the disease, high adherence to treatment and lower level of dyspnea

    High baseline prevalence of atopic comorbidities and medication use in children treated with allergy immunotherapy in the REAl-world effeCtiveness in allergy immunoTherapy (REACT) study

    Get PDF
    BackgroundRespiratory allergy, commonly manifesting as allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma, is a chronic progressive disease that frequently starts in childhood. Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causal treatment for respiratory allergy with the potential to modify the underlying cause of allergy and, ultimately, prevent disease progression. This analysis aimed to determine if AIT is received sufficiently early to halt the progression of allergic disease, by characterizing the burden and progression of disease in children prior to AIT initiation in real-life clinical practice.MethodsThe REAl-world effeCtiveness in allergy immunoTherapy (REACT) study was a large retrospective cohort study using German claims data between 2007 and 2017. Characteristics of two pre-defined AIT age cohorts from the REACT study – children (aged &lt;18 years) and adults (aged ≥18 years) – were evaluated during the 1-year period before the first AIT prescription. For comparison, a control group of all subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of AR and without prescriptions for AIT was included. Burden of disease was assessed using diagnostic codes for atopic comorbidities [e.g., atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, and acute allergic conjunctivitis] and non-atopic comorbidities (e.g., migraine, headache); medication use, recorded as prescriptions for symptom-relieving AR medication and reliever/controller medication for asthma, was also assessed. Data were analyzed descriptively, using summary statistics.ResultsBoth children (n = 11,036) and adults (n = 30,037) showed a higher prevalence of atopic comorbidities and a greater drug burden prior to AIT initiation compared to AR patients not treated with AIT (n = 1,003,332). In the two age-specific AIT cohorts, children consistently showed the highest prevalence of atopic comorbidities compared to adults (AIT children, AIT adults – asthma: 41.4%, 34.5%; AD: 19.9%, 10.2%; acute allergic conjunctivitis: 13.6%, 10.2%). Generally, prescriptions per year for symptom-relieving AR and asthma treatments were also higher for children initiating AIT vs. adults (AIT children, AIT adults – AR prescriptions per subject: 1.72, 0.73; asthma prescriptions per subject: 1.42, 0.79).ConclusionsChildren with AR who are offered AIT in real-life show considerable disease burden prior to initiation. As AIT may alleviate the burden and halt the progression of allergic disease, considering AIT earlier in the disease course may be warranted

    Disease awareness in patients with COPD: measurement and extent

    Get PDF
    Background: Patient awareness of COPD refers to knowledge and acceptance of the disease and its treatment. Although it is relevant to management and outcomes, the disease awareness of patients is poorly investigated, and no validated questionnaires are currently available. We aimed to develop the novel Disease Awareness in COPD Questionnaire (DACQ), which was validated in relation to demographic and clinical features, in patients participating in the SATisfaction and Adherence to COPD Treatment (SAT) study. Methods: DACQ was developed according to a list of items regarding the patient's knowledge, acceptance, and perception of COPD as well as of treatment needs. The questionnaire was validated by assessing internal structure and consistency, correlations with other patient-reported outcomes, and stability over time. Furthermore, the extent of disease awareness of patients enrolled in the SAT study was assessed by using DACQ, and correlations with demographic and clinical features were evaluated. Results: DACQ was composed of four domains. Overall reliability and stability over time were adequate; correlations between DACQ and other tools measuring different constructs (ie, treatment satisfaction, illness perception, impact of COPD symptoms on daily life, and dyspnea severity) were, as expected, more limited. In the enrolled patient sample, a suboptimal level of disease awareness (&lt;70%) was detected, especially in terms of disease acceptance and perception. Disease knowledge was positively associated with COPD severity, while the impact of symptoms on daily life was negatively associated with disease acceptance, awareness of treatment needs, and overall awareness. Conclusion: DACQ proved to be a reliable tool to assess awareness in COPD patients. Awareness of COPD patients need to be improved. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID# NCT02689492

    Satisfaction with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment: results from a multicenter, observational study

    Get PDF
    Background: Understanding the level of patients' satisfaction with treatment and its determinants have the potential to impact therapeutic management and clinical outcome in chronic conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: A national, multicenter, longitudinal, observational study of COPD from 20 Italian pulmonary centers to explore patients' satisfaction to treatment [assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, 9 items (TSQM-9)] and association with clinical parameters [including dyspnea score, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, exacerbation rate], adherence to treatment [Morisky Medication-Taking Adherence Scale (MMAS-4)], illness perception [evaluated by Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ)] in a 1-year follow up. Results: A total of 401 COPD patients were enrolled [69.4% group B Global Initiative for COPD (GOLD), considering 366 patients with available GOLD 2017 classification at enrollment]. At enrollment, satisfaction with treatment was moderate, being TSQM-9 mean scores for effectiveness 64.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 62.5-65.9], for convenience 75.8 (95% CI 74.2-77.3), and for global satisfaction 65.7 (95% CI 64.0-67.4). Global satisfaction was negatively associated with disease perception (beta = -0.4709, p &lt; 0.0001), and grade of dyspnea (beta = -4.2564, p = 0.009). Satisfaction with treatment was lower in patients with poor compared with optimal adherence to treatment (beta = -4.5608, p = 0.002). Changes in inhalation regimens during follow up did not modify the satisfaction with treatment. Conclusions: The results of this real-life study showed that the patients' satisfaction with treatments is only moderate in COPD. A high grade of patients' satisfaction is associated mainly with a low perception of the disease, high adherence to treatment and lower level of dyspnea

    Minimal clinically important difference for asthma endpoints: an expert consensus report

    Get PDF
    Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) can be defined as the smallest change or difference in an outcome measure that is perceived as beneficial and would lead to a change in the patient's medical management.The aim of the current expert consensus report is to provide a "state-of-the-art" review of the currently available literature evidence about MCID for end-points to monitor asthma control, in order to facilitate optimal disease management and identify unmet needs in the field to guide future research.A series of MCID cut-offs are currently available in literature and validated among populations of asthmatic patients, with most of the evidence focusing on outcomes as patient reported outcomes, lung function and exercise tolerance. On the contrary, only scant and partial data are available for inflammatory biomarkers. These clearly represent the most interesting target for future development in diagnosis and clinical management of asthma, particularly in view of the several biologic drugs in the pipeline, for which regulatory agencies will soon require personalised proof of efficacy and treatment response predictors
    • …
    corecore